Table 1 showcases the acceptable thresholds for toxic metals, such as lead (Pb), nickel ( Ni), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), etc., in soil and other Agro-based goods, according to the WHO/FAO standards of 2001 and 2007 (Adu et al., 2012). Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5 provide estimates of the accumulated levels of the toxic metals Pb, Ni, Zn, and Cd in wastewater, surface water, deep tube well, and agricultural land. Table 6 displays the metals present in fruits and vegetables. - 31 samples were gathered within two years. The samples comprised 36 items, including canal water (9), raw effluent (8), surface water (5), deep tube well water (2), soil (6), and 6 obtained
Table: 1: Safe Permissible Limit of Heavy Metals in Fruits, Vegetables, Water, and Soil as FAO /WHO standard 2001, 2007 and IS: 10500:1993
Metal
|
Fruits/Veg.
( mg/kg)
|
Soil
( mg/kg)
|
Water
(mg/l)
|
Papaya
(mg/kg)
|
Guava
(mg/kg)
|
Effluent
IS:10500
(mg/l)
|
Cu
|
73
|
5-5.6
|
2
|
|
|
3.0
|
Pb
|
0.30
|
2-13.4
|
0.01
|
Nd
|
0.58
|
0.10
|
Cd
|
0.20
|
0.1
|
0.003
|
Nd
|
Nd
|
1.0
|
Cr
|
0.1-1
|
10-80
|
0.05
|
|
|
2.0
|
Zn
|
99.4
|
60-780
|
3
|
|
|
15
|
Ni
|
1-10
|
10-50
|
0.02
|
0.26
|
Nd
|
3
|
Nd= not detectable, Source a=Adue et.al 2012
Table 2: Pb concentration in effluent, canal, pond, tube well water and soil
Sl. No
|
Sample
& year
|
Canal Water (mg/l)
|
Effluent (mg/l)
|
Pond water (mg/l)
|
Tube well water (mg/l)
|
Soil
(mg/kg)
|
1.
|
*S-12
|
0.05
|
0.07
|
0.01
|
0.007
|
1.16
|
2
|
S-12
|
0.05
|
0.08
|
0.25
|
------
|
11.14
|
3.
|
S-12
|
0.104
|
-----
|
------
|
------
|
17.32
|
4.
|
S-12
|
0.03
|
-----
|
------
|
------
|
41.20
|
5.
|
S-13
|
0.014
|
0.25
|
0.016
|
0.058
|
90.80
|
6.
|
S-13
|
0.15
|
1.84
|
0.01
|
------
|
------
|
7.
|
S-13
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
------
|
------
|
------
|
8.
|
S-13
|
0.10
|
0.14
|
------
|
------
|
------
|
9.
|
S-13
|
----
|
0.17
|
------
|
------
|
------
|
|
Mean
|
0..38
|
0.074
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
32.32
|
|
S.D
|
0.27
|
0.67
|
0.10
|
0.02
|
32.07
|
*S-12, 13 indicates sample of the 1st year and 2nd year. As per WHO safe limits of Pb concentration in canal water, Effluent, Pond water, tube well water, and soil were very significantly higher (39-fold, 7-fold, 7-fold, 10-fold, ). Further, Mean Pb concentration was found in canal water > soil> effluent ˃ Pond ≥ tube well water. Again, Pb level increases from year 1st year to 2nd year in canal water (0.03 mg/l to 0.15 mg/l), effluent (0.07mg/l to 1.84 mg/l), and tube well water (0.007 mg/l to 0.058 mg/l), and soil (from 1.16mg/kg to 90.80 mg/kg)
Table 3: Content of Nickel in the effluent, canal water, pond, and tube well water.
Sample/
Year
|
Canal water (mg/l)
|
Effluent
(mg/l)
|
pond
(mg/l)
|
Tube well (mg/kg)
|
Soil(mg/kg)
|
S-12
|
0.05
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.34
|
S-12
|
0.05
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
14.93
|
S-12
|
0.07
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
34.77
|
S-12
|
0.05
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
S-13
|
0.037
|
0.049
|
0.02
|
0.016
|
-
|
S-13
|
0.037
|
0.093
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Mean
|
0.05
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.016
|
16.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SD
|
0.01
|
0.02
|
-
|
-
|
14.11
|
As per the sample in Year 2012,13, Mean Ni in Effluent, canal, pond water, and soil was significantly Higher 4-fold, 3-fold, normal, and 2-fold) and lower in Tube well water.
Table 4: Content of Zinc in the effluent, canal water, pond, tube well water, and soil
Sample
|
Canal water
|
Effluent
|
Pond
water
|
Tube well
water
|
Soil
|
|
Mg/l
|
Mg/l
|
Mg/l
|
Mg/l
|
Mg/kg
|
*S-12
|
0.05
|
0.94
|
0.004
|
1.15
|
250.84
|
S-12
|
0.28
|
0.15
|
-----
|
------
|
54.26
|
S-12
|
0.02
|
-----
|
-----
|
------
|
980.4
|
S-12
|
0.18
|
-----
|
-----
|
------
|
-------
|
S-13
|
0.15
|
0.55
|
0.05
|
0
|
------
|
S-13
|
-----
|
0.07
|
------
|
------
|
------
|
S-13
|
-----
|
0.09
|
------
|
------
|
------
|
Mean
|
0.14
|
0.36
|
0.027
|
1.15
|
428.50
|
S.D
|
0.09
|
0.33
|
0.025
|
----
|
398.41
|
As per WHO limits mean Zn level in effluent, canal, pond, tube well water and soil were very significantly lower (8- fold, 21-fold, 111- fold, 3- fold, 2- fold).
Table 5: Content of Cadmium (Cd) in Soil
Sample/ year
|
Soil
mg/kg
|
S -12
|
0.94
|
S-12
|
0.53
|
R-12
|
1.29
|
Mean
|
0.92
|
S.D
|
0.31
|
As per WHO standard, the Concentration of Cd in Soil was lower ( 9 fold)
Table 6: Metal concentration papaya and coconut water, guava, coix grass and water hyacinth for the year 2013
Metal
|
Papaya
mg/kg
|
Coconut water
mg/l
|
Guava
mg/kg
|
Coix grass mg/kg
|
Water Hyacinth
mg/kg
|
Pb
|
0.45
|
0.41
|
12.62
|
0.66
|
2.75
|
Cd
|
----
|
----
|
1.47
|
0.10
|
0.15
|
Cr
|
----
|
----
|
0.10
|
0.145
|
0.27
|
Zn
|
1.96
|
0.39
|
----
|
13.15
|
|
Pb levels significantly higher (2-fold, 1.5-fold, 42-fold, 2- fold, 9- fold) , safe limits of Cd in Guava were
Significantly higher ( 7- fold, ), Safe limit of Cr in Guava was normal and Safe limit of Zn in Papaya
Coconut water and Coix grass was significantly Lower 50- fold, 8 –fold, 8 – fold.
from fruits and vegetables. Pb was found to accumulate at significantly higher levels in canal water, effluent, pond water, tube well water, and soil (38.9x, 6.7x, 7.1x, 2.1x, and 16.2x). The average accumulation of Pb was higher in canal water compared to soil, which was higher than in wastewater, pond, and deep tube well water.
The concentration of Pb in canal water increased from 0.105 mg/L to 0.151 mg/L, while in the effluent it increased from 0.08 mg/L to 0.17 mg/L. The concentration of Pb in tube well water increased from 0.007 mg/L to 0.058 mg/L between the first and second years. - Ni was found 4.1 times, 3.1 times, and 19 times higher than normal in the effluent, surface water, and agricultural land, respectively, as well as in the pond and deep tube well water. The zinc levels in the wastewater, canal, pond, tube well water, and soil are significantly below the WHO standard. The soil sample exhibited a Cd level below nine times. Therefore, the hierarchy of heavy metal levels in the soil is as trails: Pb > Ni > Zn > Cd.
Papaya, coconut water, guava, long grass, and Water hyacinth have Pb levels exceeding WHO's safe limits. The level of Cd detected in Guava was significantly elevated. - The level of Guava Cr was within normal range, whereas Papaya, Coconut water, and long grass exhibited Zn levels far below the FAO/WHO standards.
Table 8 presents the customary health hazard evaluation. The concentrations (mg/L) of various metals in Guava are presented in Table 9, whereas Table 10 pertains to coconut water. The survey results of the disease profile due to metal intake are in Table 11, and the survey results of the socioeconomic condition are in Table 12. Further Figure. 1. shows the toxic metal contamination in food crops and the mechanisms of their entrance, Figure 2. Highlighted the concentration of different heavy metals in soils. Figure 3 shows Lead and Zinc levels in fruits, vegetables, and plants compared to the WHO/FAO and IS:10500:1993 safe limits. All tables and figures are available in the Tables and Figures section.