(Table 1) shows the distribution of patients according to gender, with males having the largest percentage of 158 (79%), compared to females, who accounted for 42 (21%).
Table 1
| N | % |
Gender | Male | 158 | 79.0 |
Female | 42 | 21.0 |
Total | 200 | 100.0 |
(Table 2) reviews the distribution of patients according to age groups, where the two categories: (between 50 and 60 years old) and (between 60 and 70 years old) constituted the largest percentage of the sample, as each of them amounted to 64 (32%), and the category (less than 40 years) had the percentage At least 6 (3%).
Table 2
| N | % |
Age | < 40 | 6 | 3.0 |
40–50 | 47 | 23.5 |
50–60 | 64 | 32.0 |
60–70 | 64 | 32.0 |
> 70 | 19 | 9.5 |
Total | 518 | 100.0 |
(Table 3) shows that more than half of the patients were smokers, with a percentage of 114 (57%), compared to 86 (43%) of non-smokers.
Table 3
| N | % |
Smoking | No | 86 | 43.0 |
Yes | 114 | 57.0 |
Total | 200 | 100.0 |
(Table 4) reviews the distribution of patients according to the incidence of diabetes, and it was found that more than half of the patients were non-diabetic, with a percentage of 126 (63%), compared to diabetic patients, who amounted to 74 (37%).
Table 4
| N | % |
Is there diabetes? | No | 126 | 63.0 |
Yes | 74 | 37.0 |
Total | 200 | 100.0 |
(Table 5) presents the distribution of diabetic patients according to the type of diabetes, and it was found that most of them are of the type-2, with a percentage of 65 (32%), compared to patients with the type-1, whose percentage was only 9 (4.5%).
Table 5
| N | % |
Type of diabetes | Non-diabetic | 126 | 63.0 |
Type-1 | 9 | 4.5 |
Type-2 | 65 | 32.5 |
Total | 200 | 100.0 |
(Table 6) reviews the distribution of diabetic patients according to diabetes control, as the disease was not controlled in most of them, 41 (55%), compared to 33 (45%) in controlled patients.
Table 6
| N | % |
Diabetic control status | Controlled | 33 | 45 |
Uncontrolled | 41 | 55 |
Total | 73 | 100.0 |
(Table 7) shows that the most common complications among patients were: cardiovascular, renal and retinal complications, which had the same rate of 34 (24.3%), and the digestive complications were the least common, with a rate of 5 (3.6%).
Table 7
| N | % |
Cardiovascular complications | 34 | 24.3% |
Neurological complications | 18 | 12.9% |
Digestive complications | 5 | 3.6% |
Renal complications | 34 | 24.3% |
skin complications | 15 | 10.7% |
Retinal complications | 34 | 24.3% |
Total | 140 | 100.0% |
(Table 8) shows the distribution of patients according to the type of infarction that occurred. The largest percentage was anterior infarction, which amounted to 98 (49%), followed by inferior infarction, with a rate of 62 (31%), then lateral infarction, with a rate of 30 (15%), and the posterior infarction had the lowest percentage 10 (5%).
Table 8
| N | % |
Infarct type | Anterior | 98 | 49.0 |
Posterior | 10 | 5.0 |
Lateral | 30 | 15.0 |
Inferior | 62 | 31.0 |
Total | 200 | 100.0 |
(Table 9) shows that more than half of the patients were treated with thrombolytics 105 (52.5%), followed by the CABG procedure with a rate of 78 (39%).
Table 9
| N | % |
Infarction management | CABG | 78 | 39.0 |
PCI | 13 | 6.5 |
Thrombolytics | 105 | 52.5 |
Electric shock | 4 | 2.0 |
Total | 200 | 100.0 |
(Table 10) shows the complications of infarction, the highest rate was for cardiac arrhythmias 56 (34.8%), followed by pulmonary edema 46 (28.6%), and the lowest rate for cardiac arrest was 8 (5%).
Table 10
| N | % |
Shock | 12 | 7.5% |
Cardiac arrest | 8 | 5.0% |
Cardiac arrhythmias | 56 | 34.8% |
Pulmonary edema | 46 | 28.6% |
Mechanical complications | 39 | 24.2% |
Total | 161 | 100.0% |
Studying the relationship between diabetic and non-diabetic patients and each of (sex, age, smoking, diabetes type, diabetes control, infarction type, infarction management):
(Table 11) shows that non-diabetics (86.5%) is the highest percentage among males compared to diabetic patients, and it was found that diabetic female patients (33.8%) among females is the highest percentage compared to non-diabetics, and the highest rates of diabetes according to sex are among women Females (59.5%) compared to males, (P-value = 0.001).
Table 11
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Gender | Male | N | 109 | 49 | 158 (79%) | 0.001 |
%With gender | 69.00% | 31.00% |
%With diabetes | 86.50% | 66.20% |
Female | N | 17 | 25 | 42 (21%) |
%With gender | 40.50% | 59.50% |
%With diabetes | 13.50% | 33.80% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |
The results of both (Table 12) and (Table 13) show that the significance of the test is greater than the level of significance (0.05), that is, we did not find a statistically significant relationship between the incidence of diabetes and both age and smoking.
Table 12
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Age | < 40 | N | 6 | 0 | 6(3%) | 0.188 |
%With age | 100.00% | 0.00% |
%With diabetes | 4.80% | 0.00% |
40–50 | N | 29 | 18 | 47(23.5%) |
%With age | 61.70% | 38.30% |
%With diabetes | 23.00% | 24.30% |
50–60 | N | 43 | 21 | 64(32%) |
%With age | 67.20% | 32.80% |
%With diabetes | 34.10% | 28.40% |
60–70 | N | 39 | 25 | 64(32%) |
%With age | 60.90% | 39.10% |
%With diabetes | 31.00% | 33.80% |
> 70 | N | 9 | 10 | 19(9.5%) |
%With age | 47.40% | 52.60% |
%With diabetes | 7.10% | 13.50% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |
Table 13
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Smoking | No | N | 51 | 35 | 86(43%) | 0.347 |
%With smoking | 59.30% | 40.70% |
%With diabetes | 40.50% | 47.30% |
Yes | N | 75 | 39 | 114(57%) |
%With smoking | 65.80% | 34.20% |
%With diabetes | 59.50% | 52.70% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |
(Table 14) shows the relationship between the incidence of diabetes and the type of diabetes. It was found that the highest percentage was for type-2 (87.8%) among people with diabetes compared to type-1, (P-Value = 0.001).
Table 14
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Type of diabetes | Non-diabetic | N | 126 | 0 | 126 (63%) | 0.001 |
%With type | 100.00% | 0.00% |
%With diabetes | 100.00% | 0.00% |
Type-1 | N | 0 | 9 | 9 (4.5%) |
%With type | 0.00% | 100.00% |
%With diabetes | 0.00% | 12.20% |
Type-2 | N | 0 | 65 | 65 (32.5%) |
%With type | 0.00% | 100.00% |
%With diabetes | 0.00% | 87.80% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |
(Table 15) shows a comparison between diabetics and non-diabetics and the condition of diabetic control. It was found that the highest percentage was for uncontrolled (55.4%) among diabetics compared to controls, (P-Value = 0.001).
Table 15
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Diabetic control status | Non-diabetic | N | 126 | 0 | 126(63%) | 0.001 |
%With control status | 100.00% | 0.00% |
%With diabetes | 100.00% | 0.00% |
Controlled | N | 0 | 33 | 33(16.5%) |
%With control status | 0.00% | 100.00% |
%With diabetes | 0.00% | 44.60% |
Uncontrolled | N | 0 | 41 | 41(20.5%) |
%With control status | 0.00% | 100.00% |
%With diabetes | 0.00% | 55.40% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |
(Table 16) It appears that we did not find a relationship between the incidence of diabetes and the type of infarction, (P-Value = 0.66).
Table 16
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Infarction type | Anterior | N | 63 | 35 | 98(49%) | 0.66 |
%With Infarction type | 64.30% | 35.70% |
%With diabetes | 50.00% | 47.30% |
Posterior | N | 6 | 4 | 10(5%) |
%With Infarction type | 60.00% | 40.00% |
%With diabetes | 4.80% | 5.40% |
Lateral | N | 16 | 14 | 30(15%) |
%With Infarction type | 53.30% | 46.70% |
%With diabetes | 12.70% | 18.90% |
Inferior | N | 41 | 21 | 62(31%) |
%With Infarction type | 66.10% | 33.90% |
%With diabetes | 32.50% | 28.40% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |
(Table 17) shows that the differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients and infarction management are statistically significant (P-Value = 0.04), The highest percentage was for thrombolytics as the most used method for managing infarction was in both diabetics and non-diabetics (47.3%) (55.6%), respectively.
Table 17
| Diabetes | Total | P-value |
Non-diabetic | Diabetic |
Infarction management | CABG | N | 47 | 31 | 78(39%) | 0.04 |
%With Infarction management | 60.30% | 39.70% |
%With diabetes | 37.30% | 41.90% |
PCI | N | 9 | 4 | 13(6.5%) |
%With Infarction management | 69.20% | 30.80% |
%With diabetes | 7.10% | 5.40% |
Thrombolytics | N | 70 | 35 | 105(52.5%) |
%With Infarction management | 66.70% | 33.30% |
%With diabetes | 55.60% | 47.30% |
Electric shock | N | 0 | 4 | 4(2%) |
%With Infarction management | 0.00% | 100.00% |
%With diabetes | 0.00% | 5.40% |
Total | 126 | 74 | 200 |
63.00% | 37.00% | 100.00% |