In present study, we present cases with selective feticide in DCDA twins with PV-PROM of upper sac having favorable outcomes, including low risk of oligohydramnios. Compared with the expectant management group, more cases attaining at least 32 weeks in the selective feticide group. However, there was no significantly difference in the obstetric outcomes in DCDA twins with PV-PROM of lower sac whether selective feticide was performed or not.
Zajicek and colleagues[11] reported that 13 cases of PV-PROM following selective feticide delivered at 39 weeks, which was greater than that 30 weeks of gestation in cases underwent expectantly management. The cases complicated with intrauterine infection were excluded, resulting in the median gestational age at delivery in above study was substantially longer than our study. The improvement of neonatal care might indicate the higher survival rate. Furthermore, in another study, 6 DCDA twins with PV-ROM following selective feticide delivered at 33–40 weeks, while 3 patients delivered before 32 weeks with expectant management[12]. It’s seeming that selective feticide have an advantage over expectant management. The interval time between ROM and delivery in selective feticide group was longer than that in expectant management group, but not reach significant, probable due to the small number of cases.
For all cases from PV-PROM of upper sac, the gestational age at delivery reaching 33.9 ± 4.9 weeks was far greater in the selective feticide group compared with 26.6 ± 6.2 weeks in expectant management group. In addition, a lower rate of preterm delivery before 32 weeks of 16.7% in selective feticide group compared to 85.7% in the expectant management group. It’s potential that an intact lower sac might protect the fetuses with ROM of upper sac. Previous study showed that the incidence of intrauterine infection was 15% and all in the cases with expectant management. However, in present study, the risk of intrauterine infection was up to 71.4% in expectant management group compared to 16.7% in the selective feticide group.
Nevertheless, selective feticide for cases with PV-ROM of lower sac showed no benefit compared with expectant management. No cases delivered after 32 weeks of gestation. It’s still conventual to perform selective feticide for the DCDA twins of PV-PROM. Most of literature focused on the twins with PV-ROM was small series. Dinsmoor[8] observed that the survival rate was only 30% in 10 twins with PV-ROM following expectantly managed. In a retrospective cohort which included 27 DCDA twins with PV-ROM following expectant management, Wagner[12] reported 60% of cases delivered after 24 weeks and the survival rate of fetus without major complications were 40%. De Catte and co-workers[7] described that none of nine cases of PV-PROM with expectant management delivered after 30 weeks of gestation. In accordance with previous study, the median gestational age at delivery from expectant management group in present study was 24.9 ± 5.5 weeks.
To the best of our knowledge, no larger study that assesses the optimal management for the DCDA twins with PV-ROM. Our results showed important information that could consulting the DCDA twins with this uncommon condition. Based on our results, selective feticide showed a possible trend for favorable outcomes, especially for the cases with PV-ROM of upper sac. More cases with ROM of lower sac in selective feticide group could possibly impact the results, because the prognosis of impaired lower sac is poor than the prognosis of intact lower sac. The potential risk in prolongation of pregnancy should be considered when we consult with patients.
It’s the first study that reported selective feticide can be offered for DCDA pregnancies with PV-ROM of upper sac. When patients with PV-ROM required maintain pregnancy despite the risk, selective feticide seemed to be associated with an excellent outcome in the neonates owing to prolonged gestational age at delivery. The main limitation of present study is the small number of cases in our cohort, which is due to the rarity of PV-ROM in DCDA twins. A large series should be further studied. Another disadvantage is the retrospective nature of present study which leading to the validity of the data limited by selection bias. Numerous potential confounders, including antibiotic regimen, prior abortion, group B streptococcus status, might influence the obstetric outcomes in this study. When accounting for the reduced fetus after selective feticide, the survival rate of fetus in the expectant management group seems high.