3.1. Characteristics of the Subjects
Baseline demographics are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences in gender, education, HTN, DM, CAD, hypercholesterolemia, Smoke, alcholo and education level between the 69 patients with ICAS and the 52 patients without ICAS. Importantly, patients with MBI had a significantly higher percentage of ICAS than those without MBI (15.9% vs. 51.9%, respectively; p < 0.05). While there were statistical differences in age, MOCA score and The Frail Scale score between the two groups (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1
Demographic and clinical features of patients
Abbreviations: MBI-C: Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ICAS: intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; CAD: coronary artery disease; HC: hypercholesterolemia; FBI: Fasting blood insulin; CRP: C-reactive protein; WBC: White blood cell count; N: Neutrophil count; L: Lymphocyte count; PLT: Platelet count; ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate. *p<0.05.
3.2. The distribution of ICAS.
Table 2 presents the percentage and distribution of ICAS in patients with a minor stroke. We observed that the majority of stenotic sites were located in the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA), followed by the Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA).
Table 2 The percentage and distribution of ICAS in patients with a minor stroke.
Abbreviations: ICA: Internal carotid artery (intracranial segments), MCA: middle cerebral artery (M1-M3 segments), ACA: anterior cerebral artery (A1 segments), VA: vertebral artery (intracranial segment), BA: basilar artery, PCA: posterior cerebral artery (P1-P3 segments).
3.3. the association between ICAS and MBI
Binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between ICAS and MBI, as shown in Table 3. ICAS was positively associated with MBI following an acute, non-disabling ischemic stroke after adjustment for age and sex in model 2 (OR: 5.62; 95% CI: 2.41-14.0). This association still existed after adjustment for the following factors in model 3 (OR: 5.28; 95% CI: 2.27-13.0): education level, history of hypertension, diabetes, and HDL(Table 3).[23] This illustrates that our results are robust. Additionally, Supplementary Table 1 reveals the associations between ICAS and MoCA, frailty, and fatigue. Although the results did not exhibit robust and significant relationships, there may be some underlying connections.
Abbreviations: Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age and sex; Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, education level, history of hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, stroke, smoking, drinking, and laboratory tests of FBI, CRP, WBC, N, L, PLT, ESR. OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICAS, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. *p<0.05.
3.4 Analysis based on brain structure.
Voxel-based logistic regression analysis between WMH volume and MBI did not show a correlation between WMH and MBI scores, Moca scores, The Frail Scale, and The Fatigue Scale (Table 4). Binary logistic regression was performed on cortical thickness and gray matter volume and MBI in different brain regions, and the results were shown in Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3, respectively. The gray matter volume and MBI-C score did not show a correlation in any brain region (Supplementary Table 3). The thickness of the right precuneus cortex was screened for possible association with the MBI-C score(Supplementary Table 2). Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that after adjusting for confounders, the MBI-C score was negatively correlated with right precuneus thickness (p<0.05, CI: 0.00-0.24).
Abbreviations: MBI-C: Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ICAS: intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; HWMH: Higher white matter hyperintensities