1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014), http://www.ipcc.ch/ report/ar5/syr (accessed 17 October 2018)
2 Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81-98.
3 Sterner, T., (2012). Distributional effects of taxing transportation fuel. Energy Policy, 41, 75-83.
4 Alló, M. & Loureiro, M. L. (2014). The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy 73, 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.042
5 Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S. & Kroll, S. (2012). The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation. Environmental Science Policy 16, 90–96.
6 Ejelöv, E. & Nilsson, A. (2020). Individual factors influencing acceptability for environmental polices: A review and research agenda. Sustainability 12, 2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062404
7 Kyselá, E., Ščasný M. & Zvěřinová, I. (2019). Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: A review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Climate Policy 19, 878-892. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1611534.
8 Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S. & van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature. Climate Policy 19, 1186-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490.
9 Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. (1991). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 170-211.
10 Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3), 407-424.
11 Eriksson, L., Garvill, J. & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norms, freedom, and fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26, 15-26.
12 Hiratsuka, J., Perlaviciute, G. & Steg, L. (2018). Testing VBN theory in Japan: Relationships between values, beliefs, norms, and acceptability and expected effects of a car pricing policy. Transportation Research Part F 53, 74-83.
13 Steg, L., Dreijerink, L. & Abrahamse, W. (2006). Why are energy policies acceptable and effective? Environment and Behaivor 38, 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505278519.
14 Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011).
15 Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain. P. G. & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analysis of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change 6, 622-627. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2943.
16 Shwom, R., Bidwell, D., Dan, A. & Dietz, T. (2010). Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environmental Change 20, 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003.
17 Eriksson, L., Garvill, J. & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A 42, 1117-1128.
18 Kim, J., Schmöcker, J., Fujii, S. & Noland, R. B. (2013). Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students. Transportation Research Part A 48, 50-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.005.
19 Schmöcker, J., Pettersson, P. & Fujii, S. (2012). Comparative analysis of proximal and distal determinants for the acceptance of coercive charging policies in the UK and Japan, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 6, 156-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2011.570856.
20 Robelia, B. & Murphy, T. (2012). What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environmental Education Research 18, 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.618288.
21 Gifford, R. & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology 49, 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034 (2014).
22 Pelham, B. W. (2009). Views on global warming relate to energy effi-ciency: Relationship exists regardless of national wealth, literacy. Re-trieved fromhttp://www.gallup.com/poll/117835/views-global-warming-relate-energy-efficiency.aspx
23 van der Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology 41, 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012.
24 Fransson, N. & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measuret methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 4, 369-382.
25 Oreskes, N. & Conway, E. M. Defeating the merchants of doubt. Nature 465, 686-687 (2010).
26 Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M. & Gustafson, A. (2019). Climate Change in the American Mind: April 2019. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
27 Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. & Camerer, C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acadamic Management Review 23, 393–404 (1998).
28 Kallbekken, S., Garcia, J. H. & Korneliussen, K. (2013). Determinants of public support for transport taxes. Transportation Research Part A 58, 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.004.
29 Hammar, H. & Jagers, S. C. What is fair CO2 tax increase? On fair emission reductions in the transport sector. Ecological Economics 61, 337-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.004 (2007).
30 Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I. & Kulin, J. Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change 59, 102003 (2019).
31 Harring, N. & Jagers, S. C. Should we trust in values? Explaning public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability 5, 210-227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010210 (2013).
32 Hin Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Phillips, W. J., Cooksey, R., Marks, A. D. G., Nunn, P., Watt, S. E., Bradley, G. L. & Glendon, A. I. Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology 36, 229-239 (2013).
33 Schwartz, S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 1–65 (Academic Press, New York, 1992).
34 Steg, L. & De Groot, J. I. M. Environmental values. In S. Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, pp. 81-92 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012).
35 van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Keizer, K. (2013). The values of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006.
36 Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A. & Leiserowitz, A. (2020). Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States. Behavioural Public Policy 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.39.
37 Xi Xiao, C. & Dunlap, R. F. (2007). Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: A U.S.-Canadian comparison. Social Science Quarterly 88, 2 (2007).
38 Owen, A. L., Conover, E., Videras, J. & Wu, S. (2012). Heat waves, droughts, and preference for environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31, 556-557. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21599.
39 Bronfman, N.C.; Jiménez, R.B.; Arevalo, P.C.; Cifuentes, L.A. (2012). Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy, 46, 246–252.
40 Jones, D. A weird view of human nature skews psychologists’ studies. Science 328, 1627–1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.328.5986.1627 (2010).