Although the effects of AA exposure on cancer cells have been demonstrated in in vitro culture[10], two in vivo randomized controlled trials[12, 13] failed to identify any action of oral AA administration against cancer. However, as intravenous administration of AA could increase the blood concentration of AA [14] then it is still possible that AA may have a role in cancer therapy. The potential anticancer mechanisms of AA include ROS generation, prevention of HIF-1 activation, and epigenetic regulation via the ten-eleven translocation protein. AA is also expected to promote anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy[15]. In the present study, we show that AA induced an increase in ROS only in CD166− cells cultured in RPMI; we also showed an increased rate of CD166− cell death as ROS levels increased. Although AA did not induce cytotoxic effects in cells cultured in mTeSR1, we did note that if AA was added to cells cultured in mTeSR1 supplemented with FBS, cytotoxicity was observed, although it was weaker than the effect seen in RPMI cultures (supplemental Fig. 1). It is possible that factors in FBS are required for AA cytotoxicity and/or that mTeSR1 contains factors that inhibit ROS. We also found that the cytotoxic effect of AA was restricted to cultures with low cell densities, and even in these AA did not result in total cell death. Extrapolating from these findings, it seems that AA monotherapy for advanced cancer with large tumors is likely to have limited efficacy; this may be one of the reasons for the failure of AA monotherapy clinical trials[16, 17]. In order to achieve an effect using AA therapy for advanced cancers, it may be necessary to combine AA with other drugs that target non-CSCs or that have been shown to enhance antitumor effects, such as anti-PD-L1 therapy[18].
CSCs have an crucial role in cancer recurrence[1] and are an important therapeutic target. The efficacy of AA against CSCs has been described previously [19], and a clear cytotoxic effect on CSC-like cells in the Li-7 cell line was also obtained in this study. However, a small proportion of CD166− cells can survive high concentrations of AA and TBHP, and these cells may be the most important therapeutic targets to avoid cancer recurrence. We also found that AA is highly effective against small spheroids including CSCs and it has been shown to suppress metastasis in mouse xenograft model[20]. Since AA is well tolerated in terms of side effects, AA monotherapy or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy may have considerable potential for suppressing postoperative recurrence.
In this study, we examined the effects of AA treatment on the Li-7 cell line that contains CSC-like cells. AA predominantly killed CSC-like cells following the generation of ROS; the effect of AA was more clearly observed in cultures at lower cell densities and on smaller spheroids. These results suggest that AA may have the potential for use in the clinic as an approach to suppress CSCs, although further work is clearly required to determine the optimal treatment.