“A part of my life”. A qualitative study about perceptions of female genital mutilation among affected women residing in Sweden

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3573612/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

“A part of my life”. A qualitative study about perceptions of female genital mutilation among affected women residing in Sweden

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3573612/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 21 May, 2024

Read the published version in BMC Women's Health →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is defined as all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injuries to them for non-medical reasons. Due to migration, healthcare providers in high-income countries need to better understand the consequences of FGM. The aim of this study was to elucidate women’s experiences of FGM, with particular focus on perceived health consequences and experiences of healthcare received in Sweden.

Methods

A qualitative study was performed through face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with eight women who had experienced FGM in childhood, prior to immigration to Sweden. The transcribed narratives were analyzed using content analysis.

Results

Three main categories emerged: “Living with FGM”, “Living with lifelong health consequences” and “Encounters with healthcare providers”. The participants highlighted the motives behind FGM and their mothers' ambivalence in the decision process. Although the majority of participants had undergone FGM type 3, the most severe type of FGM, the lifelong health consequences were diverse. Poor knowledge about FGM, insulting attitude, and lack of sensitive care were experienced when seeking healthcare in Sweden.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that FGM is a complex matter causing a diversity in perceived health consequences in women affected. Increased knowledge and awareness about FGM among healthcare providers in Sweden is of utmost importance. Further, this subject needs to be addressed in the healthcare encounter in a professional way.

Female genital mutilation

Interview study

Qualitative study

Sweden

healthcare

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines female genital mutilation (FGM), as all procedures involving removal of or injury to the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons (1). FGM is mostly carried out on girls between infancy and the age of 15 and the type of FGM varies between communities (1). The four types of FGM are presented in Fig. 1. It is estimated that more than 200 million girls and women have been subjected to FGM worldwide, and that nearly four million girls are at risk annually (2). FGM is mostly found in a cluster of countries on the African continent, with FGM prevalence as high as 98% among girls and women in Somalia. To a lesser extent, the practice is found in parts of the Middle East and Asia (2).

Complications after FGM include both immediate and long-term consequences. The immediate complications can include pain, hemorrhage, urinary problems, genital tissue swelling, infections and sometimes death (3, 4). Long-term complications include menstrual and urinary problems, as well as sexual problems such as painful intercourse and low satisfaction (3, 5, 6). FGM has also been associated with obstetric complications such as perineal tears, prolonged labor and episiotomy (3, 5, 7). The experience of FGM has further been associated with adverse mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (3, 8). It is suggested that the degree of complications is in relation to the severity of FGM (4, 8, 9).

Numerous sociocultural factors contribute to the practice and its continuation. Regardless, FGM is an expression of gender inequality rooted in social, economic and political structures (10). Where widely practiced, it is a part of the social norm and everyone is expected to comply with it. It is seen as a rite of passage that reinforces cultural identity and a sense of belonging (1). Ensuring the girl's chastity, marriageability and hygiene are other common motives. Although FGM is not endorsed by religion and predates Christianity and Islam, some communities consider the practice a religious requirement (1, 11, 12).

Due to migration, approximately half a million women and girls with experience of FGM now live in Europe (13). According to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare’s survey (2023), it is estimated that 68,000 girls and women in Sweden live with the consequences of FGM. The largest estimated groups are born in Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Iraq, Egypt, Sudan and Gambia (14). There are few qualitative studies on women’s experiences of FGM and its effect on health after migration. FGM is a global health concern and brings healthcare challenges in countries with large FGM-affected diasporas. Healthcare services in Western countries do not seem prepared to care for girls and women affected by FGM (15, 16). A report from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare describes lack of knowledge and experience of FGM among staff, language difficulties and fear of stigmatization as reasons for finding it difficult to discuss FGM with patients (17). The report highlighted the lack of care for women with FGM and suggests further knowledge-raising initiatives among healthcare providers.

Disempowerment, poor attitude and offensive comments from healthcare providers have been described by women with FGM when seeking prenatal care in Norway and the UK (18, 19). Studies from Sweden have reported that women with FGM sometimes feel looked down on, disrespected and not listened to by healthcare providers during pregnancy and delivery (20, 21). They also experienced language barriers and poor knowledge about FGM among the staff. In several studies, fear of poor knowledge has been expressed by participants (19, 22, 23). Contrastingly, women also reported positive encounters with health care providers mainly due to the midwifes’ or doctors’ good knowledge about FGM and friendly attitude (20, 22, 23).

The aim of this study was to elucidate the experiences of women’s lived experiences of FGM with focus on perceived consequences on their health, and experiences of encounters with healthcare providers in Sweden.

The aim of this study was to elucidate women’s experiences of FGM with particular focus on the perceived consequences on their health. Furthermore, we were interested in how the women experienced the encounters with healthcare providers in relation to FGM.

Our method chosen was an inductive, qualitative interview study. A qualitative study design is a common choice when there is a lack of available research on an issue such as in this case (24). A semi-structured interview method was chosen to give the participants the freedom to express their views in their own words within the topics chosen. The interviews were based on the idea that it is a dialogue between the interviewee and the interviewer (25). Our aim was to recruit participants that we considered could contribute with rich and in-depth information. Purposeful sampling was used in order to include participants that could contribute to the research question and we strived for heterogeneity among the participants concerning age, ethnic group and religion (26). However, the specialized FGM-clinic from which participants were recruited is mainly visited by women of reproductive age, and a majority originated from Somalia. The participants were recruited by clinicians working at the clinic. The interviews were done in parallel with recruitment until saturation was achieved, that is when no new perspectives emerged (27). In the interviews conducted at the end of data collection, the stories contained variations of previously described perspectives and experiences. Due to the Covid-19 epidemic, the time between the decision to participate and the actual interview was prolonged in some cases and the interview was cancelled in others.

The inclusion criteria for participants were age above 18, experience of FGM during childhood and Sweden as current place of residence. It was also required to speak Swedish. The participants were recruited from a gynecological outpatient clinic in Stockholm, Sweden during 2019–2021. The clinic is specialized in caring for women and girls with experience of FGM. Two pilot interviews were performed to ensure that the interview questions answered the aim and whether they opened the possibility for the informants to share their in-depth experiences. The pilot interviews were later included in the final result. After giving written informed consent, the participant chose the location for the interview. Six of the interviews took place in the participant's home and two were conducted in a private room in the hospital where the out-patient clinic is located.

The pre-tested semi-structured interview guide also included sociodemographic data and information about FGM status. The topics in the interview guide where three: 1) the experience of FGM, 2) informants own thoughts about possible self-lived health complications, 3) their perceptions of the encounter with Swedish health care providers. The first author (BE) conducted all the interviews. All interviews were performed face-to-face and digitally recorded for later verbatim transcription. Each interview lasted between 45 and 90 minutes.

The transcribed text was analyzed using content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman (28). The analysis was conducted in five steps. First, all texts were read carefully, yielding an overall impression of the content. Second, so-called meaning units of one or more sentences were selected. Third, the underlying meanings were condensed. Fourth, the condensations were formulated into codes. The text was critically analyzed, read and compared to achieve reasonability. Lastly, the researchers reflected upon and discussed the findings, considering the research questions and agreed on the subcategories and main categories.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2019-01492). The ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed (29). Informed written and oral consent were obtained from the participants at recruitment, including that they could withdraw from the study at any time.

Eight women who met the inclusion criteria agreed to take part in the study. Their ages ranged from 25 to 36 years, and they had resided in Sweden between 10 and 30 years. A majority of participants migrated to Sweden at the age of 10 or younger. All of them spoke good or excellent Swedish. One woman originated from Eritrea, one from eastern Ethiopia (Somali region) and the remaining from Somalia. Seven of them were mothers or soon-to-be mothers. Six of the participants had a college or university degree and two had secondary school-level education. One participant was Orthodox Christian and the rest identified themselves as Sunni Muslims. One woman had been subjected to FGM type 2 and the remaining seven to FGM type 3. All of the infibulated women had undergone deinfibulation. The names below the quotations are not the real names of the participants in this study. The three main categories and ten subcategories that emerged from the analysis are presented in Fig. 2.

Living with FGM

All participating women shared the experience of having undergone FGM as girls. The women’s memories of the event were all different. Most participants did not know what was about to happen and were very surprised. The age at the event varied between 6 months and 12 years of age. All girls except one underwent FGM type 3. The context varied with six women being genitally mutilated in their own home or the home of a grandmother or aunt, and two of the women at health facilities. Seven women reported having a female circumciser whereas one woman reported that the procedure was performed by a male doctor. Some of the women recalled the event as something very traumatic and painful while others experienced little pain or mainly pain afterwards when passing urine. Two women had very little or recalled no memory at all from the event. One woman explained the procedure as something nontraumatic and without pain.

Preserving virginity and culture

The women expressed that culture was the main reason for continuation of the tradition of FGM and that the tradition is based on safeguarding and ensuring virginity. A general explanation for the tradition is that it transforms girls into “real” women and that it was done to avoid condemnation, harassment, and ostracism.

“It is a tradition. That women should not feel sexual desire and practice sex without being married...They believe they remove the desire to have sex, but that is not the case.” (Ayan)

Other arguments recalled were due to the force of social norms, being part of the community, not feeling ashamed as a parent, or to hurry up and ensure that it was performed before migration.

“I personally remember wanting to go through it because everyone my age had it done. It was such a thing that if you didn't have it done, you were ashamed. You wanted to feel like a woman, you wanted to be a part of the gang… I wanted to do it, it was really a decision I took… Also, I was influenced by the opinions of others, influenced by society's opinions and the culture. You want to be like your mother, your sister, your grandmother.” (Hiba, 7 years old when subjected to FGM)

The participating women mentioned that there is no clear religious argument for FGM, except one woman who mentioned pricking from religious Islamic texts (Hadiz). Although culture and tradition emerged as a central motive from the interviews, this was also questioned within the family. It was described that the tradition was continued, despite the knowledge of the harm it resulted in, because of the perceived social benefits.

“This is the way it always has been. The tradition just continues, without being questioned. It was never because of Islam…God created you just like you are, you don’t need to change anything. So, I think if you follow that literally, this would never exist.” (Hiba)

The mother’s ambivalence in the decision process of FGM

The motive most often mentioned for continuing the practice of FGM was persuasion from older female relatives. Several women mentioned that their grandmothers played a significant role. One woman was subjected to FGM while living with her grandmother when her parents were migrating to Europe. The grandmother initiated the FGM without asking for the parents' permission.

The mothers of the participants were described as having a main role but in an ambivalent position. Almost all the narratives included love and compassion for their own mothers when describing the decision process around FGM. The participants often reported that their mothers were under the power of their own mothers (the interviewees grandmothers). The peer pressure was mentioned as a strong argument, although the mothers were resisting. And if the mothers were present at the time of the mutilation, they could make sure that a less severe type was performed. It was also described by some that the mutilation was hastened due to forthcoming migration.

“I was like three years old, and my mother wanted to speed up the process because we were leaving for Sweden. She didn't want to have that taboo feeling. That she hadn't done it even though we were going abroad. She told me that there was not much that was cut. Rather that they had sewed everything together. To make it look covered somehow… And then she also told me that if she had more knowledge, she would never have done this. And I think she has said it to me many times.” (Deeqa)

One of the participants described how she herself put pressure on her mother due to her strong wish to undergo FGM. She remembered how she wished to belong to the group and to not feel ashamed about being different from her peers.

The participants remembered how their mothers let them become genitally mutilated without themselves actually wanting it but trusting that this was the best for their daughter. One of the mothers were described as clearly against the practice: she later even lectured to newly immigrated neighbours in Sweden about the negative health consequences of FGM.

“My mother didn't want me to be mutilated but everyone else did it and everyone knew each other. She felt the pressure… She didn't want me to be bullied. So, she did it for my own sake… Somali culture is special. Sometimes you have to, even if you don't want to. She did her best. I am not angry at her.” (Fatima)

One of the participants said that her mother was in favor of the tradition and made sure that it was done without the father's knowledge since he was against the tradition. Two of the participants described how their grandmothers initiated the procedure without the permission of the parents. The fathers of the women were either not present or against the tradition to mutilate girls.

“Dad was against it but was not there to stop it. My dad, grandfather and all the men in my family were totally against it… My grandmother did it behind my grandfather's back and my mother did it behind my father's back.” (Deeqa)

Processing FGM through life

Most women described FGM as something they had gone through earlier in life, however later reconciled with. It was also described by some as having been part of their identity, a feeling that changed over time. Responding to an open question on how they perceive themselves in relation to FGM, several expressed that they did not see themselves as victims.

“I do not feel like a victim, however it's of course a part of me. A part of my life. That's who I am today. I would not replace it for anything else, because I do not have anything else to compare with… I feel like a strong person who has gone through this and today I feel good. I have my family, my children, and a fantastic sex life.” (Deeqa)

Most of the participants did not feel anger towards their parents that had let them undergo FGM. However, some of them expressed frustration. One participant found out that she was mutilated during a gynecological examination and described how mad it made her and that she thereafter talked to her parents about it.

“In the beginning I was very mad. Now I don't think about it. Well, I think I actually do… It took me some time. I was very mad in the beginning, and I didn’t want to talk to them at all. But then I saw how bad it made my mom and dad feel... Okay I know, It's not them, it's the culture. So really, it's not their fault, it's the culture. This has been happening for the longest time.” (Senait)

One participant described how she was informed about FGM from a newly arrived family from Somalia. Before this encounter she did not perceive she had much knowledge about the motives of FGM. But through this relationship she learnt more about the culture, language and concept of purity linked to FGM. However, she found the practice of FGM very problematic and couldn’t understand why the young girls in that family protected the culture.

“We thought, you can't do that to people, but they told us ‘we are clean… you can stick a match in us’. I answered ‘what, that's not normal!’ But they were really proud and thought that you aren't a woman if you aren't like that, that you aren't clean and that the man should open you up, you shouldn't have the temptation.” (Khadra)

All participants in this study expressed a strong negative attitude towards the tradition of FGM. The negative attitude was due to the health risks, pain and the unnecessary and old-fashioned tradition of controlling girls’ bodies. There were different opinions whether FGM continues to be practised in the diaspora. Some found it possible, especially during vacation trips to other countries. Increased knowledge and fear of punishment were recurrent motivations for the abandonment of the tradition after migration.

“Yes, but of course. No, but maybe, it depends on the parents. If they're conservative you know, they might take the girl back and do it. But maybe that's not happening here. Everyone is scared too.“ (Fatima)

Living with lifelong health consequences

Challenges during menstruation, urination and sexual intercourse

Most of the participating women did not experience their menstruation as challenging at all. However, for some women the menstrual period was associated with severe pain, in a few cases to the degree that they did not know how to handle it. One woman remembered how she fainted from pain when in school.

“Each time I got my period, I felt I was going to pass out. I was very pale and it was so damn painful...” (Ayan)

Some of the participating women described that urination was time consuming and involved different measures and adjustments to be able to urinate.

“Previously it felt like I needed to put pressure (on the bladder) to pee faster.” (Hiba)

Most of the participants with previous sexual experiences described painful intercourses when they started to practice it.

“It felt tight, it was really painful.” (Zahra)

The deinfibulation as a positive turning point

Deinfibulation refers to the surgical procedure where the scar tissue in the seal covering the infibulated vulva is opened. Most women had the procedure done in Sweden, however one woman had it performed in England. For some of the participants the operation was postponed because of traumatic memories from the FGM. The deinfibulation was performed either with local anesthetics or full anesthesia. Most women did not experience any discomfort after the deinfibulation, however one mentioned soreness in the area, which was relieved with anesthetic gel. One woman described a strong emotional reaction of relief after the deinfibulation. The deinfibulation took place either independently of marriage, just after marriage or during pregnancy.

“I wanted to do it… but there are prejudices if you have done it. Maybe you are not a virgin anymore and stuff like that…I didn't want to do the operation and then get shit for it later, for something I did not do... I wanted to wait until I felt ready. So, it took another 4 years.” (Hiba)

All women experienced the deinfibulation as a positive turning point. The deinfibulation made vaginal intercourse possible and painless. Positive changes were described as being able to pass urine without the procedure taking a very long time and “not having to press” anymore when urinating.

“It was an aha-experience to be able to pee without it taking so long… The urine stream came differently.” (Amal)

Also, the pain that some of the participants had lived with during the menstrual period disappeared after the deinfibulation. Some of the women expressed that they did not understand until after the deinfibulation that the suffering they had experienced previously during urination and menstruation was not normal and not necessary to live with.

“Prior to my deinfibulation I always had very painful periods. I thought it was normal.” (Ayan)

“I used to pee so slowly...It's more free now!… Previously I had to wait and put my finger like this to wash myself… Now I don't need to. It goes really fast. I don't know why I waited so long.” (Fatima)

One of the participants explained that she was happy with her deinfibulation since it released the pain during intercourse. But later in life, after childbirth, she felt that her genitals were different and embarrassing, unlike before childbirth.

“You know when you are mutilated, everything is sort of even and pretty down there. An opening that is not too wide. Now after giving birth to my children they didn't sew it back as before. Now it is more open. Now the urine tract and everything is visible as it should be. Then of course that suddenly feels strange to me… because this is not the way I used to look.” (Deeqa)

Lifelong learning about sexual pleasure

From the women's narratives different aspects related to sexuality emerged. Several women mentioned difficulties imagining how their sexual life would have been without the experience of FGM. The women’s sexual experiences differed. Some women had experience of long-time relationships, whereas others historically had several different sexual partners. One of the participants who recently got married explained that she yet had no experience of sexual intercourse or masturbation. Most of the women could reach orgasm although the issue of reaching orgasm was challenging for some of the women who described the process as very time consuming.

“I can achieve orgasm, but not so often. I feel limited in what I can do… I know that I should practice stimulating myself, but I don't feel comfortable yet.” (Senait)

The reasons behind the sexual challenges described differed among women, some related to inexperience, some related to the mutilation and some related to the partner.

“I think it depends on the man. The father of my child was really bad at sex. He was not sensitive at all or interested in my emotions or satisfaction.” (Zahra)

It was also described that they needed to explore their bodies on their own to gradually develop skills to better enjoy their sexual life. FGM being the clear cause of challenges in sexual enjoyment was also stated in few cases.

“It was so painful in the beginning... We didn’t have much knowledge about sex at all… Now I understand my body much better. Even if I don't have a clitoris, I know that I can reach orgasm. But I needed to practice a lot.” (Khadra)

One participant recounted psychological suffering due to alleged problems associated to FGM. The woman expressed how bad she felt when people talked about the problems she was expected to have due the FGM. Hearing about the negative health consequences mainly related to sexual enjoyment, but also to urination and menstrual periods was difficult to relate to as she had not experienced those herself. Later, when she started to have sex, she felt very insecure due to all the negative “talking”.

“I always tried to object when others talked about mutilated girls, like ‘they don't feel anything’ and ‘they are not feeling well and have lots of problems down there’. I used to say that I don’t have any problems and I feel just fine!” (Deeqa)

“You know, you have been hearing all the time ‘you should not be able to feel anything, you have no feelings, you might as well read a magazine’ (while having sex). So, this is what you hear, and then you believe it. Or I didn't think it would affect me, but apparently it did. You see, I was affected by that in an unconscious way.” (Deeqa)

Encounters with the healthcare providers

Being acknowledged in the encounter with healthcare providers

Encounters with healthcare providers emerged as either positive or mixed with negative experiences. Several of the participants expressed their own experiences of trust and feeling safe and comfortable in the encounter with healthcare providers. In those positive encounters they highlighted being acknowledged, that is, being asked about or neutrally explained that they had undergone FGM. The participants also appreciated knowledgeable information provided in a sensitive and compassionate way. This was often described as a feeling of being educated. Further, being referred to psychological counseling was also appreciated. All the participants described the encounters at a specialist clinic eliciting feelings of trust and comfort and being educated. Further, it also emerged that it was appreciated when not referring to FGM if not relevant during the healthcare encounter.

“She knew that just because I was circumcised it does not define my whole personality or who I am. So, she treated me like I was just any person.” (Ayan)

Feeling ignored

Experiences of feeling ignored were expressed by several participants during gynecological examination and delivery. Some participants did not feel included in the reasoning about specific situations. One woman overheard conversations from the corridor about herself and how the caesarean section was decided on due to the FGM, something that was not explained to her. That feeling of being ignored was also experienced by another participant during delivery. She perceived that the staff did not explain why so many people examined her.

“Doctors and midwives were running in and out (from the delivery room) and everybody said: We do not know how to fix this.” (Ayan)

Feeling ignored was also experienced when healthcare providers did not ask or mention the fact that the woman had undergone FGM. Khadra, a woman with four children, had never been asked about FGM:

“It feels like they don’t see you… It's like, you are looking at my private parts...You are the one with more knowledge. It's like not asking a woman with bruises if she has been abused!... I think it is inhumane because they could change someone's life.” (Khadra)

A couple of the participants commented that they would have appreciated it if psychological counseling was being offered when seeking medical advice.

“They just think ‘We are going to fix this person, just open her up and everything is over.’ But when they opened me floodgates of shit came out! My memories came back, that I thought I had forgotten.” (Ayan)

Experiences of insulting attitudes

Delayed care-seeking related to the FGM experience was expressed. Memories from the FGM event in childhood was explained as a reason to avoid seeking care for symptoms such as sexual dysfunction and menstrual pain. But seeking care was also avoided by some due to prior experiences of insulting attitudes. The silence from healthcare providers; not explaining, asking, or including the women in the decision making, was expressed as offensive by some of the participants. Furthermore, several participants experienced comments from healthcare providers that they perceived insulting.

“I remember her comment… ‘This was tight!’ And I was like, ‘what is she saying?’... I felt so embarrassed, why did she say that? But I never understood that I was mutilated. She didn't tell me. Maybe she didn't understand that I was mutilated either… So, I thought this was normal… I felt uncomfortable, I never wanted to go to the gynecologist again.” (Senait)

But for some it was also perceived as insulting when seeking health care for other reasons than FGM, but still offered care for the FGM on the initiative of the healthcare provider. For example, one woman booked an appointment due to symptoms of urinary tract infection, but was told about the advantages to reconstruct her clitoris:

“The doctor talked a lot about my mutilation, that I could seek medical care. And they could help me get my clitoris back. And that they could help me look normal again… Sure, I was not angry with him, since I understood that he only wanted to help me. But I went there to talk about my urinary tract infection, not about my mutilation. If I needed antibiotics or something. Not to get help to look normal. (Deeqa)

Feeling as of having no choice

One of the participants recalled that when she was a teenager, she had severe menstrual pain and was referred to a gynecologist by the school nurse. She said she was offered to have a deinfibulation operation performed, but the healthcare personnel did not understand the sensitivity of the cultural situation as her mother was present during the consultation.

“She examined me and said ‘you have the choice if you want it or not.’ But my mother was with me, so I did not have much of a choice. This was before I got married.” (Fatima)

Preserving virginity was described in this study as one of the main motives for performing FGM, which is in line with reports from the WHO (1). In many communities, female virginity is considered an absolute prerequisite for marriage, and the family's honor is dependent upon a girl's virginity (30, 31). Infibulation (FGM type 3) is associated with women's virginity and virtue, but also men's sexual pleasure (32–34). An intact infibulation at marriage is proof of her virginity and high moral standards (35, 36). According to the WHO, infibulation is considered the most severe type of FGM, mostly practiced in the north-eastern region of Africa; Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan (1).

In this study, FGM was mainly expressed as something the women had gone through in the past, and now reconciled with. FGM was further expressed by some as being part of their identity without being their only identity. Several participants talked about the practice of FGM as a social convention. It caused them both frustration, but also a way to understand why FGM continued to exist despite the society’s awareness of negative health consequences. All participants expressed a strong negative attitude towards FGM.

The participating women’s mothers’ ambivalence in the decision-making process regarding having their daughter undergo FGM or not, emerged in this study. Most of the participants explained the difficulties their own mothers had when deciding to have the procedure done, as the decision process to a great extent was governed by other female family members, social pressure, fear of harassment and exclusion. One of the participants expressed that fear of exclusion and the strong wish for her to belong, contributed to her mother’s decision of her undergoing FGM. It has previously been well described how FGM is motivated as a way to secure a good life for one’s daughters, despite having a negative attitude towards the practice (10). Even post migration, social pressure to perform FGM on one’s daughters have been shown in several Nordic studies. The main risk has been described when revisiting the original country and being under the influence of relatives (31, 37).

The fathers of the participants on the other hand were either not present or strongly against the tradition. Men’s rising negative attitude towards the tradition has been shown in previous studies (38, 39). A systemic review from 2015 found that education, knowledge of the health complications of FGM, age, religion, urban living, and migration influence men’s stated support for the abandonment of FGM (40).

In the present study several negative lifelong health consequences were presented, all confirmed by previous literature (3–6). Previous research has suggested that the complications are in relation to the severity of FGM (4, 8, 9). In our study, the majority of participants were subjected to infibulation. However, some of them experienced long-term suffering whereas others perceived the consequences as minor. This variety of experiences in relation to FGM, despite having undergone the same type, is an important finding showing the heterogeneity between individuals.

In this study, all women except one, had undergone infibulation and later in life a medical deinfibulation. There was a variation between the narratives regarding views on the timing of medical deinfibulation. Despite a resistance to all forms of FGM, some found themselves in a limbo between traditional norms in the countries of origin and Swedish norms. While most women had the deinfibulation done independent of marriage, mainly due to physical problems, others wanted to wait until marriage. Out of them, only one woman distinctly explained that she avoided premarital deinfibulation, in order not to be accused of premarital sex. This is in contrast to other Scandinavian studies regarding premarital deinfibulation, where the women felt hesitant to undergo medical defibulation due to traditional perceptions and values of virginity (32, 33).

Deinfibulation was perceived as a turning point in this study. This refers to medical deinfibulation - a simple surgical procedure that can be performed after infibulation. During deinfibulation, the covering seal consisting of the labia that were joined together during the mutilation, are surgically opened, in order to relieve passage of urine and menstrual blood and to enable vaginal intercourse and vaginal birth (41). Medical deinfibulation should not be confused with the so-called traditional deinfibulation; when the partner is expected to widen the bride's narrowed vagina through penile penetration (42). In this study traditional deinfibulation was never mentioned by the participants, whereas medical deinfibulation was seen as a positive option. This is in contrast with previous studies conducted in Sweden and Norway (32, 34). In the Norwegian study it was shown that medical deinfibulation was considered a threat, undermining men’s attempt to prove their virility and manhood through the traditional penile penetration. Furthermore it was described that the larger orifice created by a medical deinfibulation would result in a lesser tight opening, thus jeopardizing male pleasure (34). In the Swedish study women's perception of medicalised deinfibulation was strongly influenced by the importance of being a virgin and being able to prove their virginity (32). Differences in views on medical deinfibulation between our studies could be related to time in the new country after immigration. Time is often discussed as a factor for changing attitudes regarding FGM (43–45). Our study included participants that at the time of the interview had lived in Sweden between 10 and 32 years (average 24 years), while participants in the study by Chavez et al (32) included women that had lived in Sweden between 9 months and 6 years (average 4 years). Another difference worth mentioning is that most of the participants in our study had lived in Sweden from a young age. In a study from UK exploring experiences and attitudes related to FGM in association with age at arrival in the new country, they concluded that living in UK from a younger age appeared to be associated with abandonment of FGM (46). Living in a new country where FGM is perceived as something harmful could provide opportunity to reflect on one’s own experience of FGM as well as on traditional values. Medical deinfibulation independently from marriage might be interpreted as a step towards taking a stand against old traditions, thereby reclaiming the body and autonomy.

Although positive encounters with healthcare services were reported in our study, most participants also recounted negative experiences. The participants described being ignored, not included in the decision process and poor attitude as major reasons for having a negative experience with healthcare providers. Furthermore, they found poor knowledge among healthcare providers, or fear of ignorance, as a hindering factor for seeking healthcare. This is in accordance with other studies conducted in Europe, where challenges in encounters between healthcare providers and women with experience of FGM have been highlighted (18, 20, 23, 47).

From prior studies on healthcare providers’ perspective, Swedish midwives and obstetricians have expressed lack of knowledge, lack of guidelines and inconsistent practice in care of women with FGM as major factors resulting in less-than-optimal care (48–50). They also found interaction with the women complex, due to language barriers, cultural differences and because of sensitivity of the issue of FGM. Lack of knowledge about FGM among healthcare providers is further well described in several publications from other high-income countries (18, 51–55).

From the concerned women’s perspective, not being asked or being asked about FGM status was a recurrent subject. On one hand it was described that not being asked about it made them feel ignored. Women expected the healthcare provider to address the subject of FGM and do it with a respectful and professional manner, because it was difficult for themselves to broach the subject. This finding is consistent with findings in other studies (47, 56, 57). On the other hand, if being asked they had concerns and certain expectations of how to be asked about it. They wished that the issue of FGM was raised in a sensitive way when relevant. In the study by Omron et al the women emphasized the importance of knowledge of the cultural setting and asking questions in a sensitive matter when caring for women with FGM. The importance of verbal and non-verbal communication was also highlighted here, in accordance with findings expressed in our study (57).

During the interviews the women spoke about FGM as something that had harmed them physically, psychologically or in both ways. They could also describe their overall wellbeing as good. Acceptance was a strategy used to move on, while self-exploration a way to reach bodily understanding. Further, positive encounters with healthcare providers also seemed to play a significant role in perceiving good health. This was in part due to the opportunity of accessing medical care such as surgery, but also largely due to the experience of being professionally treated. Thus, an important finding is that healthcare providers approach is crucial in making positive changes in the lives of women subjected to FGM. The healthcare encounter can therefore be seen as an opportunity to promote improved health in several ways. Basic education about FGM and its consequences to healthcare providers is a prerequisite for the ability to provide good care.

The aim of this study was to explore experiences and perceptions among individuals with a history of FGM, now living in Sweden. The results in this study thus reflect the perception from a limited number of women, which reduces generalizability. Recruitment from a specialized gynecological clinic for women with experience of FGM facilitated purposive sampling and further gave the opportunity to offer psychological support if needed. However, one can argue that women visiting the clinic all had issues concerning FGM, thereby contributing to bias. Women with a less severe form of FGM may never seek healthcare based on the FGM status and can have different experiences and perceptions of FGM. Further, the criteria for participants to be able to speak Swedish, without the need of an interpreter, could also contribute to bias regarding attitudes and views on FGM, as this suggests longer residency in Sweden. The decision to exclude women that could not express themselves in Swedish was discussed thoroughly. When using an interpreter during interviews, parts of emotions and stories may be lost in translation. Participants may also fear that confidentiality may be compromised if a third party is listening. These reasons contributed to the decision not to use an interpreter.

There are different strategies to enhance quality in qualitative research and they often address multiple criteria simultaneously. One aspect is the researcher’s experience in the field, which makes it more likely to gain rich, detailed information from the participants (58). The researchers in this study have an in-depth knowledge of FGM. Reflexivity strategies involve attending systematically and continually to the context of knowledge constructions and particularly to the researcher’s potential effect on the collection, analysis and interpretation of data. Reflexivity involves awareness that the researchers bring to the inquiry a unique personal background and set of values that can affect the research process. So called investigator triangulation was performed in this study. It refers to the use of two or more researchers to make analysis and interpretations decisions. The premise is that investigators can reduce the risk of biased judgements and interpretations through collaboration (59).

This study illustrates that FGM is a complex matter causing a variety in experiences and perceived health consequences among women affected. The study also indicates that clinical encounters have the potential to be improved through increased knowledge of FGM among health care providers. Recognizing the vast diversity among women affected, exerting a sensitive approach and individualizing healthcare could improve perceptions of healthcare encounters.

Further, the positive attitudes to medical deinfibulation, including those performed independent from marriage, might be seen as a positive step towards taking a stand against old harmful traditions and reclaiming the body and autonomy.

FGM

Female genital mutilation

WHO

World Health Organization

PTSD

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval to conduct the study was granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2019-01492). Ethical approval comprised the procedure to collect informed consent, i.e., participants gave their written consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials
The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding
The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Authors' contributions

Study conception and design: BE, VB, LM

Acquisition of data: BE

Analysis and interpretation of data: BE, VB

Drafting of manuscript: BE

Critical revision: BE, VB, CB, LM

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participating women for their generosity to share their experiences and thoughts.

World Health Organization. Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement - OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO [webbsite]., Geneva2008 [cited 2023 April 20]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43839/9789241596442_eng.pdf?sequence=1.
United Nations Children's Fund. At least 200 million girls and women alive today living in 31 countries have undergone FGM [webbsite]. UNICEF; 2023 [cited 2023 May 20]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/female-genital-mutilation/.
World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation: Fact sheet 2023 [cited 2023 April 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation.
Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11):e006316.
Lurie JM, Weidman A, Huynh S, Delgado D, Easthausen I, Kaur G. Painful gynecologic and obstetric complications of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(3):e1003088.
Andersson S, Rymer J, Joyce D, Momoh C, Gayle C. Sexual quality of life in women who have undergone female genital mutilation: a case–control study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2012;119(13):1606–11.
Eshraghi B, Hermansson J, Berggren V, Marions L. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter tear among primiparous women with a history of female genital mutilation, giving birth in Sweden. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0279295.
Abdalla SM, Galea S. Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(4):e001553.
Banks E, Meirik O, Farley T, Akande O, Bathija H, Ali M. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1835–41.
United Nations Children's Fund. Changing a harmful Social Convension: Femate Genital Mutilation/Cutting, Innocenti Digest, no.12. Italy; 2005.
Nour NM. Female genital cutting: a persisting practice. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(3):135–9.
Mackie G, LeJeune J. Social Dynamics of Abandonment of Harmful Practices. United Nations; 2009.
Van Baelen L, Ortensi L, Leye E. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(6):474–82.
Socialstyrelsen [Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare]. Estimation of the number of women and girls in Sweden in 2021 who can have been exposed or are at risk of subjected to female genital mutilation. Stockholm, Sweden: National Board of Health and Welfare.; 2023.
Zurynski Y, Sureshkumar P, Phu A, Elliott E. Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015;15:32.
Reig-Alcaraz M, Siles-González J, Solano-Ruiz C. A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilation. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(2):245–60.
Socialstyrelsen [Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare]. Inventering av vård för kvinnor och flickor som har varit utsatta för könsstympning. [Inventory of care for women and girls who have been exposed to genital mutilation.]. Stockholm; 2021.
Vangen S, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Traeen B, Stray-Pedersen B. Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;112(1):29–35.
Konje JK, Konje JC. Experiences of accessing maternity care in the UK: Perspectives from Somali migrant women in Leicester. Eur J Midwifery. 2021;5:56.
Berggren V, Bergström S, Edberg AK. Being different and vulnerable: experiences of immigrant African women who have been circumcised and sought maternity care in Sweden. J Transcult Nurs. 2006;17(1):50–7.
Ahlberg BM, Krantz I, Lindmark G, Warsame M. It’s Only a Tradition’: Making Sense of Eradication Interventions and the Persistence of Female ‘Circumcision’ within a Swedish Context. Crit Soc Policy. 2004;24(1):50–78.
Lundberg PC, Gerezgiher A. Experiences from pregnancy and childbirth related to female genital mutilation among Eritrean immigrant women in Sweden. Midwifery. 2008;24(2):214–25.
Essén B, Johnsdotter S, Hovelius B, Gudmundsson S, Sjöberg NO, Friedman J, et al. Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in Sweden. BJOG. 2000;107(12):1507–12.
Creswell JWC. J David;. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.
Kvale S. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc; 1994.
Creswell JWPC. Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.
Morse JM. The Significance of Saturation. Qual Health Res. 1995;5(2):147–9.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.
World Medical Association Declaration. of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
Gruenbaum E. Socio-cultural dynamics of female genital cutting: research findings, gaps, and directions. Cult Health Sex. 2005;7(5):429–41.
Isman E, Ekéus C, Berggren V. Perceptions and experiences of female genital mutilation after immigration to Sweden: an explorative study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013;4(3):93–8.
Chavez Karlström A, Danielsson L, Dahlberg H. Medical Defibulation as a Possibility-the Experiences of Young Swedish- Somali Women. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020;15(1):1848026.
Johansen RE. Undoing female genital cutting: perceptions and experiences of infibulation, defibulation and virginity among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Cult Health Sex. 2017;19(4):528–42.
Johansen RE. Virility, pleasure and female genital mutilation/cutting. A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of medicalized defibulation among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):25.
Ziyada MM, Lien IL, Johansen REB. Sexual norms and the intention to use healthcare services related to female genital cutting: A qualitative study among Somali and Sudanese women in Norway. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0233440.
Gruenbaum E. Sexuality issues in the movement to abolish female genital cutting in Sudan. Med Anthropol Q. 2006;20(1):121–38.
Johansen REB. Blurred transitions of female genital cutting in a Norwegian Somali community. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0220985.
Shahawy S, Amanuel H, Nour NM. Perspectives on female genital cutting among immigrant women and men in Boston. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:331–9.
United Nations Children's Fund. Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York; 2013.
Varol N, Turkmani S, Black K, Hall J, Dawson A. The role of men in abandonment of female genital mutilation: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1034.
World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Talle A. The making of female fertility. Anthropological perspectives on a bodily issue. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73(4):280–3.
Gele AA, Kumar B, Hjelde KH, Sundby J. Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: a qualitative study. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:7–17.
Gele AA, Johansen EB, Sundby J. When female circumcision comes to the West: Attitudes toward the practice among Somali Immigrants in Oslo. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):697.
Vogt S, Efferson C, Fehr E. The risk of female genital cutting in Europe: Comparing immigrant attitudes toward uncut girls with attitudes in a practicing country. SSM - Population Health. 2017;3:283–93.
Morison LA, Dirir A, Elmi S, Warsame J, Dirir S. How experiences and attitudes relating to female circumcision vary according to age on arrival in Britain: a study among young Somalis in London. Ethn Health. 2004;9(1):75–100.
Moxey JM, Jones LL. A qualitative study exploring how Somali women exposed to female genital mutilation experience and perceive antenatal and intrapartum care in England. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009846.
Boisen C, Gilmore N, Wahlberg A, Lundborg L. Some women are proud of their experience and I have to respect that': an interview-study about midwives' experiences in caring for infibulated women during childbirth in Sweden. J Prim Health Care. 2021;13(4):334–9.
Widmark C, Levál A, Tishelman C, Ahlberg BM. Obstetric care at the intersection of science and culture: Swedish doctors' perspectives on obstetric care of women who have undergone female genital cutting. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(6):553–8.
Widmark C, Tishelman C, Ahlberg BM. A study of Swedish midwives' encounters with infibulated African women in Sweden. Midwifery. 2002;18(2):113–25.
Lazar JN, Johnson-Agbakwu CE, Davis OI, Shipp MPL. Providers' Perceptions of Challenges in Obstetrical Care for Somali Women. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:149640.
Dawson A, Turkmani S, Fray S, Nanayakkara S, Varol N, Homer C. Evidence to inform education, training and supportive work environments for midwives involved in the care of women with female genital mutilation: a review of global experience. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):229–38.
Dawson A, Homer CS, Turkmani S, Black K, Varol N. A systematic review of doctors' experiences and needs to support the care of women with female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):35–40.
Hess RF, Weinland J, Saalinger NM. Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting and Experience With Women Who Are Circumcised: A Survey of Nurse-Midwives in the United States. J Midwifery Women's Health. 2010;55(1):46–54.
Levy AT, Beausang JK, Finley ED, Wolf SM. Provider Knowledge and Attitudes About Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Philadelphia. J Immigr Minor Health. 2021;23(1):45–53.
Azadi B, Tantet C, Sylla F, Andro A. Women who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting's perceptions and experiences with healthcare providers in Paris. Cult Health Sex. 2022;24(4):583–96.
Ormrod J. The experience of NHS care for women living with female genital mutilation. Br J Nurs. 2019;28(10):628–33.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry: sage; 1985.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 21 May, 2024

Read the published version in BMC Women's Health →

Editorial decision: Revision requested
27 Mar, 2024
Reviews received at journal
27 Mar, 2024
Reviews received at journal
20 Mar, 2024
Reviewers agreed at journal
19 Mar, 2024
Reviewers agreed at journal
19 Mar, 2024
Reviewers agreed at journal
22 Feb, 2024
Reviewers agreed at journal
21 Feb, 2024
Reviewers invited by journal
21 Feb, 2024
Editor assigned by journal
19 Feb, 2024
Editor invited by journal
20 Nov, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
07 Nov, 2023
First submitted to journal
07 Nov, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

“A part of my life”. A qualitative study about perceptions of female genital mutilation among affected women residing in Sweden

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Living with FGM

Preserving virginity and culture

The mother’s ambivalence in the decision process of FGM

Processing FGM through life

Living with lifelong health consequences

Challenges during menstruation, urination and sexual intercourse

The deinfibulation as a positive turning point

Lifelong learning about sexual pleasure

Encounters with the healthcare providers

Being acknowledged in the encounter with healthcare providers

Feeling ignored

Experiences of insulting attitudes

Feeling as of having no choice

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Acknowledgements

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1