Phase transformation, which can be examined using DSC, is one of the most important factors determining the mechanical properties of NiTi alloys [12, 13, 26]. The results of the present study showed that Af and Ms of Mtwo were lower than RT, indicating that this non-heat-treated instrument is austenitic at RT and BT. The heat-treated instruments exhibited two distinct peaks during cooling, representing a two-step phase transformation involving the formation of R-phase followed by martensite [27]. R-phase has less memory strain than conventional austenite-martensite materials [28], resulting in superior fatigue resistance [29, 30]. The peak in the heating curve indicates austenite transformation (reverse transformation). VB showed two peaks during heating, indicating that R-phase is present during the reverse transformation. The Af of EDM was higher than BT, indicating that this instrument is primarily composed of martensite/R-phase at both RT and BT. CM, RE, and JIZAI had an As that was similar to RT and an Af that was similar to or higher than BT, indicating that these instruments are composed of a mix of martensite/R-phase and austenite at RT, and the proportion of austenite phase is greater at BT than at RT. These findings are supported by an earlier X-ray diffraction analysis at RT (25 °C), which showed that EDM has a significant amount of R-phase in addition to B19′ martensite, while CM has both austenite and martensite and a small amount of R-phase [22]. VB may also contain a mix of martensite/R-phase and austenite at both RT and BT as well as a greater proportion of austenite than the other heat-treated instruments, as suggested by the lower As (8.0 °C).
The results of the bending test showed that Mtwo exhibited significantly higher load values than the other instruments at RT and BT, indicating that heat treatment improves the flexibility of the instruments. Moreover, CM, VB, and JIZAI showed significantly higher bending loads at BT than RT. Thus, the null hypothesis on bending properties was rejected.
In the elastic range, EDM and RE exhibited similar load values at BT and RT, in contrast to CM, VB, and JIZAI, which exhibited significantly higher load values at BT. This may be explained by the difference in the phases of each instrument at different temperatures. EDM and RE, with a higher Af, may contain a higher proportion of martensite/R-phase at BT than CM, VB, and JIZAI.
In the superelastic range, VB and JIZAI had higher load values at BT than at RT, while EDM, RE, and CM exhibited comparable load values at both temperatures. Superelasticity arises from the reversible stress-induced martensitic transformation, and this process is influenced by the difference in the environmental temperature and Af [26]. The present results indicated that instruments with an Af higher than BT, such as EDM, RE, and CM, may require a similar level of critical stress to induce superelastic deformation at both RT and BT. These results are congruent with an earlier study showing that the bending resistance of EDM is not affected by the temperature change [19].
There are two types of cyclic fatigue tests: static and dynamic [31, 32]. In the static test, an instrument is rotated in a root canal model without back-and-forth movement until separation, and the highest bending stress occurs at the center of the root canal curvature [31, 32]. In the dynamic test, dynamic back-and-forth movement of the instrument simulates the stress that is generated on an instrument in the clinical setting because the maximum point of flexure varies along the instrument throughout the testing procedure [33]. Instruments are never used in a fixed position in clinical practice, and thus dynamic testing is considered more appropriate because it more closely reproduces actual conditions than static testing [34, 35]. Therefore, dynamic cyclic fatigue test was conducted in this study.
The results of the dynamic cyclic fatigue test revealed several significant differences among the instruments and in the same instrument at the two temperatures. Thus, the null hypothesis on cyclic fatigue life was rejected. Instruments with lower bending loads had higher NCF values, which is congruent with the fact that flexible instruments are more resistant to cyclic fatigue [11].
EDM, CM, VB, and RE showed a significantly higher NCF than Mtwo at either or both temperatures, supporting the fact that heat treatment improves the cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi rotary instruments [14, 36] by modifying the phase transformation temperatures [11, 20, 31, 32, 37]. EDM had the highest NCF at both temperatures, which may be attributed to the finding that only EDM exhibited an As higher than BT. According to a previous study comparing CM and EDM of the same size as the investigated instruments in this study (#40/0.04 taper), EDM has an approximately 700% higher NCF than CM [22]. In this study, the NCF of EDM was approximately 500% higher than that of CM, which may be attributed to the difference in the dimension of the model root canals (such as radius and degree of curvature) and the test condition, i.e., dynamic versus static. A previous study used dynamic cyclic fatigue testing to show that JIZAI (#25/0.06 taper) and EDM One File (#25/0.08 taper at the tip) have similar NCF values [14]. This is inconsistent with the current findings. Specifically, in this study, tip size- and taper-matched conditions were employed, and the results showed that EDM was more resistant to cyclic fatigue than JIZAI.
NCF values of heat-treated instruments, except VB, were lower at BT than at RT, supporting earlier studies, which showed that NiTi rotary instruments are more resistant to cyclic fatigue at the lower temperature [17, 18]. The Rf of EDM was between BT and RT, and thus EDM is richer in R-phase at RT than at BT, which explains the decreased NCF value at BT. However, some studies have reported contradictory findings in that the NCF of EDM is unaffected by the environmental temperature [17–19, 38]. The contradictory findings may be attributed to differences in instrument size (EDM One file versus #40/0.04 taper), the dimension of the model root canal, and the test condition, i.e., static versus dynamic. The decreased NCF values of CM, RE, and JIZAI at BT may be associated with the greater proportion of austenite at BT than at RT. In contrast, the NCF of VB was unaffected by the environmental temperature, although a previous study showed that the NCF of VB is lower at 37 °C than at 20 °C [18]. The present finding may be attributed to the lower As of VB, indicating that VB is richer in austenite at RT, and thus the difference in phase composition at RT and BT is less prominent compared with the other heat-treated instruments.
In addition to phase composition, geometrical differences are known to vary the flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi rotary instruments [20]. In particular, smaller cross-sectional areas and core diameters are associated with increased flexibility [39] and cyclic fatigue resistance [20, 21, 40]. In this study, despite the same tip size and taper, the core diameter and cross-sectional shape differed owing to the specific design features among the instruments. Although the present DSC analysis suggested that CM is poorer in martensite/R-phase than RE, the bending tests indicated that CM is more flexible in the superelastic range than RE, which may be attributed to the smaller core diameter of CM. Although VB and RE were similar in cross-sectional shape and area, RE tended to exhibit lower bending loads and higher NCF values than VB. These results may be explained by the phase compositional difference between the two instruments; RE is richer in martensite/R-phase than VB. EDM exhibited superior flexibility, which agrees with earlier findings [11, 17–19] and may be explained by its higher Af and smaller core diameter than the other instruments.
Collectively, the present study clearly demonstrated that, at RT, various heat-treated NiTi rotary instruments showed higher transformation temperatures and improved flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance than Mtwo. At BT, however, some instruments, particularly those with a mix of martensite/R-phase and austenite as estimated by phase transformation temperatures, did not exhibit higher NCF values than Mtwo. In the clinical setting, NiTi rotary instruments usually receive a temperature change from RT to BT, starting from insertion into the canal. After 4 min of irrigation with an RT solution, the intracanal temperature is reported to reach 35 °C [41], indicating that the temperature rise may play a role in the shaping performance of heat-treated NiTi rotary instruments. At present, no evidence has been provided to indicate the extent to which instruments’ properties are affected by the intracanal temperature change. However, the present findings may support the view that testing at RT can lead to an overestimation of the heat-treatment-induced improvement in the bending properties and fatigue life of NiTi instruments. The advantages derived from heat treatment may be less prominent at BT, particularly in instruments with mixed phases, which may exhibit prominent phase compositional differences at RT and BT.
Care should be taken when the present in vitro findings are extrapolated to the clinical setting owing to the following limitations of this study. First, although efforts were made to mimic clinical conditions during the dynamic cyclic fatigue tests, there could be several differences between laboratory and clinical conditions, including the canal shape, friction generation, and length and speed of pecking motion. Second, as an inherent limitation of most studies employing commercially available instruments, several confounding geometric factors other than the size and taper were not eliminated, which complicated the attribution of differences between groups to a single factor [42]. The use of pair(s) of instruments that differ in one particular parameter, such as metallurgy, may be essential to evaluate the impact of the parameter. Third, the temperature conditions (RT and BT) of the present study cannot fully simulate the actual temperature change that a NiTi instrument may receive during clinical operation. Further study is required to determine comprehensively how NiTi rotary instruments perform under more clinically relevant temperature conditions, with tests for other parameters, such as torsional resistance, cutting efficiency, torque/force generation during instrumentation, and root canal shaping ability.