This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of self-reported asthma and examined ETS exposure, active tobacco smoking along with demographic, lifestyle and behavioural characteristics in relation to self-reported asthma status among adolescents in Hawalli Governorate, Kuwait. The prevalence estimates of self-reported asthma and physician-diagnosed asthma were (20.5%) and (16.4%) respectively. The prevalence estimates for self-reported asthma is higher than the figures reported by earlier ISAAC studies conducted in Kuwait during 1995-1996 (16.8%) [8], and 2001-2002 (15.6%) [9]. The estimate of self-reported asthma in this study is also greater than an estimate (14.6%) reported in a recent study among university students in Kuwait [15]. In contrast, the prevalence estimate of physician-diagnosed asthma (16.4%) in this study is largely in agreement with the estimates from the 1995-1996 (16.8%) and 2001-2002 (15.6%) ISAAC studies in Kuwait [8, 9]. Additionally, prevalence estimate (20.5%) of self-reported asthma among high school students in this study was fairly comparable with the estimates reported among high-school students in Saudi Arabia (18.5%) [19], Lebanon (19.5%) [12], Virginia, USA (16%) [20], Lima, Peru (16.7%) [21], and much higher than a prevalence (10.7%) estimated among 6-15 years old 23,044 Japanese students based on ISAAC criteria [22]. Across Latin American countries, a wide variation in one-year prevalence of self-reported asthma diagnosed based on ISAAC criteria was recorded, which ranged from 6-28% among adolescents (13-14 years) and 7-27% among children (6-7 years) [23], with some countries registered higher estimates than the one in the present study. Furthermore, in the present study, 12-month prevalence of wheezing was 20.1%, which is higher than the 12-month prevalence estimates reported in earlier ISAAC studies conducted in Kuwait during 1995-1996 (16.1%) [8], and 2001-2002 (7.6%) [9]. Additionally, the 12-month prevalence of wheezing in the current study is also higher than the global estimate of 14.8% among adolescents aged 13-14 years [24]. Evaluation of worldwide trends in the prevalence of asthma symptoms based on ISAAC Phase III study has shown that while there was little change in the overall prevalence of current wheeze, the proportions of the children reported to have had asthma increased significantly, possibly reflecting greater awareness of this condition and/or changes in diagnostic practice. However, it was recognized that the increases in asthma symptoms prevalence in Africa, Latin America and parts of Asia indicate that the global burden of asthma is continuing to rise, but the global prevalence differences are lessening [25]. Hence with 20.5% prevalence estimate of self-reported asthma, Kuwait can be bracketed with the group of countries with high prevalence of self-reported asthma among adolescences. These differences in the self-reported asthma prevalence could possibly be due to varying distributions of underlying contributing factors such as populations’ genetics, dietary habits, microbial exposure, economic status, indoor or outdoor environment, climatic variation, and disease awareness [26, 27]. It has been argued that the global increases in asthma prevalence appear to include both allergic and non-allergic asthma which highlights the importance of considering the heterogeneity of asthma with different phenotypes having different pathophysiologic mechanisms [28]. Therefore, monitoring of adolescents’ respiratory disorders including asthma and identification of underlying factors in various geographical regions is warranted to alleviate the burden of asthma and related complications.
Multivariable log-binomial regression model showed that compared to non-smokers, current smoker adolescents were significantly more likely to be asthmatic. This finding is consistent with the reports from Britain [29], Argentina [30], South Korea [31, 32], wherein smoker adolescents reportedly were at greater risk for current self-reported asthma. Relatively a recent study also found 70% increased asthma risk among smoker than non-smokers young adults enrolled in a public sector university in Kuwait [15]. Thus, cconcerted efforts at high school-level to increase the awareness regarding deleterious effects of tobacco smoking may help in reducing tobacco consumption among adolescents.
Final multivariable log-binomial regression also revealed that the adolescents were significantly more likely to be asthmatic, if they have had ETS exposure at home. This finding is in agreement with the results of earlier cross-sectional studies undertaken in various regions across the globe using ISAAC methodology [30, 33]. These reports showed that adolescents were more likely to develop asthma if either or both parents were smokers compared to non-smoking parents [11, 30, 33, 34]. Another cross-sectional study from Spain showed that parental smoking was associated with a higher prevalence of all forms of asthma in the adolescents population, particularly if mother or both parents smoked [35]. In Mexico, a case-control study showed adolescents with asthma nearly were twice as likely to report one or more smokers at home as those without asthma [36]. In Sweden, a longitudinal population-based cohort study of children recruited at birth and followed through childhood and adolescence demonstrated 68% significantly increased risk of asthma among children up to 16 years of age born to heavy (≥ 10 cigarettes /d) smoking compared to non-smoking mothers [37]. To demonstrate the consistency of relationship between tobacco and the asthma risk across the globe, Mitchell and colleagues analyzed the ISAAC programme Phase III data on the 6-7 year age group (220 407 children from 75 centres in 32 countries) and 13-14 year age group (350 654 adolescents from 118 centres in 53 countries) and reported a significant association between current maternal smoking and current asthma symptoms. This association was held across all nine world regions covered by the study including Eastern Mediterranean region. Moreover the investigators showed a dose-response relationship between severe asthma symptoms and number of cigarettes smoked per day by both the parents [11]. Thus, cumulated anecdotal evidence on the link between ETS exposure and asthma risk among adolescents warned the causal relationship [37-39]. Furthermore, it has been argued that while significant advances in asthma treatment were made in the 20th century, it is evident that in the 21st century, asthma is likely to create a tremendous strain on a large population of socio-economically disadvantaged individuals with limited access to health care and resources [28]. Therefore, focused education to minimize the exposure to tobacco smoke through active or passive modes may alleviate the asthma burden in such populations.
There are some notable strengths of this study. First, the study sample comprised participants who were homogenous regarding age. Second, the use of sex-stratified sampling allowed enrollment of an almost equal number of male and female participants. Final, the use of the standardized and validated ISAAC questionnaire for the outcome assessment facilitated the comparison study results with that of other local, regional and international studies. Some limitations of this study should be considered while interpreting the results. First, this was a cross-sectional study and this design has inherent limitation in establishing temporal relationship between the studied exposures such as self-smoking status, ETS exposure at home and self-reported asthma. Second, past one-year data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with chances of recall bias. However, one-year period presumably was not long enough to severely hamper the recall the events. Third, we estimated the asthma prevalence for the past 12 months and if the children grew out of asthma, which they might have early on in their life then such cases were likely to be missed out as asthmatic in this evaluation. This might have led somewhat underestimation of self-reported asthma prevalence. However, due to a chronic nature of the disease, the number of such adolescents is likely to be very small and indeed might have negligible influence on the study results. Fourth, we enrolled the adolescents in the study as a sample of convenience, therefore, generalizability of the results to the other adolescents in the country and beyond should be exercised with care. However, we do not have any reason to believe that the adolescents in the study were any different from those at large in the population. Additionally, though our sample was statistically non-representative but was typical of Kuwaiti adolescents in the population at large. Final, the responses on outcome questions were self-reported and were not validated by more objective measurements. However, the ISAAC questionnaire used in this evaluation has been validated in multiple languages in different countries including Kuwait [8, 9, 11].