Trophic positions of Paradoxurinae civet species
Our findings show relatively high δ15Nbulk values and higher estimated TP among non-binturong civets, suggesting the possibility that the consumption of animal foods may have been previously underestimated. The results of δ13Cbulk and δ15Nbulk values of civets suggest that their diet is different among species, which is supported by TP values estimated from CSIA-AA. It is difficult to estimate the degree of faunivory from these results of varying δ15Nbulk values of possible food sources because the δ15Nbulk values reflect variations in both baseline isotope ratios and trophic discrimination. In other words, it is not clear whether the higher δ15Nbulk values of a given civet species are the result of higher trophic levels or elevated dietary δ15Nbulk values. It is not practical to collect and analyze dozens of dietary items from all civets (Nakabayashi 2020) to determine a stable isotopic baseline. As mentioned earlier, CSIA-AA provides information on both baseline isotope ratios and trophic positions, which enables the quantitative estimation of the TPs even from a limited set of representative samples.
The measured TP of plant-eating insects was higher (≥ 2.6) than that expected for obligate plant eaters (i.e. 2), and it is possible that a small amount of insectivory inflates the TPs of civet species. The higher-than-expected insect TP may be due to the consumption of microorganisms with a higher TP than autotrophic organisms (Steffan et al. 2015, 2019). If dung beetles and weevils assimilated proteins from intestinal bacteria from feces or microbes grown on decaying wood, their TP would be higher than expected for a strict herbivorous insect. Even so, the TPs of masked palm civets (2.7) and common palm civets (2.9) were higher than those of insects, confirming faunivory in these civet species.
The point measurements of TP of the civet species ranged from 2.0 to 2.9, and each species showed clustered TPs that did not overlap with those of other species (Fig. 3). Although our critical assumption is that the TP estimates of two individuals per species represent their respective species, this result suggests possible species-specific differences in the degree of faunivory in Paradoxurinae civet species. CSIA-AA illustrated overall faunivory in common palm civets, masked palm civets, and small-toothed palm civets, and the tendency of faunivory seems to be stronger in this order if the analyzed individuals truly represent the diet of each species. Contrary to the other civet species, the TP of binturongs was almost one-level lower even within the same subfamily, suggesting that their diet consists almost entirely of plant-based materials such as fruits.
The diet of these civet species can be discussed more in detail with the existing knowledge from observational studies. First, we used the hairs of the two intensively radio-tracked female binturong individuals for the analysis (Nakabayashi et al. 2016; Nakabayashi and Ahmad 2018; Nakabayashi 2020). According to the results of individual tracking of these binturongs, spanning over 900 days in total, 79–86% of their diets consisted of fig fruits, and faunivory was not observed (Nakabayashi and Ahmad 2018). Therefore, the obviously low δ15Nbulk values and TP of binturongs, which are similar to those of plant-eating animals, compared to the other three Paradoxurinae species simply reflect their fruit-dominated diet (Figs. 2, 3, and 4). Furthermore, given that fig fruits generally contain pollinating fig wasps inside (Harrison et al. 2003), fig wasps seem to contribute little to protein intake in binturongs despite the large consumption of fig fruits (Nakabayashi et al. 2019). Popowics (2003) noted that binturong dentition is relatively small compared to the body size and shows a decrease in shearing and crushing functions. Binturongs usually feed on mature fig fruits, and thus, large teeth to process large hard fruits may not be necessary for them. Our stable isotopic results, as well as the abovementioned observational studies, implying that faunivory seldom occur in wild binturongs, at least for females. This result is similar to the results of individual trackings (Nakabayashi and Ahmad 2018) and conclusions of more than 700 hours of observation of animals who visited fruiting fig trees in Borneo (Leighton and Leighton 1983; Shanahan 2000).
Compared with binturongs, the difference in TP among other civet species is less clear. To further investigate their dietary niche partitioning in TP, more samples need to be analyzed by CSIA-AA. Even though, these civet species have occasional species-specific feeding behaviors, especially in small-toothed palm civets and binturongs. Common palm civets showed similar TP (2.9) to masked palm civets (2.7), which is equivalent to omnivorous diet. Scat analyses of common palm civets revealed that they sometimes consume rodents in Borneo (Nakashima et al. 2010, 2013; Colon and Sugau 2012), and their occasional faunivory was supported by our CSIA-AA. These two species are genetically close compared to the other two Paradoxurinae species (Patou et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2017) and show overlap in several food items (Nakabayashi 2020). However, competition could be mitigated by their habitats being different in altitude. While the occurrence records of common palm civets are concentrated in the lowlands, those of masked palm civets are concentrated in the highlands at an altitude of over 700 m in Borneo (Mathai et al. 2010; Brodie and Giordano 2011; Nagano et al. 2019; Nakabayashi et al. 2021). Geographical differences may be a more critical niche partitioning factor than diet for these two species. The measured TP for small-toothed palm civets (2.4 and 2.5) is between those of common palm civets and binturongs, suggesting their unique dietary niche among Paradoxurinae civets as omnivores consuming both plant and animal materials. This is partly supported by their unique dietary habits of feeding on tree bark sap, nectar, oil palm pith, and unripe fruits which the other Paradoxurinae civets do not consume in Borneo (Nakabayashi 2020). Contribution from these unique food sources would increase the overall dietary protein contribution from plants and lower the TP of small-toothed palm civets compared to common palm civets and masked palm civets.
Ecological significance
Our stable isotopic results suggested faunivory in several Paradoxurinae civet species in Borneo, which has never been confidently shown in previous observational studies (e.g., Harrison 1961). Paradoxurinae civet species are thought to be largely dependent on plant foods (Nakabayashi 2020) although their dental morphology (Anders 2005) and digestive tract anatomy (Gahkod 1878; Liu et al. 1997; McGrosky et al. 2016) present clear characteristics of Carnivora. Such an adaptation is not unique to civets because some other mammals in Carnivora largely depend on plant foods, such as extant giant pandas and extinct cave bears (Naito et al. 2020). However, this study suggested that the postulated assumption of a plant-dominated diet is only applicable for binturongs among the Paradoxurinae civet species in Borneo. Common palm civets, masked palm civets, and small-toothed palm civets showed TP values greater than 2.4, suggesting their omnivorous diet (Table 2, Fig. 4). Such an unexpected omnivorous diet was also suggested in South American extinct ground sloth Mylodon by CSIA-AA (Tejada et al. 2020). Considering that small-toothed palm civets evolutionarily diverged from the group containing these four species first, followed by binturongs and masked palm civets (Patou et al. 2008), the possible differences in TP are not explained by the evolutionary relationship among the subject species. In Viverridae civets, larger species feed on fibrous low-quality food (Gittleman 1985), such as figs. Binturongs have the largest body size and they cannot digest fruits efficiently (Crapo et al. 2002; Lambert et al. 2014), indicating that they need large amounts of food to extract sufficient energy for survival and reproduction compared to the other three species (Kleiber 1961). Because Ficus reproduces fruits year-round due to its obligate mutualism with pollinating fig wasps and has a relatively large crop size (Harrison et al. 2003), it is one of the most stable food resources in the Bornean rainforest where fruit production is unstable and low (Wich et al. 2011). Therefore, binturongs may strongly depend on figs for their diet, at least in Borneo. Considering that Asian rainforests possess a much larger number of sympatric carnivore species than the other tropical regions (Corlett 2007), strong dependence on plant foods in binturongs may reduce competition for faunivorous diets among sympatric carnivores.
Direct observation of food items in wild civet species is usually difficult, and previous field-based observational studies, such as focal individual observations and fecal content analysis (Nakabayashi 2020), failed to detect dietary partitioning in Paradoxurinae civet species. Most civets’ behaviors are not observable due to their nocturnal, solitary, and semiarboreal habits above 10–60 m canopies (Nakabayashi et al. 2017; M Nakabayashi personal observation). Observation of opportunistic consumption of small insects is quite difficult, and their faunivory had been underestimated. Furthermore, civets’ feces are difficult to obtain for fecal content analysis because several civet species, such as small-toothed palm civets and binturongs, defecate higher in the canopy (Nakabayashi et al. 2019; M Nakabayashi personal observation), making the detectability of these feces on the ground extremely low. Even if their fecal samples are obtained, some soft-bodied insects such as larvae and annelids are easily digested and thus are morphologically undetectable through the identification of macro remains in feces. This study shows that stable isotope analysis, as well as direct observation, is useful to reveal the entire diet of the subject species. Additionally, metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses of feces can be utilized further to reveal the detailed food items of mammalian species (e.g. Mallot et al. 2017; Tsutaya et al. 2021). The application of isotopic and biomolecular analyses, such as that conducted in this study, to animal species that are difficult to observe or have been studied little can illuminate unrevealed mechanisms of coexistence and facilitate efficient conservation approaches especially for non-charismatic medium- and small-sized mammals (Trimble and Van Aarde 2010; Troudet et al. 2017).
As with this study, stable isotope analyses have revealed nuanced dietary partitioning in various sympatric terrestrial mammalian taxa, such as Malagasy lemurs (Dammhahn and Kappeler 2014), great apes (Oelze et al. 2014), bats (Campbell et al. 2017; Oelbaum et al. 2019), rodents, and Bovidae (Djagoun et al. 2020). In general, dietary overlap in sympatric carnivores is extensive, especially for confamilial species (Arbogast et al. 2017; Webster et al. 2021), because of the morphological and physiological limitations to digestible diets (Stevens and Hume 2004). In this regard, the inclusion of and dependence on plant foods, in addition to faunal foods, enabled the Paradoxurinae civet species to compensate for their spatial, temporal, and taxonomic overlaps and similarities (Nakabayashi et al. 2016, 2017) and to occur sympatrically. Such subtle but important differences in closely related sympatric species would maintain high biodiversity in tropical regions (Whitmore 1984). It is possible that anthropogenic disturbances would destroy such a subtle difference, such that by exacerbating competition for fruits (Meijaard et al. 2005), and thus the exquisite coexistence mechanism and biodiversity are impaired.