Postprandial Negatively Charged Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein ­Is a Novel Biomarker for Atrial Remodeling in Metabolic Syndrome

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-34109/v1

Download PDF

Original investigation

Postprandial Negatively Charged Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Is a Novel Biomarker for Atrial Remodeling in Metabolic Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34109/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Negatively charged very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL-χ) in metabolic syndrome (MetS) patients exerts cytotoxic effects on endothelial cells and atrial myocytes. Atrial cardiomyopathy, manifested by atrial remodeling with a dilated diameter, contributes to atrial fibrillation pathogenesis and predicts atrial fibrillation development. The correlation of VLDL-χ with atrial remodeling is unknown. This study investigated the association between VLDL-χ and left atrial dilatation.

Methods: We evaluated 87 MetS and 80 non-MetS individuals between 23 and 74 years old (50.6% men) without overt cardiovascular diseases. Blood samples were collected while fasting and postprandially (at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after a unified meal). VLDL was isolated by ultracentrifugation; the percentile concentration of VLDL-χ (%) was determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography. The correlations of left atrial diameter (LAD) with variables including VLDL-χ, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, glucose, and blood pressure, were analyzed by multiple linear regression models. A hierarchical linear model was conducted to test the independencies of each variable’s correlation with LAD.

Results: The mean LAD was 3.4 ± 0.5 cm in non-MetS subjects and 3.9 ± 0.5 cm in MetS patients (P< 0.01). None of the fasting lipid profiles were associated with LAD. VLDL-χ, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, and blood pressure were positively correlated with LAD (all P<0.05) after adjustment for age and sex. We observed significant interactions between VLDL-χ and blood pressure, waist circumference, and hip circumference. When adjusted for obesity- and blood pressure-related variables, 2-hour postprandial VLDL-χ (mean 1.30 ± 0.61%) showed a positive correlation with LAD in MetS patients. Each 1% VLDL-χ increase was estimated to increase LAD by 0.62 cm.

Conclusion: Postprandial VLDL-χ is associated with atrial remodeling. VLDL-χ is a novel biomarker for atrial cardiomyopathy in MetS patients and may be a therapeutic target.

Trial registration: ISRCTN 69295295. Registered 9 June 2020.

Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

atrial cardiomyopathy

atrial fibrillation

metabolic syndrome

negatively charged

postprandial

very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major factor associated with the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular diseases, including atrial fibrillation (AF) [1]. The association of MetS with AF has been identified in epidemiological studies [2–5]. Furthermore, some manifestations of MetS, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity, are independently associated with AF and are attributed to pathogenic mechanisms of atrial remodeling and the development of AF [4–8]. Nevertheless, the findings from clinical studies of the correlation between dyslipidemia and AF are not consistent [9].

Elevated triglycerides are common in MetS and correlate with elevated cardiovascular risk [10]. Triglycerides are primarily carried by very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) in circulation [11]. In the postprandial state, the triglyceride level varies greatly and is affected largely by VLDL-related metabolism [12–14]; therefore, hypertriglyceridemia is preferentially defined by fasting triglyceride values [15]. Nevertheless, nonfasting triglyceride values have been shown to better predict cardiovascular disease risks [16, 17]. The capacity to retain hemostasis upon food intake has been proposed to be important in normal human lipid and glucose metabolism [18]; a sequence of responses are elicited from the gastrointestinal system involving hormones and digestion enzymes, followed by nutritional absorption and delivery to organs and tissues. Abnormalities in postprandial lipid catabolism have been shown to be able to effectively detect early MetS [19].

Furthermore, VLDL remnants in the postprandial state have higher affinity for VLDL receptors [20]. VLDL receptors are expressed abundantly in the heart and are associated with hypertension-related ventricular hypertrophy [21]. Regarding atrial remodeling, we are the first group to examine VLDL-induced atrial remodeling and related mechanisms [22] [9, 23–25]. Of note, the aforementioned changes can be induced only by VLDL in MetS patients but not VLDL in non-MetS subjects. On the basis of electrical charge (i.e., the abundance of negative charge), our colleagues developed a method for stratification of lipoproteins and found much higher cytotoxicity associated with VLDL in MetS patients with the highest abundance of negative charge [23, 26]. Here, we tested the hypothesis that VLDL may be attributed to atrial remodeling, more so in the postprandial state than in the fasting state. We also hypothesized that negatively charged VLDL (referred to as VLDL-χ) may be associated with atrial remodeling in MetS patients.

Left atrial (LA) diameter, a simple echocardiographic parameter, predicts AF recurrence risk after electrical cardioversion and is the first reported index of structural remodeling and a widely accepted predictive marker for AF [27]. On the other hand, noninvasive electrocardiography P wave indexes, such as the P wave duration, PR interval, and terminal force of P waves, have been reported as indicators of atrial electrical dysfunction [28–30]. The goals of the current study were to determine the quantitative changes in lipids and glucose levels before and after meal intake and to evaluate the associations of VLDL-χ and markers of MetS with indexes of LA remodeling. The differences in postprandial variation in VLDL-χ between patients with and without LA remodeling were also evaluated.

Study participant enrollment

In this study, 167 participants were enrolled (age range, 28–74 years old). Among these patients, 87 and 80 had MetS and did not have MetS, respectively. All study participants with MetS were seen by cardiologists or endocrinologists at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (Kaohsiung, Taiwan). The study protocol was approved by the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board (KMUHIRB-E(I)-20170256). An informed consent form was signed and returned by all participants before joining the study and undergoing plasma collection. This study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sample and demographic data collection

All study participants were instructed to fast before beginning at midnight and came to the hospital at 8 AM. Each participant underwent two venous blood draws (20 mL for each sampling, in BD VACUETTE® EDTA Blood Tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA)); one blood draw was performed in a fasting state, and the other was at a postprandial time of 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, or 4 h, which was randomly selected. In addition to blood sample collection, each participant underwent measurements of height, body weight, abdominal and hip circumferences, blood pressure and heart rate measurements. The medical record, if available, was reviewed, and data related to medical history and medication use were recorded.

Laboratory testing for biochemical indicators and the quantification of negatively charged low-density lipoprotein (LDL-χ) and negatively charged VLDL (VLDL-χ)

The analysis of biochemical parameters was performed in the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital according to the standard operating procedures. As described previously, pairs of plasma samples (in fasting and postprandial states) were obtained from 167 participants. Plasma samples were immediately supplemented with the following after collection to prevent bacterial contamination and oxidation: protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), 1% penicillin/streptomycin/neomycin mixture (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 0.5 mM EDTA. Plasma LDL and VLDL were isolated by using sequential potassium bromide density-gradient ultracentrifugation between a density range of 1.006 and 1.063 g/mL. Fractions of LDL and VLDL samples that were isolated by density were resolved into subfractions with most negatively charged lipoproteins, i.e., LDL-χ and VLDL-χ, respectively, by increasing the negative charge on UnoQ12 columns (BioRad, Hercules, CA) in the ion-exchange fast-protein liquid chromatography system (FPLC, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL), as described previously [26, 31]. In short, the columns were first equilibrated with buffer A (0.02 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; 0.5 mM EDTA). With a multistep linear gradient of buffer B (1 M NaCl in buffer A) at a flow rate of 2 mL/min under observation at 280 nm, the LDL-χ and VLDL-χ subfractions were eluted, separately concentrated by using Centriprep filters (YM-30; EMD Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) and sterilized by being passed through 0.22-µm filters. The protein concentration of the LDL and VLDL samples was measured by using the Lowry method [31, 32].

Electrocardiographic parameters

Twelve-lead electrocardiography was performed by experienced medical technicians. The parameters that were measured and recorded by one experienced technician who was blinded to the other data and clinical information included P wave durations, PR intervals, QRS width, QTc intervals, and the terminal force of P waves in lead V1 [33]. Cardiac rhythms were interpreted, and any rhythm other than regular sinus rhythm (such as AF and/or flutter, pacemaker rhythm, ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, and second- or third-degree atrial-ventricular block) was discarded before further analyses.

Echocardiographic assessment

Echocardiography was performed by one experienced cardiologist using a transthoracic cardiac probe (Vivid 7; General Electric Medical Systems, Horten, Norway), with the participant in the left decubitus position. Two-dimensional and two-dimensional-guided M-mode images were obtained, and LA diameter, left ventricle (LV) size, and LV function were assessed according to the standards of the American Society of Echocardiography [34]. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was derived by the modified Simpson’s method [34]. The raw data were measured and recorded while the researchers were blinded to the other data.

Statistical analysis

All continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. For all parameters examined in this study, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used to determine whether a random sample of values followed a normal distribution. To compare differences between the non-MetS and MetS groups, Student’s t test was used for continuous data, and a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for binary data. The associations of LA diameter and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, systemic blood pressure, pulse rate, fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-χ and VLDL-χ were evaluated by using the Pearson or Spearman (nonparametric) correlation. To evaluate the determining and confounding factors for LA diameter, simple linear regression and hierarchical multivariate linear regression with the stepwise method in the MetS group, non-MetS group, and total group were used to analyze all the variables, including age, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, VLDL-χ, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, left ventricular size, LVEF, E/E’ med, and E/E’ lat. Results were considered statistically significant based on a P value < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed by using the statistical package in GraphPad Prism (version 8; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) software system and SPSS statistical software (version 22).

Subject characteristics

Among 80 non-MetS and 87 MetS subjects participating in this study, sex was matched between groups (Table 1). The MetS group was older than the non-MetS group (52.7 ± 11.5 years and 44.4 ± 10.2 years). Markers of obesity, including BMI, waist circumference, and hip circumference, were greater in the MetS group. Similarly, blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the MetS group. In regard to biochemistry data, plasma hemoglobin A1c and fasting glucose were higher in the MetS group. While creatinine was similar in both groups, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were higher in the MetS group. In regard to lipid profiles, while the MetS group had higher fasting triglycerides and HDL-C, total cholesterol and LDL-C were similar in both groups. In addition, the MetS group had a higher plasma level of uric acid.

Table 1

Demographics of the study population
Variables	Non-MetS (n = 80)	MetS (n = 87)	P value
Age, years	44.4 ± 10.2	52.7 ± 11.5	< 0.0001
Male, n (%)	39 (48.1)	46 (52.9)	0.4477
BMI, kg/m²	22.3 ± 3.0	29.2 ± 4.7	< 0.0001
Waist circumference, cm	75.7 ± 8.2	97.6 ± 9.7	< 0.0001
Hip circumference, cm	94.3 ± 6.9	104.0 ± 9.2	< 0.0001
Systolic BP, mmHg	116.0 ± 9.0	143.5 ± 21.3	< 0.0001
Diastolic BP, mmHg	70.1 ± 7.3	85.9 ± 15.1	< 0.0001
Heart rate, beats/min	75.3 ± 10.0	84.2 ± 12.8	< 0.0001
Biochemistry
HbA1c, %	5.4 ± 0.2	6.7 ± 0.9	< 0.0001
AST, IU/L	17.7 ± 7.1	24.8 ± 8.9	< 0.0001
ALT, IU/L	20.4 ± 5.4	32.0 ± 18.4	< 0.0001
Creatinine, mg/dL	0.7 ± 0.2	0.8 ± 0.2	0.3018
Glucose, mg/dL	86.1 ± 9.5	119.8 ± 26.4	< 0.0001
Total cholesterol, mg/dL	187.9 ± 35.0	187.6 ± 30.7	0.9598
HDL-C, mg/dL	67.7 ± 14.4	41.5 ± 9.0	< 0.0001
LDL-C, mg/dL	116.5 ± 30.9	124.7 ± 27.6	0.1258
Triglycerides, mg/dL	85.6 ± 27.4	208.7 ± 100.3	< 0.0001
Uric acid, mg/dL	4.9 ± 1.1	5.8 ± 1.3	< 0.0001
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Changes in glucose and triglycerides from fasting to after a standard meal in the MetS and non-MetS groups

Glucose and triglycerides were higher in the MetS group under fasting conditions, while glucose levels decreased 4 h after breakfast, and triglyceride levels were still elevated in the MetS group (Fig. 1A & B).

Changes in HDL-C, LDL-C, LDL-χ and VLDL-χ from fasting to after a standard meal in the MetS and non-MetS groups

HDL-C was lower in the MetS group at fasting and exhibited a decreasing trend after the meal at 2 h and 4 h (Fig. 1C), whereas the postprandial decrease in HDL-C was not present in the non-MetS group. Unlike the results for HDL-C, the plasma LDL-C at fasting and the change after a meal were similar in both groups (Fig. 1D). While LDL-C did not change after a meal, the negatively charged LDL and LDL-χ in the MetS group decreased 4 h after the meal (Fig. 1E). The decrease at 4 h in LDL-χ did not occur in the non-MetS group. At fasting (0 h, Fig. 1F), the negatively charged VLDL-χ was similar in both groups but was significantly higher in the MetS group than in the non-MetS group 0.5 h after the meal. VLDL-χ decreased 4 h after the meal in both groups.

LA dilation as a marker for atrial structural remodeling

Among 167 non-MetS and MetS subjects participating in this study, we recruited subjects aged between 40 and 60 years to undergo 12-lead electrocardiography and standard echocardiography. The characteristics of 62 non-MetS and 68 MetS subjects who had completed the heart examinations are shown in Table 2. Similar to all participants, the MetS group was more obese, had higher blood pressure, and had a higher heart rate than the non-MetS group. Regarding electrocardiographic parameters, the PR interval was wider in the MetS group than in the non-MetS group (167.6 ± 20.0 msec and 156.2 ± 24.9 msec), whereas the P wave duration, terminal force of P waves, QRS width and QTc interval were similar in both groups. Regarding echocardiography, LV function was similar in both groups (LVEF, MetS 67.3 ± 7.1% and non-MetS 63.9 ± 11.3%), whereas the diameter of the aorta, LA and size of LV were larger in the MetS group (Table 2). The ratios of mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') as markers for diastolic function and indicators for LV filling pressure were higher in the MetS group (Table 2). The aforementioned results showed evidence of LA and LV remodeling in MetS participants in this study, and this remodeling was associated with diastolic dysfunction of the LV without overt systolic dysfunction.

Table 2

Characteristics of subjects included in the echocardiographic study
Variables	Non-MetS (n = 62)	MetS (n = 68)	P value
Age, years	48.7 ± 7.0	51.9 ± 9.4	0.0351
Male, n (%)	31 (50.0)	37 (54.4)	0.4669
BMI, kg/m²	22.7 ± 3.0	29.0 ± 3.8	< 0.0001
Waist circumference, cm	78.2 ± 8.5	97.8 ± 9.7	< 0.0001
Hip circumference, cm	95.2 ± 6.5	103.9 ± 8.6	< 0.0001
Systolic BP, mmHg	116.4 ± 10.3	142.8 ± 20.7	< 0.0001
Diastolic BP, mmHg	71.2 ± 7.9	87.2 ± 14.4	< 0.0001
Heart rate, beats/min	73.9 ± 9.2	85.0 ± 13.8	< 0.0001
Electrocardiogram Parameters
P, msec	105.6 ± 14.2	108.9 ± 13.2	0.1872
PR, msec	156.2 ± 24.9	167.6 ± 20.0	0.0064
Terminal force of P, mVS	1.6 ± 1.5	1.7 ± 1.6	0.8157
QRS, msec	85.7 ± 10.8	88.5 ± 16.5	0.2735
QTc, msec	405.0 ± 21.5	405.5 ± 37.8	0.9292
Echocardiographic Parameters
Aorta diameter, cm	3.2 ± 0.3	3.4 ± 0.4	0.0012
LA diameter, cm	3.4 ± 0.5	3.9 ± 0.5	< 0.0001
LA volume, mL	48.9 ± 15.4	70.6 ± 18.2	< 0.0001
LVEDD, cm	4.6 ± 0.5	4.8 ± 0.5	0.0049
LVEDV, mL	95.9 ± 30.4	126.0 ± 37.2	< 0.0001
LV mass, gram	107.7 ± 23.7	133.7 ± 28.8	< 0.0001
EF, %	63.9 ± 11.3	67.3 ± 7.1	0.0515
E/E’ (med)	7.7 ± 2.3	9.8 ± 2.7	< 0.0001
E/E’ (lat)	5.8 ± 2.2	6.7 ± 1.8	0.0169
Valve disease, n (%)	0	0	-
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricle end-diastolic dimension; LVEDV, left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; E/E’ (med), the ratio of mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') at medial mitral ring; E/E’ (lat), the ratio of mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') at the lateral mitral ring.

LA dilation was associated with central obesity and hypertension

The LA diameter was shown to significantly correlate with BMI and waist and hip circumferences in both the non-MetS (Fig. 2A-C) and MetS (Fig. 2D-F) groups. The LA diameter was also positively correlated with blood pressure (Fig. 3) and with diastolic blood pressure in the MetS group (Fig. 3E).

Correlation of LA size with fasting and postprandial VLDL-χ

The results of the analysis of the correlation between LA diameter and fasting and 0.5-h, 1-h, 2-h, and 4-h postprandial VLDL-χ are shown in Fig. 4. In the MetS group, the LA size was significantly correlated with fasting (Fig. 4F) and 2-h postprandial VLDL-χ (Fig. 4I). Similarly, the LA size was also significantly correlated with 2-h postprandial VLDL-χ in the non-MetS group (Fig. 4D).

Two-hour postprandial VLDL-χ is correlated with P wave duration

Markers of electrical remodeling on P waves were measured and analyzed (Fig. 5). The P wave duration was significantly correlated with 2-h postprandial VLDL-χ in the MetS group (Fig. 5A), and the PR interval tended to be correlated with VLDL-χ (Fig. 5B) but without a significant correlation in the non-MetS group (Fig. 5D-F).

Different kinetics of VLDL-χ in MetS subjects with larger LA size

The changes in VLDL-χ from fasting to 2 h after the meal are shown in Fig. 6. The pattern of changes was different between the non-MetS and MetS groups (Fig. 6A). In the MetS group with dilated LA (diameter ≧ 3.8 cm), VLDL-χ increased after a meal compared with the level in the fasting state, and VLDL-χ remaining steady in those with LA diameters smaller than 3.8 cm (Fig. 6B).

VLDL-χ was independently correlated with LA diameter

There was a significant correlation between VLDL-χ and blood pressure and waist and hip circumference. After adjusting for variables of obesity and blood pressure, VLDL-χ showed an independent positive correlation with LA diameter in the MetS group (Table 3). Each 1% increase in VLDL-χ was estimated to increase the LA diameter by 0.62 cm. The other independent determining factor of LA diameter is waist circumference.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate linear regression of determining factors of LA volume
	Univariate linear regression			Multivariate linear regression^#
	Regression coefficient	95% confidence interval	p value	Regression coefficient	95% confidence interval	T	p value
Age	-0.003	(-0.018, 0.012)	0.684
BMI	0.053	(0.02, 0.087)	0.02*
Waist circumference	0.027	(0.015, 0.039)	< 0.001*	0.028	(0.015, 0.040)	4.544	< 0.001*
Hip circumference	0.02	(0.004, 0.035)	0.012*
Systolic BP	-0.002	(-0.008, 0.005)	0.646
Diastolic BP	0.000	(-0.009, 0.01)	0.949
Heart rate	-0.005	(-0.015, 0.005)	0.34
Triglycerides	0.000	(-0.001, 0.002)	0.662
HDL-C	-0.009	(-0.024, 0.005)	0.187
VLDL-χ	0.258	(0.034, 0.482)	0.024*	0.225	(0.025, 0.425)	2.25	0.028*
LVEDD	0.166	(-0.52, 0.385)	0.134
LVEDV	0.005	(0.002, 0.009)	0.005*
EF	0.018	(-0.00, 0.037)	0.067
E/E’ med	-0.015	(-0.067, 0.037)	0.567
E/E’ lat	-0.008	(-0.085, 0.068)	0.828
^#Hierarchical multivariate linear regression in stepwise method with variables including age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, heart rate, triglycerides, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-χ, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), ejection fraction (EF), ratio of mitral flow E velocity and tissue Doppler E’ velocity of the medical and lateral mitral ring, i.e., E/E’ med and E/E’ lat.

For all subjects in this study, the univariate analysis revealed four factors that were significantly correlated with LA diameter, including waist circumference, LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and E/E’ med. Among those factors, waist circumference and LVEDD remained independent determinants of LA diameter in multivariate analysis (see suppl. Table). Among non-MetS subjects, age, BMI, and LVEDD were significantly and independently correlated with LA diameter (see suppl. Table).

The main results from this study are as follows: (1) we clinically validated the method to quantify negatively charged LDL-χ and VLDL-χ lipoproteins in plasma samples; (2) the postprandial kinetics of glucose, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, LDL-χ and VLDL-χ were determined; (3) LA dilation was associated with markers of central obesity, hypertension, and postprandial VLDL-χ; (4) 2-h postprandial VLDL-χ was associated with P wave duration in electrocardiography and independently correlated with LA diameter; and (5) MetS subjects whose VLDL-χ increased after a meal had a larger LA diameter than those whose VLDL-χ decreased.

The metabolism of VLDL is an important determinant of LDL formation and triglyceride levels. Both normal and hypertriglyceride VLDL molecules contain apoB-100 and apoE. Hypertriglyceridemic VLDL has a higher content of apoE, which facilitates its affinity to VLDL receptors [35]. The tissue distribution of VLDL receptors is quite different from that of LDL receptors. The VLDL receptor is abundant in tissue largely utilizing fatty acids as an energy source, including heart, muscle, and adipose tissue, and it mediates cellular catabolism and regulates the levels of lipoprotein lipase [36, 37]. Whether the modulation of VLDL receptor expression is involved in VLDL-χ-related LA remodeling needs further study.

The importance of postprandial hyperlipidemia in the context of atherosclerosis was suggested early in 1979 [38] and was later increasingly explored in recent years [10, 16, 17]. In 2016, experts reached a consensus regarding the complementary value of nonfasting measurements of lipid profiles for clinical and laboratory medicine [39]. More recently, Nakajima et al. reported evidence to disclose the predictive role of remnant lipoproteins in coronary heart diseases [20]. They also reported that compared to fasting VLDL, postprandial VLDL has a higher affinity for VLDL receptors and easier internalization [40]. Accordingly, we suggest that the postprandial VLDL-χ has larger internalization and results in cytotoxicity in atrial tissue and ultimately significant remodeling of the atrium. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to report the correlation of postprandial VLDL-χ with LA remodeling.

The association of markers of central obesity with LA size is consistent with results derived by other clinical studies [41, 42]. Obesity, as a well-identified risk factor for AF, causes discrete atrial cardiomyopathy in animal models [43] [44]. Experimental hypertensive rats have fibrosis, inflammation, atrial wavelength shortening and calcium current changes in the LA [45]. Patients with obesity often have coexisting hypertension and dyslipidemia; therefore, it is difficult to identify the major cause of atrial remodeling. In this study, we further determined the postprandial VLDL-χ as an independent determinant of LA size by using multivariant analysis.

The pathogenesis of AF is complex and can involve a combination of etiological factors and metabolism-associated elements. AF is a common outcome of combining atrial dilatation with atrial fibrosis, triggered activities and electrical automaticity. In many patients, AF is not curable at the time of diagnosis due to long-lasting and significant atrial remodeling with extensive fibrosis. To intervene at the early stage of atrial remodeling, i.e., application of the “upstream therapy” approach, may be possible to prevent AF by targeting the cytotoxic fraction of postprandial VLDL that leads to the progression of atrial cardiomyopathy.

We observed a correlation between postprandial plasma VLDL-χ and LA remodeling. Despite other factors, such as hypertension and obesity, which also cause LA remodeling in MetS patients, plasma VLDL-χ is still attributed to LA remodeling. We suggest that the metabolism of VLDL and the characteristics of postprandial VLDL-χ are the major determinants of the progression of LA remodeling, especially in MetS patients.

AF: atrial fibrillation; LA: left atrium; LV: left ventricle; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MetS: metabolic syndrome; VLDL: very low density lipoprotein; VLDL-χ: negatively charged very low density lipoprotein

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Miss Chung-Ya Wang for VLDL sample isolation and purification.

Author contributions

All authors have approved the submitted version and agree to be personally accountable for the their own contributions. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Data curation, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Formal analysis, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Funding acquisition, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Investigation, Hsiang-Chun Lee, Liang-Yin Ke, Shyi-Jang Shin, He-Jyun Jiang and Wei-Chung Tsai; Methodology, Hsiang-Chun Lee and Liang-Yin Ke; Project administration, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Resources, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Software, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Supervision, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Validation, Hsiang-Chun Lee and Liang-Yin Ke; Visualization, Hsiang-Chun Lee; Writing – original draft, Hsiang-Chun Lee; and Writing – review & editing, Hsiang-Chun Lee.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX107-10724SC and NHRI-EX108-10724SC to H.C. Lee), Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital research grants (KMUH 107-7R11, KMUH 108-8R10); Kaohsiung Medical University (KMU-TP104D04) and Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology grants (MOST 104-2314-B-037 -080 -MY3 to HCL).

Availability of data and materials

All the re-identified data are available upon reasonable request ([email protected]).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was approved by the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board. This study was conducted with adherence to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Signed informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to engaging in any research.

Consent for publications

Not applicable.

Competing interests

"The authors declare no conflict of interest."

Conflict of interest

none

Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-2497.
Korantzopoulos P, Kokkoris S, Papaioannides D: The association of metabolic syndrome with atrial fibrillation: an emerging epidemiological and pathophysiological hypothesis. Cardiology. 2005;104(3):148-9.
Tanner RM, Baber U, Carson AP, Voeks J, Brown TM, Soliman EZ, Howard VJ, Muntner P: Association of the metabolic syndrome with atrial fibrillation among United States adults (from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke [REGARDS] Study). Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(2):227-232.
Kim YG, Choi KJ, Han S, Hwang KW, Kwon CH, Park GM, Won KB, Ann SH, Kim J, Kim SJ et al: Metabolic syndrome and the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in middle-aged east asian men. Circ J. 2018;82(7):1763-9.
Kwon CH, Kim H, Kim SH, Kim BS, Kim HJ, Kim DK, Han SW, Ryu KH, Dong Sung J: The impact of metabolic syndrome on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study in South Korea. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8).
Movahed M-R, Hashemzadeh M, Mazen Jamal M: Diabetes mellitus is a strong, independent risk for atrial fibrillation and flutter in addition to other cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Cardiology. 2005;105(3):315-8.
Huxley RR, Filion KB, Konety S, Alonso A: Meta-analysis of cohort and case–control studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of atrial fibrillation. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2011;108(1):56-62.
Manolis AJ, Rosei EA, Coca A, Cifkova R, Erdine SE, Kjeldsen S, Lip GY, Narkiewicz K, Parati G, Redon J et al: Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: diagnostic approach, prevention and treatment. Position paper of the Working Group 'Hypertension Arrhythmias and Thrombosis' of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2):239-252.
Lee HC, Lin YH: The Pathogenic Role of very low density lipoprotein on atrial remodeling in the metabolic syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3).
Toth PP, Fazio S, Wong ND, Hull M, Nichols GA: Risk of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia: A review of real-world evidence. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(3):279-289.
Paredes S, Fonseca L, Ribeiro L, Ramos H, Oliveira JC, Palma I: Novel and traditional lipid profiles in metabolic syndrome reveal a high atherogenicity. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11792.
Sabaka P, Kruzliak P, Gaspar L, Caprnda M, Bendzala M, Balaz D, Oravec S, Dukat A: Postprandial changes of lipoprotein profile: effect of abdominal obesity. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2013;12(1):179.
Mittendorfer B, Yoshino M, Patterson BW, Klein S: VLDL triglyceride kinetics in lean, overweight, and obese men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(11):4151-4160.
Alves-Bezerra M, Cohen DE: Triglyceride metabolism in the liver. Compr Physiol. 2017;8(1):1-8.
Joint committee for guideline r: 2016 Chinese guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018;15(1):1-29.
Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Schnohr P, Jensen GB, Nordestgaard BG: Nonfasting cholesterol and triglycerides and association with risk of myocardial infarction and total mortality: the Copenhagen City Heart Study with 31 years of follow-up. J Intern Med. 2011;270(1):65-75.
Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG: Nonfasting Triglycerides, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Heart Failure Risk: Two Cohort Studies of 113 554 Individuals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38(2):464-472.
van Ommen B, Keijer J, Kleemann R, Elliott R, Drevon CA, McArdle H, Gibney M, Muller M: The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2: quantification of the nutritional phenotype. Genes Nutr. 2008;3(2):51-9.
Fiamoncini J, Rundle M, Gibbons H, Thomas L, Geillinger-Kästle K, Bunzel D, Trezzi J-P, Kiselova-Kaneva Y, Wopereis S, Wahrheit J et al: Plasma metabolome analysis identifies distinct human metabotypes in the postprandial state with different susceptibility to weight loss–mediated metabolic improvements. The FASEB Journal. 2018;0(0):fj.201800330R.
Nakajima K, Tanaka A: Atherogenic postprandial remnant lipoproteins; VLDL remnants as a causal factor in atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;478:200-215.
Gallego-Delgado J, Connolly SB, Lazaro A, Sadlier D, Kieran NE, Sugrue DD, Doran P, Brady HR, Osende J, Egido J: Transcriptome of hypertension-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression by antihypertensive therapies. Hypertens Res. 2009;32(5):347-357.
Takahashi S, Sakai J, Fujino T, Hattori H, Zenimaru Y, Suzuki J, Miyamori I, Yamamoto TT: The very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor: characterization and functions as a peripheral lipoprotein receptor. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2004;11(4):200-8.
Lee HC, Lin HT, Ke LY, Wei C, Hsiao YL, Chu CS, Lai WT, Shin SJ, Chen CH, Sheu SH et al: VLDL from metabolic syndrome individuals enhanced lipid accumulation in atria with association of susceptibility to atrial fibrillation. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(1).
Lee HC, Chen CC, Tsai WC, Lin HT, Shiao YL, Sheu SH, Wu BN, Chen CH, Lai WT: Very-low-density lipoprotein of metabolic syndrome modulates gap junctions and slows cardiac conduction. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):12050.
Shiou YL, Lin HT, Ke LY, Wu BN, Shin SJ, Chen CH, Tsai WC, Chu CS, Lee HC: Very low-density lipoproteins of metabolic syndrome modulates STIM1, suppresses store-operated calcium entry, and deranges myofilament proteins in atrial myocytes. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6).
Chen CH, Lu J, Chen SH, Huang RY, Yilmaz HR, Dong J, Elayda MA, Dixon RA, Yang CY: Effects of electronegative VLDL on endothelium damage in metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):648-653.
An K, Zhu J, Ma N, Tang M, Mei J: Predictive risk factors for recurrent atrial fibrillation after modified endoscopic ablation: A 2-year follow-up. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(3):372-7.
Park J, Kim TH, Lee JS, Park JK, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN: Prolonged PR interval predicts clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(5):e001277.
Nielsen JB, Kühl JT, Pietersen A, Graff C, Lind B, Struijk JJ, Olesen MS, Sinner MF, Bachmann TN, Haunsø S et al: P-wave duration and the risk of atrial fibrillation: Results from the Copenhagen ECG Study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(9):1887-1895.
Magnani JW: Risk assessment for atrial fibrillation: Enter the P-wave. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(9):1896-1897.
Bancells C, Benitez S, Ordonez-Llanos J, Oorni K, Kovanen PT, Milne RW, Sanchez-Quesada JL: Immunochemical analysis of the electronegative LDL subfraction shows that abnormal N-terminal apolipoprotein B conformation is involved in increased binding to proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(2):1125-1133.
Chan HC, Bonnie Chan HC, Liang CJ, Lee HC, Su H, Lee AS, Shiea J, Tsai WC, Ou TT, Wu CC et al: Role of low-density lipoprotein in early vascular aging associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020.
Snyder ML, Soliman EZ, Whitsel EA, Gellert KS, Heiss G: Short-term repeatability of electrocardiographic P wave indices and PR interval. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47(2):257-263.
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T et al: Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39 e14.
Tudorache IF, Trusca VG, Gafencu AV: Apolipoprotein E - A multifunctional protein with implications in various pathologies as a result of its structural features. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2017;15:359-365.
Niu YG, Evans RD: Very-low-density lipoprotein: complex particles in cardiac energy metabolism. J Lipids. 2011;2011:189876.
Feingold KR, Grunfeld C: Introduction to Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: Endotext. Edited by Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P et al. South Dartmouth (MA); 2000.
Zilversmit DB: Atherogenesis: a postprandial phenomenon. Circulation. 1979;60(3):473-485.
Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Mora S, Kolovou G, Baum H, Bruckert E, Watts GF, Sypniewska G, Wiklund O, Boren J et al: Fasting is not routinely required for determination of a lipid profile: clinical and laboratory implications including flagging at desirable concentration cut-points-a joint consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(25):1944-1958.
Nakajima K, Tokita Y, Tanaka A, Takahashi S: The VLDL receptor plays a key role in the metabolism of postprandial remnant lipoproteins. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:382-393.
Wang TJ, Parise H, Levy D, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Wolf PA, Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ: Obesity and the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2004;292(20):2471-7.
Nystrom PK, Carlsson AC, Leander K, de Faire U, Hellenius ML, Gigante B: Obesity, metabolic syndrome and risk of atrial fibrillation: a Swedish, prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127111.
Mahajan R, Lau DH, Brooks AG, Shipp NJ, Manavis J, Wood JP, Finnie JW, Samuel CS, Royce SG, Twomey DJ et al: Electrophysiological, electroanatomical, and structural remodeling of the atria as consequences of sustained obesity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(1):1-11.
Kim SM, Cho KI, Kwon JH, Lee HG, Kim TI: Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on left atrial functional and structural remodeling beyond obesity. J Cardiol. 2012;60(6):475-483.
Choisy SC, Arberry LA, Hancox JC, James AF: Increased susceptibility to atrial tachyarrhythmia in spontaneously hypertensive rat hearts. Hypertension. 2007;49(3):498-505.

supplement4.pdf

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Postprandial Negatively Charged Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Is a Novel Biomarker for Atrial Remodeling in Metabolic Syndrome

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Study participant enrollment

Sample and demographic data collection

Electrocardiographic parameters

Echocardiographic assessment

Statistical analysis

Results

Subject characteristics

LA dilation as a marker for atrial structural remodeling

LA dilation was associated with central obesity and hypertension

Correlation of LA size with fasting and postprandial VLDL-χ

Two-hour postprandial VLDL-χ is correlated with P wave duration

Different kinetics of VLDL-χ in MetS subjects with larger LA size

VLDL-χ was independently correlated with LA diameter

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publications

Competing interests

Conflict of interest

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1

Postprandial Negatively Charged Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein ­Is a Novel Biomarker for Atrial Remodeling in Metabolic Syndrome

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Study participant enrollment

Sample and demographic data collection

Electrocardiographic parameters

Echocardiographic assessment

Statistical analysis

Results

Subject characteristics

LA dilation as a marker for atrial structural remodeling

LA dilation was associated with central obesity and hypertension

Correlation of LA size with fasting and postprandial VLDL-χ

Two-hour postprandial VLDL-χ is correlated with P wave duration

Different kinetics of VLDL-χ in MetS subjects with larger LA size

VLDL-χ was independently correlated with LA diameter

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publications

Competing interests

Conflict of interest

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1

Postprandial Negatively Charged Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Is a Novel Biomarker for Atrial Remodeling in Metabolic Syndrome