2.1 Study design and selection criteria of patients
This study evaluated the performance of a new KB staining test on a nonpregnant population with a high rate of hemoglobin abnormalities and compared the results with those obtained with the Shepard technique currently used in our laboratory. We ensured that none of the patients included in the study were pregnant by verifying in the medical files the possibility of a pregnancy or the recent history of a negative total human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test.
We selected patients for whom the results of hemoglobin electrophoresis and blood grouping were available from December/29/2020 to February/04/2021.The samples were provided by the laboratory of biochemistry in the CHU Saint Etienne, and represents the blood that remains after the prescribed analysis has been carried out. Sixteen O + patients, one O − patient, nine A + patients, and four B + patients aged between 18 and 79 years old met these criteria. The blood samples were used respecting the conservation time of a maximum of 1 month at + 4°C in a biochemistry laboratory.
As a positive control to evaluate the fetal RBC counting accuracy, we spiked in the patient samples newborn blood of phenotype O obtained from the EFS used currently as a reagent.
The newborn blood was diluted with the adult blood at a volume ratio of 1/100 to achieve approximately 140 fetal RBCs to 10,000 adult RBCs. The smears were carried out on the same day that the newborn mixture was prepared, according to the procedure currently used in the immunohematology laboratory. Each patient had four smears: two native smears, expected negative (without fetal RBCs) and two smears containing the newborn/patient blood mixture, expected positive. One negative and one positive smear were stained using the Shepard method, and two others smears were stained using the new method, described above. Therefore, the drying time was the same for each couple of slides.
To obtain the number of fetal RBCs in each mixture preparation, we used data from complete blood count. We divided the RBC count per mL of newborn blood used to prepare the mixture by the RBC count per mL of the patient, ratio (newborn RBC/adult RBC) multiplied by 100, resulting in a reference value for accuracy evaluation.
2.2 Staining technique
The blood samples for KB test are diluted 1/3 in physiologic serum. The smears are performed and dried for a minimum of 30 minutes. For each smear, exactly 5 µL of diluted blood was used. We standardized this quantity because in previous observations (data not shown), the elution was reversed proportionally with the quantity of blood on the slide.
In the Shepard technique (Fig. 1A), the slides arranged in a slide bank are immersed for 5 minutes in a fixation solution containing 80% ethanol. After a drying step, they are immersed in a solution of iron, chlorohydric acid, and hematoxylin for 20 seconds. In this step, the slides are eluted by the acidic environment, and the acidic cellular structures are stained blue by hematoxylin. After washing with tap water, the bank of slides was immersed in the 1% erythrosine solution for red staining of the alkaline compounds present in the cells, such as noneluted hemoglobin and the cell membrane.
For the new method (Fig. 1B), we considered a fixation of 15 minutes to be acceptable, using the same 80% alcoholic solution used in the Shepard method. This fixation is shorter than 60 minutes used in the original KB technique, and did not remove the cells from the slide by the acid, which could disrupt the ratio adult/fetal RBCs. After, we used two steps for elution and hematoxylin staining. The elution is the most important step in this technique, and a substantial number of experiments and outcomes were required to determine the best formula. To acquire simple reactant solutions that were easy to find and reasonably priced, we chose to make a solution of acetic acid 1/1000, using 0.9% NaCl and 0.2% bovine serum albumin solution. This solution’s pH was measured with an Accumet AB 150 (produced by Fisherbrand™) and was determined to be 3.09, adequate for an effective elution. We also chose to retain the original temperature recommendation for the eluent (37°C).
In fact, we tested a theory relying on the osmolarity gradient. The fixation was performed with an alcoholic solution, so the cells were fixed at their original size and dehydrated after the drying step. The hyperosmotic acid solution, measured at 530 mOsm/kg, leads to protein denaturation, normally contributing to cell fixation. The acid penetrates the cell, solubilizes and denatures the hemoglobin, and facilitates the hemoglobin wash. In the wash step, which is performed with deionised water measured at 0 mOsm/kg, the cells that contain hemoglobin become larger because the water is retained in the cell by osmotic forces, and the eluted cells, which do not have as much osmotic potential inside, become smaller. This process facilitates the elution and the creation of a size difference between the eluted and non-eluted cells.
In the final formula, bovine serum albumin acted as a membrane stabilizer, and the acetic acid, even if it forms dimers, easily crossed the membrane barrier to react with hemoglobin. Ten seconds was considered adequate for slide immersion, but we allowed the reaction to continue for another 90–120 seconds before washing, with the slide slightly angled to facilitate fluid movement. In the 10-second immersion step, the acid enters the cells; in the reaction step, the adult hemoglobin is solubilized, and a red–brown liquid running down the slide can be seen, confirming that the elution worked. The slide is then washed under tap water for at least 10 seconds. The advantage of this method is a considerable decrease in the volume of elution solution used; this is because most of the eluted hemoglobin is removed during the wash, so it does not contaminate the existing solution. With this modification, we expect a more efficient slide elution with less hemoglobin residue along with an increased stability time of the reactant and more uniform slide results. It must be noted that the elution is directly dependent on the smear thickness (to obtain reproducible results, all the smears must have the same cellular load).
The next step is the blue staining, for which the classical methods use hematoxylin. One of the problems is the poor staining of eluted cell membranes and white cells, especially lymphocytes, which have the same dimensions as fetal erythrocytes, causing these cells to easily be misclassified (3). We conducted experiments with May Grunwald Giemsa (MGG) stain applied to an eluted smear using the staining protocol used in the hematology laboratory. The white blood cells were more visible, but the fetal cells became grey and were barely visible on the slide. Therefore, the two methods were combined by mixing the methylene blue and still using the erythrosine at the end. We expect that methylene blue will reduce errors due to inexperienced users confusing fetal RBCs with small nucleated cells. Our preferred incubation time was 3 minutes, but the color contrast and intensity can be adjusted according to the operator’s preferences. The washing step after the staining is very important; it must be performed under tap water for at least 10 seconds.
The last step of the staining is the same as that in the Shepard method: 3 minutes of erythrosine followed by a wash. The slide reading is performed using a microscope with a blue filter and the condenser set to 2/10.
2.3 Smear reading data collection
Fetal RBC counting was performed under an optical microscope with 40× magnification and an ocular lens grid with 100 squares. We counted the number of adult RBCs on the 10 squares (comprising the diagonal) and the fetal cells in 100 squares. We repeated this procedure fifty times and subsequently estimated the number of adult RBCs between 10,000 and 20,000 (7). To calculate the final result, we multiplied the total number of fetal RBCs in 5000 squares by 100 and divided it by the number of all adult RBCs in 500 squares; the result was the number of fetal cells observed per 10,000 adult RBCs. The counting of each smear was recorded on paper and the final result was integrated into an Excel sheet.
Two operators read all 120 slides. The four slides for each patient were grouped together, and they were read in the following order: None of the slides was labeled with the pathology of the patient, and the order of the patient’s reading was not important. Each operator was blinded to the results obtained by the other. Before each reading, all operators were assessed for eye accommodation using a positive case.
All the slides were classified as positive or negative using the threshold of 5 fetal RBCs/10,000 adult RBCs. The average of the two counts and the variation coefficient between the two slide readings was calculated. Using the expected values of fetal RBC in the blood mixture, we were able to evaluate the accuracy of each fetal RBC count with the two staining methods. We calculate the median of these accuracy values and of the standard deviation, for the two techniques, for comparison purpose and we evaluate the sensitivity and the specificity of each staining method. Quantitative data of fetal cells reported to 10000 adult RBC for the 30 patients are presented as medians (quartile 1 [Q1]–quartile 3 [Q3]) (as the data did not follow a normal distribution). In addition, considering the hemoglobin electrophoresis results for each patient, the correlation between the value of the ambiguous RBCs and the percentage of the hemoglobin other than HbA was assessed.
2.4 Statistics
The statistical data were analyzed using R software produced by the CRAN project, version i386 4.1.2. We used nonparametric tests for comparison, such as the Wilcoxon test, and the correlation was assessed by Spearman correlation. The average, median, quartiles and standard deviation were calculated in the Microsoft Office Excel (version 2016).