Mice
All animal procedures adhered to the US National Research Council's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the US Public Health Service's Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and were approved by the McLaughlin Research Institute’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All mice were housed in the McLaughlin Research Institute’s Animal Resource Center, an all-mouse facility accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Mice were housed in individually ventilated cages under standard conditions, with a 14-hour light/10 hour dark light cycle, and provided Purina 5053 chow and water ad libitum.
Slc1a4em2Tmg mice, referred to herein as Slc1a4E256K mutants were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene editing in mouse embryos using a single guide RNA (sgRNA), CUUCAAUUCCUUCAAUG (Synthego), and a sense HDR single stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) repair template: AGCTAGGCCCCGAGGGAGAAGACCTCATCCGATTCTTCAATTCCTTCAATAAGGCCACCATGGTGCTGGTGTCATGGATCATGTGGTG (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.). The G > A mutation at c.978 (the first underlined base) results in p.E256K, while the A > C modification at c.986 (the second underlined base) is a silent change intended to insert an NcoI site to facilitate genotyping, but the founder and pups only showed the c.G978A mutation (second underlined base) that results in p.Glu256Lys. The sgRNA and ssODN were resuspended in embryo microinjection buffer (filter sterilized 5 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). The ribonucleoprotein (RNP) mix was prepared by diluting SpCas9 2NLS nuclease (Synthego) and the sgRNA to 4 µM each in Opti-Mem (Gibco) and incubating at room temperature for 10 min prior to adding the ssODN (final concentration of 10 µM). The RNP mix was electroporated into 1-cell mouse embryos following published conditions (Troder et al. 2018), after which embryos were incubated in EmbryoMax Advanced KSOM Embryo Medium (Sigma Cat # MR-101-D) with 3 µM Alt-R HDR Enhancer v.1 (Integrated Data Technologies, Inc.), then transferred to pseudopregnant recipient females at the 1- or 2-cell stage. Founders were identified by PCR and sequencing, as described below, and mated to C57BL/6J mice to identify heterozygotes, which were intercrossed to generate homozygotes. CRISPR founder mice were identified by Sanger sequencing of a PCR product amplified from tail DNA (forward primer: GCTTCCCTGCTGAATCTGAC and reverse primer: ACATGGGAAGGTTGCAAGAC). Sequence data was analyzed using Synthego’s Inference of CRISPR Edits (ICE) tool. Founders were mated to unmanipulated, wildtype C57BL/6J mice and heterozygotes for the edited allele intercrossed. All the animals used in the studies described here were N1F3-N1F6, descended from one male founder. Age-matched wildtype C57BL/6J mice or wildtype siblings from heterozygous intercrosses were used as controls for all studies.
Mice were genotyped either by PCR amplification and sequencing, as described above, or PCR using the following allele-specific primers: wildtype forward CCGATTCTTCAATTCCTTCAATG and reverse atgttttctcctcccaccgt (263 bp product), or mutant forward CCGATTCTTCAATTCCTTCAATA and reverse: ttgatgtgagtccaggggtc (492 bp product). Amplification reactions used Go-Taq Green Master Mix (Promega). Cycling conditions for the wildtype product were: 95 C for 3 min followed by 33 cycles of 95 C for 30 sec, 61 C for 30 sec and 72 C for 60 sec, followed by 3 min at 72 C. Cycling conditions for the mutant product were: 94 C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 C for 15 sec, 60 C for 30 sec and 72 C for 45 sec, followed by 72 C for 7 min.
Western Blotting
Sagittal brain hemispheres were homogenized in protein lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant diluted in 2X SDS loading buffer. Proteins were electrophoresed through 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon P membrane (Millipore). Western blotting (WB) was performed following standard protocols using rabbit anti-SLC1A4 (Proteintech Cat# 13067-2-AP, RRID:AB_2190604 or Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 8442, RRID:AB_10828382) and mouse anti-beta-tubulin-III (3F3-G2) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-53140, RRID:AB_793543). Following ECL (BioRad Clarity ECL substrate), blots were imaged using an Azure 300 imager and quantified using AzureSpot Pro (Azure Biosystems). SLC1A4 expression was normalized to beta-tubulin-III and differences in expression by genotype assessed using a 2-tailed, paired t-test in Microsoft Excel. Similar results were obtained with both SLC1A4 antibodies.
Histology
Brains were fixed either at room temperature in 10% formalin for at least 1 week or at 4 C in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 days prior to standard processing and embedding in paraffin. Coronal sections were taken at 5 µm, mounted on positively charged slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or processed for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining following standard protocols, using an antibody against Neuronal nuclei (NeuN; Millipore Cat#MAB377, RRID:AB_2298772) at 1:100 or myelin basic protein (MBP; Covance Cat# SMI-99, RRID:AB_2314772) at 1:1000, and DAB chromogen (Biolegend Cat# 926507 and 926606) with manual development to ensure that each negative control remained negative and the positive controls developed signal in the appropriate and expected regions. Slides with no primary antibody were used as negative controls. Brains from wildtype mice were used as positive controls. Images were taken on a Zeiss AxioImagerM1 microscope with a Pixielink A623C color camera and morphometry analyzed using ImageJ and the Fiji image-processing package. Brain structures were measured in millimeters after the settings were established on Fiji. Cortex layer 1 thickness was measured in three separate areas evenly spaced across each field of view. The corpus callosum was measured at the midline. All comparisons between genotypes were made on sections representing similar rostral-caudal regions of the brain.
Uptake Assays
Xenopus oocytes (EcoCyte Bioscience) injected with approximately 50 ng of human SLC1A4 (wildtype or E256K mutant) cRNA (Ambion mMessage mMachine T7 transcription kit) or uninjected (control) oocytes were incubated with indicated concentrations of [3H]-labeled amino acids (Moravek Biochemicals, Inc.; 20–60 Ci mmol − 1) in Ringer solution (96 mM CaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES pH 7.5). Uptake was stopped by washing 3 times with 4°C buffer, then oocytes were lysed in 1.0% sodium dodecylsulfate, and radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation spectroscopy, as previously described (Foster et al., 2016). D-serine uptake was measured in fresh 300 µm brain slices cut from wildtype and Slc1a4K/K mice on a VF-200-OZ Compresstome (Precisionary Instruments) in ice-cold sucrose buffer (80 mM NaCl, 75 mM sucrose, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 mM CaCl2, MgCl2*6H2O, 1 mM ascorbic acid, 3 mM sodium pyruvate, with 5 mM 25 mM glucose and 24 mM NaCO3 added immediately before use). Slices were bubbled in artificial cerebrospinal fluid for 15 min, transferred to labeling solution (100 nM 3H-D-serine, Moravek Biochemicals, Inc., in 1X aCSF (126 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2*6H2O, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 2.4 mM CaCl2 with 11.4 mM glucose and 21.4 mM HEPES)) for 15 min, then washed three times in aCSF. After transferring slices to scintillation vials, 1% SDS was added and samples were left to solubilize overnight before measuring 3H activity in a Beckman LS6000IC liquid scintillation counter. Slices were generated from four mice per genotype and four slices were assayed per mouse.
Acute Brain Slice Recordings
Acute brain slices (300 µm) were sectioned and allowed at least 1 hour to recover at room temperature before being placed in a submersion-type recording chamber perfused at 1.6-2.0 ml/minute with ACSF at 30°C. Slices were visualized on an upright fixed-stage microscope (Olympus BX51WI) equipped with IR-DIC optics. Extracellular field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were recorded using glass electrodes filled with ACSF. fEPSPs were induced with 100 µs current pulses between 0.1mA − 0.4mA administered through ACSF-filled stimulating pipettes placed in stratum radiatum. Theta burst stimuli (5 bursts separated by 200 ms of 5 pulses at 100Hz) were administered to induce long-term potentiation. Recordings were made with analog-digital converters and amplifiers from Molecular Devices, and data were acquired at 10kHz and filtered at 2 kHz. Data were acquired and analyzed with pClamp11. Data are presented as mean ± S.E. and were evaluated by Student's paired t-test or as noted.
Behavioral Studies
Behavioral studies were performed on three cohorts of 4–5-month-old Slc1a4K/K homozygotes and wildtype (Slc1a4E/E) controls, all on the C57BL/6J background. The first cohort of 6 males and 5–6 females of each genotype was assessed for open field, novel object, Y-maze, balance beam, and grip strength. The second cohort of 4 wildtype and 6 Slc1a4K/K males and 5 wildtype and 3–4 Slc1a4K/K females was assessed for open field, novel object, Barnes maze and grip strength. The third cohort of 7 wildtype and 8 Slc1a4K/K males and 4 wildtype and 7 Slc1a4K/K females were subjected to rotarod and grip strength testing. ANY-Maze tracking software (Stoelting Co.) was used for data collection in all studies. Mice were also examined in their home cage for body position, spontaneous activity, tremor, and other general neurobehavioral features.
The novel object tests were performed as described in (Leger et al., 2013) using a 1 day habituation period and white open field as follows. On day 1, mice were allowed to explore the open field freely for 5 min (habituation). For the familiarization stage, 24 h later, two identical objects were placed 5 cm from the walls of the open field and mice were allowed to explore for 10 min. The testing session, where one of the objects was replaced by a new object, occurred 24 h after familiarization and also lasted 10 min. The total number of investigations and time spent investigating each object was recorded for the familiarization and test sessions. An investigation was defined as the mouse being within 2.5 cm of the object, with its nose pointed towards it. Climbing on the object did not count as an investigation.
The Y-maze test was performed according to standard protocols. Briefly, 16 h before the habituation session, mice were singly housed with fresh bedding. The Y-maze was cleaned with 70% ethanol in between mice to minimize odor cues. During the habituation session, mice were introduced to the maze and allowed to explore freely for 5 min, then returned to their home cage for about an hour before the testing session. For the testing session, bedding was placed in each of the arms as follows: clean bedding in the starting arm (arm C), home-cage bedding in one of the short arms (arm A), and bedding from an age- and sex-matched mouse of the other genotype in the remaining arm (arm B), to act as a novel stimulus. Mice were allowed to freely explore for five minutes.
The balance beam test measured time to cross a 1 m long, 6 mm wide beam, and consisted of two training sessions and a test session. The beam and escape box were always cleaned with 70% ethanol between mice. During the training sessions, a mouse was placed on a 12 mm thick beam and gently encouraged to go towards an escape box, which held nesting material from the mouse's home cage. If a mouse stopped moving during the run, a gentle tap on the back was given to encourage forward progress. If a mouse refused to go across the beam, the researcher held the mouse by the tail and nudged it toward the escape box. Timing started when the hind legs crossed the start line and ended when the hind legs crossed the finish line. Mice were allowed a brief rest (approx. 15 sec) in the escape box before being repositioned at the start line to repeat the trial. After 3 trials, the mouse was returned to its home cage for a 10-minute break before repeating 3 training runs on a 6 mm wide beam. This entire process was repeated 24 hours after the first training session. The testing session consisted of three runs across the 6 mm beam 24 h after the second training session.
The Barnes maze test included 1 habituation session, 8 spatial acquisition sessions, and 1 probe session. First, mice were placed on the Barnes maze and allowed to explore freely for 120 sec (habituation). Solid black cues (a triangle, circle, square, and lightning bolt) were placed on the four walls around the maze to provide spatial orientation. At the end of habituation, a clear beaker was placed over the mouse to guide it to the escape hole, where it was kept for 120 sec. The spatial acquisition session took place 24 h after habituation. The target hole and escape tunnel were moved 180 degrees from their original position. Mice were placed under a start cup in the middle of the maze and aversive stimuli (bright lights and 80-decibel hairdryer audio) were used to encourage the mice to find the target hole as quickly as possible. Mice were released from the start box and allowed to roam freely until they found and entered the target hole, or until 3 min had passed; if the mice did not find the target hole within 3 min, they were guided to the target hole and allowed to remain there for about 30 sec. Two spatial acquisitions were done per day for four days. For the probe trial, which took place 72 h after the last spatial acquisition session, the escape chamber was closed off. As in the training sessions, the mice were placed under a start box and then allowed to explore the maze freely for 90 sec. Aversive stimuli were present during the probe trial.
Grip Strength was assessed using a Bioseb-GS3 Grip Strength Meter. Mice were held over the grid until they grasped it with only their forepaws, then gently tugged by the tail until they released the grid and maximal peak force recorded. The same process was repeated with all four paws engaging the grid.
For the Rotarod test, mice from the same cage were placed on the apparatus (Maze Engineers) facing forward at a speed of 4 rpm. Once the mice were in placed, the Rotarod accelerated from 4 to 40 rpm over 300 sec. The latency for the mice to fall was recorded. This was done three times a day with at least 15 min in between trials, for three consecutive days.
Statistical Analyses
Unless otherwise indicated, data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9. For behavioral studies, differences by genotype were assessed by two-tailed, paired or unpaired T-tests with Welch’s correction, except rotarod data, which was assessed using two-way ANOVA for average latency and distance and linear regression for drop speed. Data for males and females of the same genotype were first assessed separately, then combined if no significant difference was observed.