Reagents and supplies. All reagents and solvents were liquid chromatography (LC)/mass spectrometry (MS)-grade quality unless otherwise noted. [13C6]-leucine was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA). Anti-FXN recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibody (mAb) EPR21840 (cat. # ab219414) was from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-free protease inhibitor cocktail, DL-dithiothreitol (DTT), EDTA-free Easypack protease inhibitor cocktail tablets, and dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride (DMP) were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Billerica, MA). LC-grade water and acetonitrile were obtained from Burdick and Jackson (Muskegon, MI). Protein G Dynabeads for immunoprecipitation (IP) and radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer with EDTA were from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). LC/MS grade water and Optima LC/MS grade solvents were from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA).
Study animals. The study was conducted in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines. C57Bl/6 mice were received from Taconic Biosciences (Germantown, NY) and were weighed and identified by ear punch upon receipt. Animals were housed by sex and treatment group in normal vivarium cages, with up to four mice per cage. Temperature and relative humidity were maintained at 21–23°C and 45–55%, respectively, and were monitored by Watchdog Environmental Monitors (VERTIV; Lincoln, NE). Animals were exposed to a 12:12 h light:dark cycle that alternated at 6 am and 6 pm. Water was supplied through an automated watering system, and the water pH was maintained at 2.5–2.8 (monitored weekly). Food was provided ad libitum (PicoLab® Rodent Diet 20; cat. # 5053; Lab Supply; Northlake, TX).
Dosing and sampling. For the purposes of 2D-nano-UHPLC-PRM/HRMS analysis, eight-week-old (± 1 week) WT C57Bl/6 mice weighing between 18–30 g were IV-administered vehicle [control article/formulation buffer (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], pH 7.4; 1.06 mM KH2PO4, 155.17 mL NaCl, 2.97 mM Na2PO4ꞏ7H2O)] or a low [1.8e12 genome copies (gc)/kg)], mid (5.7e12 gc/kg), or high (1.8e13 gc/kg) dose of AAVrh.10hFXN. Vector titration was performed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (data not shown). Administration was performed in a volume of 0.1 mL by IV injection into the lateral veins of the tail. The control group (n = 5) comprised three males and two females, the low-dose and mid-dose groups (n = 6 each) comprised three males and three females, and the high-dose group (n = 8) comprised three males and five females. Animals were excluded from the study when the IV injection leaked subcutaneously or externally, or mice did not survive for 48-h post injection, or dermatitis and/or any signs of severe stress and pain were noted 48 h after injection. Mice were anesthetized by CO2 inhalation until surgical plane, then euthanized by terminal cardiocentesis 7–10 months after dosing. Heart (septum) and liver were collected, weighed, and snap-frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C (± 10°C) until further processing.
Internal standard. It was possible to determine whether truncation of the FXN proteins had occurred in vivo in the mice or during sample processing by adding an internal standard (stable isotope labelling by amino acids in cell culture [SILAC]-hFXN [S81GTLGHPGSLDETTYER97] in which the [12C6]-lysine and [12C6]-leucine were replaced with [13C615N1]-lysine and [13C6]-leucine), to tissue samples before the analysis (Fig. 2). Mature SILAC-hFXN (81–210) is 98.5% homologous and 92.3% identical to the predicted sequence of mature mFXN (78–207). The hFXN protein standard was prepared with a 6 × His tag and the SILAC-hFXN internal standard prepared with a 6 × His tag as previously described30,32.
Tissue lysis. Mouse heart and liver tissue samples were cut into small pieces while still frozen, and 7–100 mg pieces were transferred to LoBind Eppendorf tubes containing 1 mL RIPA lysis buffer (supplemented with 1 mM EDTA, 1 × complete protease cocktail, 1 mM DTT). Tissue homogenization was conducted on ice using a sonication probe (30 pulses at setting 5). Lysed samples were centrifuged at 17,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min and the supernatant transferred to a separate tube. For heart samples, 50 ng of SILAC-hFXN standard was added and the entire sample was analyzed. For liver samples, 500 µL of the homogenate (~ 50%) was withdrawn, and 50 ng of SILAC-hFXN standard was added (i.e., only half of the sample was analyzed). Sample volumes were adjusted to standardize tissue amounts across samples.
mAb-bead cross-linking. Anti-FXN recombinant rabbit mAb (Abcam; Cambridge, UK; cat. # ab21914) was cross-linked to magnetic protein G beads using DMP30 (Fig. 2). This made it possible to thoroughly wash the beads to remove all interfering matrix contaminants before eluting the mature FXN proteoforms for 2D-nano-UHPLC-PRM/HRMS analysis, unlike previous IP studies31. Analyses could then be conducted without contamination of the mass spectrometer’s ion source or degradation of the LC column. Protein G magnetic Dynabeads (5 mg; 165 µL; ThermoFisher Scientific; Waltham, MA; cat. # 10009D) were washed three times with PBS containing 0.02% Tween (buffer A) and incubated with 40 µg (40 µL in 460 µL PBS) of a recombinant rabbit mAb against the FXN protein (cross-reactive with both mFXN and hFXN) on a rotator at 4°C overnight. The mAb-bound protein G beads were washed twice with 1 mL cross-linking buffer (0.2 M triethanolamine, pH 8.0) and incubated with 13 mg DMP in 2 mL cross-linking buffer on a rotator at room temperature for 1 h. The mAb-crosslinked G beads were quenched with 2 mL blocking solution (0.1 ethanolamine, pH 8.5) for 1 h at room temperature. The beads were washed with buffer A three times and stored in 1 mL of buffer A at 4°C until used (Fig. 2).
FXN IP. FXN protein IP was performed following a previously described protocol with minor modifications31. Briefly, a portion of tissue homogenate (typically 500 µL) was mixed with 500 µL ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (supplemented with 1 × complete protease cocktail,1 mM DTT). Mature SILAC-hFXN (50 ng) containing [13C6]-Leucine was spiked into each sample to serve as the internal standard. Each sample was transferred to a 2 mL LoBind Eppendorf tube containing 100 µL G beads cross-linked to an FXN mAb (0.5 mg) and incubated on a rotator at 4°C overnight. The next day, the supernatant was removed, and the cross-linked beads were washed two times with 1 mL buffer A. The beads were then transferred to a LoBind Eppendorf tube and washed with 1 mL PBS. Next, 100 µL elution buffer (300 mM acetic acid and 10% acetonitrile) was added to the beads, which were eluted at 1,000 rpm at 37°C for 1 h. The elution buffer was then transferred to another 1.5 mL LoBind Eppendorf and dried under nitrogen flow. Dried samples were then dissolved in 50 µL 25 mM aqueous NH4HCO3 solution containing 500 ng trypsin protease and digestion was performed at 37°C overnight prior to 2D-nano-UHPLC-PRM/HRMS analysis. Calibration standards were prepared by spiking 1, 2, 15, 30, 50, 600 and 1500 ng of mature hFXN into a solution of 50 ng of mature SILAC-hFXN in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and analysis of the calibration standards was performed alongside the samples following the same protocol.
Standard curves. Linear standard curves were obtained for the FXN peptide S81GTLGHPGSLDETTYER97) used to calculate mFXN and hFXN levels over a 1–50 ng range as previously described33 (a representative standard curve shown in Supplementary Fig. S1a). Different standard curves were used to quantify mFXN and hFXN > 50 ng, as these quantities distorted the lower end of the curve (Supplementary Fig. S1b). Transitions that were used to monitor the peptides are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Back-calculated values for the authentic standards used to prepare the standard curves were within acceptable limits (Supplementary Table S2).
2D-Nano-UHPLC-PRM/HRMS. Analyses were conducted using a high-resolution Q-Exactive HF hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano with capillary flowmeter chromatographic systems (ThermoFisher Scientific; San Jose, CA) as previously described with minor modifications (Fig. 2)1. The 2D system was set up in a pre-concentration mode composed of a ten-port valve, one nanopump for delivering solvents to analytical columns, and a micropump for delivering solvents to trapping columns. The 2D-nano-UHPLC-PRM/HRMS system was controlled by Xcalibur software (version 4.3) from the Q-Exactive mass spectrometer. The UHPLC trapping column was an Acclaim PepMap C18 cartridge (0.3 mm × 5 mm, 100 Å; ThermoFisher Scientific; San Jose, CA) and the analytical column was a C18 AQ nano-UHPLC column with a 10 µm pulled tip (75 µm × 25 cm, 3 µm particle size; Columntip; New Haven, CT). Samples (8 µL) were injected using the microliter-pickup injection mode. Loading solvent was water:acetonitrile (99.7:0.3 v:v) containing 0.2% formic acid. During sample loading, the valve stayed in the loading position (1–2) and solvent was loaded at 10 µL/min for 3 min. During the elution and analysis steps, the valve stayed in the injection position (1–10), the trapping column was connected to the nanopump and the analytical column, and samples were back-flushed into the analytical column. Washing of the trapping column using the nanopump continued until 5 min before the end of the run. Samples were eluted in the mass spectrometer with a linear gradient at a flow rate of 0.4 µL/min. Solvent A was water:acetonitrile (99.5:0.5 v:v) containing 0.1% formic acid, and solvent B was acetonitrile:water (98:2 v:v) containing 0.1% formic acid. The gradient on the analytical column was as follows: 2% B at the start, 5% B at 10 min, 55% B at 45 min, 98% B at 60 min, held for 15 min, then re-equilibrated at 2% B from 70−80 min. Ionization was conducted using a Nanospray Flex ion source (ThermoFisher Scientific; San Jose, CA). Mass spectrometer operating conditions were as follows: spray voltage = 3500 V; ion transfer capillary temperature = 275°C; ion polarity = positive; S-lens radiofrequency (RF) level = 55; and in-source collision-induced dissociation (CID) = 1.0 eV. The PRM/HRMS parameters were as follows: resolution = 60,000; automatic gain control (AGC) target = 2e5; maximum ion trap (IT) = 80 ms; loop count = 5; isolation window = 2.0 Da; and normalized collision energy (NCE) = 25 (Supplementary Table S1).
Data analyses. Protein quantification was performed using Skyline software (version 23.1; MacCoss Laboratory, University of Washington; Seattle, WA). 34 The peak area ratio of each PRM/HRMS transition for each unlabeled/light (L) peptide to labeled/heavy (H) peptide was calculated by Skyline software and used for absolute quantification. The most intense PRM/HRMS transition of [M + 3H]3+ (m/z 611.3002) to y4+ (568.2726) transition for S81GTLGHPGSLDETTYER97 (L = [13C6]-leucine) was used for the internal standard. The most intense PRM/HRMS transition of [M + 2H]2+ (m/z 940.9473) to y7+ (m/z 883.3792) for L78GTLDNPSSLDETAYER94 was used to quantify mature mFXN. The most intense PRM/HRMS transition of [M + 3H]3+ (m/z 607.2867) to y4+ (m/z 568.2726 for S81GTLGHPGSLDETTYER97 was used to quantify mature hFXN. Concentrations of mature mFXN and hFXN were determined from the L/H ratio of each N-terminal peptide to S81GTLGHPGSLDETTYER97 and interpolation from the standard curve.
Ethics declarations. All animal protocols and surgical experiments on mice were performed at the Belfer Gene Therapy Core Facility in accordance with and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Weill Cornell Medicine.