[1]M. Mandels and E. T. Reese, “Induction of cellulase in Trichoderma viride as influenced by carbon sources and metals,” J. Bacteriol., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 269–278, 1957.
[2]Y. H. P. Zhang and L. R. Lynd, “Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 797–824, 2004.
[3]A. Amore et al., “Distinct roles of N- and O-glycans in cellulase activity and stability,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., pp. 1–6, 2017.
[4]H. Tang et al., “N-hypermannose glycosylation disruption enhances recombinant protein production by regulating secretory pathway and cell wall integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Sci. Rep., vol. 6, no. January, pp. 1–13, 2016.
[5]T. Jeoh, T. Jeoh, W. Michener, M. E. Himmel, S. R. Decker, and W. S. Adney, “Implications of cellobiohydrolase glycosylation for use in biomass conversion Biotechnology for Biofuels conversion,” no. May, 2008.
[6]N. Deshpande, M. R. Wilkins, N. Packer, and H. Nevalainen, “Protein glycosylation pathways in filamentous fungi,” Glycobiology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 626–637, 2008.
[7]J. P.M. Hui et al., “Characterization of cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) glycoforms from extracts of Trichoderma reesei using capillary isoelectric focusing and electrospray mass spectrometry,” J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl., vol. 752, no. 2, pp. 349–368, 2001.
[8]V. Lombard, H. Golaconda Ramulu, E. Drula, P.M. Coutinho, and B. Henrissat, “The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 42, no. D1, pp. 490–495, 2014.
[9]C. M. Payne et al., “Fungal cellulases,” Chem. Rev., vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 1308–1448, 2015.
[10]M. J. Harrison et al., “Modified glycosylation of cellobiohydrolase I from a high cellulase- producing mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei,” Eur. J. Biochem., vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 1998.
[11]I. Stals, K. Sandra, S. Geysens, R. Contreras, J. Van Beeumen, and M. Claeyssens, “Factors influencing glycosylation of Trichoderma reesei cellulases. I: Postsecretorial changes of the O- and N-glycosylation pattern of Ce17A,” Glycobiology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 713–724, 2004.
[12]W. S. Adney et al., “Probing the role of N-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis,” Cellulose, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 699–709, 2009.
[13]J. Kari, S. J. Christensen, M. Andersen, S. S. Baiget, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “A practical approach to steady-state kinetic analysis of cellulases acting on their natural insoluble substrate,” Anal. Biochem., vol. 586, no. September, p. 113411, 2019.
[14]B.C. Knott et al., “The Mechanism of Cellulose Hydrolysis by a Two-Step, Retaining Cellobiohydrolase Elucidated by Structural and Transition Path Sampling Studies,” 2014.
[15]T. C. F. Gomes and M. S. Skaf, “Cellulose-builder: A toolkit for building crystalline structures of cellulose,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 33, no. 14, pp. 1338–1346, 2012.
[16]N. Cruys-Bagger, J. Elmerdahl, E. Praestgaard, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “A steady-state theory for processive cellulases,” FEBS J., vol. 280, no. 16, pp. 3952–3961, 2013.
[17]J. Kari, M. Andersen, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “An Inverse Michaelis-Menten Approach for Interfacial Enzyme Kinetics,” ACS Catal., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 4904–4914, 2017.
[18]A. S. Dotsenko, A. V. Gusakov, P. V. Volkov, A.M. Rozhkova, and A. P. Sinitsyn, “N-linked glycosylation of recombinant cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) from Penicillium verruculosum and its effect on the enzyme activity,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 283–291, 2016.
[19]M. Andersen, J. Kari, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “Michaelis–Menten equation for degradation of insoluble substrate,” Math. Biosci., vol. 296, no. November 2017, pp. 93–97, 2018.
[20]C. J. Bailey, “Enzyme kinetics of cellulose hydrolysis,” Biochem. J., vol. 262, no. 3, p. 1001, Sep. 1989.
[21]A.D. McLaren and L. Packer, “Some aspects of enzyme reactions in heterogeneous systems.,” Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol., vol. 33, pp. 245–308, 1970.
[22]J. Kari, M. Andersen, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “An Inverse Michaelis-Menten Approach for Interfacial Enzyme Kinetics,” ACS Catal., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 4904–4914, 2017.
[23]N. Karuna and T. Jeoh, “The productive cellulase binding capacity of cellulosic substrates,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 533–542, 2017.
[24]J. Jalak and P. Väljamäe, “Multi-mode binding of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei to Cellulose,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 9, 2014.
[25]J. Ståhlberg, G. Johansson, and G. Pettersson, “A New Model For Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose Based on the Two-Domain Structure of Cellobiohydrolase I,” Bio/Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 286–290, 1991.
[26]J. Nill and T. Jeoh, “The role of evolving interfacial substrate properties on heterogeneous cellulose hydrolysis kinetics,” bioRxiv, p. 691071, 2019.
[27]C. M. Payne et al., “Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose.,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A., vol. 110, no. 36, pp. 14646–51, 2013.
[28]D. Chung et al., “Glycosylation Is Vital for Industrial Performance of Hyperactive Cellulases,” ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 4792–4800, 2019.
[29]M. H. Momeni et al., “Structural, biochemical, and computational characterization of the glycoside hydrolase family 7 cellobiohydrolase of the tree-killing fungus heterobasidion irregulare,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 288, no. 8, pp. 5861–5872, 2013.
[30]C. Schiano-di-Cola et al., “Systematic deletions in the cellobiohydrolase (CBH) Cel7A from the fungus Trichoderma reesei reveal flexible loops critical for CBH activity,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 294, no. 6, pp. 1807–1815, 2019.
[31]A. Nakamura et al., “The tryptophan residue at the active site tunnel entrance of trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel7A is Important for initiation of degradation of crystalline cellulose,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 288, no. 19, pp. 13503–13510, 2013.
[32]J. Kari, J. Olsen, K. Borch, N. Cruys-bagger, K. Jensen, and P. Westh, “Kinetics of Cellobiohydrolase ( Cel7A) Variants with Lowered,” vol. 289, no. 47, pp. 32459–32468, 2014.
[33]V. O. A. Pellegrini et al., “Reversibility of substrate adsorption for the cellulases Cel7A, Cel6A, and Cel7B from Hypocrea jecorina,” Langmuir, vol. 30, no. 42, pp. 12602–12609, 2014.
[34]N. Cruys-Bagger, H. Tatsumi, G. R. Ren, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “Transient Kinetics and Rate-Limiting Steps for the Processive Cellobiohydrolase Cel7A: Effects of Substrate Structure and Carbohydrate Binding Domain,” Biochemistry, vol. 52, no. 49, pp. 8938–8948, 2013.
[35]P. Väljamäe, V. Sild, A. Nutt, G. Pettersson, and G. Johansson, “Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I,” Eur. J. Biochem., vol. 266, no. 2, pp. 327–334, 1999.
[36]M. V. Rubio et al., “Redesigning N-glycosylation sites in a GH3 β-xylosidase improves the enzymatic efficiency,” Biotechnol. Biofuels, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019.
[37]K. Borch et al., “Cellobiohydrolase variants and polynucleotides encoding same.” Google Patents, 2016.
[38]T. H. Sørensen, N. Cruys-Bagger, M. S. Windahl, S. F. Badino, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “Temperature effects on kinetic parameters and substrate affinity of Cel7A cellobiohydrolases,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 290, no. 36, pp. 22193–22202, 2015.
[39]Y.-H. P. Zhang, J. Cui, L. R. Lynd, and L. R. Kuang, “A Transition from Cellulose Swelling to Cellulose Dissolution by o-Phosphoric Acid: Evidence from Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Supramolecular Structure,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 644–648, 2006.
[40]S. J. Christensen, J. Kari, S. F. Badino, K. Borch, and P. Westh, “Rate-limiting step and substrate accessibility of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei,” FEBS J., vol. 285, no. 23, pp. 4482–4493, 2018.
[41]M. Lever, “Calorimetric Determination and Acid Fluorometric with Hydrazide,” Anal. Biochem., vol. 281, pp. 274–281, 1973.
[42]H. M. Berman, “The Protein Data Bank,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 235–242, Jan. 2000.
[43]B.C. Knott et al., “The Mechanism of Cellulose Hydrolysis by a Two-Step, Retaining Cellobiohydrolase Elucidated by Structural and Transition Path Sampling Studies,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 321–329, Jan. 2013.
[44]R. Danne et al., “doGlycans –Tools for Preparing Carbohydrate Structures for Atomistic Simulations of Glycoproteins, Glycolipids, and Carbohydrate Polymers for GROMACS,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2401–2406, Oct. 2017.
[45]J. Kraulis et al., “Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing.,” Gritzali & Brown, 1989.
[46]M. J. Harrison et al., “Modified Glycosylation of Cellobiohydrolase I from a High Cellulase-producing Mutant Strain of Trichoderma Reesei.,” Eur. J. Biochem., vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 119–27, Aug. 1998.
[47]C. M. Payne, W. Jiang, M. R. Shirts, M. E. Himmel, M. F. Crowley, and G. T. Beckham, “Glycoside Hydrolase Processivity Is Directly Related to Oligosaccharide Binding Free Energy,” JACS, 2013.
[48]J. Sunhwan, K. Taehoon, I. G. Vidyashankara, and I. Wonpil, “CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1859–1865, Aug. 2008.
[49]R. B. Best et al., “Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ 1 and χ 2 Dihedral Angles,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 8, pp. 3257–3273, 2012.
[50]O. Guvench et al., “CHARMM Additive All-Atom Force Field for Carbohydrate Derivatives and Its Utility in Polysaccharide and Carbohydrate–Protein Modeling,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 3162–3180, Oct. 2011.
[51]M. J. Abraham et al., “GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers,” SoftwareX, vol. 1–2, pp. 19–25, Sep. 2015.
[52]S. Páll, M. J. Abraham, C. Kutzner, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, “Tackling Exascale Software Challenges in Molecular Dynamics Simulations with GROMACS,” in Solving Software Challenges for Exascale, 2015, pp. 3–27.
[53]C. Kutzner, R. Apostolov, B. Hess, and H. Grubmüller, “Scaling of the GROMACS 4.6 molecular dynamics code on SuperMUC.”
[54]S. Pronk et al., “GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit,” Bioinformatics, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 845–854, Apr. 2013.
[55]B. Hess, C. Kutzner, D. van der Spoel, and E. Lindahl, “GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 435–447, Mar. 2008.
[56]D. Van Der Spoel, E. Lindahl, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark, and H. J. C. Berendsen, “GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 1701–1718, Dec. 2005.
[57]E. Lindahl, B. Hess, and D. van der Spoel, “GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis,” Mol. Model. Annu., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 306–317, Aug. 2001.
[58]H. Berendsen, D. van der Spoel, and R. Drunen, “GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comp. Phys. Comm. 91, 43 –56,” Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 91, pp. 43–56, 1995.
[59]A. Bondi, “van der Waals Volumes and Radii,” J. Phys. Chem., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 441–451, 1963.
[60]W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, “Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 926–935, Jul. 1983.
[61]T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, “Particle mesh Ewald: An N log( N) method for Ewald sums in large systems,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 10089–10092, Jun. 1993.
[62]L. Verlet, “Computer ‘Experiments’ on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules,” Phys. Rev., vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 98–103, Jul. 1967.
[63]B. Hess, H. Bekker, H. J. C. Berendsen, and J. G. E. M. Fraaije, “LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1463–1472, Sep. 1997.
[64]H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P.M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, “Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 3684–3690, Oct. 1984.
[65]G. Bussi, T. Zykova-Timan, and M. Parrinello, “Isothermal-isobaric molecular dynamics using stochastic velocity rescaling,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 130, no. 7, p. 074101, Feb. 2009.
[66]J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson, “CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 4673–4680, 1994.
[67]S. Kumar, G. Stecher, M. Li, C. Knyaz, and K. Tamura, “MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms,” Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1547–1549, 2018.
[68]S. Whelan and N. Goldman, “A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach,” Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 691–699, 2001.