The clinical features of pleural involvement in our patient seem to be interesting for several reasons. Firstly, this case of sarcoidosis is presented with both pleural effusion and pleural nodules. Pleural involvement in sarcoidosis was first recognized by Schaumann in 1933.5 It can be manifested by pleural effusion, pleural nodules, pleural thickening, pneumothorax, hydropneumothorax, and chylothorax.3 The true incidence of pleural involvement in sarcoidosis remains unclear because some cases of pleural sarcoidosis are asymptomatic.6 Chusid and colleagues reported that pleural involvements were histologically confirmed in 5 of 950 (0.5%) patients with sarcoidosis.7 Soskel et al. stated that pleural involvement occurred in about 3% of sarcoidosis.3 The first case of histologically proven pleural effusion caused by sarcoidosis was reported by Talbot et al.8 Sarcoidosis-related pleural effusions were considered to be less than 3% of this entity and, when present, occur slightly more commonly in the right pleural cavity, although sometimes they can be bilateral.3 The typical finding in pleural effusions caused by sarcoidosis is a paucicellular exudate with the predominance of lymphocytes.9 The mechanism of pleural effusion formation may be analogous to that of other infiltrative diseases. Increased capillary permeability due to involvement of the pleura, obstruction of superior vena cava, lobar atelectasis, and trapped lung have been considered as a cause of pleural effusions secondary to sarcoidosis.10,11 Pleural nodules, another manifestation of pleural sarcoidosis, were infrequent although the use of CT and thoracoscopy has increased awareness of this unusual site of involvement in sarcoidosis. These are often described as innumerable white nodules on both the parietal and visceral pleura.12,13 Sarcoidosis-related pleural effusions and pleural nodules are unusual, and they occur concurrently in one patient, as described in our case, are even more uncommon.
Secondly, pleural involvement is the initial manifestation of sarcoidosis. Pleural manifestations caused by sarcoidosis may arise at the onset of this disease which is first diagnosed, as the case we have described, or at any time during the course of the known sarcoidosis.14 The development of pleural involvement in sarcoidosis seems to have no definite prognostic value.15 Thirdly, the pleural effusion and pleural nodules are associated with neither hilar adenopathy nor pulmonary infiltrate. The most common radiographic finding of sarcoidosis is bilateral hilar adenopathy. Other clinical features consist of interstitial lung disease, pulmonary nodules, skin lesions, and eye symptoms.13 Pleural sarcoidosis usually correlates with extrapulmonary involvement or extensively parenchymal lesions of the lung.7,9,16 In the present case, of great interest is pleural involvements are not associated with hilar adenopathy or pulmonary infiltrate.
Finally, the pleural involvement of sarcoidosis responds well to corticosteroids. Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids hamper the formation of granulomas and, as a result, are largely efficient against most active clinical manifestations.17 They are required for recurrent or symptomatic patients of sarcoidosis with pleural involvement.18 Asymptomatic pleural effusions are likely to resolve spontaneously. The time of spontaneous resolution ranges from 1 to 3 months.18 Our case responded well to oral corticosteroid therapy, resulting in marked improvement in both symptoms and chest radiological findings. Sarcoidosis related pleural effusions which resolve incompletely and develop to trapped lung may be relieved by decortication.11
The diagnosis of sarcoidosis involving the pleura is based on finding the histologic evidence of noncaseating granuloma, the hallmark of sarcoidosis, and on excluding other granulomatous diseases, such as tuberculosis, fungal disease, and granulomatous polyvasculitis.2 In addition, some disorders including congestive heart failure and neoplasia, may be concomitant with sarcoidosis, must be ruled out. However, because the clinical and pathological features of sarcoidosis and tuberculosis may mimic each other, the differentiation between the two entities remains a challenging problem. when the caseous necrosis is absent in biopsy samples, the real time PCR quantification for mycobacterium tuberculosis genome is a valuable test for differentiation between sarcoidosis and tuberculosis.19
Medical thoracoscopy, a relatively less invasive and more efficient diagnostic method, plays a significant role in the diagnosis of pleural involvement in sarcoidosis, especially of pleural effusions and pneumothorax. It allows physicians to directly access and assess the pleural cavity, including the parietal, visceral and diaphragmatic pleura, and to obtain adequate tissue sampling. Additionally, pleural fluid can be aspirated without complications during thoracoscopy. Therefore, thoracoscopy, an appropriate alternative technique, can provide doctors with important evidences to convince pleural sarcoidosis. Although thoracentesis or closed pleural biopsy can also help to diagnose, it is not easy for physicians to get the accurate pathologic evidence.