This is a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 1 to 1 randomized, multicentric clinical superiority trial of orally administered FZHY versus placebo in patients with pulmonary fibrosis and respiratory impairment due to COVID-19 in their “recovery phase”. Participants receive FZHY or placebo until they meet a primary endpoint event, the trial concludes, or they withdraw consent. Each patient will be observed for 24 weeks and followed up for 8 weeks. Follow-up of assessment measures will continue for the duration of the trial for those participants stopping trial medication due to adverse events or patient choice. The vital status and details of admission to hospital will be captured for all patients who have consented to participate in the trial regardless whether they have withdrawn from the intervention or trial assessments.
Figure 1 provides a study flowchart of the trial design and Table 1 provides the time and event schedule. This trial protocol (v1.0, dated March 18, 2020) is based on the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement for protocols of clinical trials (see Additional file 3).
Table 1 Time and Event Schedule
Item
|
Screening period
|
Treatment period
|
Follow-up period
|
-1wk-0d
|
4wk±3d
|
8wk±3d
|
12wk±3d
|
16wk±3d
|
20wk±3d
|
24wk±3d
|
32 wk±7d
|
Eligibility Criteria
|
√
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sign informed consent
|
√
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demographic information
|
√
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past medical history
|
√
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symptoms
|
Recorded in APP everyday
|
Vital signs
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
HRCT
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
Lung function test
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
6-min walking test
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Dynamic oxygen saturat-ion
|
Wrist watch automatic recording and uploading daily
|
QOL-BREF
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
PHQ-9
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
GAD-7
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibodies
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
Routine blood test+CRP
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
Routine urine test
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
Stool-routine
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
ECG
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
Liver and kidney function
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
|
|
√
|
√
|
Randomized grouping
|
√
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dissemination of Drugs and Participant Logs
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
Recovery of residual drugs and participant logs
|
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
The trial is set in 8 academic hospitals in three provinces or municipality in China. The first patient was randomized on April 14, 2020. In total, 160 patients will be recruited into the trial. This trial has ethical approval from IRB of Shuguang Hospital affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Approval No. 2020-798-05-01) and is registered onto Clinical Trials.gov(ID:NCT04279197). Ministry of science and technology of People’s Republic of China is the trial sponsor. Professor Chenghai Liu is Principle Investigator (PI) for the clinic trial. A Trial Management Group (TMG) ,as shown in Table 2 ,has been set up to assist with developing the design, coordination and strategic management of the trial. An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) ,as shown in Table 2 ,has been established to provide oversight of safety and efficacy considerations, sample size estimation and study conduct. Following review, the DMC will recommend continuation, modification, or discontinuation of this study based on reported safety and efficacy data. Details of DMC responsibilities and procedures are specified in the DMC charter. Representatives of the sponsor will serve only as coordinators of the committee, without having full member responsibilities or privileges.
Table 2 Trial oversight committees
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role and responsibilities
|
Trial Management Group
|
|
|
Professor Chenghai Liu
|
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM
|
Principal investigator
|
Dr.Feng Xing, Dr.Jing Lv
|
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM
|
Clinical trial manager
|
Yingchun He
|
Shanghai University of TCM
|
Statistician
|
Dr.Zhimin Zhao
|
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM
|
Head of data management
|
Professor Wei Zhang
|
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Qi-wu Qiu
|
Jingmen No.1 People’s Hospital
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Xian-gao Jiang
|
Wenzhou Central Hospital
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Jia Ke
|
Hubei Hospital of TCM
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Hui Wu
|
Wuhan NO.1 hospital
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Peng-cheng Luo
|
Wuhan NO.3 hospital
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Xin Zheng
|
Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
|
Co-investigator
|
Professor Jia-quan Huang
|
Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
|
Co-investigator
|
Independent Data Monitoring Committee
|
|
|
Professor Ping Liu
|
Shanghai University of TCM
|
Chair
|
Professor Qingshan Zheng
|
Shanghai University of TCM
|
Statistician
|
Dr.Yanyan Tao
|
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM
|
Member
|
Neither the patients nor the researchers who participated in this trial are aware of the allocation. Drug on-site numbering is performed by statisticians who are unrelated to the trial. Drug packaging number, validation code and corresponding treatment group are generated by SAS software (version 9.4 or above).The drug packaging number and validation number are filled in (or pasted) on the label of the corresponding drug (test drug or control drug).The test drug is packed according to the visit period, and the drug for each visit period of the participants is packed as a package. Blinding record is saved during the process of compiling.
Researcher record data according to the content of case report form (CRF) and used the Electronic Clinical Data Management System (DAS for EDC V6.0) for electronic data management. The Data Management Plan (DMP), as a guiding document for data management, is written by the DMC and approved by the PI. The data management work will be carried out according to the time, content and method defined by the DMP. Data managers construct electronic case report forms (eCRFs) according to the design of the trial scheme and set up logical verification according to the data verification plan (DVP), which are released and used after passing the test and being approved by the PI. The eCRF data originated from the original records, and the data entry personnel filled in the instructions according to the eCRF, and timely entered the subject visit data into the Electronic Data Capture System (EDC). The Inspector checks the consistency of eCRF data and source data, and questions can be raised. After data entry is completed and Source Data Verification (SDV) is performed, the electronic signature verification is carried out by the researcher. If the data are revised after signature, it needs to be resigned. After the database lock record is signed jointly by the PI, sponsor, statistician and data manager, the data manager locks the database and submits the database to the statistician. Each participant's eCRF generates PDF electronic documents for preservation, and data managers write data management reports. After the statistical analysis was completed, the data manager closed the database.
Patient’s information is recorded in the CRF. All the research results (including personal data, laboratory documents, etc.) appearing in the original medical records will be completely confidential within the limits permitted by law. The patient's name does not appear on the CRF, only the initials and assigned numbers appear. Only abbreviations and numbers of patients will appear in relevant research summaries, articles and public publications, if necessary. Drug supervision and administration departments, ethics committees or sponsor may consult the data of participating patients according to regulations. But without permission, they will not use the patient data for other purposes or leak it to other groups.
Patient characteristics
Patients need to meet the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
- Compliance with the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 (China Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for COVID-19(Trial Version 7);
- Real-time fluorescent polymerase chain reaction test to detect of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in respiratory specimens or blood specimens of patients with negative results (>2 times);
- Pulmonary CT scans within 7 days showed that there were still unabsorbed inflammation or pulmonary fibrosis in the lungs;
- Age 18-70;
- Six-minute walk distance less than 350 meters;
- Participate in clinical research voluntarily and sign informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients who have undergone lung surgery that affects pulmonary function, such as pulmonary transplantation, pulmonary resection, pulmonary volume reduction, etc;
- Relying on mechanical ventilation to maintain pulmonary function, such as ventilators;
- Combined with chronic pulmonary diseases affecting pulmonary function, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other known causes of interstitial pulmonary disease;
- Patients with diseases affecting cardiac function, such as pulmonary circulation hypertension, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, fibromyalgia, and pacemaker installation;
- Patients with severe underlying diseases affecting survival, including uncontroled cardiac, renal, digestive, hematological, neuropsychiatric, immune, metabolic diseases, malignant diseases and severe malnutrition;
- Resting heart rate >120 times/min;
- Systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg;
- Unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction occurring within the last month;
- Severe obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2);
- Allergic constitution, allergic to the drug components involved in the treatment program;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- Patients with disabilities who are unable to complete the efficacy evaluation questionnaires;
- Difficult collaborators with poor mental health status, suffering from mental illness, patients without self-control, unable to express clearly;
- Those who are participating in other clinical trials;
- According to the investigator's judgment, patients whose enrollment complications or poor compliance will affect the efficacy and safety evaluation.
Identification, Recruitment
Patients will be mainly recruited from 8 hospitals, as shown in Table 3. These hospitals are all comprehensive hospitals and can carry out diagnostic and therapeutic activities for convalescent patients with COVID-19. Potential recruits are being approached by local clinic teams and provided with Informed consent and given at least 24 hours to read this prior to consent. Consent is taken by appropriately-trained clinicians or delegated members of staff.
Table 3 Participating sites
Trust name
|
Principal investigator
|
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM
|
Professor Wei Zhang
|
Jingmen No.1 People’s Hospital
|
Professor Qi-wu Qiu
|
Wenzhou Central Hospital
|
Professor Xian-gao Jiang
|
Hubei Hospital of TCM
|
Professor Jia Ke
|
Wuhan NO.1 hospital
|
Professor Hui Wu
|
Wuhan NO.3 hospital
|
Professor Peng-cheng Luo
|
Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
|
Professor Xin Zheng
|
Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
|
Professor Jia-quan Huang
|
Randomization
A double-blind study design is chosen to preserve study integrity and minimize bias in the assessment of all study endpoints. After patients have provided their written informed consent, completed all Screening assessments and received confirmation of eligibility, they will be 1:1 randomization into the study using an Interactive Web Randomization System (IWRS) and stratification based on:
- Age: ≥ 50 years vs. < 50 years
- Pulmonary inflammation: Chest CT shows that there is still acute exudative disease in the lung, but it had been significantly improved vs no acute exudative disease in the lung
- 6-minute walk test: ≥ 250 m vs. < 250 m
These stratification factors are chosen on the basis that they may be sufficiently prognostic such that an imbalance may bias the results. Participants, caregivers, and the study team assessing the outcomes are blinded to group assignment.
Interventions
The two groups will be given the same basic treatment, but all of them are restricted to anti-fibrosis herbs or medications. The experimental group is given FZHY, and the control group is given placebo of FZHY, which appearance, taste, quality, taking times and methods are the same as those of FZHY. Basic treatment includes respiratory function rehabilitation training and Vitamin C tablets. Detailed interventions are shown in Table 3.
Table4 Grouping and specific interventions
Groups
|
Interventions
|
Remarks
|
Control group
|
basic treatment (respiratory function rehabilitation training + Vitamin C tablets)
+ placebo of FZHY
|
Vitamin C tablets, administration: 0.2g/time, 3 times/ day, oral;
Placebo of FZHY or FZHY, administration: 0.4g/tablet, 1.6g/time, 3 times/day, oral; medicine to be taken after meals.
|
Experimental group
|
basic treatment (same as control group) + FZHY
|
Primary outcomes
The primary outcome for the trial is a composite endpoint consisting of lung function (pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk test) and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT).
Pulmonary function test is a commonly used method for evaluating pulmonary function in clinical practice. We need to detect forced vital capacity (FVC), percentage of FVC to the predicted value, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO) in this trial. Spirometry[13] and DLCO[14] are being measured according to current American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines. FVC and DLCO are both components of prognostic modelling algorithms[15], are frequently utilised in clinical trials[16].
The 6-minute walk test is a common method to objectively evaluate the functional exercise capacity of patients with moderate to severe pulmonary disease[17]. In this study, the longest 6-minute walking distance of patients is measured, and the lowest oxygen saturation of the six-minute walking test is collected before the study. patients are required to wear wearable equipment, and are monitored remotely every day. When pulmonary function returned to normal, monitoring is stopped. The lowest oxygen saturation is recorded after each six-minute walking test is completed.
HRCT is a commonly used method to identify pulmonary fibrosis in clinic, research proves that HRCT may be useful for assessing the risk of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) in patients with IPF, independent of ethnicity[18], HRCT pulmonary fibrosis area and pneumonia severity index (PSI) are observed.
Secondary outcomes
Secondary efficacy criteria includes dynamic oxygen saturation, discomfort symptoms, quality of life assessment, and SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibodies.
Blood oxygen saturation is an important physiological parameter in the process of respiratory circulation, and the change of blood oxygen saturation can reflect the state of lung function. In this study, the lowest oxygen saturation of the six-minute walk test is collected before the test. Wearable equipment is worn during the test. The monitoring is stopped when the pulmonary function returned to normal. The lowest oxygen saturation is recorded when the six-minute walk test is completed.
Discomfort symptoms include dyspnea, cough, exhausted, fatigue, insomnia, sweating, poor appetite, diarrhea, etc., which are common manifestations of patients with COVID-19[19, 20]. And, they are also a common clinical manifestation of respiratory diseases. In this study, the 0-10 visual analogue score method is used to record the most severe symptom score and the average score within 24 hours; before the study and during the study, the patients' APP is used to record the symptoms daily.
- Quality of life assessment
Quality of Life-BREF (QOL-BREF)[21], Patient Health Questionnaire-9(PHQ-9)[22] and Generalized anxiety disorder-7(GAD-7)[23] can all reflect the quality of life of patients to some extent.
- SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibody detection
Virus-specific antibody detection is one of the important means for laboratory diagnosis of viral diseases. Antibody detection is of great significance for virus diagnosis and time of infection, evaluation of the infection stage of the virus and prediction of disease outcome.
End Points
The primary efficacy end points are pulmonary function recovery and fibrosis reverse rates assessed on the 4, 8, 12, and 24-week period.
In this trial, definition of pulmonary function recovery is: pulmonary function test normalized(FVC、FEV1、DLCO≥80%predictive value, FEV1/FVC≥92% predictive value),or meet the following three requirements at the same time:(1) Lowest Blood oxygen saturation≥95% on two consecutive days, (2) 6MWD>500m, (3) pneumonia absorbed totally in HRCT.
Pulmonary fibrosis reverse means that HRCT reveal fibrosis vanished in lungs.
The main secondary end points are the absolute change from baseline in the 6MWD at week 24 and time to pulmonary function recovery.
Safety outcomes
Blood routine, urine routine, fecal routine, electrocardiogram and liver&kidney function assessment is being taken at baseline, 12,24 weeks and Week 8 follow-up.
Adverse events
Researchers will assess the risk of patients throughout the study. If serious adverse events occur, they should report to the responsible unit of the project in time and take corresponding measures to remedy them. If a change in drug dosage is required due to moderate or serious adverse events (clinical and/or laboratory tests), the researcher should make a request, and the drug dose can only be changed if interrupted or adjusted according to the comprehensive judgement of the expert committee. When subsequent adverse events improve, a further dose increase may be considered. These changes must be documented in the CRF. In addition, patients may be allowed to withdraw for any reason, but all data collection required by the protocol at the time of withdrawal must be completed as far as possible.
Sample size
Because there is no reference to calculate the sample size, this trial presupposes a sample size of 160 cases (Including 20% shedding rate) according to the research experience, 80 cases in each group. During the trial, the sample size may be increased appropriately or the course of trial may be adjusted after evaluation and discussion by the DMC.
Data management
Clinical data management will be performed by the sponsor designee according to procedures described in a comprehensive data management plan. The data management plan will include procedures for processing the data from this study, and will describe the responsibilities of the sponsor and designee when clinical data management is provided by an external vendor. In particular, the data management plan will include a list of the standard operating procedures that apply to this study.
Statistical analysis
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set will be considered as the full analysis set. This will include all evaluable patients, ie, all randomized patients who receive at least one dose of Fuzheng Huayu or placebo and who have lung function test at randomization and at least one post randomization lung function test.
In general, all demographics, baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety variables will be summarized using descriptive statistics and graphs as appropriate. Continuous variables will be summarized by descriptive statistics (sample size (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum, median and maximum). Categorical variables will be summarized in frequency tables (frequencies and percentages).
The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is the lung function recovery rate. We will summarize recovery rate using a binomial response rate and corresponding two-sided 95% exact confidence interval (CI) as per the Clopper-Pearson method. At each visit, odds ratio (OR) (FZHY vs. Placebo) with 95% CI will be reported, logistic regression will utilized adjusted for potential confounders, age, baseline 6-minute walk test, Pulmonary inflammation and site.
The change in 6-minute walking distance from baseline to week 24 is secondary efficacy parameter. The analysis will be conducted using a mixed-effects model for repeated-measures (MMRM) approach with treatment group, study site, visit and treatment group x visit interaction as fixed effects and the baseline distance and baseline x visit interaction as the covariates.
Safety analyses will be performed in all treated subjects. Descriptive statistics of safety will be presented using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. All TEAEs, Grade 3-4 AEs, treatment-related AEs, Grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs, SAEs, treatment-related SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation will be tabulated using worst grade per NCI CTCAE v 5.0 criteria by system organ class and preferred term.
All statistical analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.4. Tests of statistical significance for all efficacy endpoint analyses will use the 2-sided significance level of 0.05.
Adaptive designs
An interim analysis is planed when 60 subjects completed the 4-week study by IDMC. If 4 weeks lung function recovery rate is more than 60%, then compare the lung function recovery rate of the two groups at 4 weeks. Sample size estimation will be based on interim results.
The adaptive design could be based on a 4-week measurement of patient lung function state when the primary endpoint is the assessment of the same outcome at 24 weeks.
The flexibilities offered by adaptive designs may be particularly useful in this exploratory period of development by allowing initial evaluation of a broad range of choices. Using adaptive designs in this trial to learn about patient’s early stage response offers sponsors opportunities that can improve the designs and shorter expected calendar time.
There is no requirement to adjust for multiplicity due to interim analyses, since there are no planned interim analyses with the opportunity to make an early claim of efficacy.
Dissemination
The results of this study regardless of the direction of effect, will form research reports, academic papers and dissertations, which will be submitted to government departments and peer review. In addition, results will be published in relevant journals or international conferences.