This study included 89 eyes from 85 patients. A total of 32 eyes were assigned to the Phaco-ExPRESS group; 25 eyes were assigned to the Phaco-Trab group, while another 32 eyes were assigned to the Trab group. The average follow-up periods were 26.5 ± 2.1 months, 27.5 ± 3.5 months, and 27.2 ± 3.0 months in the Phaco-ExPRESS, the Phaco-Trab, and the Trab group, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the demographics of the subjects in the three groups. Patients in the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Phaco-Trab group were older than the Trab group. All other baseline characteristics showed no statistical significance among the three groups. The change in IOP is presented in Table 2. The Trab group showed higher preoperative IOP than the other two groups (Phaco-ExPRESS vs. Trab, 21.15 ± 8.27 vs. 29.82 ± 11.32, P < 0.01; Phaco-Trab vs. Trab, 24.21 ± 7.80 vs. 29.82 ± 11.32, P = 0.01). However, no statistical significance was found in postoperative IOP between the three groups. For preoperative anti-glaucoma medications, the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Phaco-Trab group had fewer preoperative anti-glaucoma medications than the Trab group (Phaco-ExPRESS vs. Trab: 1.97 ± 1.12 vs. 3.00 ± 1.10, P < 0.01; Phaco-Trab vs. Trab: 2.24 ± 0.94 vs. 3.00 ± 1.10, P = 0.01). The Phaco-ExPRESS and the Trab group also showed fewer anti-glaucoma medications than the Phaco-Trab group at 24 months postoperatively (Phaco-ExPRESS vs. Phaco-Trab, 0.53 ± 0.84 vs. 1.32 ± 1.21, P = 0.04; Trab vs. Phaco-Trab, 0.72 ± 0.99 vs. 1.32 ± 1.21, P = 0.03).
Control of IOP after surgery in three groups
Table 3 shows the success rate of the three groups at 24 months postoperatively. The qualified success rate showed no significant difference among the three groups at postoperative 24 months (P = 0.90). For complete success rate, the Phaco-Trab group showed a lower success rate than the other groups (Phaco-Trab vs. Phaco-ExPRESS, P = 0.01; Phaco-Trab vs. Trab, P = 0.04) at postoperative 24 months, while no significant difference was found between the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Trab group (P = 0.61). Figure 2 shows the result of the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The Phaco-ExPRESS group showed a higher cumulative probability of qualified success and complete success than the Phaco-Trab group, while the Trab group showed a higher cumulative probability of complete success than the Phaco-Trab group. When comparing the Phaco-ExPRESS group with the Trab group, no statistical difference was found in the cumulative probability of qualified or complete success at postoperative 24 months.
Assessment of filtering blebs
As shown in Figure 3, in 24 months follow-up, the Phaco-ExPRESS, and the Trab group showed a statistically significant increase in mean epithelial microcysts area from 0.11 ± 0.06 μm2 to 0.19 ± 0.12 μm2 and from 0.13 ± 0.06 μm2 to 0.19 ± 0.15 μm2 in 1 μm2, from postoperative 2 weeks to postoperative 24 months respectively. However, the Phaco-Trab group decreased mean epithelial microcysts area from 0.09 ± 0.05 μm2 to 0.07 ± 0.09 μm2 in 1 μm2 from 2 weeks to 24 months postoperatively with no statistical significance. The Phaco-Trab groups showed significantly smaller mean epithelial microcysts area than the Trab and the Phaco-ExPRESS groups from 3 months to 24 months postoperatively. No significant difference in mean epithelial microcysts area was found between the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Trab group.
Figure 4 shows the density of hyperreflective dots in filtering blebs of the three groups. Even though both the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Phaco-Trab showed statistically significant decrease in hyperreflective dots from postoperative 2 weeks to 24 months, the hyperreflective dots of the Phaco-ExPRESS group were significantly decreased by 45.3% from postoperative 1 month to 6 months, while the Phaco-Trab group did not show a significant decrease in hyperreflective dots until 12 months postoperatively, of which the hyperreflective dots were decreased by 44.2%. When comparing the hyperreflective dots between the three groups, both the Phaco-Trab group and the Phaco-ExPRESS showed higher hyperreflective cell count than the Trab group at 2 weeks postoperatively (Phaco-Express vs. Trab: 112.70 ± 103.80 /mm2 vs. 63.48 ± 49.39 /mm2, P = 0.05; Phaco-Trab vs. Trab: 154.25 ± 125.14 /mm2 vs. 63.48 ± 49.39 /mm2, P < 0.01). Besides, the Phaco-Trab group also showed statistically higher hyperreflective dots than the Trab and the Phaco-ExPRESS group from 1 month to 12 months postoperatively.
Regarding the connective tissue density of the three groups, we calculated the percentage of filtering blebs with loose to mildly dense connective tissue networks (connective tissue grade ≤ 2). As shown in Figure 5, the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Trab group showed 59.4% and 65.6% filtering blebs with connective tissue grade ≤ 2, respectively, while only 12.0% of filtering blebs in the Phaco-Trab met the criteria at 24 months postoperatively. From postoperative 3 months to 24 months, the Phaco-Trab group showed a lower percentage of filtering blebs with loose connective tissue than the other two groups. In accordance with the IVCM results, assessment by AS-OCT also showed a lower percentage of filtering blebs with the striping phenomenon in the Phaco-Trab group than the other groups from postoperative 3 months to 24 months (shown in Fig. 6). At postoperative 24 months, only 24.0% of filtering blebs in the Phaco-Trab group had striping phenomenon while 53.1% and 59.4% of filtering blebs in the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Trab group, respectively, had striping phenomenon. No significant difference was found between the Phaco-ExPRESS and the Trab group in connective tissue density and the presence of the striping phenomenon at each time point.
To better investigate the relationship between bleb morphology parameters and IOP outcome, we used age and anti-glaucoma medications at postoperative 24 months as covariates. We analyzed the correlation between IOP at postoperative 24 months and IVCM parameters and the presence of striping phenomenon (Table 4). We found that the IOP at postoperatively 24 months is positively correlated with the presence of the striping phenomenon at 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. However, the IOP at each postoperative time point did not show any correlation with the epithelial micro cysts area, density of hyperreflective dots, or connective tissue grade.
No serious choroidal detachment and corneal decompensation were found in the three groups. Conjunctival wound dehiscence was found in two patients (6.3%) in the Phaco-ExPRESS group, one patient (4.0%) in the Phaco-Trab group, and no patient in the Trab group. All of them underwent wound repair by suturing. Two patients (6.3%) in the Phaco-ExPRESS group and two patients (8.0%) in the Phaco-Trab group presented with shallow anterior chambers in the early postoperative period, and all recovered after conservative treatments. In addition, two patients (6.3%) in the Phaco-ExPRESS group, two patients (8.0%) patients in the Phaco-Trab group, and one patient (3.1%) in the Trab group underwent laser suture lysis. Postoperative needling with intra-bleb 5 fluorouracil was performed in two patients (6.3%) in the Phaco-ExPRESS and three (12.0%) in the Phaco-Trab. No additional glaucoma surgery was performed in the three groups.
To determine interobserver variability, two different observers combined and analyzed all three groups of patients. The ICC of epithelial microcysts area, hyperreflective dots, and connective tissue grade by the investigator (YQZ) and investigator 2 (CXL) were 0.725, 0.784, 0.864, and 0.953, respectively.