Ezetimibe inhibits the migration of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells.
To determine the safe concentration of ezetimibe on MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells and evaluate its effect on the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells, we tested the effect of ezetimibe on the viability of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells through CCK8 experiments. The viability plots of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells after treatment with different concentrations of ezetimibe for 48 hours are shown in (Fig. 1a).The IC50 of ezetimibe on MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells for 48 hours was 45.71 µM and 34.67 µM, respectively. When the concentration of ezetimibe was 10 µM for 48 hours of treatment, the cell viability of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells was 88.17% and 85.99%, respectively. When the concentration of ezetimibe was 20 µM for 48 hours of treatment, the viability of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells was 81.83% and 76.83%, respectively. Therefore, 10 µM and 20 µM ezetimibe had little effect on the viability of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells. These two concentrations were selected to study the effect of ezetimibe on the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells. Then, the wound healing assay was used to assess the effect of ezetimibe on the migration of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells, and we found that treatment with 10 µM and 20 µM ezetimibe on MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells for 24 h resulted in a significant decrease in the healing rate compared with the untreated group, and the cell healing rate showed a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1b). The results indicated that ezetimibe could inhibit the migration ability of triple-negative breast cancer cells.
Ezetimibe inhibits the invasion of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells.
After observing that ezetimibe could inhibit the migration of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells, we further explored the effect of ezetimibe on the invasion of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells. We evaluated the effect of ezetimibe on the invasion of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells using transwell invasion assays. As shown in Fig. 2, the numbers of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells treated with ezetimibe for 24 h that passed through the Matrigel were significantly fewer than those of untreated cells in a dose-dependent manner. The results illustrate that the invasive ability of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells treated with ezetimibe was significantly reduced compared to that of untreated cells, and ezetimibe inhibited the invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells.
Ezetimibe inhibits EMT in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells.
We found that ezetimibe can inhibit the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role in the occurrence of invasion and subsequent metastasis of tumor cells. Therefore, we examined whether ezetimibe affects EMT in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells. We first observed the cell morphology of ezetimibe-treated MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells after 24 hours by microscopy, as shown in (Fig. 3a). The ezetimibe-treated cells exhibited a cobblestone-like shape as opposed to the spindle-shaped DMSO-treated control cells, with a low infiltrative and migratory competent phenotype, indicating that ezetimibe slows the morphological transition of triple-negative breast cancer cells toward EMT. We detected the expression of EMT-related markers by Western blot assay in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells. As shown in (Fig. 3b and Fig S2), compared with untreated cells, the levels of the mesenchymal markers N-cadherin, vimentin, and snail protein were significantly downregulated, while the expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin was significantly increased in the ezetimibe-treated group. These results indicate that MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells treated with ezetimibe display lower levels of EMT and that ezetimibe can significantly inhibit EMT in triple-negative breast cancer cells, thereby affecting the migration and invasion abilities of triple-negative breast cancer cells.
Ezetimibe inhibits TGFβ in triple-negative breast cancer cells.
We have shown that ezetimibe can inhibit the migration and invasion abilities as well as EMT of triple-negative breast cancer cells, and to define the mechanism of ezetimibe's effect, we used transcriptome sequencing to compare the differential gene expression profiles between ezetimibe-treated and untreated MDA-MB-231 cells, and the gene expression profiles by transcriptome sequencing are shown in Table S1 and Fig S1. We screened 146 differentially expressed genes based on the fold change values and p values less than 0.05. Of these, 44 genes had a difference multiple of more than 2 times, and 102 genes had a difference multiple of less than 0.5. The differential gene cluster analysis plot and volcano plot of transcriptome sequencing is shown in( Fig. 4a, 4b, and Table S2). Based on the fold change values of upregulated gene ploidy greater than 2 and downregulated gene ploidy less than 0.52, we identified 6 upregulated genes and 14 downregulated genes in ezetimibe-treated cells with FPKM more significant than 1 and p values less than 0.05. We then further subjected these differentially expressed genes to pathway enrichment analysis.
The Gene Ontology analysis results are shown in (Fig. 4c and 4d), and according to the enrichment degree q value of the pathway, the upregulated gene is mainly related to the process of toxin metabolism (Fig. 4c), which may be a normal metabolic process after the treatment of cells with the cholesterol-lowering drug ezetimibe. This study focused on tumor migration and invasion; therefore, the downregulated genes were explored. Based on the enrichment degree q value of the pathway, the downregulated genes were related to cell morphology pathways, which are related to breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and EMT that we previously studied. We then filtered out two downregulated genes associated with cell morphology: il7r (interleukin 7 receptor) and tgfb2 (transforming growth factor beta 2) (Fig. 4d). Since il7r is associated with inflammation and immunity 29, by reviewing the literature to analyze the correlation between each downregulated gene and tumor migration and invasion and considering the ranking of the fold change of genes, we found that TGFβ2 in downregulated genes is closely related to the metastasis of tumors. TGFβ2, as a member of the TGFβ family, plays a critical role in the EMT of cells 30–32. Multiple studies have demonstrated that increased expression of TGFβ2 promotes breast cancer metastasis 33,34. Notably, recent studies have noted that a high-cholesterol diet significantly induces TGFβ expression in the livers of mice 35,36. These results guide us to further probe the relationship between ezetimibe and TGFβ in breast cancer cells. We validated the effect of ezetimibe on TGFβ2 mRNA by qRT-PCR, which showed a significant decrease in TGFβ2 mRNA in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells treated with ezetimibe compared to untreated cells (Fig. 4e). We next tested the effect of ezetimibe on TGFβ2 protein expression by Western blot assay. The expression levels of TGFβ in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells treated with ezetimibe were significantly decreased compared with those in untreated cells (Fig. 4f and Fig S3). These results demonstrate that the mRNA and protein expression levels of TGFβ were significantly decreased in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells treated with ezetimibe.
Overexpression of TGFβ2 reverses the inhibitory effect of ezetimibe on the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells.
Sequencing results and validation experiments implicated the role of TGFβ2 in the ezetimibe-mediated inhibition of migration and invasion in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Given that previous studies have shown that increased TGFβ2 expression promotes breast cancer metastasis, we hypothesized that ezetimibe inhibits the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells through TGFβ2.
First, we used lentiviral transfection to achieve TGFβ2 overexpression in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells and verified it by real-time PCR and Western blot experiments. As shown in (Fig. 5a and Fig S4), TGFβ2-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells were constructed successfully. We next treated TGFβ-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells and control cells with ezetimibe. The migration ability of the cells was assessed by a scratch assay, and the healing rate of cells overexpressing TGFβ2 was significantly higher than that of control cells (Fig. 5b), illustrating that overexpression of TGFβ2 in triple-negative breast cancer cells resisted the inhibitory effect of ezetimibe on cell migration.
Similarly, we treated TGFβ2-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells and control group cells with ezetimibe, and then the invasive ability of the cells was assessed by Transwell invasion assay. We found that the number of TGFβ2-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells crossing the Matrigel was significantly higher than that of control cells (Fig. 5c), indicating that TGFβ overexpression significantly attenuated the inhibitory effect of ezetimibe on the invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Overall, we demonstrated that overexpression of TGFβ2 can reverse the inhibitory effect of ezetimibe on the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Thus, ezetimibe's ability to inhibit the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer occurs through TGFβ2.