Twenty-four women in informal work were enrolled in the cohort in the last trimester of pregnancy. We present data from 18/24 mothers who returned to work. Six mothers were excluded from this analysis: three mothers lost their jobs and did not return to work; and three mothers were lost to follow up before they returned to work (Fig. 1). Two photovoice groups were conducted with five participants each (total 10 participants).
The median age of participants at pre-delivery interview was 28.5 years (SD 4.7; IQR 25.0-30.7). Participating women worked in a variety of informal jobs including as domestic workers (6), informal vendors (1), home-based workers (4), hairdressers (5), fuel attendant (1) and informal tuck shop owner (1). Most participants characterised themselves as employed and receiving payment from an employer (10), but others described themselves as own account (self-employed) workers (8). Participants’ incomes varied between < R1000 (<$70) per month (3), R1000- R3000 ($70- $210) per month (14), with only one mother earning > R3000 (> USD210) per month (1). A summary of participants’ sociodemographic characteristics is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics (baseline quantitative interview)
Mothers
|
N = 18
|
Population group (Black/African)
|
18
|
Relationship status
|
|
Married
|
1
|
In a relationship, living with partner
|
11
|
In a relationship, not living with partner
|
6
|
Education
|
|
Secondary schooling: grade 8–11
|
13
|
Completed schooling: grade 12
|
5
|
Number of children
|
|
None (first pregnancy)
|
1
|
1–2
|
14
|
3–4
|
3
|
Pregnancy was planned
|
7
|
Self-reported HIV positive (all on antiretroviral treatment)
|
7
|
Receives financial support from father of baby
|
18
|
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
|
|
Type of house
|
|
Formal brick/ cement
|
15
|
Informal traditional
|
1
|
Informal shack
|
2
|
Main source of drinking water for the household
|
|
Piped -inside the home
|
4
|
Piped – outside the house but on the property
|
12
|
Piped – public tap
|
2
|
Type of toilet used by household
|
|
Flush toilet inside the house
|
5
|
Flush toilet outside the house
|
7
|
Ventilated pit latrine
|
6
|
Toilet is shared with other households
|
4
|
Household connected to electricity
|
18
|
Household has a working fridge
|
15
|
PLANS FOR RETURNING TO WORK
Before the baby was born, all women planned to take some time off after childbirth: ten mothers planned to return to work before the baby was two months old; six mothers when the baby was three to four months old; and two mothers when the baby was five to six months old. To support themselves during this time mothers planned to use various sources of income including their savings, CSG received for their older children, or support from the child’s father or other family members. A few mothers reported they would continue working from home. Mothers also stated that they would immediately apply for a CSG for the new baby. In practice many mothers returned to work earlier than planned (Table 2). One mother returned to her previous work before the baby was two weeks of age and three mothers were doing casual paid work within two weeks of the baby’s birth.
Before returning to work, participants carefully considered the benefits and risks of the different childcare options available to them. These included having the baby cared for by a family member or paid carer, leaving the baby in day care (crèche), or caring for the baby themselves, either taking the baby with them to the workplace or working from home. Some mothers also considered sending their baby to their family (parental) home, often in a rural area, to be cared for by grandparents.
‘I did think about taking her home (mother’s parent's home) but again I thought she was too young and my parents are quite old and there are other children [there] as well. I also considered the crèche but I was uncomfortable with it because you find that there are too many children and this one is still very young…so I ended up taking her to my neighbour’s.’ (SL05, Photovoice group 1,)
REASONS FOR RETURNING TO WORK
At the time of returning to work, 11 mothers left their baby in non-parental care, three mothers first took their baby to work with them but later left the baby in care, and four mothers worked from home and cared for the baby themselves (Table 2).
The financial pressure of meeting the costs of a new baby and fulfilling financial obligations to the household was the major reason for mothers returning to work. Several women described severe financial pressure, such as being unable to provide necessities, including food, for their older children or pay for household essentials, such as electricity.
‘It was the financial circumstances [that made me return to work early]. The child needs nappies. We also need money in the house. We were relying on the child support grant money but it is insufficient. There are too many things that are needed. It was the money.’ (SM12, return-to-work interview)
Some mothers experienced less severe financial constraints, usually because of financial support from family members, but felt a strong responsibility to contribute to the household. These mothers preferred to return to work rather than rely on family members or the child’s father, who also had limited financial resources. In addition, participants reported that earning their own income gave them a strong sense of independence and the freedom to make their own choices.
‘It is like I have said, that I only earn if I have worked. I work as a dressmaker. If I do not make dresses I do not get any income. The child needs nappies and everything. I cannot be asking for everything from the child’s father. It is better if I can also do what I need to do with the money that I get.’ (SL05, return-to-work interview)
Table 2
Reported return to work and childcare practices (return-to-work quantitative interview)
N = 18
|
|
Age of child on return to work/months
|
|
Less than one month
|
1
|
1-< 2 months
|
9
|
3-< 4 months
|
3
|
5-< 6 months
|
4
|
Above 6 months
|
1
|
Place where child is cared for during work hours
|
|
Mother’s own home
|
5
|
Carer’s home
|
3
|
Creche
|
3
|
With mother at workplace
|
3
|
With mother working at home
|
4
|
Person who cares for the child during work hours
|
|
Grandmother
|
2
|
Father
|
1
|
Other relative
|
3
|
Non-relative or creche
|
5
|
Mother (at work or at home)
|
7
|
CHOICE OF CHILD CARER |
A common theme expressed by mothers when choosing a carer was that they preferred to leave their baby with an older woman who had childcare experience, and were perceived to be more responsible and knowledgeable about childcare.
‘It is much better if an elderly person is looking after my baby because she will know what to do if the baby cries or the baby’s temperature rises. When the baby is hungry; she will be able to see that the baby is hungry. So, I decided to ask the granny from next door to look after her, she knows a lot about babies and there is a lot of information that I get from her’. (SL01, Photovoice group 1)
The preferred choice for most participants, when available, was a trusted older family member. This was also the most convenient and low-cost option for child care, as in most cases the family member was not paid.
‘I know that she (child’s grandmother) is someone that I trust. It is not the same as leaving my child with a nanny from outside. I know that she is my parent. So, in everything I am comfortable. There is nothing can hurt my child, or there is nothing bad that she can do to the child.’ (SL06, return-to-work interview)
Despite the preference for older carers, four mothers reported that their child’s main carer was under 18 years old. In several cases, mothers described how they depended on their older children to care for the baby when they were at work or busy with other household responsibilities (Fig. 2).
Five mothers chose to leave the child with a paid carer who was not a relative, usually a neighbour. Mothers reported they chose paid carers because they were available, lived nearby and were not working. Childcare experience was an important consideration, and carers who were clean and kept the environment clean were strongly valued by mothers (Fig. 3).
A few mothers expressed concerns that carers sometimes prioritised their own commitments over caregiving responsibilities and could be unreliable. In some instances, mothers were not always certain about who was looking after their child during the day:
‘The woman that I used to leave my child with earns a living by looking after children. She is not running a crèche but she just looks after children. If she is gone to order stock [for her other business] she leaves the kids with her children. I am not comfortable with my child being looked after by children’. (SL01, return-to-work interview)
For a few mothers, the unpredictable nature of informal work made it difficult to establish regular childcare arrangements, so they sometimes had to leave the child with whichever carer was available at the time, even if that person was not a suitable carer.
‘I had to go and plait this other woman who was sick, so I knew I could not bring my child with me. I asked this other granny to look after my baby. I told her that I will not be able to take my baby to that house…. the granny said I can leave her with her so I left my baby with her. They told me that she was crying so much that day that I had to come back. (SL01, Return-to-work interview)
Three mothers paid for formal childcare in a creche as they felt this was the most reliable option:
‘Creche is better because that woman (who owns the creche), we sat down and had a discussion, and she said she would look after my child. That woman said that even if my shift started at 13h00, she would look after my child until her father came to fetch her. They treat her like their own child at the crèche. She is the youngest one [laughs]. We drop her off at the crèche at 05h30 and then her father drops me off at work at 06h00 and then he also goes to work.’ (SL08, Return-to-work interview)
The crèche was usually a higher cost option at approximately R250- 500 per month (US$ 15–30), making it unaffordable for many participants. In addition, crèche hours were often fixed and incompatible with the working hours of informal workers. However, several mothers did suggest that they would consider the crèche when the child was older and needed less care.
MOTHER AS CARER: WORKING WITH THE BABY
Three mothers chose to take the baby to work with them, while four own-account workers were able to adapt their schedule to work from home to care for the child. These four mothers had either been working from home before the baby was born or were able to take on different types of informal work which could be done from home, such as laundry and hairdressing.
‘Everything is returning to normal. The only difference is that I no longer go out to people. They come here. I used to deliver for them. I no longer deliver. The people come here to fetch their stuff.’ (SL11, Return-to-work interview)
The main concern expressed by mothers taking the child to work was balancing childcare needs with work commitments. Although these mothers had flexibility in caring for their child, it was a challenge to manage the dual commitments. Many participants mentioned that they were unable to maintain the same amount of work as they did before having their baby, which resulted in a loss of income.
‘There is change because I can no longer work for the whole day or full time. I only do my work when I have time maybe when the child is sleeping. I try to work quickly. But when the child wakes up I cannot continue working. So I stop and the work piles up.’ (SL05, Return-to-work interview)
CHILDCARE ENVIRONMENT
Most mothers preferred that their child be cared for in their own home. It was a familiar environment, and mothers could avoid the stress of dropping their child at another location before starting work. Mothers who left the child with a carer expressed that having to prepare the child added more time pressure to their day and at times made them late for work.
‘It is also time consuming to pack his bag and take him there (to the carer), especially if he is agitated and crying. I have to wait for him to calm down and spend time waiting there instead of selling. I lose some money in the process. (SL12, Baby-in-care interview)
Caring for the child in the family home meant that family members were often available in the house to oversee the activities of the carer.
I prefer that [the] carer look after her at home. My sister is also there anyway. She is unemployed. She is always there. She is older and she can tell if the child is hungry and she tells the carer what to do. The carer does as she is told. If she cannot find certain things, she [sister] shows her [carer] because she is always around’. (Sl12, photovoice group2)
However, mothers expressed many concerns about the childcare environment, regardless of where the child was cared for, even when it was their own home. Mothers frequently described the childcare environment as hazardous because of poor hygiene facilities, as well as proximity to roads or other environmental hazards. Several children were cared for in environments with inadequate access to clean water and safe toilet facilities (Photovoice story 4).
The crèche environment was also reported by many mothers as being unsafe with poor quality care, particularly for a young baby. Many mothers considered taking the baby to a creche but rejected this because of concerns about the environment.
‘The first crèche I went to is on the side of the road and the person who looks after the children looks; how can I say this? She looks like she does not take care of herself. The day I went there to inspect what the place is like I saw the other children who were left by their mothers. One child was eating and the cat there took the meat from the baby’. (SL05, Photovoice group1)
Many of the mothers worried that if their child was not watched at all times they could be injured, and described the anxiety they experienced at leaving their child in hazardous environment, particularly when they first returned to work.
I am thinking about the child most of the time. My mind is not where I am. My mind is preoccupied with the child. So it is not alright. However, there is nothing that we can do. One has to work. (SM12, Return-to-work interview)
The three mothers who took their child to work were also very concerned about exposing their young child to poor safety and hygiene conditions within the work environment:
‘If you are going to be caring for a small child and also be busy with other things on the side you are prone to making a lot of mistakes. A lot can happen, especially since I put her to sleep inside the shop, anything could fall from the shelves and fall on her and hurt her. Those are the things that I have thought about, and the [poor] air quality in the shop as well.’ (SL11, Return-to-work interview)