KLF5-mediated EPPK1 Expression Promotes Cell Proliferation in Cervical Cancer via the P38 Signaling Pathway

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-29332/v1

PDF

Research article

KLF5-mediated EPPK1 Expression Promotes Cell Proliferation in Cervical Cancer via the P38 Signaling Pathway

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-29332/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 08 Apr, 2021

Read the published version in BMC Cancer →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Epiplakin1 (Eppk1) is part of the EGF signal and is involved in cytoskeleton reorganization and cell proliferation. However, the role of Eppk1 in cervical cancer remains unknown.

Methods: The expression of Eppk1 and KLF5 as well as their correlation were assessed by RNA-seq, qRT-PCR, TCGA database and immunofluorescence staining. In CC cell lines, adenovirus-mediated overexpression or knockdown of KLF5 and Eppk1 as well as corresponding assessment of cell proliferation and signaling were determined by western blot and CCK8 experiments. Assays of lucifase reporter gene and CHIP were used to investigate mechanism between KLF5 and Eppk1.

Results: Eppk1 expression was markedly in CC tissues and cell lines companied by KLF5 upregulation. The results of immunofluorescence staining further showed that the increased expression of Eppk1 and KLF5 correlated with progression of cervical tumorigenesis. Overexpression of KLF5 significantly increased Eppk1 expression at transcription and translation levels. Conversely, the knockdown of KLF5 by siRNA against KLF5 decreased Eppk1 expression. Mechanical studies showed that KLF5 activated Eppk1 transcription by direct binding to the Eppk1 promoter. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments showed that KLF5 promoted cell proliferation in Hela by upregulating Eppk1 expression. Moreover, KLF5-mediated the activation of EGFR and p38 signaling significantly decreased after Eppk1 knockdown companied with reduction of proliferating activity, suggesting that Eppk1 lies upstream of p38 signaling affecting cell proliferation in CC. Finally, the expression of Eppk1 positively correlated with tumor size.

Conclusions: Eppk1 may be an effective therapeutic target on affecting EGFR-associated p38 signaling pathway and cell proliferation in cervical cancer.

Cancer Biology

Oncology

Cervical cancer

Eppk1

KLF5

proliferation

EGFR

p38 signal

Cervical cancer represents a major clinical problem as it is globally the most common malignancy of the female reproductive system and usually affects young women [1]. Clinically, its late results of treatment and prognosis are still in bad, the overall five-year survival rate was only 60% [2]. The pathogenesis is still unclear, whereas persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the main cause of cervical cancer, suggesting that the investigation of prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in CC is crucial [3]. The application of high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as RNA-sequence, provides convenient means for finding them in the treatment of CC.

Epiplakin1 (Eppk1), a member of the plakin gene family, is a universal cell linker protein originally identified as a 450-kDa human epidermal self-antigen, expressed in liver, small intestine, stomach, salivary glands, esophagus and skin [4, 5]. Plakin protein is known to bind cytoskeletal myofilaments and anchor at the cytoplasmic membrane junction, which is a component of EGF signaling and involved in cytoskeletal aggregation and proliferation signal transduction of tumor cells [6]. The different expression of Eppk1 has been reported in various cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma [7], bladder urothelial carcinoma [8], cervical cancer [9], and Eppk1 has been studied in pancreatic cancer [10], but the role of Eppk1 in CC remains unknown.

Kruppel-like factors 5 (KLF5) exerts cell biological functions such as cell proliferation, migration and differentiation by regulating many important target genes [11]. Our previous study found that KLF5 also plays a role in cytoskeletal aggregation and proliferation, and plays an important role in the proliferation of cervical cancer [12], suggesting that whether there is a link between Eppk1 and KLF5 may be involved in the pathological progression of cervical cancer.

The present study investigated the role of Eppk1 in cervical tumogenesis and examined whether KLF5 regulating Eppk1 expression affects EFGR activation and its downstream p38 signaling, which will provide molecular targets for clinical late treatment and prognosis of cervical cancer.

Clinical samples

Selection in September 2014 to September 2017 tangshan worker hospital cases cervical biopsy and surgical treatment, clinical data integrity, and did not receive preoperative radiation and chemotherapy treatment, a total of 152 cases, of which the normal cervical 34 cases (control), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in 78 cases (including CIN Ⅰ 31 cases, CIN Ⅱ - Ⅲ 47 cases) and 40 cases cervical squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The general conditions of the patients were investigated, and the age of the patients, age of menarche, number of sexual partners, number of pregnancies, number of abortions, smoking and drinking had no statistical significance (P >0.05). The median age of all participants was 45 and ranged from 25 to 79. After diagnosis, they underwent surgical resection of primary cervical cancer in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Tangshan workers' hospital. The histological types and grades of tumors were classified according to WHO criteria. The stage of each cancer was determined according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2000) criteria. According to the agency guidelines, all of these patients had obtained informed consent prior to sample collection, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of North China University of Technology in Tangshan, Hebei province, China.

Cell culture

Human normal cervical epithelial cell (HcerEpic) and human cervical (HeLa, SiHa and C33A) cancer cell lines were purchased from the Cell Culture Center (Manassas, VA). And containing RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 5% carbon dioxide, 37℃ constant temperature incubator, logarithmic growth phase cells were used for the following experiments.

Adenoviral vector, siRNA and transfection

Ad-KLF5 and Ad-GFP were made as described previously [13]. Hela cells were infected with Adenoviral vector (Genechem Co., Ltd). To achieve RNAi-mediated depletion of Eppk1, we transfected cells with siRNA oligos targeting Eppk1 or negative controls (Genechem Co., Ltd). In this process, we also used the Lipofectamine 2000 reagents (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the operation instructions.

Immunofluorescence staining.

All cervical tissue samples were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde solution, the fixed tissue was dehydrated by ethanol, transparent by xylene, embedded in paraffin, and the sections were 4 μm. The above samples were operated by indirect immunofluorescence method according to the instructions. rabbit anti-KLF5 (1:50, GTX103289, GeneTex) and mouse anti-Eppk1 (1:50, sc-87102, Santa) were incubated overnight at 4℃, Fluorescein labeled fluorescent secondary antibody, Rhodamine labeled fluorescent secondary antibody (KPL) and DAPI (Sigma) nuclear staining. Image Pro-Plus6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc, USA) Image analysis software analyzed the fluorescence intensity of Eppk1 and KLF5 expressions.

Real-time PCR

Total tissue RNA was extracted from the cervical tissues preserved in liquid nitrogen according to the instructions of Trizol kit. RNA was used as template, cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen, USA), and then cDNA was used as template for Real-time PCR. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as internal reference. Apply Primer Premier software, design and downstream primers respectively: Eppk1 upstream Primer sequences for 5'- GGCCATGCCGATTTAAATGC-3', The downstream primer sequences for 5'- CAAGCAAAGTCAGTCCAAGC-3'. The upstream primer sequence of GAPDH was 5'- CGTCCCGTAGACAAAATGGT-3'. The downstream primer sequence of GAPDH is 5'- GAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTCG-3'. Amplification reaction conditions: 95℃, 2min, 95℃, 15s, 72℃, 35s, 40 cycles. Formula 2^-^△△^Ct (Ct as the circulating threshold) was used to calculate the mRNA expression level of the target gene, and the experiment was repeated 3 times for each group.

Western blotting

A RIPA kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was operated to extract total proteins from treated cells, the total protein content was detected by the protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). SDS-PAGE was used to separate the protein samples with 8-12% separating gel and every protein sample added in the well was 40 µg. The separated proteins was resolved and electrophoretically moved to the PVDF membranes. After blocked with 5% defatted milk in TBST at room temperature for 1.5 h, the blots were incubated with primary antibodies for a night at 4℃. The secondary antibody (1:2000) was incubated at room temperature, the membrane was washed, and the film was developed. The β-actin is the internal reference protein. The signals were detected with the ECL system (Pierce) and quantifed by scanning densitometry with the Image J analysis. The primary antibodies includes anti-KLF5 antibodies (1:1,000, GTX103289, GeneTex), anti-Eppk1 antibodies (1:1,000, sc-87102, Santa), anti-p38 antibodies (1:1000, 14064-1-AP, Proteintech), p-p38 (1:1000, 14064-1-AP, Proteintech), AKT (1:1000, 10176-2-AP, Proteintech), p-AKT (1:1000, 66444-1-Ig, Proteintech), p-ERK1/2 (1:1000, cat. no.9101, Cell Signaling), ERK (1:1000, 16443-1-AP, Proteintech) and β-actin (1:5000, 20536-1-AP, Proteintech).

Dual luciferase assays

Lipofectamine-2000 was used to co-transfect pGL3-basic (negative control) vector, pGL3-Eppk1promoter, pGL3-Eppk1 promoter mutation, plasmid-expressed KLF5 or empty plasmid. The concentration of each plasmid was 0.5 μg/well. Meanwhile, pRL-β-actin 10 ng/well was co-transfected as internal reference. At 24 h after transfection, the cells were transfected with empty plasmid (pcDNA3.1) and plasmid-expressed KLF5 (pcDNA3.1-KLF5). At 48 h after transfection, luciferase activity was measured using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) The experiment was repeated three times, and the average value of the data was calculated.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays

The chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was performed using the HeLa cells following the protocol provided by Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). The diluted DNA- protein complex was incubated with an equal amount of anti-Eppk1 antibody or mouse IgG (Santa Cruz) overnight at 4℃ in the presence of herring sperm DNA and protein A/G beads. Chromosomal DNA was purified and analyzed by RT-qPCR. The PCR primers for the Eppk1 gene promoter to amplify the KLF5-binding region were as follows: Forward: 5'TGGGGCCTGGTGGGGGGAAAG 3'; Reverse: 5'GGCCGGCCCCCTCTGACTCA 3'.There were three groups of samples: IgG (negative control), Input (positive control) and Ad- KLF5.

Cell proliferation assay

CCK-8 assay was used to detect the growth and proliferation of Hela cells. Hela vaccination in 96-well plates, 100 μl per hole cell suspension, after waiting for cell adherent to group training, each group have 3 hole, cultivate 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h after 10 μl per hole to join CCK 8 solution, set a zero cell free hole, incubator to 4h incubation, enzyme standard instrument determination at 450nm OD value.

Statistical analysis

Data provided as mean ± standard deviation (x±s) was analyzed with SPSS13.0 (SPSS, Inc.) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). The pathological data collected from the samples was compared by using Chi-square test. Contrasts between two groups were performed through an unpaired two-tailed t test. One-way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons followed by the post hoc Turkey’s test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Eppk1 expression is significantly increased in cervical cancer tissues and cell lines.

To examined whether the levels of Eppk1 would be altered in cervical cancer, we performed RNA expression profiling using RNA-sequence analyses of human CC tissues (n=3) and normal cervical tissues (n=3). As shown in Fig. 1a, mRNA level of Eppk1 was significantly upregulated in CC tissues. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of Eppk1 mRNA in CC tissues was by 8.7 times (p<0.001) compared with the control (Fig. 1b). TCGA database further revealed that the level of Eppk1 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma was significantly increased (p<0.05) (Fig. 1c). Moreover, we also found the correlation between Eppk1 and KLF5 in cervical cancer using the TCGA database (R = 0.18, P<0.01) (Fig. 1d). In subsequent western blotting assay in vitro, compared with normal cervical epidermal cells (HcerEpic), the protein levels of both Eppk1 and KLF5 were increased in the CC cell lines C33A, SiHa and Hela, especially in Hela (Fig. 1f).

In addition, we further performed immunofluorescence staining to examine co-expression of Eppk1 and KLF5 proteins in different pathologic cervical tissues (37 normal cervical tissues, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) tissues (CIN I: 31 cases; CIN II-III: 47 cases) and 40 CC tissues) was detected by, as shown in Fig. 1e. The result showed that Eppk1 expression was significantly increased in CINII-III and SCC tissues accomplished with increased KLF5 (both p<0.05 and p<0.01). Moreover, Eppk1 was mainly located in the intercellular and cytoplasm, suggesting that it mainly plays the role of membrane receptor and skeleton. These data suggest that Eppk1 upregulation is involved in the tumorigenesis in cervical cancer, which is associated with increased KLF5 expression.

KLF5 is a positive regulator of Eppk1 in CC cell.

To further validate whether KLF5 is required for the expression of Eppk1 gene, we generated KLF5 overexpressing and knockdown Hela cells by infecting with adenoviruses encoding KLF5 (Ad-KLF5) or transfecting with siRNA against KLF5 (si-KLF5), respectively. Both RT-qPCR and Western blot results showed that the overexpression of KLF5 increased the expression of Eppk1 at transcription and translation levels (Fig. 2a, 2b). Conversely, knockdown of KLF5 suppresses Eppk1 expression in Hela cells (Fig. 2c, 2d). These results indicate that KLF5 plays a key role in the regulation of Eppk1 expression.

KLF5 regulates Eppk1 expression by direct binding to the Eppk1 promoter.

To demonstrate whether Klf5 regulates the expression of Eppk1 by direct binding to its promoter, using the JASPAR CORE database, we performed a KLF5-binding motif analysis on the Eppk1 promoter, and identified one typical KLF5-binding site in the −1000 to +1 bp of the 5′upstream promoter of Eppk1 gene (Fig. 3a). Subsequently, the Eppk1 promoter and its mutant were constructed and tested by the luciferase activity assay. The results showed that enforced KLF5 expression markedly increased the activity of the Eppk1 full-length promoter. Mutation of −295 to −285 bp region of the Eppk1 promoter significantly decreased activation by KLF5 (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3b), indicating that KLF5-binding site between −295 to −285 are critical for the KLF5-mediated transcriptional activation of the Eppk1 promoter. Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) assay further demonstrated that overexpression of KLF5 obviously increased its recruitment to the site (Fig. 3c). These results indicated that KLF5 activates Eppk1 transcription by directly binding the Eppk1 promoter.

KLF5 promotes CC cell proliferation dependent on Eppk1 expression.

As essential role of transcription factor KLF5 in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in CC, we determined whether Eppk1 expression can influence cell proliferation. As shown in Fig. 4a, Eppk1 expression was markedly attenuated in si-Eppk1-transfected HeLa cells relative to cells transfected with si-Con. Correspondingly, cell viability was significantly suppressed by CCK8 assay (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, enhanced KLF5 expression inducing Eppk1 expression and cell proliferation were both significantly decreased in si-Eppk1–transfected cells (Fig. 4c and 4d), suggesting that Eppk1 is required for cell proliferation in CC. These results suggested that KLF5 mediates Eppk1 expression promoting Hela cell proliferation.

Eppk1 expression affects p38 signal pathway.

Because Eppk1 is a component of EGFR, and Eppk1 expression has a positive correlation with EGFR in CC from TCGA data (p<0.05, R=0.13) (Fig. 5a), we further clarify the EGFR-related signaling pathways by which Eppk1 expression affects the proliferation of cervical cancer cells. As shown in Fig. 5b, the activation protein of p-p38, p-ERK1/2 and p-AKT were all significantly increased (P < 0.01) in Ad-KLF5-infected Hela cells, whereas KLF5 expression-induced p-p38 activation was significantly decreased after si-Eppk1 transfection (P < 0.05), and p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 signaling pathways did not seem to be affected (Fig. 5b and 5c). In addition, we investigated the correlation between the expression of Eppk1 and clinicopathological parameters in CC. The results showed that the mRNA level of Eppk1 was correlated with HPV positive infection rate and tumor size (P < 0.05), but not with pathological grade and clinical stage, as shown in table 1. Taken together, these data suggest that KLF5-mediated Eppk1 expression affecting p38 signaling, KLF5, Eppk1 and p38 co-regulate cell proliferation and the tumorigenesis in cervical cancer.

The present study firstly demonstrates that Eppk1 plays a critical role in positively regulating AKT signaling mediated cell proliferation as well as Eppk1 as a direct target of KLF5. Specifically, we observed that knockdown of Eppk1 expression blocked KLF5-induced cell proliferation via p38 signaling pathway in Hela. Additionally, KLF5 and Eppk1 are co-expressed in human CC tissues and CC cell lines. Our results suggest that Eppk1 may be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Most plakins containing a plakin domain formed by up to nine spectrin repeats (SR1–SR9) and an SH3 domain are expressed in various organs and tissues [14], but detailed expression patterns has not been examined. Eppk1 as a member of plakin family, was expressed in various progenitors and developing and regenerating cells, especially in pancreatic cancer [15, 16], suggesting that Eppk1 is a good marker for development of cancer cells. In this study, we focused on the expression pattarns of Eppk1 in cervical tissues and found that under-expression of Eppk1 is in normal cervical tissues and is slightly increased in CINⅠtissues. However, it was significantly increased in severe pathological changes of cervical tissues, such as CINⅡ-Ⅲ and cancer, which would be similarly to the regeneration and development of injured tissues or cancer associated with upregulation of Eppk1. It is hypothesized that some cancers represent an aberrant recapitulation of normal development, even that further deduction that some cancers are originated from adult tissue stem cell [17]. Moreover, expression of Eppk1 was positive correlation with tumor size in CC tissues (Table 1). Therefore, study of Eppk1 expression might shed lights on initiation and development of cervical cancer. In addition, Marrero-rodriguez et al. found that KLF5 showed a gradual up-regulation trend in normal tissues, low-grade intraepithelial lesions, intraepithelial squamous lesions and CC samples, indicating that the up-regulation of KLF5 expression plays a certain role in the occurrence and development of cervical cancer [18]. We also demonstrated that the co-expression pattern between KLF5 and Eppk1 as well as Eppk1 is a target of KLF5 in CC cells, suggesting that inhibition of KLF5 expression by pharmacologic treatment (such as ML264) may be beneficial for treatment of CC.

It is well known that elevated levels of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a growth-factor-receptor tyrosine kinase, and/or its cognate ligands have been identified as a common component of multiple cancer types and promote solid tumor growth [19]. When EGFR is activated by growth factors, it mainly regulates cell proliferation and other processes through downstream signaling pathways [20]. EGFR activation-associated downstream signaling pathway mainly includes ERK [21], p38 [22] and AKT [23] signalings, which need to explored the potential functional mechanism by which Eppk1 mediates cell proliferation of CC. Furthermore, KLF5 is widely expressed in different tissues and plays a higher role in cell proliferation than in cell differentiation [24]. It has been reported that KLF5 is a positive regulator of the RAS/MAPK signaling pathways, and the RAS/MAPK pathway is affected by KLF5-mediated EGFR activation [25, 26]. Our previous study also revealed the p38 signaling pathway mediated the effects of KLF5 on CC cell proliferation [12]. In addition, Eppk1-positive cells express PCNA (a proliferation marker), which plays an important role in transient amplification of cells [27], and Blagoev et al found that plakin was identified as one of the proteins binding to EGF receptor using proteomics, suggesting that Eppk1 is involved in EGFR-related proliferation signal transduction in tumor cells [28]. In our experiments, we demonstrated that the expression of Eppk1 is positively correlation with EGFR from TCGA database, simultaneously inhibition of p38 phosphorylation by Eppk1 knockdown indicate that KLF5 and Eppk1 co-regulate p38 signaling pathway during cell proliferation, indicating that cell proliferation of CC partly dependent on Eppk1 expression via p38 signaling pathway in context of KLF5 expression, but not the ERK or AKT signaling pathway. Therefore, inhibition of Eppk1 or its downstream p38 signaling pathway may be may exert benefcial efect for attenuation of CC initiation and development.

Overall, the present study showed that KLF5-mediated upregulation of Eppk1 can activate the p38 signaling pathway to promote the proliferation of CC cells. There are some limits in this study: Firstly, the role of Eppk1 in CC cell growth should be verified in vivo; Secondly, some other biological functions of Eppk1 in CC cells still need to be assessed. Last, Eppk1 deficiency in CC model causing a phenotype of tumor growth inhibition is also critical. However, this work excites attention on the role of Eppk1 in CC and gives the direction in future research, contributing to a novel molecular target for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer.

Eppk1: Epiplakin1; HPV: human papillomavirus; KLF5: Kruppel-like factors 5; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; SCC: squamous cell carcinomas; FIGO: Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics; HcerEpic: Human normal cervical epithelial cell; DAPI: 2-(4-Amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Ct : the circulating threshold; Ad-KLF5: adenoviruses encoding KLF5; si-KLF5: siRNA against KLF5; CHIP: chromatin immunoprecipitation; EGFR: the epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; PCNA: Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Cervical cancer (CC) specimens were obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection upon informed consent and approval by Ethical Committee of the North China University of Science and Technology (approval number: 15070). The present study received ethical approval from the North China University of Science and Technology and the written informed consent of each participant was obtained.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81541149), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. H2016209095), 2018 Hebei Provincial Medical Science Research Major Projects (No. 20180729). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Authors' contributions

ZP, QC, JJZ and DM performed most experiments and analyzed data, XL, NH and GHL performed and supervised clinical experiments. ZP and DM conceived the study, supervised experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Quan Chang, Jin-jin Zhang for excellent technical assistance, Xiao Liu, Na Hua, Guo-Hua Li for clinical assistance.

Author details

¹ School of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, 21 Bohai Avenue, Caofeidian New City, Tangshan 063210, China; ² Department of Infection Control, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical Univertisy, No.12 Jian Kang Rd. Shi Jiazhuang, 050011, China; ³ Tangshan Customs, People's Republic of China, Tangshan, 063200, China; ⁴ Department of Oncology, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan, 063000, China.

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(1):5-29.

2. Verma J, Monk BJ, Wolfson AH. New strategies for multi-modality therapy in treating locally advanced cervix cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016;26(4):344-348.

3. Bosch FX, Manos MM. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: A worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(11):796-802.

4. Fujiwara S, Takeo N, Otani Y, et al. Epiplakin, a novel member of the Plakin family originally identified as a 450-kDa human epidermal autoantigen. Structure and tissue localization. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(16):13340-13347.

5. Takeo N, Wang W, Matsuo N, et al. Structure and heterogeneity of the human gene for epiplakin (EPPK1). J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121(5):1224-1236.

6. Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Ong SE, et al. A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(3):315-318.

7. Shen T, Lu Y, Zhang Q. High squalene epoxidase in tumors predicts worse survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: integrated bioinformatic analysis on NAFLD and HCC. Cancer Control. 2020;27(1):1-9.

8. Lee H, Kim K, Woo J, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis identifies AHNAK (neuroblast differentiation-associated protein AHNAK) as a novel candidate biomarker for bladder urothelial carcinoma diagnosis by liquid-based cytology. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2018;17(9):1788-1802.

9. Guo X, Hao Y, Kamilijiang M, et al. Potential predictive plasma biomarkers for cervical cancer by 2D-DIGE proteomics and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Tumor Biol. 36(3):1711-1720.

10. Smith A, Poole L, Dhanwada K, et al. Identification of candidate biomarkers and cancer genes AHNAK2 and EPPK1 in pancreatic cancer. BJMMR. 2016;18(8):2231-0614.

11. Dong JT, Chen C. Essential role of KLF5 transcription factor in cell proliferation and differentiation and its implications for human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(16):2691-2706.

12. Ma D, Chang LY , Zhao S , et al. KLF5 promotes cervical cancer proliferation, migration and invasion in a manner partly dependent on TNFRSF11a expression. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15683.

13. Shi JH, Zheng B, Chen S, et al. Retinoic acid receptor α mediates all-trans-retinoic acid-induced Klf4 gene expression by regulating klf4 promoter activity in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(14):10799-10811.

14. Ortega E, Manso JA, Buey RM, et al. The structure of the plakin domain of plectin reveals an extended rod-like shape. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(36):18643-18662.

15. Sawamura D, Li K, Chu ML, et al. Human bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG1). Amino acid sequences deduced from cloned cDNAs predict biologically important peptide segments and protein domains. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(27):17784-17790.

16. Yoshida T, Shiraki N, Baba H, et al. Expression patterns of epiplakin1 in pancreas, pancreatic cancer and regenerating pancreas. Genes Cells. 2008;13(7):667-678.

17. Dunne RF, Hezel AF. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev. 2015;29(4):595-608.

18. Marrero-Rodrgíuez D, Taniguchi-Ponciano K, Jimenez-Vega F, et al. Krüppel-like factor 5 as potential molecular marker in cervical cancer and the KLF family profile expression. Tumor Biol. 2014;35(11):11399-11407.

19. Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(suppl 4):S9-15.

20. Ciardiello F. A novel approach in the treatment of cancer: targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7 (10):2958-2970.

21. Ohm AM, Affandi T, Reyland ME. EGF receptor and PKCδ kinase activate DNA damage-induced pro-survival and pro-apoptotic signaling via biphasic activation of ERK and MSK1 kinases. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(12):4488-4497.

22. XieZB, Zhang YF, Jin C, et al. LRG-1 promotes pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis via modulation of the EGFR/p38 signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):75.

23. Cao Q, Wang N, Ren L, et al. MiR-125a-5p post-transcriptionally suppresses GALNT7 to inhibit proliferation and invasion in cervical cancer cells via the EGFR/PI3K/AKT pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:117.

24. McConnell BB, Yang VW. Mammalian Krüppel-like factors in health and diseases. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(4):1337-1381.

25. Nandan MO, Yoon HS, Zhao W, et al. Krüppel-like factor 5 mediates the transforming activity of oncogenic H-Ras. Oncogene. 2004; 23(19):3404-3413.

26. Yang Y, Goldstein BG, Nakagawa H, et al. Krüppel-like factor 5 activates MEK/ERK signaling via EGFR in primary squamous epithelial cells. FASEB J. 2007;21(2):543-550.

27. Matsuo A, Yoshida T, Yasukawa T, et al. Epiplakin1 is expressed in the cholangiocyte lineage cells in normal liver and adult progenitor cells in injured liver. Gene Expr Patterns. 2011;11(3-4):255-262.

28. Lagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Ong SE, et al. A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(3):315-318.

Table 1The relationship between expression of Eppk1 mRNA andpathological characteristics of CC

Parameter

Eppk1 low expression

Eppk1 high expression

χ²

P-value

N（%）

HPV16/18type

positive

negative

Tumor size（cm）

≤ 4

＞4

Pathological grading

High and medium differentiation

poorly differentiated

clinical stages

Ⅰ

Ⅱ

21（72.4）

4（36.4）

10（71.4）

8（30.8）

8（61.5）

10（37.0）

15（65.2）

8（47.1）

8（27.6）

7（63.6）

4（28.6）

18（69.2）

5（38.5）

17（63.0）

8（34.8）

9（52.9）

4.42

6.07

2.13

1.32

0.035

0.014

0. 145

0.251

Supplymentaryfigure.TIF

PDF

Journal Publication

published 08 Apr, 2021

Read the published version in BMC Cancer →

Editorial decision: Major revision
04 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received at journal
26 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed at journal
10 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
04 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
10 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
21 Aug, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
23 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
21 Jul, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
09 Jul, 2020
Editor invited by journal
09 Jul, 2020

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

KLF5-mediated EPPK1 Expression Promotes Cell Proliferation in Cervical Cancer via the P38 Signaling Pathway

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1