Albert PS (2001) Limitations of the Case-only Design for Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions. American Journal of Epidemiology 154:687–693. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.8.687
Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, et al (2015) Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaSci 4:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
Cheng KF, Lin WJ (2009) The Effects of Misclassification in Studies of Gene-Environment Interactions. Hum Hered 67:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1159/000179556
Cleynen I, Vazeille E, Artieda M, et al (2014) Genetic and microbial factors modulating the ubiquitin proteasome system in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 63:1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303205
Cordell HJ (2002) Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn’t mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Human Molecular Genetics 11:2463–2468. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.20.2463
Cowman T, Koyutürk M (2017) Prioritizing tests of epistasis through hierarchical representation of genomic redundancies. Nucleic Acids Research 45:e131–e131. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx505
Das S, Abecasis GR, Browning BL (2018) Genotype Imputation from Large Reference Panels. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 19:73–96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021602
Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S, et al (2016) Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 48:1284–1287. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3656
Dempfle A, Scherag A, Hein R, et al (2008) Gene–environment interactions for complex traits: definitions, methodological requirements and challenges. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.106
Gauderman WJ (2002a) Sample Size Requirements for Association Studies of Gene-Gene Interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology 155:478–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.5.478
Gauderman WJ (2002b) Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med 21:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.973
Goldman D, Oroszi G, Ducci F (2005) The genetics of addictions: uncovering the genes. Nat Rev Genet 6:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1635
Guan W, Boehnke M, Pluzhnikov A, et al (2012) Identifying Plausible Genetic Models Based on Association and Linkage Results: Application to Type 2 Diabetes: Identifying Genetic Models Based on Association and Linkage Results. Genet Epidemiol n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21668
Kraft P, Yen Y-C, Stram DO, et al (2007) Exploiting Gene-Environment Interaction to Detect Genetic Associations. Hum Hered 63:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000099183
Krawczak M, Nikolaus S, von Eberstein H, et al (2006) PopGen: Population-Based Recruitment of Patients and Controls for the Analysis of Complex Genotype-Phenotype Relationships. Public Health Genomics 9:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090694
Kulle B, Schirmer M, Toliat MR, et al (2005) Application of genomewide SNP arrays for detection of simulated susceptibility loci. Hum Mutat 25:557–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20174
Marchini J, Howie B (2010) Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 11:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2796
Naj AC (2019) Genotype Imputation in Genome‐Wide Association Studies. Current Protocols in Human Genetics 102:. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphg.84
Piegorsch WW, Weinberg CR, Taylor JA (1994) Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. Stat Med 13:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780130206
Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, et al (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38:904–909. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1847
Ramnarine S, Zhang J, Chen L-S, et al (2015) When Does Choice of Accuracy Measure Alter Imputation Accuracy Assessments? PLoS ONE 10:e0137601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137601
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Case-control studies: research in reverse. The Lancet 359:431–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07605-5
Schurz H, Müller SJ, van Helden PD, et al (2019) Evaluating the Accuracy of Imputation Methods in a Five-Way Admixed Population. Front Genet 10:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00034
the Haplotype Reference Consortium (2016) A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet 48:1279–1283. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3643
Verma SS, de Andrade M, Tromp G, et al (2014) Imputation and quality control steps for combining multiple genome-wide datasets. Front Genet 5:370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00370
Wong MY, Day NE, Luan JA, Wareham NJ (2004) Estimation of magnitude in gene–environment interactions in the presence of measurement error. Statist Med 23:987–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1662
Yadav P, Freitag-Wolf S, Lieb W, et al (2015a) Allowing for population stratification in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction, using genomic control. Hum Genet 134:1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-015-1593-y
Yadav P, Freitag-Wolf S, Lieb W, Krawczak M (2015b) The role of linkage disequilibrium in case-only studies of gene-environment interactions. Hum Genet 134:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-014-1497-2
Yang Q, Khoury MJ (1997) Evolving Methods in Genetic Epidemiology. III. Gene-Environment Interaction in Epidemiologic Research. Epidemiologic Reviews 19:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017944
Zhang B, Zhi D, Zhang K, et al (2011) Practical Consideration of Genotype Imputation: Sample Size, Window Size, Reference Choice, and Untyped Rate. Stat Interface 4:339–352. https://doi.org/10.4310/sii.2011.v4.n3.a8