This study involved a total of four hundred and fourteen participants, comprising two hundred and fourteen patients with malaria referred to as cases and two hundred apparently healthy individuals who served as controls. The mean age of the cases was slightly higher than that of the control group and a greater proportion of the cases were females whereas the controls were dominated by males. Regarding employment status of the participants, the cases reported 55.1% for employed, 42.4% for unemployed and 1.4% for retired whilst the control group recorded 51%, 48% and 1% for employed, unemployed and retired, respectively. Also, on the educational background it was revealed that 28% of the malaria cases had attained basic education compared to 30.5% of the control and 43.9% with secondary education compared to 28% for the control group. In terms of abode, majority of the case group were known to have their houses close to stagnant water whilst the opposite was the case for the control group. Also, with the use of insecticide treated nets (INTs), 49.1% of the cases said Yes to whether they use ITNs whilst 93.5% of the control group said to ITN use.
In determining the degree of malaria infection (parasite density) among the cases, it was observed that their parasite density ranged between 75/µL – 84364/µL, with a mean parasite density of 3,520/µL, indicating generally high parasite count. This finding was similar to a study by Ayoyo (2009) and Jalal et al., (2016) who found a relatively higher parasite density (parasitaemia ≥ 5000/µL) among their study participants [15, 16]. In high-transmission areas such as the current study location, it has been seen that a higher proportion of the population may be diagnosed with parasites on the basis of microscopy findings but may be asymptomatic and asymptomatic parasite densities often extend up to 10 000 parasites/µL [17]. Therefore, it is not surprising that microscopy employed in this study was able to show observation of high intensity of the infection.
Regarding haematological parameters, it was observed that the cases had a significantly lower red blood cell count, haemoglobin level, haematocrit level, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, red cell distribution, platelet counts, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, plateletcrit, as well as platelet large cell count and ratio, than the control group. These findings concur with other studies that postulate that high parasitemias are known to exacerbate anaemia due to excessive haemolysis of parasitized RBCs [18, 19, 20, 21].
Furthermore, thrombocytopenia was also observed among the cases which has also been noted by previous studies that increasing levels of P. falciparum parasite density results in a decreased platelet count via peripheral destruction [22]. Another study suggested immune-mediated destruction of circulating platelets as a possible cause of thrombocytopenia in malaria infections, especially those caused by P. falciparum [23]. Another observation in this study was that the cases had a significantly higher neutrophil count than the control group. These findings parallel what was observed in the study of Kotepui et al., (2015) and is also consistent with the integral role that neutrophils play in the immune response to pathogens [24]. On another hand, the study recorded lower levels of eosinophils and basophils for the cases than the control group in line with other studies [24].
A key objective of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist between the control group and the cases with regards to their levels of CD4+, CD3+, CD8+, and CD45+ lymphoid cells. This was to understand how malaria parasites affect the normal profile of immune cells in the peripheral blood [25]. From the study outcome, it was seen that more participants in the control group had normal CD3+ cells as compared with the cases who showed depletion in the cells. A similar observation was made for CD8+, CD4+, CD45 + cell levels. This finding was in line with earlier reports that T cell lymphopenia is a well-established feature of P. falciparum malaria with the depletion attributed to sequestration or apoptosis [26, 27, 28, 29].
In determining the possible associations between the degree of malaria infection (parasite density) and specific leucocytic and haematological parameters among the cases, it was seen that with the exception of haematocrit levels, none of the parameters evaluated showed a significant association with parasite density. This is in line with the study of Bashawri et al., (2002) and Ekval, (2003), but in contrast to a previous study by McKenzie et al., (2005) which found a consistent positive relationship between leukocyte counts and parasite density in Plasmodium-infected patients [18, 19, 30].