See the published version of this preprint at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Shi-Bao Lu
Xuanwu Hospital
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an evidence-based improvement over none-ERAS traditional care. The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of an ERAS program in patients over 70 years undergoing lumbar arthrodesis by comparison with none-ERAS traditional care.
Methods: During January 2018 to December 2018, patients enrolled received none-ERAS traditional care, while the ERAS program was implemented from January to December 2019. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, surgical data and postoperative recovery parameters were collected from all patients. Postoperative pain scores were evaluated by visual analog scales (VAS). The clinical outcomes were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and postoperative pain scores. Compliance results were also collected.
Result: A total of 127 patients were enrolled, including 67 patients in the none-ERAS traditional care group and 60 patients in the ERAS group. The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the two groups showed no significant differences. The LOS of patients treated with ERAS program (13.6±4.0 days) was significantly less than that of patients treated with none-ERAS traditional care (15.6±3.9 days) (p = 0.034). Complication rate was 8.3% in the ERAS group versus 20.9% in the none-ERAS traditional care group (p = 0.048). VAS (back) in the ERAS group was significantly lower on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2. Postoperative recovery parameters were improved in the ERAS group. The overall compliance with the ERAS program was 94%.
Conclusions: Based on our results, ERAS program is safer and more effective for elderly patients over 70 undergoing lumbar arthrodesis than none-ERAS traditional care.
Keywords
Enhanced recovery after surgery, elderly patients, lumbar arthrodesis, length of stay, complication
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Version 3
Posted 14 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 30 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 24 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 20 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 19 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 31 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 31 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 31 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 17 Dec, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 14 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 08 Dec, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 28 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 27 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 27 Oct, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 13 Oct, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 02 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 29 Sep, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 01 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 01 Jul, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 01 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 23 Jun, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 22 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 22 Jun, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedics
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Shi-Bao Lu
Xuanwu Hospital
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Version 3
Posted 14 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 30 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 24 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 20 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 19 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 31 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 31 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 31 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 17 Dec, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 14 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 08 Dec, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 28 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 27 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 27 Oct, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 13 Oct, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 02 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 29 Sep, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 01 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 01 Jul, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 01 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 23 Jun, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 22 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 22 Jun, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedics
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an evidence-based improvement over none-ERAS traditional care. The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of an ERAS program in patients over 70 years undergoing lumbar arthrodesis by comparison with none-ERAS traditional care.
Methods: During January 2018 to December 2018, patients enrolled received none-ERAS traditional care, while the ERAS program was implemented from January to December 2019. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, surgical data and postoperative recovery parameters were collected from all patients. Postoperative pain scores were evaluated by visual analog scales (VAS). The clinical outcomes were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and postoperative pain scores. Compliance results were also collected.
Result: A total of 127 patients were enrolled, including 67 patients in the none-ERAS traditional care group and 60 patients in the ERAS group. The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the two groups showed no significant differences. The LOS of patients treated with ERAS program (13.6±4.0 days) was significantly less than that of patients treated with none-ERAS traditional care (15.6±3.9 days) (p = 0.034). Complication rate was 8.3% in the ERAS group versus 20.9% in the none-ERAS traditional care group (p = 0.048). VAS (back) in the ERAS group was significantly lower on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2. Postoperative recovery parameters were improved in the ERAS group. The overall compliance with the ERAS program was 94%.
Conclusions: Based on our results, ERAS program is safer and more effective for elderly patients over 70 undergoing lumbar arthrodesis than none-ERAS traditional care.
Loading...