A modified pull-through approach with a pedicled bone flap for oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection - a cadaveric feasibility study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2710534/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

A modified pull-through approach with a pedicled bone flap for oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection - a cadaveric feasibility study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2710534/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 15 Feb, 2024

Read the published version in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose

Compromised swallowing and speaking as well as local complications are the major disadvantages of established approaches to the posterior tongue and oropharynx. The mandibular split involves an esthetically unpleasant bipartition of the lower lip and is prone to bony non-union or sequestration. The traditional pull-through technique on the other hand lacks the safe reattachment of the lingually released soft tissues.

Methods

The feasibility of a new modified pull-through approach was tested on three anatomical specimens. CAD/CAM cutting guides were used to design a retentive bone flap for the proper refixation of the genioglossus and geniohyoid muscles after the procedure.

Results

Precise repositioning and dynamic compression of bony segments was reproducible and no injury to adjacent structures occurred. In all cases, a median lingual foramen was found and in two cases vessels entering it could be dissected.

Conclusion

The method presented is safe and easy to perform. Individual cutting guides improve the safety and accuracy of the procedure, potentially eliminating the need for osteosynthesis. We provide the anatomical and radiologic basis for clinical evaluation of this pedicled bone flap procedure.

Oral cancer (OSCC)

oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC)

resection

pull-through

mandibular lingual release

mandibular split

Head and neck cancer therapy frequently has burdensome side effects, which can be a result of the surgical therapy itself or the multimodal treatment concept, including adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The consequent impairment in speaking and swallowing is a major factor in lowering patient quality of life (QoL), even after tumor eradication [30]. Tumors in the posterior third of the oral cavity, at the base of the tongue, or oropharyngeal primaries are a surgical challenge because the conventional transoral approach may be inadequate. Because transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is available in few specialized centers, the prevailing techniques used in these situations include pull-through (PT) or mandibular lingual release (MLR) and mandibular lip-split (MS), all of which have side-effects and pose potential risks [3, 8]. For MS in particular, these include altered occlusion and injury of adjacent teeth as well as impairment of bony consolidation, especially in patients who received postoperative radiotherapy [8, 14]. Another disadvantage is the requirement for titanium plates to fixate the repositioned mandibular segments, which can compromise radiation therapy and provoke tissue irritation and is prone to infections [2, 20]. Studies by Cheng et al. and Li et al. have revealed that the PT approach seems to be beneficial in terms of esthetics, time of surgery, postoperative complications, pain, and patient-related QoL [8, 14]. By contrast, Devine et al. reported a better outcome of MS regarding speech, swallowing, and chewing [9]. Nevertheless, both surgical techniques are associated with the risk of impaired tongue movement, as well as difficulty in swallowing and speaking [8, 9]. Cheng et al. (2018) evaluated both functions 6 months after T4a tongue and floor of mouth cancer resections and found that 35 of 58 MLR and 24 of 33 MS patients still depended on tube feeding and only 29 of 58 MLR as well as 24 of 33 MS patients demonstrated good speech intelligibility [8]. Furthermore, postoperative tracheostomy maintainance, an indicator for the risk of aspiration, exeeded one month in 31 of 58 MS and 19 of 33 MS patients. The fact that the tumor resection itself, depending on its location, leads to impairment of oral function calls for a surgical technique that avoids further debilitation. Given that Devine et al. (2001) for instance included almost exclusively T1 and T2 tumors of the anterior oral cavity when comparing MLR and MS, one has to acknowledge the limitied comparability of existing studies on the topic [9]. Nevertheless, especially the results of this study on small anteriorly located tumors unmask the potentially detrimental effect of the traditional MLR on QoL in terms of speech, swallowing and chewing [9].

The aims of this study are to combine the advantages of both surgical approaches, to provide adequate access to the posterior oral cavity, ensure secure anterior refixation of the tongue, and preserve mandible continuity without the necessity for osteosynthetic plating.

In this study, we present a modified PT approach, which comprises CAD/CAM-guided mental osteotomy of the mandible to preserve the attachments of the genioglossus (GGM) and geniohyoideus (GHM) muscles on the mandible. This pedicled, retentive bone flap can be repositioned into its socket after tumor resection resulting in preserving anterior tongue fixation. The findings of this study demonstrate the feasibility of this novel surgical approach and provide the basis for further clinical evaluation.

Body donors

The surgical procedure was carried out on three body donors at the Institute of Clinical Anatomy & Cell Analysis. Cause of death according to the certificate of death were stroke, cardiac infarction, and cardiac failure, respectively. No morphological abnormalities, scars, or deformities were visible externally. One body donor had a central venous catheter, which did not affect the surgical area. The body donors gave informed consent to use their cadavers for research purposes in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The procedure was approved by the local ethics committee (Project Nr. 081/2022BO2).

Fixation

Tissue fixation was performed by intranasal infusion through the femoral artery using the IJT-50 injection system (Thalheimer, Ellwangen, Germany). Depending on the condition of the cadaver’s vascular system, we used a perfusion pressure of 0.5–1.0 bar, with an ethanol-based fixative solution.

Photo- and video documentation

We photodocumented relevant surgical steps under standardized conditions using a Nikon D300 camera equipped with a vario lens. We used the integrated FullHD camera (1920 px × 1080 px) of two marLED X operating lights (KLS Martin, Tuttlingen, Germany) for video documentation.

Artwork

Figures including Artwork were created using Procreate (Savage Interactive, Hobart, Australia), CorelDraw (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada), and Affinity Photo (Serif (Europe) Ltd, Nottingham, United Kngdom)

Surgical Approach

The surgical procedure was performed according to a standardized protocol. Computer tomography scans of all three anatomical specimens were performed, with a slice thickness of 1.25 mm. These were used for the virtual planning and design of the cutting guides.

The cutting guides provide the generation of a pyramid- or wedge-shaped bony fragment that would allow self-fixation due to the tapering cutout and the pulling force applied by the intact musculature (Figs. 1–6).

Surgery was performed under standard conditions. A bilateral neck incision was made in the skin fold, > 2 cm below the inferior mandibular border. A skin platysma flap was raised and ROBINS levels IA and IB dissection was performed. Then, an incision was made along the lower mandibular border to detach the vestibular lateral and anterior periosteum, including the mentalis muscle, to gain access to the mental region. Furthermore, the mylohyoid muscle was detached from the lingual aspects of the posterior mandible. If no interference with the cutting guide occurred, the median aspect of the mylohyoid could be left attached to the mandible. Subsequently, a crestal or linguo-marginal incision was made to detach, elevate, and protect soft tissue before the osteotomy. Then the cutting guides were positioned and fixed with screws. An oscillating saw was used to perform the osteotomy. The bony segment was mobilized anteriorly upon mouth opening and brought out of its socket. Lastly, the tongue was mobilized and its base pulled into view. The bony segment was then repositioned into the socket.

The entire procedure was filmed from two angles and photodocumented. The procedure is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Design of the Cutting Guides

Cutting guides for the V-shaped osteotomy of the anterior mandibular border were

designed and manufactured using CAD/CAM technology. Mimics Medical 23.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was used for segmentation of the DICOM-Data and rendering 3D models of every single specimen. The cutting guides were planned and designed using Freeform plus (Geomagic, Morrisville, North Carolina). To assure the attachment of the GGM and GHM to the bony segment, the osteotomy lines were determined by the surgeon under consideration of the anatomical landmarks such as the mental spines, the medial lingual foramina and the GGM using bone as well as soft tissue fenestration (Fig. 2). 3D rendering of the mandibles provided additional three-dimensional orientation (Fig. 3. KLS Martin GmbH (Tuttlingen, Germany) performed the technical execution and printing (printer: FORMIGA P 110 Velocis and material: PA 2200 - Polyamide 12, EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems, Krailing, Germany). Three designs were used (Fig. 4).

Cutting Guides

In practical use, design 1 (Fig. 4a and b) has the advantage of reproducibility and easy positioning of the cutting guide on the mandibular vestibular aspect. Design 2 (Fig. 4c and d) offers the advantage of reduced dissection of vestibular soft tissue and periosteum laterally and facilitates the ventral removal of the bony fragment. However, positioning of the cutting guide is more challenging. Design 3 (Fig. 4e and f) offers a facilitated angulation of osteotomy lines; however, its bulky design has many disadvantages in terms of in-surgery handling and lack of saw cooling. Therefore, guide 3 was excluded from application in this study.

Feasibility of the planning procedure and reproducibility according to the anatomical landmarks (mental spines, medial lingual foramina and GGM) was assessed on 12 CT-scans of anatomical specimens including the three cadavers included in the presented anatomical dissection (Table 1). In every case, at least two landmarks were definable, offering sufficient information for the procedure. In five specimens, the modified PT would not have been a viable option due to an edentulous, highly atrophic mandible. The mal/female ratio of the anatomical specimens was 1.4. Age distribution is illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1

Analysis of the definability of the anatomical landmarks (mental spine, median lingual foramen (MLF) and genioglossus muscle (GGM). Five patients presented edentulous and highly atrophic (e + a) mandibles. The mean age (years) at the time of death was 87.6 years.
Specimens	Age	Mental spine	MLF	GGM
A320*	81	no	yes	yes
A331*	89	yes	yes	yes
AL179*	89	yes	no	yes	e + a
A342	92	yes	yes	yes	e + a
A343	93	yes	yes	yes
A344	81	yes	yes	yes
A345	91	yes	yes	yes	e + a
A346	73	yes	yes	yes	e + a
A347	92	yes	no	yes	e + a
A349	83	yes	yes	yes
A350	92	yes	yes	yes
A341	95	yes	yes	yes
n = 12	87.6	91,7%	83.3%	100%
*were included into the presented anatomical dissection.

Osteotomy

For reproducible osteotomies, assurance of retentive design, and thinnest osteotomy lines possible, we evaluated various saws available for mandibular resection. Although, piezo-osteotomy is safe and reliable, we preferred using a delicate jigsaw (Osseo scalpel, Saw blade GD320 13/0.3/0.3 mm, AESCULAP®, Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany), because its cutting thickness (0.30 mm) is lesser than that of the slender piezo saw (0.35 mm), ensuring better fragment retention after repositioning at the end.

Surgical procedure

After the mandible was exposed using the bilateral submandibular approach and neck dissection for lymph node clearance ROBINS levels IA and IB, incision of the periosteum at the lower mandibular border and exposure of the mandible, including bilateral exposure of the mental nerve, was performed, followed by guided anterior osteotomy (Figs. 5 − 7).

The MLF was present in all three cases (Fig. 8a–c). Additionally, we dissected and demonstrated vessels entering the MLF in two cases (Fig. 8a and b). For simplicity, we referred to these vessels as “medial lingual artery” (MLA) in this study. The anatomical drawing in Fig. 9a and b illustrates the blood supply.

Dynamic compression of the bony segment could be simulated by closing the mouth of the specimens despite the lack of muscle tone (supplemental video).

Malignancies in the posterior third of the oral cavity, base of the tongue, and oropharyngeal primaries pose a major surgical challenge. To facilitate free resection margins and adequate exposure for reconstruction, e.g. by using microvascular transplants, the transoral approach must be rejected, requiring alternative approaches that compromise functional outcome and patient QoL [30]. TORS can be a valid alternative; however, its availability is limited and poor applicability in cases of larger tumors, especially with related trismus, must be considered [29]. This study aims to provide a novel feasible approach that allows adequate access while minimizing patient debilitation.

GGM, the largest and strongest extrinsic tongue muscle, plays essential roles in tongue mobility, thereby allowing complex voluntary movements, such as the oral preparatory phase of swallowing or speaking [10]. The nonvoluntary pharyngeal phase of swallowing is characterized by hyolaryngeal elevation, which is promoted by the mylohyoid and GHM [10]. Because achieving the correct refixation of the mylohyoid is a challenge due to its fanned-out shape, GHM integrity is important for preserving hyolaryngeal elevation [10, 22].

MLR is characterized by the detachment of both GGM and GHM; reapproximation can only be performed through the use of sutures [8, 26]. This adaptation might be inadequate, because patients subconsciously activate the involved musculature immediately after surgery, which explains the clinical and functional limitations that can be observed with traditional MLR [9].

Therefore, keeping the functionality of both GGM and GHM intact is a pivotal step to optimize swallowing and speaking after MLR and involves proper refixation of the GGM and GHM to the mandible.

GGM advancement procedures and their technical variations are used for treating obstructive sleep apnea surgically [7, 23]. The aim is to apply traction to the GGM by advancing a bony mandibular segment, including the genial tubercle, and to fixate it in an anterior position through plating [7]. This is effective for preventing the base of the tongue from collapsing into the pharynx occluding the posterior airway space [23]. The use of virtually-planned cutting guides is recommended for reducing the risk of failure or injury due to the close proximity to adjacent teeth and lack of visibility on the lingual aspect [7]. Moreover, the precise location of the genial tubercle cannot be predicted reproducibly due to anatomical variations [6]. However, despite its varying shape, some form of mental spine can be found in roughly 98% of the cases [25]. In concert with the MLF, which according to Wang et al. (2015) could be identified radiographically in 97% of the cases and the GGM the area of interest could be identified reproducibly [28].

In our study, no injury to relevant structures or tooth roots could be observed. The workflow of virtual design and 3D-printing of cutting guides is increasingly integrated in orthognathic surgery as well as head and neck reconstructive oncology and will likely prevail in the future [1, 6, 21].

Therefore, the clinically established procedure of GGM advancement was modified to fulfill the specific requirements of this PT approach.

To account for the anatomical vectors of force, designing a retentive shape is required (Figs. 3–6). Notably, before the osteotomy, force vectors of GGM and GHM are directed anteriorly and superiorly, which reversely forces the bony segment posteriorly and inferiorly after osteotomy [22].

Consequently, proper virtual planning is pivotal to not only avoid injury to anatomical structures but also assure stable and wiggle-free repositioning of the segment, thereby preventing it from being pulled posteriorly and inferiorly. Hence, we believe that plating will be unnecessary if the bone cuts are performed with a very delicate saw. This leads to the transformation of tensile forces of the muscles to compressive forces to the osteotomy lines, analogous to “natural strain of compression” described by Champy et al., 1978 [4].

Therefore, immediate postoperative muscle activation and logopedic functional exercise should be possible and even advantageous. Still, a specific regimen for postoperative care must be carefully established, not to jeopardize the potential benefit of this technique.

The findings of this study revealed that the segments could be repositioned stably and could not be elevated from their position when the mouth of the anatomical specimen was closed (supplemental video material). This simulates the forces applied when activating GGM and GHM. Avoiding the application of osteosynthesis material is desirable, because it can cause severe complications, as seen in MS [8]. However, mandibular continuity is intact and if stable repositioning cannot be achieved, a delicate miniplate should suffice. A highly atrophic mandible is a potential contraindication. In these cases, mandibular continuity cannot be preserved or the risk of fracture is excessive. The relatively large number of edentulous and highly atrophic mandibles in this cohort may arise from the high average age of almost 90 years.

Another anatomical foundation includes adequate blood supply to the bony segment to avoid sequestration and ensure postoperative consolidation. Studies have reported the presence of a lingual foramen and the corresponding canal in the midline of the symphysis in 97–100% cases [15, 28]. These common canals can be detected through three-dimensional radiographic imaging despite having diameters ranging from 0.25 to 1.60 mm [13, 28]. Interestingly, although the respective foramina were described several times, they were named inconsistently throughout literature [19]. Here, we have used medial lingual foramen (MLF) based on the nomenclature proposed by Tagaya et al., 2009 and Nakajima et al., 2014 [19, 27]. Despite contradicting reports on the presence of nerves and venous vessels in the corresponding medial lingual canals, broad consensus exists that an arterial branch of the sublingual or submental artery passes through the MLF [15, 17, 24].

In this study, we found that MLF was present in all three cases; in two cases, the medial lingual artery (MLA) could be dissected (Fig. 8a–c). In these two cases, the MLA ran protected between the bellies of GGM and GHM. According to the literature, it is supplied by the submental and sublingual artery; however, many anastomoses between the lingual, facial, submental, and sublingual as well as the inferior alveolar arteries have been described [11, 16, 19]. Therefore, MLA is probably fed by the sublingual rete arteriosum to which the facial as well as the lingual artery contribute [19]. Another source of supply for the bony segment include the intact lingual periosteum and muscle attachment, which could compensate for the rare but potential lack of an MLF [5].

Considering the constant existence of MLF, a stable blood supply to the bony segment is likely. Due to its location central to mental spines, the associated vessel inserts are protected between the bellies of GGM and GHM (Figs. 8 and 9). By leaving this lingual muscle cuff as well as the lingual periosteum of the segment intact, we have demonstrated a technique that facilitates the preservation of pedicled blood supply. Hence, it can be considered a pedicled bone flap. Owing to the delicacy of MLA, this approach may prevent shearing of the vessel. Considering that GGM and GHM are separated for genioglossus advancement, it must be assumed that this specific blood supply can be compromised during this procedure [6, 12]. However, reproducible success of the procedure may be explained by random pattern supply through the muscle and periosteum [7, 12]. In contrast to that in orthognathic surgery, optimal blood supply of the segment is even more important because of the frequent necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy in oral and oropharyngeal cancer [18]. By contrast, the bony segment is positioned far from the tumor bed and a minimized local effect can be achieved by the steep dose gradient of modern radiotherapy techniques, which reduce the risk of sequestration of the segment further [18].

Potential downsides of this work derive from its nature as a study on anatomical specimens resulting in limited transferability to live patients.

The adequate anterior refixation of GGM and GHM as major protagonists for tongue and hyoid movement, and hence, swallowing and speaking will likely ameliorate the functional outcome in patients. Improvements of these functions would accelerate decannulation, independent food intake, social interaction and reintegration, and shorten hospitalization; consequently, improving patient QoL. A modification in terms of a unilateral approach leaving the contralateral floor of the mouth attached is also conceivable. We have provided the justification for further evaluation of this modified PT approach in clinical studies.

In this feasibility study, we demonstrated that the method presented is safe and easy to perform. The use of individually fabricated cutting guides minimizes the risk of injury to dental roots or disruption of muscle insertions. Proper osteotomy design and thin cuts enable the precise repositioning of the bony segment, thereby eliminating the need for the implantation of osteosynthetic material. Furthermore, we found anatomical evidence to consider it a pedicled bone flap procedure. Therefore, we provide the anatomical basis for further evaluation of this modified pull-through approach in clinical studies.

Ethics approval

The procedure was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany (Project Nr. 081/2022BO2).

Consent to participate and publish

The body donors gave informed consent to use their cadavers for research purposes in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki including participation and publication.

Authors’ contributions

N.N. worte the main manuscript N.N. and P.N. created and prepared the graphical artwork N.N., P.N. and S.K. conceptualized the practical execution of the study S.K. supervised the project K.K., S.K., C.D. and N.N. conceived the ideas E.H. and S.N. contributed to the execution of the study and design of the cutting guides B.H., M.H. and P.N. provided the resources All authors provided intellectual support and reviewed the manuscript

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding

No project related funding was received by the authors.

Competing Interests

Max Heiland received speaker remuneration by Karl Leibinger Medizintechnik GmbH

and Co KG (KLS Martin).

KLS Martin GmbH provided technical support for the design and manufacturing of

the patient-specific cutting guides.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Franz Hafner for photographic support, Clarence Janka (KLS

Martin) for support in designing and manufacturing the cutting guides.

Moreover, we would like to thank Jürgen Papp, Diana Hagen, and Klaus Fröhlich for technical support. Additionally, the authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind's overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude.

Alkhayer, A., Piffkó, J., Lippold, C. and Segatto, E. (2020). Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head & face medicine, 16(1), 34. doi:10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2
Bron, G., Scemama, U., Villes, V., Fakhry, N., Salas, S., Chagnaud, C., Bendahan, D. and Varoquaux, A. (2019). A new CT dynamic maneuver "Mouth Opened with Tongue Extended" can improve the clinical TNM staging of oral cavity and oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol, 94, 41–46. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.023
Cammaroto, G., Stringa, L. M., Zhang, H., Capaccio, P., Galletti, F., Galletti, B., Meccariello, G., Iannella, G., Pelucchi, S., Baghat, A. and Vicini, C. (2020). Alternative Applications of Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS): A Systematic Review. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(1). doi:10.3390/jcm9010201
Champy, M., Loddé, J. P., Schmitt, R., Jaeger, J. H. and Muster, D. (1978). Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 6, 14–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80062-9
Chanavaz, M. (1995). Anatomy and histophysiology of the periosteum: quantification of the periosteal blood supply to the adjacent bone with 85Sr and gamma spectrometry. The Journal of oral implantology, 21(3), 214–219.
Chang, E. T., Kwon, Y. D., Jung, J., Capasso, R., Riley, R., Liu, S. C. and Camacho, M. (2019). Genial tubercle position and genioglossus advancement in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment: a systematic review. Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 41(1), 34. doi:10.1186/s40902-019-0217-1
Cheng, A. (2019). Genioglossus and Genioplasty Advancement. Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America, 27(1), 23–28. doi:10.1016/j.cxom.2018.11.008
Cheng, S. J., Ko, H. H., Lee, J. J. and Kok, S. H. (2018). Comparison of long-term outcomes between pull-through resection and mandibular lip-split surgery for T4a tongue/floor of mouth cancers. Head Neck, 40(1), 144–153. doi:10.1002/hed.24994
Devine, J. C., Rogers, S. N., McNally, D., Brown, J. S. and Vaughan, E. D. (2001). A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 30(3), 199–204. doi:10.1054/ijom.2000.0038
Gawryszuk, A., Bijl, H. P., Holwerda, M., Halmos, G. B., Wedman, J., Witjes, M. J. H., van der Vliet, A. M., Dorgelo, B. and Langendijk, J. A. (2019). Functional Swallowing Units (FSUs) as organs-at-risk for radiotherapy. PART 1: Physiology and anatomy. Radiotherapy and oncology: journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 130, 62–67. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.028
Hamparian, A. M. (1973). Blood supply of the human fetal mandible. American Journal of Anatomy, 136(1), 67–75.
Henry, A. M., Franco, P. B., Choi, D. D. and Farrell, B. B. (2019). An application of virtual surgical planning in genial tubercle advancement using the mandibular trapezoid osteotomy. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases, 5(3), 100110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omsc.2019.100110
Iwanaga, J., Watanabe, K., Saga, T., Tabira, Y. and Yamaki, K. (2016). A Rare Case of an Artery Passing through the Median Perforating Canal of the Mandible. Case reports in dentistry, 2016, 8183565. doi:10.1155/2016/8183565
Li, H., Li, J., Yang, B., Su, M., Xing, R. and Han, Z. (2015). Mandibular lingual release versus mandibular lip-split approach for expanded resection of middle-late tongue cancer: A case-control study. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 43(7), 1054–1058. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.008
Liang, X., Jacobs, R., Lambrichts, I. and Vandewalle, G. (2007). Lingual foramina on the mandibular midline revisited: a macroanatomical study. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 20(3), 246–251. doi:10.1002/ca.20357
Loukas, M., Kinsella, C. R., Jr., Kapos, T., Tubbs, R. S. and Ramachandra, S. (2008). Anatomical variation in arterial supply of the mandible with special regard to implant placement. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 37(4), 367–371. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.007
Lustig, J. P., London, D., Dor, B. L. and Yanko, R. (2003). Ultrasound identification and quantitative measurement of blood supply to the anterior part of the mandible. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics, 96(5), 625–629. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.015
Morgan, H. E. and Sher, D. J. (2020). Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancers of the head & neck, 5, 1. doi:10.1186/s41199-019-0046-z
Nakajima, K., Tagaya, A., Otonari-Yamamoto, M., Seki, K., Araki, K., Sano, T., Okano, T. and Nakamura, M. (2014). Composition of the blood supply in the sublingual and submandibular spaces and its relationship to the lateral lingual foramen of the mandible. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 117(1), e32-38. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.032
Odom, E. B. and Snyder-Warwick, A. K. (2016). Mandible Fracture Complications and Infection: The Influence of Demographics and Modifiable Factors. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 138(2), 282e-289e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002385
Patel, A., Harrison, P., Cheng, A., Bray, B. and Bell, R. B. (2019). Fibular Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible with Immediate Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation: Jaw in a Day. Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America, 31(3), 369–386. doi:10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.002
Pearson, W. G., Jr., Langmore, S. E. and Zumwalt, A. C. (2011). Evaluating the structural properties of suprahyoid muscles and their potential for moving the hyoid. Dysphagia, 26(4), 345–351. doi:10.1007/s00455-010-9315-z
Riley, R. W., Powell, N. B. and Guilleminault, C. (1993). Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a review of 306 consecutively treated surgical patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 108(2), 117–125. doi:10.1177/019459989310800203
Rosano, G., Taschieri, S., Gaudy, J. F., Testori, T. and Del Fabbro, M. (2009). Anatomic assessment of the anterior mandible and relative hemorrhage risk in implant dentistry: a cadaveric study. Clinical oral implants research, 20(8), 791–795. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01713.x
Singh, V., Anand, M. K., & Dinesh, K. (2000). Variations in the pattern of mental spines and spinous mental foramina in dry adult human mandibles. Surg Radiol Anat, 22(3–4), 169–173. doi:10.1007/s00276-000-0169-1
Stringer, S. P., Jordan, J. R., Mendenhall, W. M., Parsons, J. T., Cassisi, N. J. and Million, R. R. (1992). Mandibular lingual releasing approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 107(3), 395–398. doi:10.1177/019459989210700309
Tagaya, A., Matsuda, Y., Nakajima, K., Seki, K. and Okano, T. (2009). Assessment of the blood supply to the lingual surface of the mandible for reduction of bleeding during implant surgery. Clinical oral implants research, 20(4), 351–355. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01668.x
Wang, Y. M., Ju, Y. R., Pan, W. L. and Chan, C. P. (2015). Evaluation of location and dimensions of mandibular lingual canals: a cone beam computed tomography study. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 44(9), 1197–1203. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2015.03.014
Weinstein, G. S., O'Malley, B. W., Jr., Rinaldo, A., Silver, C. E., Werner, J. A. and Ferlito, A. (2015). Understanding contraindications for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 272(7), 1551–1552. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3331-9
You, Q., Jing, X., Fan, S., Wang, Y. and Yang, Z. (2020). Comparison of functional outcomes and health-related quality of life one year after treatment in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with three different reconstruction methods. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58(7), 759–765. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.010

Competing interest reported. Max Heiland received speaker remuneration by Karl Leibinger Medizintechnik GmbH and Co KG (KLS Martin). KLS Martin GmbH provided technical support for the design and manufacturing of the patient-specific cutting guides.

VideoModifiedPullThrough.mp4

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 15 Feb, 2024

Read the published version in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy →

Editorial decision: Major revision
17 Jul, 2023
Reviews received at journal
30 Mar, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
22 Mar, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
22 Mar, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
21 Mar, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
21 Mar, 2023
First submitted to journal
19 Mar, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

A modified pull-through approach with a pedicled bone flap for oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection - a cadaveric feasibility study

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Material And Methods

Body donors

Fixation

Photo- and video documentation

Artwork

Surgical Approach

Design of the Cutting Guides

Results

Cutting Guides

Osteotomy

Surgical procedure

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1