Tables 1 and 2 present characteristics concerning the size of the examined groups of young people and the size of somatic features.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics in/of participants.
Years of study | n (%) | Age (mean ± SD) |
All | Men | Women | All | Men | Women |
2001 | 47 | 12 (25.5) | 35 (74.5) | 21.55 ± 1.32 | 22.08 ± 2.27 | 21.37 ± 0.73 |
2002 | 40 | 13 (32.5) | 27 (67.5) | 21.12 ± 0.56 | 21.15 ± 0.69 | 21.11 ± 0.51 |
2003 | 38 | 6 (15.8) | 32 (84.2) | 22.79 ± 1.28 | 23.33 ± 1.37 | 22.69 ± 1.26 |
2004 | 47 | 8 (17.0) | 39 (83.0) | 22.32 ± 1.11 | 23.00 ± 2.14 | 22.18 ± 0.72 |
2005 | 58 | 11 (19.0) | 47 (81.0) | 22.10 ± 0.48 | 22.09 ± 0.30 | 22.11 ± 0.52 |
2006 | 60 | 8 (13.3) | 52 (86.7) | 22.25 ± 0.75 | 23.12 ± 1.55 | 22.12 ± 0.43 |
2007 | 116 | 37 (31.9) | 79 (68.1) | 21.65 ± 0.91 | 21.54 ± 1.02 | 21.70 ± 0.85 |
2008 | 61 | 21 (34.4) | 40 (65.6) | 21.59 ± 1.78 | 22.14 ± 2.83 | 21.30 ± 0.72 |
2009 | 176 | 69 (39.2) | 107 (60.8) | 20.99 ± 0.90 | 21.03 ± 0.94 | 20.96 ± 0.88 |
2010 | 112 | 33 (29.5) | 79 (70.5) | 20.40 ± 1.70 | 20.79 ± 2.51 | 20.24 ± 1.19 |
2011 | 80 | 28 (35.0) | 52 (65.0) | 20.36 ± 0.83 | 20.61 ± 1.20 | 20.23 ± 0.51 |
2012 | 96 | 30 (31.2) | 66 (68.8) | 20.33 ± 0.80 | 20.43 ± 0.90 | 20.29 ± 0.76 |
2013 | 98 | 31 (31.6) | 67 (68.4) | 20.40 ± 1.00 | 20.71 ± 1.35 | 20.25 ± 0.77 |
2015 | 113 | 30 (26.5) | 83 (73.5) | 21.30 ± 0.72 | 21.23 ± 0.57 | 21.33 ± 0.77 |
2016 | 114 | 26 (22.8) | 88 (77.2) | 21.25 ± 0.64 | 21.27 ± 0.60 | 21.25 ± 0.65 |
2017 | 101 | 26 (25.7) | 75 (74.3) | 21.19 ± 0.50 | 21.19 ± 0.40 | 21.19 ± 0.54 |
2018 | 99 | 23 (23.2) | 76 (76.8) | 21.24 ± 0.73 | 21.30 ± 0.93 | 21.22 ± 0.67 |
2019 | 83 | 26 (31.3) | 57 (68.7) | 21.37 ± 0.85 | 21.54 ± 1.03 | 21.30 ± 0.76 |
2020 | 86 | 26 (30.2) | 60 (69.8) | 21.34 ± 0.82 | 21.77 ± 1.07 | 21.15 ± 0.61 |
n (%)—numerical and percentage characteristics of the size of student groups surveyed; mean—average age of student groups surveyed; |
SD—standard deviation.
The characteristics of the descriptive statistics indicate that in all years of observation, women accounted for significantly larger shares with slightly lower average ages and standard deviations.
Table 2
Numerical characteristics of the somatic features of the examined women and men (mean ± SD).
Years of study | Body height (cm) | Body mass (kg) | Chest circumference (cm) | Pignet II index (n) |
Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women |
2001 | 180.70 ± 5.20 | 165.74 ± 5.15 | 77.33 ± 10.57 | 59.11 ± 7.49 | 94.12 ± 5.73 | 84.69 ± 5.80 | 9.24 ± 11.96 | 21.93 ± 12.11 |
2002 | 183.51 ± 5.54 | 169.25 ± 6.65 | 75.62 ± 5.39 | 60.78 ± 7.37 | 94.23 ± 3.64 | 82.31 ± 4.66 | 13.66 ± 10.25 | 26.16 ± 11.56 |
2003 | 182.33 ± 5.30 | 165.89 ± 7.37 | 87.17 ± 10.61 | 59.81 ± 9.78 | 100.33 ± 5.75 | 82.41 ± 4.93 | -5.17 ± 17.16 | 23.67 ± 12.11 |
2004 | 180.09 ± 3.89 | 166.07 ± 6.34 | 80.88 ± 9.42 | 58.56 ± 9.01 | 96.75 ± 4.67 | 82.01 ± 4.64 | 2.46 ± 15.42 | 25.50 ± 12.06 |
2005 | 175.25 ± 6.40 | 164.15 ± 5.90 | 68.64 ± 9.83 | 59.91 ± 11.44 | 90.73 ± 7.42 | 80.56 ± 7.30 | 15.89 ± 11.03 | 23.67 ± 15.93 |
2006 | 177.38 ± 11.84 | 165.44 ± 5.07 | 77.25 ± 13.88 | 59.60 ± 6.79 | 96.56 ± 5.05 | 81.68 ± 4.10 | 3.56 ± 11.50 | 24.16 ± 9.69 |
2007 | 179.60 ± 5.69 | 167.82 ± 6.32 | 75.44 ± 10.05 | 61.59 ± 9.47 | 91.78 ± 6.17 | 81.04 ± 5.41 | 12.37 ± 15.42 | 25.18 ± 12.55 |
2008 | 180.31 ± 7.18 | 166.69 ± 5.94 | 79.00 ± 9.81 | 58.55 ± 6.73 | 95.05 ± 6.92 | 79.62 ± 4.30 | 6.26 ± 16.15 | 28.52 ± 9.14 |
2009 | 180.99 ± 6.08 | 166.72 ± 6.23 | 77.10 ± 10.62 | 60.36 ± 8.95 | 93.62 ± 6.65 | 81.49 ± 5.01 | 10.26 ± 14.19 | 24.88 ± 11.80 |
2010 | 179.75 ± 6.82 | 167.61 ± 6.10 | 76.33 ± 9.52 | 58.49 ± 7.46 | 94.06 ± 5.75 | 81.73 ± 4.41 | 9.36 ± 10.89 | 27.38 ± 9.54 |
2011 | 177.89 ± 6.84 | 166.62 ± 4.98 | 76.64 ± 8.44 | 60.37 ± 10.05 | 92.43 ± 4.84 | 82.24 ± 5.78 | 8.81 ± 12.52 | 24.02 ± 15.13 |
2012 | 180.45 ± 5.92 | 166.50 ± 5.87 | 79.05 ± 15.97 | 60.49 ± 8.13 | 93.87 ± 3.95 | 79.59 ± 4.19 | 7.53 ± 16.17 | 26.42 ± 9.78 |
2013 | 181.45 ± 6.74 | 167.97 ± 5.75 | 76.76 ± 11.47 | 60.87 ± 9.23 | 94.23 ± 5.73 | 80.24 ± 4.50 | 10.47 ± 11.94 | 26.87 ± 8.86 |
2015 | 179.07 ± 6.63 | 168.01 ± 6.16 | 78.67 ± 11.50 | 61.11 ± 8.00 | 95.63 ± 6.73 | 81.57 ± 4.68 | 4.77 ± 15.75 | 25.33 ± 11.11 |
2016 | 180.85 ± 7.94 | 165.86 ± 5.52 | 82.44 ± 15.66 | 61.14 ± 9.78 | 97.12 ± 8.96 | 82.05 ± 6.32 | 1.30 ± 21.81 | 22.67 ± 15.12 |
2017 | 178.79 ± 5.66 | 166.18 ± 5.81 | 81.88 ± 10.87 | 63.99 ± 11.94 | 96.19 ± 8.02 | 82.88 ± 7.34 | 0.72 ± 17.23 | 19.30 ± 16.99 |
2018 | 179.71 ± 6.70 | 167.16 ± 5.75 | 79.72 ± 10.48 | 61.66 ± 12.03 | 96.61 ± 6.67 | 82.70 ± 7.26 | 3.39 ± 12.18 | 22.80 ± 18.62 |
2019 | 178.63 ± 4.56 | 166.91 ± 5.75 | 79.74 ± 12.12 | 61.92 ± 8.65 | 97.03 ± 8.20 | 82.50 ± 5.44 | 1.86 ± 19.08 | 22.49 ± 11.81 |
2020 | 183.23 ± 5.38 | 168.15 ± 5.76 | 84.93 ± 12.86 | 61.09 ± 10.07 | 104.38 ± 9.81 | 86.89 ± 6.84 | -6.09 ± 20.27 | 20.16 ± 14.29 |
SD - standard deviation.
The men covered by the observation were characterized by higher mean somatic features and mean standard deviations, as well as lower average values of the Pignet II index, indicating a strong build contrasting with a weak build of women.
Tables 3 and 4 show the results of fitness tests of men's and women's teams.
Table 3
Numerical characteristics of the results of fitness tests of the examined men (mean ± SD).
Years of study | General balance (n) | Speed of limb movement (n) | Explosive strength (cm) | Running speed, agility (n) | Cardio-respiratory endurance (m) |
2001 | 7.50 ± 3.48 | 90.25 ± 6.58 | 236.58 ± 17.57 | 196.50 ± 14.93 | 2645.50 ± 385.31 |
2002 | 7.15 ± 4.14 | 94.23 ± 6.17 | 243.62 ± 15.64 | 196.38 ± 10.40 | 2552.46 ± 276.42 |
2003 | 10.33 ± 2.34 | 99.00 ± 17.29 | 229.33 ± 15.46 | 190.33 ± 8.82 | 2339.17 ± 342.59 |
2004 | 9.75 ± 3.99 | 96.62 ± 12.67 | 227.00 ± 20.54 | 197.00 ± 9.77 | 2322.12 ± 373.94 |
2005 | 8.36 ± 3.32 | 89.09 ± 11.93 | 233.45 ± 27.21 | 182.09 ± 15.69 | 2370.91 ± 508.31 |
2006 | 10.38 ± 2.62 | 97.12 ± 18.67 | 221.25 ± 20.83 | 198.88 ± 10.96 | 2268.75 ± 279.10 |
2007 | 8.08 ± 2.92 | 88.70 ± 12.08 | 233.43 ± 16.66 | 193.57 ± 24.64 | 2214.30 ± 365.48 |
2008 | 7.76 ± 4.35 | 89.43 ± 16.36 | 232.10 ± 16.24 | 198.48 ± 22.91 | 2574.90 ± 381.99 |
2009 | 8.51 ± 3.48 | 92.91 ± 10.93 | 241.12 ± 18.49 | 184.29 ± 11.08 | 2660.88 ± 333.01 |
2010 | 8.12 ± 3.43 | 92.76 ± 9.16 | 232.06 ± 16.03 | 190.03 ± 11.89 | 2686.48 ± 261.75 |
2011 | 8.25 ± 3.42 | 95.07 ± 14.19 | 215.39 ± 22.96 | 192.50 ± 18.44 | 2488.64 ± 353.53 |
2012 | 7.73 ± 4.41 | 92.67 ± 9.50 | 223.07 ± 28.32 | 175.97 ± 20.84 | 2641.07 ± 373.10 |
2013 | 7.16 ± 4.53 | 99.03 ± 12.25 | 218.87 ± 20.47 | 205.10 ± 23.00 | 2387.10 ± 368.33 |
2015 | 9.83 ± 5.09 | 95.43 ± 13.55 | 220.23 ± 25.84 | 204.60 ± 23.26 | 2471.27 ± 365.53 |
2016 | 10.27 ± 3.41 | 100.96 ± 12.61 | 221.77 ± 20.56 | 197.00 ± 15.59 | 2381.12 ± 299.85 |
2017 | 8.58 ± 4.67 | 100.23 ± 20.30 | 213.27 ± 23.16 | 215.65 ± 32.33 | 2376.23 ± 340.29 |
2018 | 10.17 ± 4.93 | 98.30 ± 16.83 | 215.00 ± 24.64 | 202.13 ± 23.62 | 2387.61 ± 338.45 |
2019 | 7.96 ± 4.75 | 99.69 ± 12.81 | 229.00 ± 28.13 | 194.54 ± 19.56 | 2399.42 ± 370.01 |
2020 | - | - | - | - | 2575.88 ± 356.12 |
SD - standard deviation.
Table 4
Numerical characteristics of the results of fitness tests of the surveyed women (mean ± SD).
Years of study | General balance (n) | Speed of limb movement (n) | Explosive strength (cm) | Running speed, agility (n) | Cardio-respiratory endurance (m) |
2001 | 6.74 ± 3.72 | 98.31 ± 7.90 | 181.20 ± 17.15 | 213.86 ± 12.69 | 2046.03 ± 197.10 |
2002 | 6.78 ± 2.76 | 99.70 ± 6.70 | 188.26 ± 16.35 | 209.81 ± 15.21 | 2227.15 ± 257.68 |
2003 | 10.62 ± 3.41 | 105.69 ± 23.29 | 174.59 ± 19.95 | 208.19 ± 10.46 | 1882.78 ± 272.72 |
2004 | 9.59 ± 4.96 | 100.46 ± 11.25 | 178.97 ± 20.53 | 214.74 ± 16.04 | 1997.33 ± 345.48 |
2005 | 9.19 ± 4.50 | 100.23 ± 12.01 | 180.94 ± 18.77 | 200.17 ± 15.82 | 1937.45 ± 287.71 |
2006 | 9.15 ± 3.79 | 101.60 ± 11.92 | 177.69 ± 18.34 | 207.13 ± 17.12 | 1818.48 ± 233.39 |
2007 | 9.00 ± 3.29 | 103.62 ± 11.97 | 185.01 ± 19.09 | 206.80 ± 13.80 | 1907.91 ± 356.33 |
2008 | 7.42 ± 3.06 | 100.92 ± 12.90 | 179.62 ± 18.11 | 205.45 ± 12.36 | 2119.88 ± 276.88 |
2009 | 8.68 ± 4.27 | 100.54 ± 12.57 | 185.56 ± 19.60 | 198.07 ± 19.65 | 2145.77 ± 255.08 |
2010 | 9.57 ± 3.41 | 100.01 ± 9.30 | 184.62 ± 18.05 | 206.30 ± 11.22 | 2193.30 ± 178.29 |
2011 | 10.23 ± 4.48 | 107.90 ± 14.18 | 169.83 ± 16.96 | 205.35 ± 13.32 | 2148.87 ± 225.38 |
2012 | 8.14 ± 3.51 | 104.97 ± 12.69 | 175.14 ± 17.53 | 185.23 ± 25.67 | 2211.09 ± 366.38 |
2013 | 9.97 ± 4.75 | 108.21 ± 10.10 | 173.06 ± 16.32 | 216.51 ± 15.11 | 1987.10 ± 275.71 |
2015 | 8.80 ± 4.73 | 112.54 ± 16.67 | 171.00 ± 19.70 | 214.17 ± 15.18 | 2077.02 ± 235.61 |
2016 | 7.81 ± 3.37 | 111.56 ± 19.67 | 173.59 ± 18.03 | 211.92 ± 18.74 | 2183.95 ± 260.23 |
2017 | 9.04 ± 4.08 | 107.63 ± 15.81 | 169.27 ± 21.66 | 220.95 ± 20.48 | 1927.61 ± 260.94 |
2018 | 9.91 ± 5.33 | 109.05 ± 20.32 | 165.97 ± 20.35 | 221.07 ± 35.44 | 1999.54 ± 261.02 |
2019 | 8.00 ± 3.64 | 105.72 ± 12.95 | 172.04 ± 17.09 | 203.81 ± 29.81 | 1991.77 ± 214.29 |
2020 | - | - | - | - | 2102.78 ± 264.30 |
SD - standard deviation.
The examined men, with the exception of the balance test, in which the averages of the teams of both genders had similar values, were characterized by higher average fitness test results and lower average speed of hand movements and the running test, which also means a better result. The size of the standard deviations of the results of the men's and women's teams took different directions.
Table 5 presents a single picture of the size of the Pearson correlation coefficients of the average values for individual features from all the years studied, depending on the selected combination.
Table 5
Numerical characteristics of the relationship between the examined features.
Age | 1 | |
Body height | 2 | -0.01 | |
Body mass | 3 | 0.08 | 0.68 | |
Chest circumference | 4 | 0.09 | 0,62 | 0.85 | |
Pignet II index | 5 | -0.12 | -0.34 | -0.89 | -0.88 | |
General balance | 6 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.08 | -0.14 | |
Speed of limb movement | 7 | 0.02 | -0.22 | -0.18 | -0.22 | 0.14 | 0.14 | |
Explosove strength | 8 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.22 | -0.20 | -0.07 | |
Running speed, agility | 9 | 0.04 | -0.17 | -0,08 | -0.12 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.23 | -0.40 | |
Cardio-respiratory endurance | 10 | -0.11 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.28 | -0.06 | -0.19 | -0.20 | 0.57 | -0.33 |
Factors | nr | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Correction factors of the examined features; |
bold indicates statistically significant correlations p < 0.05 |
As can be seen from the list, the greatest correlations were found between somatic characteristics, as well as between these characteristics and the results of the standing long jump. The highest correlation coefficients of motor features were found between the results of the Cooper test and the long jump, and negative with the results of the shuttle run, which also negatively correlated with the results of the long jump. The remaining Pearson correlation coefficients, which showed statistically significant relationships, did not exceed the value of 0.30.
The relationship of changes in the average annual values of the examined characteristics between women and men was assessed with Pearson's linear correlation coefficients, which are presented in Table 6.
Table 6
Evaluation of the relationship between changes in average annual values of female and male characteristics.
Factors | Pearson's linear correlation coefficient | p |
Age | 0.909 | 0.001 |
Body height | 0.612 | 0.001 |
Body mass | 0.190 | 0.436 |
Chest circumference | 0.656 | 0.002 |
Pignet II index | 0.516 | 0.024 |
General balance | 0.430 | 0.075 |
Speed of limb movemend | 0.633 | 0.005 |
Explosive strength | 0.899 | 0.001 |
Running speed, agility | 0.888 | 0.001 |
Cardio-respiratory endurance | 0.782 | 0.001 |
Correlation coefficient linear Pearson of the tested features;
bold indicates statistically significant correlations p < 0.05
Pearson's linear correlation coefficients, with the exception of body weight and general balance, are statistically significant for the other characteristics covered by the observation. This means that changes in the characteristics covered by the observation were in clear majority similar among women and men.
The dependence of the studied features on time was assessed using a simple linear regression model whose coefficients for women are presented in Table 7 and for men in Table 8.
Table 7
Coefficients of linear regression models for female characteristics.
| coef | P>|t| | [0.025 | 0.975] |
Age (R-kwadrat = 0.173) |
const | 117.948 | 0.034 | 9.716 | 226.179 |
x1 | -0.048 | 0.077 | -0.102 | 0.006 |
Body height (R-kwadrat = 0.066) |
const | 65.266 | 0.491 | -130.475 | 261.007 |
x1 | 0.051 | 0.289 | -0.047 | 0.148 |
Body mass (R-kwadrat = 0.41) |
const | -230.364 | 0.014 | -408.887 | -51.842 |
x1 | 0.145 | 0.003 | 0.056 | 0.233 |
Chest circumference (R-kwadrat = 0.049) |
const | -42.050 | 0.756 | -323.227 | 239.127 |
x1 | 0.062 | 0.365 | -0.078 | 0.202 |
Pignet II index (R-kwadrat = 0.155) |
const | 337.681 | 0.074 | -36.660 | 712.022 |
x1 | -0.156 | 0.095 | -0.342 | 0.030 |
General balance (R-kwadrat = 0.024) |
const | -53.327 | 0.596 | -262.480 | 155.826 |
x1 | 0.031 | 0.538 | -0.073 | 0.135 |
Speed of limb movement (R-kwadrat = 0.579) |
const | -1070.875 | 0.001 | -1602.071 | -539.679 |
x1 | 0.585 | < 0.001 | 0.320 | 0.849 |
Explosove strength (R-kwadrat = 0.51) |
const | 1787.784 | 0.000 | 951.046 | 2624.521 |
x1 | -0.801 | 0.001 | -1.218 | -0.385 |
Running speed, agility (R-kwadrat = 0.029) |
const | -309.836 | 0.684 | -1894.106 | 1274.433 |
x1 | 0.258 | 0.498 | -0.530 | 1.046 |
Cardio-respiratory endurance (R-kwadrat = 0.017) |
const | -3233.886 | 0.744 | -23800.000 | 17300.000 |
x1 | 2.627 | 0.595 | -7.603 | 12.857 |
Statistically significant models are marked with bold p < 0.05
Table 8
Coefficients of linear regression models for male characteristics.
| coef | P>|t| | [0.025 | 0.975] |
Age (R-kwadrat = 0.231) |
const | 157.496 | 0.018 | 30.512 | 284.481 |
x1 | -0.068 | 0.037 | -0.131 | -0.004 |
Body height (R-kwadrat = 0.0) |
const | 194.147 | 0.245 | -145.658 | 533.952 |
x1 | -0.007 | 0.931 | -0.176 | 0.162 |
Body mass (R-kwadrat = 0.12) |
const | -380.629 | 0.224 | -1016.516 | 255.258 |
x1 | 0.229 | 0.146 | -0.088 | 0.545 |
Chest circumference (R-kwadrat = 0.154) |
const | -308.867 | 0.197 | -793.758 | 176.023 |
x1 | 0.201 | 0.096 | -0.040 | 0.442 |
Pignet II index (R-kwadrat = 0.197) |
const | 883.644 | 0.056 | -23.643 | 1790.930 |
x1 | -0.437 | 0.057 | -0.888 | 0.015 |
General balance (R-kwadrat = 0.022) |
const | -51.495 | 0.611 | -262.065 | 159.076 |
x1 | 0.030 | 0.553 | -0.075 | 0.135 |
Speed of limb movement (R-kwadrat = 0.301) |
const | -687.505 | 0.035 | -1320.021 | -54.988 |
x1 | 0.389 | 0.018 | 0.075 | 0.704 |
Explosove strength (R-kwadrat = 0.432) |
const | 2303.467 | 0.001 | 1041.986 | 3564.948 |
x1 | -1.033 | 0.003 | -1.661 | -0.405 |
Running speed, agility (R-kwadrat = 0.117) |
const | -900.244 | 0.250 | -2497.408 | 696.920 |
x1 | 0.545 | 0.165 | -0.250 | 1.340 |
Cardio-respiratory endurance (R-kwadrat = 0.0) |
const | 2513.271 | 0.829 | -21700.000 | 26700.000 |
x1 | -0.026 | 0.996 | -12.065 | 12.012 |
Statistically significant models are marked with bold p < 0.05
For the age of women, the model is not significant and indicates that the value of the feature is maintained at a similar level. For the age of men, the model is significant and indicates a decrease in the average age of students along with the progressive change of the surveyed academic year groups by 0.068 years.
For body height, as well as axillary circumference and Pignet II index in women and men, the models are not significant and indicate that the values of the features are maintained at a similar level.
For women's body weight, the model is significant and indicates an increase in the average value of this feature year-on-year by 0.145 kg. For the body weight of men, the model is not relevant.
For the results of the general balance test, as well as the pendulum run and the Cooper test of women and men, the models are not significant and indicate that the values of the features are maintained at a similar level.
For the results of the female hand speed test, the model is significant and indicates an increase in the average value of this test year-on-year by 0.585 measurement units. For the results of men, the model is also important and indicates an increase in the average value of this sample year on year by 0.389 measurement units.
For women's long jump results, the model is significant and indicates a decrease in the average value of this test year-on-year by 0.801 cm. For the results of men, the model is also significant and indicates a decrease in the average value of this sample year-on-year by 1,033 cm.
The model of multiple linear regression was also used to check which of the somatic and sociometric characteristics adopted for the analysis significantly affect the results of fitness tests, provided that all other indicators are the same. The most important features were selected using the Sequential Feature Selection "forward" method, maximizing the R-square index. Its value and the level of significance of the regression models = < 0.001 determine the predictors, which is presented in Table 9.
Table 9
Coefficients of significant linear regression models for the motor characteristics of the tested team.
| coef | P>|t| | [0.025 | 0.975] |
General balance |
Const | 3.524 | 0.001 | 2.276 | 4.772 |
Body mass | 0.088 | 0.001 | 0.068 | 0.108 |
Male | -1.905 | 0.001 | -2.472 | -1.338 |
Speed of limb movement |
Const | 108.454 | 0.001 | 107.378 | 109.530 |
Fitness exam | -7.012 | 0.001 | -8.417 | -5.608 |
Male | -10.162 | 0.001 | -11.718 | -8.606 |
Explosove strength |
Const | 49.978 | 0.001 | 21.627 | 78.329 |
Chest circumference | 1.247 | 0.001 | 0.934 | 1.559 |
Pignet II index | 0.794 | 0.001 | 0.660 | 0.929 |
Fitness exam | 11.284 | 0.001 | 9.388 | 13.181 |
Male | 48.252 | 0.001 | 45.094 | 51.411 |
Running speed, agility |
Const | 191.517 | 0.001 | 184.928 | 198.105 |
Body mass | 0.275 | 0.001 | 0.168 | 0.382 |
Male | -18.601 | 0.001 | -21.594 | -15.608 |
Cardio-respiratory endurance |
Const | 1275.904 | 0.001 | 773.614 | 1778.194 |
Chest circumference | 15.223 | 0.001 | 10.704 | 19.743 |
Pignet II index | 11.543 | 0.001 | 9.530 | 13.555 |
Age | -35.337 | 0.001 | -48.197 | -22.476 |
Male | 441.987 | 0.001 | 394.859 | 489.114 |
For general balance, R-square = 0.047, p = 7.31e-17, and the model explains the variability in 4.7% with the significance of the whole model p = 0.001. An increase in the body weight variable by one unit increases the balance score by 0.0883 points, which means its deterioration, and male sex reduces the score by -1.9051 points, which means an improvement in the test result.
For hand speed, R-square = 0.146, p = 2.5499999999999998e-53, and the model explains the variability in 14.6% with the significance of the whole model p = 0.001. The physical fitness test causes a decrease in the result by -7.0121 points, and the male sex by -10.1623 points, which in both cases means an improvement in the result of the test.
For the explosive strength R-square = 0.629, p = 0.0, and the model explains 62.9% of the variability with the significance of the whole model p = 0.001. Increasing the axillary circumference by 1 cm extends the standing long jump by 1.2466 cm, and increasing the Pignet II index by 1 increases its distance by 0.7943 cm. To a much greater extent, the result of this characteristic is influenced by the presence of a fitness exam during recruitment for studies, which increases the result by 11.2844 cm, and the male gender extends it by 48.2523 cm.
For agility, R-square = 0.094, p = 1.67e-33, and the model explains 9.4% of the variability with the significance of the whole model p = 0.001. An increase in body weight by 1 kg results in an increase in the result by 0.2751, which means a deterioration of the test result, and male sex decreases it by -18.6008 showing an improvement in the result.
For strength R-square = 0.361, p = 1.43e-155, and the model explains the variability in 36.1% with the significance of the whole model 0.001. Increasing the axillary circumference by 1 cm improves the running result by 15.2234 m, and the Pignet II index increases by 11.5427 m. To a much greater extent, the change in the result of the Cooper test is influenced by age, which, when increased by a year, shortens the distance traveled by 35.3367 m, and the male gender extends it by 441.9866 m.
As can be seen from the summary, body height and sociometric characteristics, i.e. the size of the place of residence, type of school completed and parents' education did not affect the maintenance of the level of the observed motor characteristics.