See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Amelia Ngozi Odo
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-7112
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background Sexual and Reproductive health Services (SRHS) are essential for prevention and control of SRH problems among adolescents and the achievement of sustainable development goal 3. These services may be available but certain factors interfere with their access and utilization by the adolescents. This study sought to determine factors that predict adolescents’ utilization of SRHS in Enugu State, Nigeria.
Methods The study adopted mixed method research employing cross-sectional research design. The population of the study comprised adolescents (12-22 years). Multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select 1,447 adolescents used for the study. Questionnaire, in-depth interview, and focus group discussion were used for data collection. Percentages, Chi-square, and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data, while qualitative data were thematically analysed using NVivo software.
Results Socio-demographic factors of gender, age, education, income and living status (p = < .05) were significant predictors of utilization of SRHS. Psycho-cultural and health system factors (p = < .05) were also significant predictors of utilization of SRHS.
Conclusion The study concluded that some socio-demographic factors (of gender, age, level of education, income and living status), psycho-cultural and health system factors can be used to predict adolescents’ utilization of SRHS. These predictors could be addressed through home sex education, regular training of health care providers on youth-friendly services delivery and policy reforms
Keywords
Sexual and reproductive health, Use, Predictors, Adolescents
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 07 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 06 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 06 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 06 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 25 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 14 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 14 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 14 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 05 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 04 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 17 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 15 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 15 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 13 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 13 Oct, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 06 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 27 Sep, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 12 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 05 Sep, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 02 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 02 Sep, 2020
Editor assigned
On 25 Aug, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 24 Aug, 2020
Editor invited
On 24 Aug, 2020
Version 2
Posted 10 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 14 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 04 Aug, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 27 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 18 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 13 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 13 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 08 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 07 Jul, 2020
Editor invited
On 07 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 29 Jun, 2020
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 29 Jun, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 25 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 10 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 10 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jun, 2020
First submitted
On 26 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Amelia Ngozi Odo
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-7112
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 07 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 06 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 06 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 06 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 25 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 14 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 14 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 14 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 05 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 04 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 17 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 15 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 15 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 13 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 13 Oct, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 06 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 27 Sep, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 12 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 05 Sep, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 02 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 02 Sep, 2020
Editor assigned
On 25 Aug, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 24 Aug, 2020
Editor invited
On 24 Aug, 2020
Version 2
Posted 10 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 14 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 04 Aug, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 27 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 18 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 13 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 13 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 08 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 07 Jul, 2020
Editor invited
On 07 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 29 Jun, 2020
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 29 Jun, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 25 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 10 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 10 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jun, 2020
First submitted
On 26 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
Background Sexual and Reproductive health Services (SRHS) are essential for prevention and control of SRH problems among adolescents and the achievement of sustainable development goal 3. These services may be available but certain factors interfere with their access and utilization by the adolescents. This study sought to determine factors that predict adolescents’ utilization of SRHS in Enugu State, Nigeria.
Methods The study adopted mixed method research employing cross-sectional research design. The population of the study comprised adolescents (12-22 years). Multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select 1,447 adolescents used for the study. Questionnaire, in-depth interview, and focus group discussion were used for data collection. Percentages, Chi-square, and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data, while qualitative data were thematically analysed using NVivo software.
Results Socio-demographic factors of gender, age, education, income and living status (p = < .05) were significant predictors of utilization of SRHS. Psycho-cultural and health system factors (p = < .05) were also significant predictors of utilization of SRHS.
Conclusion The study concluded that some socio-demographic factors (of gender, age, level of education, income and living status), psycho-cultural and health system factors can be used to predict adolescents’ utilization of SRHS. These predictors could be addressed through home sex education, regular training of health care providers on youth-friendly services delivery and policy reforms
Loading...