We contrast a new continuous approach (CA) to estimation of plot level above-ground biomass (AGB) in forest inventories with the current approach of deriving the AGB estimate exclusively from the tree-level AGB predicted for each tree in a plot; henceforth called DA (discrete approach). In CA the AGB in a forest is modelled as a continuous surface and the AGB estimate for a fixed area plot is computed as the integral of the AGB surface taken over the plot. Hence with CA, the portions of biomass in plot-trees that extend across a plot perimeter is ignored while the biomass from trees outside the plot reaching inside the plot is added. We use a sampling simulation with data from a fully mapped 2 ha area to illustrate, that important differences in plot-level AGB estimates can emerge, and that one should expect CA-based estimates of AGB to be less variable than with the DA, which translates to a higher precision of estimates from field plots: in our case study, for a target precision of estimation of 5%, the required sample size was 27% lower for small plots of 100m2 when using the CA and 10% lower for larger plots of 1700m2. We discuss practical issues to implementing CA in field inventories and discuss the expected potential for applications that model biomass from remote sensing data.