1. IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (IPBES secretariat Bonn, Germany, 2019).
2. Vilà, M. et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta‐analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14, 702–708 (2011).
3. Gallardo, B., Clavero, M., Sanchez, M. I. & Vilà, M. Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 151–163 (2015).
4. Cameron, E. K., Vilà, M. & Cabeza, M. Global meta-analysis of the impacts of terrestrial invertebrate invaders on species, communities and ecosystems. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 596–606 (2016).
5. Castro‐Díez, P. et al. Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services. Biol. Rev. 94, 1477–1501 (2019).
6. Bellard, C., Marino, C. & Courchamp, F. Ranking threats to biodiversity and why it doesn’t matter. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–4 (2022).
7. Vilà, M. & Hulme, P. E. Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. (Springer, 2017).
8. Gallardo, B., Zieritz, A. & Aldridge, D. C. The importance of the human footprint in shaping the global distribution of terrestrial, freshwater and marine invaders. Plos One 10, e0125801 (2015).
9. Chytrý, M. et al. Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 448–458 (2008).
10. Liu, D. et al. The impact of land use on alien species incidence and number in local assemblages worldwide. Nat. Commun. in press, (2022).
11. Maes, J. et al. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: an EU ecosystem assessment. (Publications Office of the European Union, 2020).
12. Early, R. et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. 7, 12485 (2016).
13. Latombe, G. et al. Capacity of countries to reduce biological invasions. Sustain. Sci. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01166-3 (2022) doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01166-3.
14. Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
15. Roy, H. E. et al. Developing a framework of minimum standards for the risk assessment of alien species. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 526–538 (2018).
16. Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P. & Lockwood, J. L. Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecol. Monogr. 83, 263–282 (2013).
17. Eviner, V. T., Garbach, K., Baty, J. H. & Hoskinson, S. A. Measuring the effects of invasive plants on ecosystem services: challenges and prospects. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 5, 125–136 (2012).
18. Vimercati, G. et al. The EICAT+ framework enables classification of positive impacts of alien taxa on native biodiversity. Plos Biol. 20, e3001729 (2022).
19. Vimercati, G., Kumschick, S., Probert, A. F., Volery, L. & Bacher, S. The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species. NeoBiota 62, 525 (2020).
20. Simberloff, D. & von Holle, B. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions 1, 21–32 (1999).
21. La Notte, A. et al. Ecosystem Services Accounting – Part III – Pilot accounts for habitat and species maintenance, on-site soil retention and water purification. 234 https://doi.org/0.2760/636621 (2021).
22. Vallecillo, S. et al. Ecosystem services accounting-Part II Pilot accounts for crop and timber provision, global climate regulation and flood control. 165 https://doi.org/10.2760/631588 (2019).
23. Vallecillo, S. et al. Ecosystem services accounting: Part I-Outdoor recreation and crop pollination. 89 https://doi.org/10.2760/619793 (2018).
24. Qiu, J. & Turner, M. G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 12149–12154 (2013).
25. Turbelin, A. J., Malamud, B. D. & Francis, R. A. Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: patterns of invasion and policy responses. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 78–92 (2016).
26. Schneider, K., Makowski, D. & van der Werf, W. Predicting hotspots for invasive species introduction in Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 114026 (2021).
27. Gallardo, B. et al. Protected areas offer refuge from invasive species spreading under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 5331–5343 (2017).
28. Real, R., Barbosa, A. M. & Vargas, J. M. Obtaining environmental favourability functions from logistic regression. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 13, 237–245 (2006).
29. Broennimann, O. et al. Distance to native climatic niche margins explains establishment success of alien mammals. Nat. Commun. 12, 2353 (2021).
30. Pérez, G., Vilà, M. & Gallardo, B. Potential impact of four invasive alien plants on the provision of ecosystem services in Europe under present and future climatic scenarios. Ecosyst. Serv. 56, 101459 (2022).
31. Weber, M. M., Stevens, R. D., Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. & Grelle, C. E. V. Is there a correlation between abundance and environmental suitability derived from ecological niche modelling? A meta‐analysis. Ecography 40, 817–828 (2017).
32. Collier, M. J. Novel ecosystems and social-ecological resilience. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 1363–1369 (2015).
33. Seebens, H. et al. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 970–982 (2021).
34. Lopez, B. E. et al. Global environmental changes more frequently offset than intensify detrimental effects of biological invasions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2117389119 (2022).
35. Hejda, M., Pyšek, P. & Jarošík, V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J. Ecol. 97, 393–403 (2009).
36. Pauchard, A. et al. Non-native and native organisms moving into high elevation and high latitude ecosystems in an era of climate change: new challenges for ecology and conservation. Biol. Invasions 18, 345–353 (2016).
37. Lembrechts, J. J. et al. Disturbance is the key to plant invasions in cold environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 14061–14066 (2016).
38. Gutiérrez, J. L. Modification of habitat quality by non-native species. in Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services 33–47 (Springer, 2017).
39. Dodds, W. K. et al. Eutrophication of US freshwaters: analysis of potential economic damages. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 12–19 (2009).
40. Keeler, B. L. et al. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 18619–18624 (2012).
41. Mack, M. C. & D’Antonio, C. M. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol. Amp Evol. 13, 195–198 (1998).
42. Weidenhamer, J. D. & Callaway, R. M. Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 59–69 (2010).
43. Fried, G., Chauvel, B., Reynaud, P. & Sache, I. Decreases in crop production by non-native weeds, pests, and pathogens. in Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services 83–101 (Springer, 2017).
44. Oerke, E.-C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144, 31–43 (2006).
45. Varanasi, A., Prasad, P. V. & Jugulam, M. Impact of climate change factors on weeds and herbicide efficacy. Adv. Agron. 135, 107–146 (2016).
46. Kenis, M., Roques, A., Santini, A. & Liebhold, A. M. Impact of non-native invertebrates and pathogens on market forest tree resources. in Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services 103–117 (Springer, 2017).
47. Caffrey, J. M. et al. Tackling invasive alien species in Europe: the top 20 issues. Manag. Biol. Invasions 5, 1–20 (2014).
48. Vaz, A. S. et al. An indicator-based approach to analyse the effects of non-native tree species on multiple cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 85, 48–56 (2018).