This study presents the results of a comprehensive oral frailty prevention program for consideration as a community-based initiative. Our previous randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of a 12-week intensive comprehensive oral frailty prevention program on oral and physical functions (10, 11). Thus, the next step was social implementation in the community setting to test effectiveness (20). In the current project, the CAMCAM program was implemented in 4 municipalities after modification for better applicability in the general community. Our findings indicated program effectiveness on raising awareness and behavior towards chewing and meals and improving oral frailty. We initially observed that the scores of all assessment items, including the CAMCAM checklist, KCL, SNAQ, and Chew 20, were significantly worse in the OF group than in the Robust group. However, by completing the CAMCAM program, KCL and OFI-8 scores became significantly improved in the OF group, with a positive tendency for Chew 20. These findings suggest that older individuals at risk of oral frailty may also have problems with chewing and meals and a tendency for systemic frailty. The CAMCAM program appears able to impart awareness of chewing, oral health, and meals as well as the improvement of oral frailty.
Oral frailty and eating behavior at baseline
The OFI-8 has recently been proposed as a simple checklist for oral frailty (16). It is composed of 8 questions and is scored from 0 to 11. Tanaka et al. reported that scores over 4 had a significantly increased risk of oral frailty and functional disability, suggesting OFI-8 to be a useful indicator of individuals at frailty risk. Using a self-completed checklist and no additional devices, the OFI-8 can easily be applied in community settings for social implementation research.
In our cohort, participants who met the criteria for oral frailty had significantly lower baseline scores for the CAMCAM checklist, KCL, SNAQ, and Chew 20. Avoiding hard foods is a sign of deteriorated oral function (2, 21). Our findings indicated that the participants with OF had difficulty chewing textured foods, and so the variety of suitable choices and appetite were diminished. From the CAMCAM checklist Q1 (Eat textured diet) and Q2 (Like textured food), participants with OF tended to avoid textured food and might have realized some limitations in food intake. From Q4 (Think about nutritional balance) and Q5 (Eat sufficient protein), those subjects might also tend to deviate from nutritional balance and not consume sufficient protein. Deteriorated oral function is a risk factor for malnutrition and systemic frailty (1, 3). Considering past reports (22), our findings carry clinical implications that early detection and intervention may prevent oral frailty and subsequent problems in community-dwelling older individuals.
Validation of CAMCAM checklist
Composed of questions related to chewing and meals, the CAMCAM checklist was developed to examine the changes in awareness and attitude towards eating behavior. It included food preferences, awareness of chewing, nutrition, and joy of mealtime. The total checklist score and those of Q1 and Q2 (Eat or Like textured food) were moderately correlated with other self-reported indices, including frailty (KCL), appetite (SNAQ), and chewing ability (Chew 20). The KCL is a versatile evaluation sheet of systemic frailty that is composed of 25 questions, 2 of which on oral health. Avoiding hard or textured foods deviates nutritional balance (2), decreases appetite (23), and increases the risk of systemic frailty. Thus, the CAMCAM checklist had moderate correlations with the KCL and SNAQ. The Chew 20 simply asks about what the respondent can chew and eat to evaluate chewing ability, with higher scores indicating a greater variety of food available to the individual (19). The CAMCAM checklist correlation with the Chew 20 showed it could partially evaluate chewing ability as well.
Q5 and Q6 of the CAMCAM checklist were correlated with the KCL and SNAQ. Frailty has physical, social, and psychological aspects. Eating alone is a risk factor for depression and frailty (24–26). As the proper intake of protein is essential to prevent physical frailty, the correlation of Q5 and the KCL was reasonable. Q6 (Enjoy mealtime) had a moderate relationship with the KCL, supporting earlier literature (23). The above findings suggest that the CAMCAM checklist can be useful as an index of the attitude and behavior towards chewing and meals, including their texture, in addition to balance and joy.
Changes in characteristics of oral frailty and eating behavior
By completing the CAMCAM program, OFI-8 and KCL scores were seen to significantly improve in the OF group, which indicated potential effectiveness as an oral frailty preventive program. Although the participants were not actively encouraged to perform physical or oral exercises in the present study, our findings suggested the improvement of oral frailty via this mild intervention program. In particular, the proportions of participants who answered positively for Q1 (Difficulty chewing), Q5 (Going out), and Q8 (Dental visits) in the OFI-8 increased significantly in the OF group; it appeared that OF participants were more inclined to chew hard food by awareness of their chewing behavior through the textured lunch, went out more frequently by listening to talks about frailty prevention, and tried to visit a dental clinic more regularly. The participants had likely already heard that oral health, chewing properly, and well-balanced meals were important for their health before participating in the CAMCAM program. However, listening to such points while chewing on textured food in a public setting may have conveyed this information more effectively. Indeed, text mining analysis of Impression and Prospects confirmed that many participants had a favorable impression of the textured lunch box and perceived the importance of chewing and oral health.
The average OFI-8 score increased in the Robust group contrarily to our expectations. In particular, the proportion of participants who answered “yes” for Q2 (Coughing) and Q3 (Dentures) in the OFI-8 rose significantly. This may have reflected a realization of oral frailty symptoms during the learning period of the program, although starting denture use can increase chewing ability (27). These findings implied that additional personal instruction could be particularly beneficial in such participants after the program.
The total score of the CAMCAM checklist did not change remarkably after the program in either the Robust or OF group, although sub-item scores changed significantly. More participants cited increased awareness of chewing food for Q5 in the Robust group, with the same tendency in the OF group, which suggested promoted awareness towards chewing.
Lastly, the proportion of answers for Q6 (Enjoy mealtime) in the CAMCAM checklist did not change significantly after the program. One of the purposes of the program was to stimulate enjoyment in having meals with others to combat social isolation as a risk factor for frailty (28). In the CAMCAM program, participants easily gathered at community places close to their home for lunch and a chat while learning about their health. However, roughly 75% of the participants in both subject groups had already answered that they enjoyed mealtime often or always at baseline. There might have been a ceiling effect for this question, such that responses could not significantly change in proportion afterwards. A larger number of participants is needed to clarify this point.
Limitations
This study had several limitations. First, it was performed as a single-arm pre-post comparison study. Our previous investigation was designed as a randomized control study to test the efficacy of the program (10). The CAMCAM program was then developed to be easily adopted in community activities for the purpose of social implementation. The program was conducted in 2 prefectures in Japan. As implementation research, the study design appeared suitable for health promotion and will be further expanded. Since 22 participants (8.1%) dropped out of the study, larger sample sizes will also help adjust for possible selection bias.
Second, we only used subjective questionnaires for pre-post evaluation. The objective evaluation of oral and physical function provides useful information, but also requires equipment and skilled staff. Thus, we developed the present CAMCAM checklist to monitor the attitudes towards eating behavior and used the OFI-8 and KCL for oral frailty and frailty checks, respectively. The main purpose of the program was to modify awareness and attitudes rather than teach functional exercises. Future studies are being planned to develop a system for evaluating the continued effectiveness of the CAMCAM program in different areas.