This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research
Matched Analysis of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Using Fistula Risk Score According to Pancreaticoenterostomy Methods
Kwang Yeol Paik
Catholic University of Korea
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background
To examine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the better reconstructive method to reduce Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF), after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the fistula risk.
Methods
An institutional database was reviewed for patients undergoing PD between January 2008 and August 2019. 159 patients were stratified into four groups according to the Clinical Risk Score-Pancreatic Fistula (CRS-PF). POPF according to 4 risk groups was compared between PJ and PG.
Results
Of the 159 patients, 82 underwent PG (51.6%) and 77 underwent PJ (48.4%) reconstruction. POPF rate was 15.1% and 17.1% (n=14) in the PG group and 12.9% (n=10) in the PJ group (P =0.51). POPF rates were not different in intermediate, low and negligible risks between two reconstructive methods. In High risk group (n=47), there was 4 (22.2%) POPF in PJ group and 9 (31.0%) in PG group, respectively (p=0.74).
Conclusions
In PD, there was no superior method of reconstruction with regards of POPF, even in high risk glands.
Keywords
Pancreas, fistula, risk score, pancreaticojejunostom , pancreaticogastrostomy , pancreaticoenterostomy
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 22 May, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research
Matched Analysis of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Using Fistula Risk Score According to Pancreaticoenterostomy Methods
Kwang Yeol Paik
Catholic University of Korea
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 22 May, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background
To examine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the better reconstructive method to reduce Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF), after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the fistula risk.
Methods
An institutional database was reviewed for patients undergoing PD between January 2008 and August 2019. 159 patients were stratified into four groups according to the Clinical Risk Score-Pancreatic Fistula (CRS-PF). POPF according to 4 risk groups was compared between PJ and PG.
Results
Of the 159 patients, 82 underwent PG (51.6%) and 77 underwent PJ (48.4%) reconstruction. POPF rate was 15.1% and 17.1% (n=14) in the PG group and 12.9% (n=10) in the PJ group (P =0.51). POPF rates were not different in intermediate, low and negligible risks between two reconstructive methods. In High risk group (n=47), there was 4 (22.2%) POPF in PJ group and 9 (31.0%) in PG group, respectively (p=0.74).
Conclusions
In PD, there was no superior method of reconstruction with regards of POPF, even in high risk glands.