3.1. Structural properties of Si2BN and Carbamazepine Model Molecules
The fully optimized structure of 2D Si2BN and Carbamazepine are shown in Fig. 1. The structural parameters, such as bond lengths (Si–Si − 2.24 Å, Si–B − 1.95 Å, Si–N − 1.75 Å and B–N − 1.46 Å) were found to be in good agreement with previously reported results. [65, 66, 67] Also for Carbamazepine (N-C -1.43 Å, N-H – 1.01 Å, C = O -1.24 Å, C-C − 1.4 Å, C-H -1.08 Å ).
The Si2BN planar structure exhibits so-called planar sp2hybridization and two different bonding types. One s-orbital, two p-orbitals, and three chemical species (Si, B, and N atoms) with various valence electrons in the final orbitals make up the majority of the sp2 hybridization. The s, px, and py orbitals combine to generate s bonding (in-plane) in the valence band (occupied states) in these orbitals, while the s* orbitals stand in for anti bonding in the conduction band (unoccupied states). The strongest covalent bonds, or s bonds, are what give the Si2BN structure its high formation energy and elastic characteristics, as seen in Fig. 1, The Si atom has Si, B, and N as nearest neighbors, while each B (N) has two Si atoms and one N (B) atom as nearest neighbors. The Si atoms find themselves in electron-deficient position and the variation in bonds works as an electron reservoir for an ad-atom or a molecule on the sheet (or NT) surface. The pz orbitals pointing out of plane of the Si2BN monolayer are odd with respect to the planar symmetry, which is not coupled with s bonding states. The side interactions with neighboring pz orbitals form delocalized π bonding and π* anti-bonding orbitals.
The lattice consists of different layers, each layer having hexagonal arrangements of silicon, boron and nitrogen atoms different layers are arranged in such a manner that boron in one layer is immediately above or below nitrogen and vice versa it implies that there is continous migration of dative bond across layers which provide stability of the molecule. In particular layer boron-nitrogen bond is formed by overlap sp2 hybride orbital also silicon atom changed its hybridization from SP3 to SP2 to maintain planer structure as shown in Fig. 1.
3.2. Si2BN-Carbamazepine physiochemical properties calculation
The capability of Si2BN nanoflake to adsorb pharmaceutical compounds, such Carbamazepine, is investigated. We start by considering different adsorption positions as shown in Fig. 2
Figure 2 shows that the adsorption process is mainly by the Si atoms in the flakes due to their interactive π-bond electrons. The adsorption energy (Ea) is calculated to insure the stability of the adsorption and to compare the adsorption strength among different adsorption sites using the equation: Ea = (ESi2BN + Ecarb − Ec). Where ESi2BN, Ecarb, and Ec is the ground state energies of the flake before adsorption, Carbamazepine and the flake after adsorption, respectively. The calculated positive values of the adsorption energy in Table 1 insure a successful adsorption process. The adsorption strength is comparable in the two adsorption sites, however, adsorption energy in case of edge adsorption is slightly higher. Atoms on edge sites could be more active than atoms on the surface. There are a variety of causes for this, including differing chemical environments compared to atoms on inner surfaces, which may also cause charge redistribution at the interface, and low CN (coordination number),since the exposed atoms at the edge of Si2BN may have unsaturated bonds, such as dangling bonds, that can act as active sites for adsorption. These unsaturated bonds are highly reactive and can form strong interactions with Carbamazepine's functional groups. As shown in Fig. 3 also The Si2BN edge might offer more freedom for Carbamazepine to adsorb in favorable positions due to reduced steric hindrance. This increased freedom can result in better alignment of bonding groups, leading to stronger adsorption on the edge. according to research on Si2BN and its functionalized ones, the edges can also promote the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), [68].
The stronger adsorption at the edge might involve less charge transfer between Carbamazepine and Si2BN compared to surface adsorption. The edge sites could interact through weaker vander Waals forces or other non-covalent interactions, allowing Carbamazepine to retain more of its original charge and result in a lower positive charge on the adsorbed molecule. The adsorption of Carbamazepine on the surface may induce charge redistribution within the Si2BN material as previously mentioned. The presence of the adsorbed molecule could lead to changes in the local electronic structure, resulting in a higher positive charge. The charge transfer (ΔQ = Qf − Qi, with Qf and Qi are the initial and final charge on Si2BN and Carbamazepine is calculated using Mullikan charge analysis [69] to provide additional information on the adsorption process and it provides a clear picture of donation and back donation between the two structures [70]. The values of ΔQ in Table 1, as shown Carbamazepine has positive charge while Si2BN has negative charge. This means that when Carbamazepine approaches and interacts with the Si2BN surface, there is a possibility of charge transfer between the molecule and the surface. The Si2BN material may have a different electron affinity or electronegativity compared to Carbamazepine. As a result, electrons from the adsorbate (carbamazepine) can be transferred to the Si2BN surface, making it relatively more negatively charged. And also the Electron Redistribution which previously mentioned, CBZ may experience charge redistribution. The electric field generated by the charged or polarized surface affects the distribution of electrons within the molecule. This redistribution leads to a separation of charge within the Carbamazepine, resulting in a partial positive charge on certain regions of the molecule.
Also the obtained dipole moment results of the formed complexes (3.96, 3.66 Debye) showed an increase in the reactivity of these complexes towards the surrounded environment as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
The adsorption energy (Ea), charge transfer (ΔQ), and energy gap (Eg) of Si2BN nanoflake before and after adsorption.
Structure
|
Ea (eV)
|
ΔQ(e)
|
Eg (eV)
|
Dipole moment
Debye
|
Si2BN
|
-
|
-
|
0.5083
|
0.000141
|
Carbamazepine
|
-
|
-
|
4.4392
|
4.105898
|
Si2BN edge
|
0.832750474
|
0.041501
|
0.7347
|
3.958081
|
Si2BN surface
|
0.82450542
|
0.060142
|
0.71702
|
3.661987
|
The increased dipole moment is due to Surface Induced Dipole Moment in which The interaction with the Si2BN surface can induce a dipole moment in Carbamazepine. The negatively charged surface can attract the positively charged regions of the molecule and repel the negatively charged regions, further enhancing the positive charge separation. As also noticed that the dipole moment of the Edge adsorbed molecules is little higher this can be attributed to stronger interactions, the presence of unsaturated bonds or defects, higher surface reactivity, and a preferred adsorption orientation at the edge of Si2BN.
3.3. Electronic properties
The effect of adsorption on electronic characteristics is explored by computing the energy gaps shown in Table 1 and displaying them. The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are also proven to present the origin of the lowest energy molecular states. HOMO/LUMO of Si2BN nanoflakes are shown in Fig. 4. The interactive π-electrons from Si-atoms interact to produce moderate π-bonds with lower energies than the B-N sigma bonds, which subsequently appear as the HOMO and LUMO that distribute on Si atoms Fig. 4 (a) and (b). The development of strong interactions between Carbamazepine and the nanoflake Si atoms (Fig. 4 (c-d)) indicates that the interacting π -electrons of the low energy states are the key reason for boosting the adsorption of the Si2BN nanoflake. As observed in the HOMO and LUMO distributions in Fig. 4 (c-d), the distribution of HOMO and LUMO cubes on flake atoms rather than the adsorbed Carbamazepine incase of adsorption on both positions implies that Carbamazepine forms stronger bonds with the flake than Si–Si bonds.
As seen in figure (4), the energy gap in case of edge adsorption location (0.7347 eV) is greater than that in case of surface position (0.71702 eV). This is due to the Electronic Interaction Strength since The interaction strength between Carbamazepine and Si2BN can vary between the edge and surface. The stronger interaction at the edge might result in more significant charge redistribution, leading to alterations in the energy levels and the energy gap and also due to Quantum confinement effects may be more pronounced at the edge of Si2BN compared to the surface. These effects can lead to changes in the energy levels of Carbamazepine adsorbed at the edge.
3.4.Molecular Electrostatic Potential (MESP):
Based on the electronic density, the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) is a highly useful descriptor for identifying areas of electrophilic attack, nucleophilic reactions, and hydrogen-bonding interactions [70, 71]. Since it is related to the electronegativity and the partial charge changes on the different atoms of Si2BN and Carbamazepine. Molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) maps are created for the studied chemical structures at DFT level of theory using B3LYP/6- 31G. The maps show negative and positive potentials using colors from red to dark blue. Red represents severe negative potentials, while dark blue represents positive potentials. Yellow zones have less negative potentials than red, and green regions are neutral. The electronegativity of connected atoms affects both potential distribution and color. Coupling strong electronegative atoms with less electronegative atoms shows red colors since The presence of atoms with approximately identical electronegativity narrows the color spectrum significantly. As a result, we may rely on the MESP maps as a physical characteristic to determine if the active locations of interest can conduct nucleophilic or electrophilic chemical interactions. In Fig. 5,The MESP map of pure Si2BN sheet consists of light and dark blue, green, and light yellow colors. The light and dark green and yellow colors are observed mainly at boron atoms and in the centers of Si2BN sheet, indicating slightly negative to neutral potentials at the core of the sheet. This may be due to some delocalized electrons from silicon atoms. The terminals have light and dark blue colors, likely due to the presence of less electronegative H atoms attached to nitrogen atoms, resulting in electrophilic reactions. therefore, it is the acidic hydrogen atom. Green color confirms the neutral part and zero potential of Si2BN. the positive (blue) regions of MEP demonstrated nucleophilic reactivity, while the negative (red) areas represented electrophilic reactivity. While in case of Carbamazepine the The red area in the diagram was centered around the oxygen and neighboring atoms. The nucleophilic reactivity of the molecule, however, was focused on the hydrogen atoms at the edges, even though the blue area was not clearly visible. This molecule can be useful for intermolecular interactions and metallic bonds. The findings from the charge analysis phase also support this conclusion.
The interaction between Si2BN nanoflake and Carbamazepine redistributes electric charge due to their different electronegativity. This results in localized increases in electrostatic potentials where they interact, as observed by potential value changes for edge and surface adsorption (-7.33 to 7.33 a.u and − 7.611 to 7.611 a.u, respectively). The differences in electrostatic potentials depend on the atom configurations and charge distributions within nanoflake and Carbamazepine.
3.5 The UV-visible absorption spectrum of Si2BN and Formed Complexes
In addition to how adsorption affects electrical characteristics, its impact on optical properties has also been studied and is depicted in Fig. 5. The optical absorption spectra of Si2BN before and after Carbamazepine adsorption are examined using time-dependent DFT simulations. The first 8 excited states are taken into account for the optical transitions. As depicted in Fig. 3 (e, f), the conspicuous absorption peak of pristine Si2BN, which initially resided around ~ 1889 nm, underwent a notable blue shift to approximately ~ 1725 nm and ~ 1747 nm upon edge and surface adsorption of Carbamazepine, respectively.
primary absorption peaks arise due to excitations that are relatively distant from the highest occupied molecular orbital to lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO → LUMO or H → L) transitions, a phenomenon elucidated in Table 2. Among the excited states, the eighth one (S8) in Si2BN emerges with the highest oscillator strength. This state exhibits diverse transitions, with the most substantial contributions originating from H → L + 2 (29.6%) and H-2 → L (25.28%). Post adsorption, the principal excitations deviate from H-L transitions. In line with the UV–Vis spectra, Table 2 demonstrates a shift towards higher energies in the dominant excitation subsequent to adsorption. For instance, the S8 transition, which was at 0.6563 eV in Si2BN, shifted, to 0.7184 eV and 0.7096 eV to in Si2BN-Carbamazepine for edge and surface adsorption, respectively.
The H → L transition, prominent in the lower excited states, offers a means to determine the optical gap and juxtapose it with the electronic counterpart. The data in Table 2 reveals that the lowest excited state in Si2BN is S2, where S1 displays zero oscillator strength, indicating forbidden transitions. In contrast, for S2, the H → L transition dominates (96.5%), signifying an optical band gap of 0.2834 eV, nearly half the magnitude of the electronic gap. The reduced optical band gap points to a pronounced interaction between electrons and holes, leading to the formation of excitonic states within the electronic energy gap.Analogous to the prevalent excitation, the lowest excitation also encounters a blue shift towards higher energies after adsorption, as outlined in Table 2. Consequently, the UV–Vis spectra, both before and after adsorption, can serve as a distinctive tool to authenticate the adsorption of distinct pollutants.
The observed blue shift subsequent to carbamazepine adsorption on Si2BN originates from alterations within the electronic structure and energy levels due to the interaction with the nanoflake. This shift can be elucidated by the rise in energy level of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) from 352 in the Si2BN substrate to 414 in the complex formed with carbamazepine. This increase provides a plausible explanation for the observed blue shift in the UV absorption spectrum.
The change in HOMO energy level indicates a significant influence of the interaction between carbamazepine and the Si2BN substrate on the electronic structure of the system. Notably, distinct edge states, intensified interaction, and pronounced quantum confinement effects—resulting from the unique characteristics of nanoscale dimensions and adsorption—contribute to discrete energy levels, modifications in the band gap, and shifts in optical behaviors. These factors are primarily responsible for the more pronounced blue shift observed in edge adsorption, where these effects amplify alterations in electronic transitions compared to surface adsorption.
The distinctive attributes of nanomaterials and the accompanying shifts in electronic transitions, as exemplified by the blue shift resulting from Carbamazepine adsorption on Si2BN nanoflakes, are most effectively interpreted within the framework of this phenomenon. Post-carbamazepine adsorption at the edge position, as depicted in Fig. 2, the Si2BN structure experiences more pronounced deformation (buckling). These structural changes encompass bond stretching and bending, culminating in a more substantial blue shift, as visually depicted in Fig. 6.