Comparison of Xe-X with other primordial components
From the isotope ratios of Xe-X shown in Fig. 3 we calculated isotope ratios normalised to 130Xe and plotted them in comparison with SW Xe (Fig. 4a).
It is clear that Xe-X can be largely explained by the mass-dependent isotope fractionation of SW Xe. However, the mass-fractionation line does not fit Xe-X perfectly: a significant deviation is observed for 129Xe and minor (but outside the error bars) for 131Xe, 132Хе, 134Xe and 136Xe. In this sense Xe-X is surprisingly similar to Xe-P1, including similar deviations of 129Xe and small deviations at other masses from the corresponding mass fractionation lines (Fig. 4b), though the deviations have a different isotope structure for each component and are slightly higher for Xe-X than for Xe-P1. The only significant difference between the components is in the degree of mass fractionation from SW composition: Xe-X is much more strongly fractionated, by a factor of 3.5, than Xe-P1 (Fig. 4).
Origin of Xe-X
This observation suggests that Xe-X and Xe-P1 can be considered as two types of planetary components formed from the same solar composition likely through similar physical processes of mass fractionation, which occurred with different intensity in each case. In other words, Xe-X belongs to the same family of planetary components and can therefore be named Xe-P7 (next available number) according to the P nomenclature28. The carrier of Xe-P7 is combustible in a similar manner to the carrier of Xe-P1: both are oxidized in nearly the same relatively low temperature (100-500oC) ranges, which are only slightly different from each other (Fig. 5). This means that both appear to be carbonaceous and may be chemically similar. One of the explanations for the very high Xe-P7 concentration in C0209 may be due to its carrier’s ability to trap Xe much more efficiently than that of P1 and/or because of the relatively high concentration of P7 carrier itself in the sample.
As discussed above, most Xe released from C0209 belongs to P7 component; the signature of Xe-P1 appears above 400oC where most of Xe-P7 is gone (Fig. 3, 4). Since the bulk concentrations and relative abundance of He, Ne and Ar in C0209 are similar to that in C0208, it is reasonable to suggest that these gases in C0209 mostly belong to P1 with some contribution of SW. However, from general considerations, it is impossible to imagine that P7 consists of only Xe without lighter noble gases. It is difficult to estimate how much He, Ne and Ar P7 is present in C0209 but it is clear that the measured 36Ar/130Xe in the sample represents an upper limit for pure P7.
Obviously the P7 component is not as widespread as P1: it has never been identified in any carbonaceous or ordinary chondrites and is present here only in one out of about 20 Ryugu samples analysed for Xe so far. The reason for that could be its low temperature resistance, i.e., it does not survive during thermal parent body metamorphism. Given its primitive status, Ryugu is probably the place where P7 could be preserved. Aqueous alteration does not seem to affect the P7 carrier phase significantly. The fact that this component is not present in all analysed Hayabusa2 samples can be explained by the sample’s heterogeneity due to the differences in their thermal history associated with impact events, which may appear on a very local scale. We believe that sooner or later, P7 must be identified in other Ryugu samples if noble gas studies in them continue.
On the three-isotope diagram (36Ar/130Xe vs. 136Xe/130Xe) the compositions of P7, P1 and SW form a trend indicating that element and isotope ratios in the components are positively correlated with each other (Fig. 6), i.e., the higher their enrichment by heavy elements the higher the enrichment of their isotopic compositions by heavy isotopes relative to SW composition. This may indicate that the processes resulting in formation of P1 and P7 noble gas components are similar. Since ions in SW have the same velocity, the heavier the mass the higher the ion energy. During implantation this results in different implantation ranges for element and isotopes of different masses and thus produces element and isotope fractionation in solids where the ions are implanted, i.e., Q phase grains, if their grain sizes are comparable with implantation ranges30. This happens because a larger fraction of heavy ions goes through without stopping inside the grains, compared to that of the lighter ions. However, the direction of fractionation in this case (depletion of heavy gases and isotopes relative to the SW composition) is opposite to what is observed in P1 and P7. Thus, P1 and P7 do not represent fractionated SW components as a result of its direct implantation into Q grains.
Correlation between the difference in the elemental composition of P1 noble gases from that in SW with FIP (first ionization potential)3 indicates that ionization is an important factor during the formation of the component. This is also true for P7. Among a number of different laboratory experiments aimed at reproducing the capture of noble gases in Q, the most promising are those in which ionized noble gases are trapped at low energy in a continuously growing surface32 or organic compounds33. To a certain extent, these experiments can reproduce the observed element and isotope fractionation in P1. These experiments are related to the processes in the protoplanetary disk with solar rather than SW starting composition, i.e., the composition of the solar photosphere. During the formation of SW in the solar atmosphere it is mass fractionated relative to the composition in the outer convection zone and photosphere. According to the Inefficient Coulomb drag (ICD) model and calculations based on the correlation between fast and slow SW isotopic compositions with He/H ratio34, Ne becomes slightly isotopically lighter in SW compared to solar photosphere (13.9 vs. 13.4 for 20Ne/22Ne ratio). For Xe, the solar photosphere isotopic composition was also estimated using the ICD model27. Compared to the photosphere, the elemental ratios in SW are fractionated in the opposite to the isotope fractionation direction since element ratios depend on the element’s FIPs, which are higher for the lighter noble gases when compared to heavier ones31, while isotope fractionation depends on ion masses. The range for solar composition is shown in Fig. 6. Thus, if carriers of P1 and P7 (Q phase) have been formed in the protoplanetary disk or protosolar molecular cloud, element and isotope fractionation during their formation should follow the directions as shown with arrows in Fig. 6, i.e., P1 is slightly or not at all fractionated in isotopic composition and strongly by elemental composition, while P7 is strongly fractionated by both isotopic and elemental compositions relative to solar composition.
Тhere remain, however, the following questions: a) Why does P7 have a different degree of fractionation compared to P1? b) What does the difference in the degree of fractionation for P1 and P7 mean in terms of the fractionation mechanism and formation of their carrier(s)? As discussed above, Xe-P7 is very rare and therefore does not contribute significantly to the Xe budget in meteorites but provides clues to the origin of Xe-P1, since the formation of both involves mass fractionation processes of varying degrees. To reveal the clues, the above questions need to be answered. However, first, the presence of P7 has to be confirmed in other Ryugu samples (material from the Bennu asteroid, which will soon be available for laboratory studies, is another potential source of the component). After that, in order to understand the chemical nature of the P7 carrier it will be important to establish its reaction with acids or other solvents.