2.1 Materials
The fibroin-deficient mutant silk cocoons were produced by 180 Nd-s silkworms that were preserved in our lab. Genipin (98%) was purchased from Linchuan Zhixin Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and ninhydrin were obtained from BBI life sciences (Shanghai, China).
2.2 Extraction of sericin solution
Sericin was isolated from the natural fibroin-deficient mutant silk cocoons (Bombyx mori, 180 Nd-s) according to the method as our previous report [26]. Briefly, the cocoons were ground into powder, and then the powder was mixed with ultrapure water thoroughly. The mixture was treated at 121oC for 30 minutes. The obtained soup was centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5min to collect the supernatant sericin solution. The concentration of sericin solution was determined by the oven drying method. The molecular weight distribution of sericin was detected by SDS-page method.
2.3 Free amino group content detection
The content of free amino groups in the sericin was determined by ninhydrin colorimetry method according to the previous report with slight modifications [28]. Glycine was employed as a reference standard. Firstly, glycine was dissolved and diluted into different concentrations (0.01 mg/ml, 0.02 mg/ml, 0.03 mg/ml, 0.04 mg/ml, and 0.05 mg/ml) of solution using ultra-pure water. The glycine solution, ninhydrin ethanol solution (2%, w/v,) and PBS (pH 6.8) were mixed at a constant volume ratio of 1:2:2. Then the mixture was bathed in a hot water at 100℃ for 15 min. After that, the samples were taken out and cooled at room temperature. The absorbance value of samples was measured at 570 nm using a spectrophotometer. A linear standard curve was drawn, plotting the average absorbance values obtained for the mixture triplicate values against the standard glycine concentration. Then the glycine solution was replaced by sericin solution in the above reaction system and the absorbance values of sericin solution samples were obtained. At last, these absorbance values were brought into standard curve equation and then the free amino group content in the sericin solution can be worked out.
2.4 Amino Acid Analysis
The amino acid composition of sericin protein was determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Briefly, 1 g freeze-dried sericin sample was hydrolyzed by 20 ml HCl (6 M) at 110℃ for 24 h in a blast drying oven. The hydrolyzed sample was transferred into a colorimetric tube and diluted with deionized water to 25 ml when its temperature drops to the environment. Next, 1 ml clear solution was collected and blow-dried in the water bath at 85℃. After that, 1 ml water was added and blow-dried again. The 10 ml HCl (0.02 M) was added and shaken well. Then, 500 µl solution was taken out and mixed with 250 µl phenyl isothiocyanate acetonitrile (0.1 M) and 250 µl triethylamine acetonitrile (1 M). 1 hour later, 2 ml n-hexane was added, and mixed well. The reacted sample was then placed statically for a period. The lower solution was tested on a high-performance liquid chromatograph (Agilent 1260) after it was filtered through 0.45 µm organic membranes.
2.5 Preparation of sterile robust sericin hydrogel
Genipin was diluted with ultra-water and filtered with a 0.22 µm filter membrane. Then the genipin solution was dried at 25oC in a sterile environment. The dried genipin was added into sericin solution according to genipin and free amino groups of sericin solution with a constant mole ratio of 1:2. Then, the reaction buffer was mixed sufficiently and formed into a hydrogel in a clean environment at room temperature. The hydrogel was defined as n% sericin hydrogel according to the concentration of sericin solution (n%, w/v) that was mixed with genipin.
2.6 Gelation time of sericin hydrogel
Gelation time was determined according to a previously described method [8]. The sericin solution and genipin solution were mixed fully, followed by loading them into a vial tube. The gelation time was obtained by timing from solution mixing to the time point when the reaction buffer became viscous and couldn’t move downwards along the vertical tube wall.
2.7 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The sericin hydrogel samples were frozen at -196oC in liquid nitrogen. Then, the hydrogel samples were moved into a vacuum drying equipment (FD-1A-80, Beijing Boyikang Experiment Instrument Co.,Ltd)and dried at -196°C. The freeze-dried specimens were observed by using a scanning electron microscopy (JSM-IT300, JEOL Ltd, Japan) with working voltage of 25 kV. The pore sizes of hydrogel scaffolds were calculated by averaging 30 randomly selected pores using Image J software.
2.8 Porosity analyses
The porosity of the 8% sericin hydrogel samples was evaluated by a conventional liquid displacement method as reported previously[26]. The lyophilized sample was immersed in a known volume (VK) of ultra-pure water. One hour later, the volume of water containing hydrogel was determined and denoted as VT. The hydrogel sample was then removed and the remaining water was recorded as VR. The porosity of the lyophilized hydrogel sample was then determined according to the following equation:
\(\text{p}\text{o}\text{r}\text{o}\text{s}\text{i}\text{t}\text{y} \left(\text{%}\right)=\frac{\text{V}\text{K}-\text{V}\text{R}}{\text{V}\text{T}-\text{V}\text{R}}\times 100\) %
2.9 Evaluation of swelling behaviors and degradation dynamics
The swelling behavior of 8% sericin hydrogel was evaluated by a gravimetric method [29]. Lyophilized hydrogels were weighed and then immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at different pH (pH 3, pH 7.4, and pH 11) at 37°C atmosphere. The hydrogel samples were taken out and weighted at predetermined intervals. The swelling ratios of the lyophilized hydrogel scaffolds were calculated by:
\(Swelling\left(\%\right)=\frac{\text{M}1-\text{M}0}{\text{M}0}\) ×100%
Where M0 is the dry weight of the scaffolds, and M1 is the swollen weight of the scaffolds.
The degradation behavior of 8% sericin hydrogel in vitro was evaluated by a gravimetric method. Briefly, three randomly selected hydrogel samples were weighted and dried. Then, their wet weight (Mw0) and dry weight (Md0) were noted. Then other dried hydrogels were immersed in PBS (pH 7.4) at 37°C and replaced with fresh PBS (pH 7.4) every day. The hydrogel samples were taken out, washed, and dried at determined time points. The degradation ratios of hydrogels were calculated by:
$$Degradation=\frac{M0*R-Md}{\text{M}0\text{*}\text{R}}$$
Where, M\(0\) is the initial wet weight of sample, and Md is the dry weight of sample. R is the ratio of Md0 and Mw0.
The degradation behavior of sericin hydrogel in vivo was evaluated according to a method as previously reported with slight modifications [30]. Female C57BL/6 mice (8 weeks old) were first anesthetized by intraperitoneal administration of 10% chloral hydrate (5 µl/g•BW). Next, 8% hydrogel samples (0.2 g per sample) were placed subcutaneously in mice. According to the pre-set time points, the mice were euthanized, followed by resecting the implanted hydrogels and washing carefully with ultra-pure water. Then, the resected samples were dried for further analysis. All the animal experiments were carried out according to the guidelines and authorized by the Ethics Committee of Jiangsu University of Science & Technology (Zhenjiang, China).
2.10 The release of drug from sericin hydrogels
The controlled drug release behavior of sericin hydrogels was evaluated using HRP as a model drug. HRP-loaded hydrogel samples were prepared by mixing HRP (2 mg/ml) with sericin solution (8%, w/v) containing genipin at a constant volume ratio of 1:175. The samples were immersed in fresh PBS (pH 7.4) and kept at 37°C in a constant temperature incubator. The HRP content in the PBS was measured by ELISA kit according to the manufacturer's instructions.
2.11 Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction
The FTIR spectra of the specimens were carried out on a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Nexus, Thermal Nicolet, USA) for the spectral region of 4000 − 400 cm− 1. The software OPUS 5.5 (Bruker Optics, GmbH) was used to analyze the spectrum. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the specimens was evaluated on a D8-Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Germany). The diffraction patterns run from 5° to 70° of 2 θ angles.
2.12 Mechanical analysis
The compression test was performed on a universal testing machine (AUST, China, Zhuhai) equipped with a 20 N load cell. The hydrogel specimens for the compression test were molded into a cylindrical structure with a 7-mm height and 8-mm diameter for stress-strain analysis. While the samples for the tension test were molded into dumbbell shapes (15 mm gauge length and 10 mm width) and performed on a universal testing machine (QLW-5E, Xiamen Qunlong Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., China). All the tests were carried out at a constant velocity of 5 mm/min.
2.13 Injectable property
The 8% sericin hydrogel was formed in a syringe. Then, the injectability of the sericin hydrogel was analyzed by a syringe with a 16G needle.
2.14 In vitro cell test
Cell culture assays were performed on the sericin hydrogels, with the uncoated cell-culture plates set as controls. Briefly, the 8% hydrogel samples gelled in 24-well or 96-well culture clusters, followed by 5 rinses with fresh PBS (pH 7.4). Then, the hydrogel samples were rinsed 3 times with fresh high glucose DMEM medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum before further use. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts cells (NIH3T3) were cultured with high glucose DMEM medium in a cell incubator (37°C, 5% CO2, 100% humidity). The cell adhesion behavior of sericin hydrogels was determined according to a reported method [2]. NIH3T3 cells cultured in 24-well cell culture plates with 1×104 cells /well of initial cell density. Furthermore, the CCK-8 kit was employed to assess the viability of NIH3T3 cells which cultured in the 96-well cell culture plates at a density of 4×103 cells/well.
2.15 Statistical analysis
All the experiments were performed for n = 3 samples unless otherwise specified. All the values were expressed as mean ± SD. Data analysis was done using statistical software GraphPad Prism 8. The significance level was measured by comparing the data between groups and within groups by performing one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test. Microscopic images were analyzed using Image J software. P < 0.05 was regarded as significant difference.