1.Glynn L, Casey M, Walsh J, Hayes PS, Harte RP, Heaney D. Patients’ views and experiences of technology based self-management tools for the treatment of hypertension in the community: A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:119.
2.Statista. Mobile App Usage - Statistics & Facts 2015 [11/01/2016]. Available from: http://www.statista.com/topics/1002/mobile-app-usage/.
3.Bundorf MK, Wagner TH, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Who searches the internet for health information? Health Serv Res. 2006;41(3 Pt 1):819–36.
4.Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, Large S. The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e20.
5.Kolodychuk NL, Wong M, Chimento G, Adams T, Gastanaduy M, Waddell BS. Web-based patient portal access in an orthopedic adult reconstruction patient population. Arthroplasty today. 2019;5(1):83–7.
6.Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e104.
7.El-Gayar O, Timsina P, Nawar N, Eid W. Mobile applications for diabetes self-management: status and potential. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):247–62.
8.Kebede MM, Schuett C, Pischke CR. The Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Diabetes Smartphone Applications, and Self-Care Behavior in Glycemic Control: Results of a Multi-National Online Survey. Journal of clinical medicine. 2019;8(1).
9.Lim C, Berry A, Hirsch T, Hartzler A, H. Wagner E, Ludman E, et al. “It just seems outside my health”: How Patients with Chronic Conditions Perceive Communication Boundaries with Providers2016.
10.Skar L, Soderberg S. Patients’ complaints regarding healthcare encounters and communication. Nursing open. 2018;5(2):224–32.
11.Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Towfigh AA, Haggstrom DA, Miake-Lye I, et al. Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Annals of internal medicine. 2013;159(10):677–87.
12.Ricciardi L, Mostashari F, Murphy J, Daniel JG, Siminerio EP. A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):376–84.
13.Dendere R, Slade C, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C, Staib A, Janda M. Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e12779.
14.Beaudoin DE, Rocha RA, Tse T. Enhancing access to patient education information: a pilot usability study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:892.
15.Kupchunas WR. Personal health record: new opportunity for patient education. Orthop Nurs. 2007;26(3):185–91; quiz 92–3.
16.Leveille SG, Huang A, Tsai SB, Allen M, Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI. Health coaching via an internet portal for primary care patients with chronic conditions: a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 2009;47(1):41–7.
17.Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of medical Internet research. 2012;14(6).
18.Coughlin SS, Prochaska JJ, Williams LB, Besenyi GM, Heboyan V, Goggans DS, et al. Patient web portals, disease management, and primary prevention. Risk management and healthcare policy. 2017;10:33.
19.Jhamb M, Cavanaugh KL, Bian A, Chen G, Ikizler TA, Unruh ML, et al. Disparities in electronic health record patient portal use in nephrology clinics. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2015:CJN. 01640215.
20.Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(2).
21.Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, Lopez A, et al. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2011;18(3):318–21.
22.Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S, Courtney KL, Sondhi M, Vimarlund V, et al. Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2008;15(1):8–13.
23.Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2008;15(6):729–36.
24.Luzio S, Piehlmeier W, Tovar C, Eberl S, Lätzsch G, Fallböhmer E, et al. Results of the pilot study of DIADEM—A comprehensive disease management programme for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2007;76(3):410–7.
25.Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(2):e40.
26.Neuner J, Fedders M, Caravella M, Bradford L, Schapira M. Meaningful use and the patient portal: patient enrollment, use, and satisfaction with patient portals at a later-adopting center. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2015;30(2):105–13.
27.Turvey C, Klein D, Fix G, Hogan TP, Woods S, Simon SR, et al. Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs’ online patient portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;21(4):657–63.
28.Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Cooper AJ, Hasnain-Wynia R, Baker DW. Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011;18(Supplement_1):i8-i12.
29.Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Hasnain-Wynia R, Thompson JA, Baker DW. Disparities in enrollment and use of an electronic patient portal. Journal of general internal medicine. 2011;26(10):1112–6.
30.Irizarry T, Dabbs AD, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(6).
31.Smith SG, O’conor R, Aitken W, Curtis LM, Wolf MS, Goel MS. Disparities in registration and use of an online patient portal among older adults: findings from the LitCog cohort. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2015;22(4):888–95.
32.Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Ralston JD, Ratanawongsa N, Pasick R, et al. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(12).
33.Zhao JY, Song B, Anand E, Schwartz D, Panesar M, Jackson GP, et al. Barriers, Facilitators, and Solutions to Optimal Patient Portal and Personal Health Record Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1913–22.
34.Gordon NP, Hornbrook MC. Differences in access to and preferences for using patient portals and other eHealth technologies based on race, ethnicity, and age: a database and survey study of seniors in a large health plan. Journal of medical Internet research. 2016;18(3).
35.Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, Lopez A, et al. The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:183–96.
36.An JY. Theory development in health care informatics: Information and communication technology acceptance model (ICTAM) improves the explanatory and predictive power of technology acceptance models. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:63–7.
37.Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Mis Quart. 1989;13(3):319–40.
38.McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Handler SM, Dolovich LR, Holbrook AM, O’Reilly D, et al. Enabling medication management through health information technology (Health IT). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011(201):1–951.
39.Or CK, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2009;16(4):550–60.
40.Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJ. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235–48.
41.Samaradiwakara G, Gunawardena C. Comparison of existing technology acceptance theories and models to suggest a well improved theory/model. International Technical Sciences Journal. 2014;1(1):21–36.
42.Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. 1989;35(8):982–1003.
43.Kripanont N. Examining a technology acceptance model of internet usage by academics within Thai business schools: Victoria University; 2007.
44.Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Mis Quart. 2003:425–78.
45.Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research. 1995;6(2):144–76.
46.Access PO. Patient Online Access 2016 [cited 2016. Available from: http://myrecord.org.uk.
47.Andrews L, Gajanayake R, Sahama T. The Australian general public’s perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR). Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(12):889–900.
48.Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2011;18(4):515–22.
49.Hagglund M, Koch S. Commentary: Sweden rolls out online access to medical records and is developing new e-health services to enable people to manage their care. BMJ. 2015;350:h359.
50.Borycki E, Househ F, Kushniruk A, Nohr C, Takeda H. Empowering patients: making health information and systems safer for patients and the public. Yearbook of medical informatics. 2012;21(01):56–64.
51.Rimpilainen S. A Review of Electronic Health Records Systems Around the World. 2015.
52.Rasmi M, Alazzam MB, Alsmadi MK, Almarashdeh IA, Alkhasawneh RA, Alsmadi S. Healthcare professionals’ acceptance Electronic Health Records system: Critical literature review (Jordan case study). International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2018:1–13.
53.Bodolica V, Spraggon M. Toward patient-centered care and inclusive health-care governance: a review of patient empowerment in the UAE. Public Health. 2019;169:114–24.
54.Weber AS, Turjoman R, Shaheen Y, Al Sayyed F, Hwang MJ, Malick F. Systematic thematic review of e-health research in the Gulf Cooperation Council (Arabian Gulf): Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2016;23(4):452–9.
55.Lakkis NA, Mahmassani DM, Hamadeh GN. Diabetes quality of care at a university community in Beirut. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(5):824–30.
56.Mensing C, Boucher J, Cypress M, Weinger K, Mulcahy K, Barta P, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2006;29 Suppl 1:S78–85.
57.Alexander CS, Becker HJ. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public opinion quarterly. 1978;42(1):93–104.
58.Cavanagh GF, Fritzsche DJ. Using vignettes in business ethics research. 1985.
59.Lysonski S, Gaidis W. A cross-cultural comparison of the ethics of business students. Journal of Business Ethics. 1991;10(2):141–50.
60.Weber J. Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly. 1992;2(2):137–60.
61.Evans SC, Roberts MC, Keeley JW, Blossom JB, Amaro CM, Garcia AM, et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD–11 field studies. Int J Clin Hlth Psyc. 2015;15(2):160–70.
62.Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi journal of anaesthesia. 2017;11(Suppl 1):S80-s9.
63.Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1984;49(2):155–73.
64.Ding L, Velicer WF, Harlow LL. Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1995;2(2):119–43.
65.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics: Pearson Boston, MA; 2007.
66.Tinsley HE, Tinsley DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of counseling psychology. 1987;34(4):414.
67.IBMCorp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0. IBM Corp:. Armonk, NY, USA2016.
68.Arbuckle JL. IBM SPSS Amos 21. Chicago, IL: Amos Development Corporation. 2012.
69.Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2010.
70. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344–9.
71.Kelly MM, Dean SM, Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Hoonakker PL. Healthcare team perceptions of a portal for parents of hospitalized children before and after implementation. Applied clinical informatics. 2017;26(01):265–78.
72.Hadhri W, Arvanitis R, M’Henni H. Determinants of innovation activities in small and open economies: the Lebanese business sector. Journal of Innovation Economics Management. 2016(3):77–107.
73.El Mustapha H, Hoppe T, Bressers H. Consumer renewable energy technology adoption decision-making; comparing models on perceived attributes and attitudinal constructs in the case of solar water heaters in Lebanon2017. 347–57 p.
74.Makarem NN, Antoun J. Email communication in a developing country: different family physician and patient perspectives. Libyan Journal of Medicine. 2016;11(1):32679.
75.Al-Adwan A. Understanding Physicians’ Adoption of EMR: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model the Case of: Jordan2013.
76.Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Nguyen M. Parent intention to use a patient portal as related to their children following a facilitated demonstration. TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH. 2013;19(12):979–81.
77.Haun JN, Patel NR, Lind JD, Antinori N. Large-scale survey findings inform patients’ experiences in using secure messaging to engage in patient-provider communication and self-care management: a quantitative assessment. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(12):e282.
78.Belcher T, Vess J, Johnson E. Using patient portal messaging to improve glycemic control in adult patients with diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI). 2019;23(1).
79.Dajani D, Yaseen SG. The applicability of technology acceptance models in the Arab business setting. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research. 2016;10(3).
80.Wang DS, Jani AB, Sesay M, Tai CG, Lee DK, Echt KV, et al. Video-based educational tool improves patient comprehension of common prostate health terminology. Cancer. 2015;121(5):733–40.
81.Noblin AM, Wan TT, Fottler M. Intention to use a personal health record: a theoretical analysis using the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 2013;14(1–2):73–89.
82.Silvestre A-L, Sue VM, Allen JY. If you build it, will they come? The Kaiser Permanente model of online health care. Health Affairs. 2009;28(2):334–44.
83.Tavares J, Oliveira T. New Integrated Model Approach to Understand the Factors That Drive Electronic Health Record Portal Adoption: Cross-Sectional National Survey. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(11):e11032.
84.Ward K, Hawthorne K. Do patients read health promotion posters in the waiting room? A study in one general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44(389):583–5.
85.Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, Render ML, Orshansky G, Asch SM. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2005;12(4):438–47.
86.Shaw RJ, Horvath MM, Leonard D, Ferranti JM, Johnson CM. Developing a user-friendly interface for a self-service healthcare research portal: cost-effective usability testing. Health Systems. 2015;4(2):151–8.
87.Lazard AJ, Watkins I, Mackert MS, Xie B, Stephens KK, Shalev H. Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2016;23(e1):e157-e61.
88.Latulipe C, Gatto A, Nguyen HT, Miller DP, Quandt SA, Bertoni AG, et al., editors. Design considerations for patient portal adoption by low-income, older adults. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2015: ACM.
89.Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(2):e44.
90.Cho AH, Arar NH, Edelman DE, Hartwell PH, Oddone EZ, Yancy Jr WS. Do diabetic veterans use the Internet? Self-reported usage, skills, and interest in using My HealtheVet Web portal. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2010;16(5):595–602.
91.Alpert JM, Desens L, Krist AH, Aycock RA, Kreps GL. Measuring Health Literacy Levels of a Patient Portal Using the CDC’s Clear Communication Index. Health promotion practice. 2017;18(1):140–9.
92.Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2002;52(3):134–49.
93.Kreps GL, Neuhauser L. New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient education and counseling. 2010;78(3):329–36.
94.Powell KR. Patient-perceived facilitators of and barriers to electronic portal use: a systematic review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2017;35(11):565–73.
95.Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82(4):581–629.