1 Pardey, P. G., Chan-Kang, C., Dehmer, S. P. & Beddow, J. M. Agricultural R&D is on the move. Nature Comment 537, 301-303 (2016).
2 Wood, S. & Pardey, P. G. Agroecological aspects of evaluating agricultural R&D. Agric. Sys. 57, 13-41 (1998).
3 Alston, J. M., Norton, G. W. & Pardey, P. G. Science under scarcity: principles and practice for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. 618 (Cornell University Press, 1995).
4 Folberth, C. et al. The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming. Nature Sustainability 3, 281-289, doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0505-x (2020).
5 Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812-818, doi:10.1126/science.1185383 (2010).
6 Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519-525, doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0 (2018).
7 Erb, K.-H. et al. Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nature Communications 7, 11382, doi:10.1038/ncomms11382 (2016).
8 Koh, L. P. & Ghazoul, J. Spatially explicit scenario analysis for reconciling agricultural expansion, forest protection, and carbon conservation in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 11140, doi:10.1073/pnas.1000530107 (2010).
9 van Vliet, J. Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion. Nature Sustainability 2, 755-763, doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0340-0 (2019).
10 van Ittersum, M. K. et al. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review. Field Crops Res., doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009 (2012).
11 Deng, N. et al. Closing yield gaps for rice self-sufficiency in China. Nature Communications 10, doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09447-9 (2019).
12 van Bussel, L. G. J. et al. From field to atlas: Upscaling of location-specific yield gap estimates. Field Crops Res. 177, 98-108 (2015).
13 Grassini, P. et al. Robust spatial frameworks for leveraging research on sustainable crop intensification. Global Food Security 14, 18-22, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.002 (2017).
14 Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337, doi:10.1038/nature10452 (2011).
15 Bruinsma, J. The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? , (FAO, 2009).
16 Suh, S. et al. Closing yield gap is crucial to avoid potential surge in global carbon emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 63, 102100, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102100 (2020).
17 Fischer, G., Shah, M., van Velthuizen, H. & Nachtergaele, F. O. Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century. (IIASA, 2001).
18 IIASA/FAO. Global agro-ecological zones (GAEZ v3.0). IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy. (2012).
19 Rosenzweig, C. et al. The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170, 166-182, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011 (2013).
20 Elliott, J. et al. The global gridded crop model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015 (2015).
21 van Wart, J. et al. Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential. Field Crops Res. 143, 44-55 (2013).
22 FAOSTAT. Crops and livestock trade database www.faostat.fao.org, 2021).
23 van Ittersum, M. K. et al. Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 14964-14969, doi:10.1073/pnas.1610359113 (2016).
24 Clapp, J. Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy 66, 88-96, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001 (2017).
25 Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. (Agricultural Development Economics Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2012).
26 Blankenau, P. A., Kilic, A. & Allen, R. An evaluation of gridded weather data sets for the purpose of estimating reference evapotranspiration in the United States. Agric. Water Manag. 242, 106376, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106376 (2020).
27 Mourtzinis, S., Rattalino Edreira, J. I., Conley, S. P. & Grassini, P. From grid to field: Assessing quality of gridded weather data for agricultural applications. Eur. J. Agron. 82, Part A, 163-172, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.013 (2017).
28 van Wart, J., Grassini, P. & Cassman, K. G. Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields. Global Change Biology 19, 3822-3834 (2013).
29 Ramirez-Villegas, J. & Challinor, A. Assessing relevant climate data for agricultural applications. Agric. For. Meteorol. 161, 26-45, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.03.015 (2012).
30 Hendriks, C. M. J., Stoorvogel, J. J. & Claessens, L. Exploring the challenges with soil data in regional land use analysis. Agric. Sys. 144, 9-21, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.007 (2016).
31 Grassini, P. et al. How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis. Field Crops Res., 49-63 (2015).
32 Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S. & Döll, P. MIRCA2000—Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, doi:10.1029/2008gb003435 (2010).
33 Grassini, P., Specht, J. E., Tollenaar, M., Ciampitti, I. A. & Cassman, K. G. in Crop physiology. Applications for genetic improvement and agronomy (eds Víctor O. Sadras & Daniel F. Calderini) 15-42 (Oxford: Academic Press, 2015).
34 Müller, C. et al. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset. Scientific Data 6, 50, doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8 (2019).
35 Robinson, S. et al. The International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model description for version 3. (2015).
36 Hochman, Z., Gobbett, D., Horan, H. & Navarro Garcia, J. Data rich yield gap analysis of wheat in Australia. Field Crops Res. 197, 97-106, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.017 (2016).
37 Aramburu Merlos, F. et al. Potential for crop production increase in Argentina through closure of existing yield gaps. Field Crops Res. 184, 145-154 (2015).
38 Morell, F. J. et al. Can crop simulation models be used to predict local to regional maize yields and total production in the U.S. Corn Belt? (2016).
39 Evans, L. T. Crop Evolution, adaptation, and yield., (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
40 Cassman, K. G. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5952-5959 (1999).
41 Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G. & Field, C. B. in Annual Review of Environment and Resources Vol. 34 179-204 (2009).
42 van Wart, J., Kersebaum, K. C., Peng, S., Milner, M. & Cassman, K. G. Estimating crop yield potential at regional to national scales. Field Crops Res. in press, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.018 (2013).
43 You, L. et al. (2014).
44 International Food Policy Research Institute. (2019).
45 United Nations. World Population Prospects, the 2015 Revision. (United Nations, New York, 2015).
46 FAO. Food balance sheets. A handbook. (FAO, Rome, 2001).
47 O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387-400, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2 (2014).