Materials
Dopamine (DA), D-methionine, riboflavin and nitrotetrazolium blue chloride (NBT) were purchased from Macklin (Shanghai, China). Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mold was purchased from Taizhou Microchip Pharmaceutical Technology (Taizhou, China). Hyaluronic acid sodium salt (100 kDa) and super active hyaluronic acid (HA) (5 kDa) were purchased from Hefei BOSF Biotechnology Co., Ltd. 30% H2O2 was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Regent Co., Ltd. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) was purchased from MeilunBio®. 2, 7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), MitoTracker® Green FM, Annexin V-EGFP/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit, Hifair® Ⅱ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (gDNA digester plus), Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (No Rox) and Calcein-AM/PI Double Stain Kit were purchased from Yeasen biotech Co., Ltd. MMP assay kit with JC-1, Hydrogen Peroxide Assay Kit, Trizol were purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). RhB, DPPH, and ABTS were purchased from J&K Scientific Co., Ltd. Anti-HMGB1 antibody was obtained from Abcam (catalog no. Ab79823).
Characterizations
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were captured by a HT7700 transmission electron microscope (JEM-F200, Japan). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were captured by HITACHI UHR FE-SEM SU8000 Series (SU8010, Japan). The dynamic light scattering (DLS) size distribution was measured by Zetasizer Nano ZS ZEN3600 (Malven, England). UV/Vis absorption spectra were measured on a Cary 60 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The immunofluorescence images were captured by Leica Stellaris 5 (Heidelberg, Germany). The morphology images of microneedles were captured by stereomicroscope (T1-HD206, China). The Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis were conducted by iQ5 PCR assay systems (Bio-Rad Laboratory, Haglels, California). The mechanical strength of microneedles was conducted by Electronic Universal Material Testing Machine (Instron 5944). The permeation ability of microneedles was tested by multiphoton microscope (FVMPE-RS, Japan). All the fluorescent pictures were captured by fluorescence microscope (Leica Stellaris 5, Germany).
Synthesis of PDA and PDA-JAKi nanoparticles
180 mg DA was dissolved in 90 mL H2O. When it was heated to 50 ℃, the 760 µL NaOH (1 M) was added immediately and stirred for 5 h. After cooling into room temperature, the PDA nanoparticles was obtained by centrifugation at 18000 rpm for 15 min. The deposit re-suspended in pure water and centrifugated at 4000 rpm to remove large particles. To obtain PDA-JAKi, various concentrations (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 mg) of JAKi were feed into 2 mg PDA solution, after stirring for 4 h, the final product was centrifugated and the supernatant was collected for UV/Vis absorbance analysis. The loading efficiency of JAKi was determined using the formula: loading efficiency = 100% × (total JAKi - unloaded JAKi) / total JAKi. The loading capacity of JAKi was determined using the formula: loading capacity = (total JAKi - unloaded JAKi) / total PDA.
Catalytic ability against H2O2
50 and 100 µg mL− 1 PDA and PDA-JAKi were co-incubated with 1 M H2O2 for 12 h at room temperature. Utilizing a hydrogen peroxide assay kit to quantify the concentration of H2O2 in the supernatant after centrifugation. The specific operation was carried out according to the instructions.
Free radical scavenging assays
For DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical) depletion assay, 100 mM DPPH was co-incubation with different concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50 µg mL− 1) PDA-JAKi for 20 min in the dark. Then, the reaction mixture solution was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected for further detection by UV/Vis at 515 nm.
For •OH depletion assay, the ability of •OH depletion was monitored by ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline 6-sulfonate). 920 µL of H2O, 10 µL of H2O2 (200 uM), 20 µL of FeSO4·7H2O (18 mM), and 10 µg of PDA-JAKi were mixed together. After sonication for 5 min, the supernatant was collected by centrifugation and then incubated with 50 µL ABTS (10 µM) for different times (0, 1, 10, 30, 90, 120 min). Finally, the UV/Vis absorbance of the reaction solution at 800 nm was recorded.
For O2−• depletion assay, 12.5 mM methionine, 75 µM nitrogen blue tetrazole, 20 µM riboflavin and different concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 µg mL− 1) of PDA-JAKi were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. The reaction solution was collected for UV/Vis analysis at 560 nm after UV irradiation for 15 min.
Preparation of microneedle patches
180 mg mL− 1 HA hydrogel solution (sodium hyaluronate: super active DA = 1:5, w/w) was added to the PDSM mold. Then, PDSM mold was placed into horizontal centrifuge and centrifuged three times at 4000 rpm for 5 min. The whole product was dried at 37℃ over night. Finally, the HA MN were carefully removed from molds for the following experiments. PDA MN, JAKi MN and PDA-JAKi MN were prepared by almost the same process as HA MN, with the PDA, JAKi and PDA-JAKi already doped in HA hydrogel solution respectively. For RhB-loaded HA MN preparation, RhB was added into the HA hydrogel solution for next steps.
Mechanical strength of MN detection
the various MN patches were placed on the steel plate and moved vertically direction with detector probe at a speed of 0.1 mm s–1. When it touched the tip, recorded the displacement and force immediately. Meanwhile, when the tip started to break, the destructive force of the MN patch was recorded. A stereomicroscope was used to observe the broken MN patch.
Permeability ability of HA MN detection
The PDA-JAKi MN patches were inserted into the skin of mice. After 10 min of application, 10 mg mL–1 methylene blue (MB) aqueous solution was applied to stain the microholes. After another 10 min application, the MB aqueous solution was removed and the images were recorded with stereomicroscope. To further understand the penetration, the mice skin was collected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed by Wuhan Service Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The rhodamine B (RhB)-loaded HA MN patches were prepared in advance. They were applied to the freshly excised skin of mice. The RhB-loaded HA MN were removed and the penetration depth was observed using a multiphoton microscope (𝜆ex = 540 nm, 𝜆em = 625 nm) after 10 min of application.
Cell experiments
For cytotoxicity assay, HaCaT and PIG1 cells were seeded into 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells per well) and incubated overnight. Subsequently, the initial DMEM was disposed of and replaced with fresh DMEM solution that included varying concentrations of JAKi and PDA-JAKi individually. After further incubation for 24 h, cell viabilities were assessed by CCK-8 assay. Similarly, various doses of H2O2 ranging from 0 to 1000 µM were added into fresh DMEM, cell viabilities were assessed by CCK-8 assay after 24 h incubation. According to the result of CCK-8 assays, 1 mM H2O2 were chosen for PDA-JAKi antioxidative stress capacity detection. The DMEM was replaced with fresh DMEM containing 1 mM H2O2 and various concentration of PDA-JAKi. After co-incubation for 24 h, the cytotoxicity was conducted by CCK-8 assay.
To evaluate cellular apoptosis using flow cytometry, PIG1 cells were seeded into 6 wells with a density of 1 × 105 and cultured for 12 h. Subsequently, the cells were exposed to DMEM supplemented with H2O2, H2O2 + PDA, and H2O2 + PDA-JAKi (1 mM H2O2, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA-JAKi) for a duration of 24 h. Then, the cells were gathered and subjected to staining using the Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit. The stained cells were promptly examined using a flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA).
For live and dead cell observation, the HaCaT cells were seeded into a 6-well plate overnight and further exposed to different treatments for 24 h: H2O2, H2O2 + PDA, H2O2 + PDA-JAKi (1 mM H2O2, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA-JAKi). And then, Calcin-AM solution (2 mM, 1:1000) and PI solution (1.5 mM, 1:1000) were added to stain the cells for 10 min. After that, the cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope.
To detect the MMP change, JC-1 Assay Kit was employed to detect the alterations. PIG1 cells were placed in a 6-well plate with a density of 1 × 105 cells per well and incubated for 12 h. Following various treatments (Control, H2O2, H2O2 + PDA, H2O2 + PDA-JAKi; 1 mM H2O2, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA-JAKi) for 24 h, the cells were conducted by JC-1 Assay Kit. And the fluorescence images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope.
To observe the mitochondrial integrity, HaCaT cells was seeded into a 6-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well. After overnight incubation, the cells were treated with H2O2, H2O2 + PDA, and H2O2 + PDA-JAKi (1 mM H2O2, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA-JAKi), respectively. MitoTracker Green probe was utilized to stain mitochondria in living cells. And the fluorescence images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope.
For in vitro ROS detection, the HaCaT cells were seeded into a 6-well plate (1 × 105 cells per well) and cultured overnight. Afterwards, the origin DMEM was removed, and H2O2, H2O2 + PDA and H2O2 + PDA-JAKi (1 mM H2O2, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA-JAKi) were introduced to the fresh DMEM for 4 h. Then, PBS solution with DCFH-DA probe was stained for 30 min. Cells were washed with PBS three times and observed by a fluorescent microscope or immediately detected by a flow cytometry.
Immunofluorescence staining in vitro
PIG1 cells were seeded into confocal dishes (1×105 cells per dish) and incubated for 12 h. Afterwards, the cells were treated with H2O2, H2O2 + PDA and H2O2 + PDA-JAKi (1 mM H2O2, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA, 50 µg mL− 1 PDA-JAKi) for 24 h. Anti-HMGB1 (1:1000, Abcam, Cat. ab79823) was chosen for immunofluorescence stanning.
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Total RNA was isolated from HaCaT cells using Trizol reagent. It was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Hifair® 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (gDNA digester plus). The QRT-PCR analysis was carried out using the Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (No Rox). All procedures were performed according to the instructions. Relative mRNA expression was normalised to the GADPH gene. The primers used in this study were as follows:
Gene | Primer | Sequence (5’→3’) |
Human GADPH | Forward | CAGGAGGCATTGCTGATGAT |
Reverse | GAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTT |
Human CXCL10 | Forward | ATTCCTGCAAGCCAATTTTGTCCAC |
Reverse | TGATGGCCTTCGATTCTGGATTCAG |
Human CXCL16 | Forward | GCAGCGTCACTGGAAGTTGTTATTG |
Reverse | CCGATGGTAAGCTCTCAGGTTTC |
Animal experiments
Female C57BL/6 mice aged 4–6 weeks were used in this experiment. All mice were purchased from Beijing Weitong Lihua Animal Experiment Co., LTD. All animal rearing and experiments were carried out in accordance with the regulations set by the Animal Care and Trial Committee of Wenzhou Medical University. The vitiligo mice model was established according to previously reported literature.[11] The vitiligo mice were randomly divided into 6 groups including: 1) Control group 2) Untreated group; 3) HA MN group; 4) PDA MN group; 5) JAKi MN group; 6) PDA-JAKi ointment group; 7) PDA-JAKi MN group (PDA: 25 mg kg− 1; JAKi: 2.9 mg kg− 1). The ointment was purchased from Mannings. The PDA-JAKi ointment was prepared by simply mixing the ointment with the PDA-JAKi. The treatments were administered twice a day and two pieces at a time for the microneedles-mediated groups. For the PDA-JAKi ointment group, the ointment was applied thinly to the corresponding area of the back and gently massaged until absorbed. At the end of the treatments, the mice were sacrificed, and the treated skin was collected for ELISA assay, CD8+ T cells immunofluorescence staining, H&E staining and Masson-Fontana staining. Subsequently, the major organs were then harvested to confirm the compatibility of the therapeutic agents. All the samples were further performed by Wuhan Service Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Statistical analysis
All the results above represented mean ± standard deviation. Statistically differences were determined by an Student’s t-test. post hoc test using Graphpad Prism software 8.2.1. P values < 0.05 was considered as a significant difference between data (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; ns, no significance).