Previously, we identified significantly lower serum GDNF levels in individuals with PD and constipation. This led us to formulate two hypotheses: first, that the reduced GDNF levels could be either a consequence of pathological changes in PD or an initial factor contributing to gut pathology in PD, ultimately resulting in decreased colonic motility and clinical constipation. Second, we speculated that supplementing GDNF might ameliorate colonic motility in PD.
In light of these hypotheses, our study aimed to investigate whether GDNF supplementation could enhance colon motility in 6-OHDA-induced PD rats and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Our research reaffirmed the observation that PD rats displayed diminished colon motility and lower colon GDNF expression. This was marked by moderate to severe colon inflammation, reactive glial cells, increased CX43 expression, and neuronal loss. However, intraperitoneal injection of AAV-GDNF could counter these indicators and enhance colonic motility. Our conjecture was that GDNF plays a role in mitigating the activation of colonic EGCs and downregulating the number of CX43 hemichannels, thus safeguarding neurons from cell death and improving colonic motility in PD rats.
To achieve our goals, we initially established PD animal models to facilitate subsequent investigations. We induced central dopaminergic denervation by employing stereotaxic injection of 6-OHDA, a catecholaminergic neurotoxin that selectively affects dopaminergic neurons through the dopamine transporter. This process leads to the degeneration of the nigrostriatal system, making it the most widely utilized neurotoxin in PD modeling[17]. Rats exhibiting positive results in the Apomorphine (Apo) rotation test, characterized by circling behavior, were identified as PD rats and selected for further experimentation.
To assess colonic motility in PD rats, we employed measurements of fecal moisture percentage (FMP) and carbon powder propulsion rate (CPPR). The results demonstrated a progressive decline in both FMP and CPPR following 6-OHDA denervation, confirming that nigrostriatal denervation led to reduced colonic motility, in line with prior findings[18]. We observed a significant decrease in FMP starting at week 3 post-denervation in PD rats, with both FMP and CPPR declining by more than 20%, indicating a substantial impairment in colonic motility.
Gut motility is primarily governed by the ENS, a sophisticated network of neurons and glial cells within the intestinal wall. Among these, EGCs hold a pivotal role, as they envelop enteric neuronal cell bodies, foster neuronal communication, and provide crucial support for neural signaling and survival. Recent research has underscored the significant contribution of EGCs to gastrointestinal (GI) function regulation, encompassing aspects like gut motility and inflammation. It has become increasingly apparent that gut dysfunction, once solely attributed to enteric neurons (ENS), often arises from intricate interactions between EGCs and ENS. This emerging concept of EGCs as key regulators of gut motility has garnered substantial attention, partly due to studies indicating that the removal of glial cells can lead to neuronal loss [9] or disrupt intercellular signaling between EGCs and ENS [11].
EGCs inherently possess neuroprotective qualities and play a pivotal role in preserving enteric neuron populations. They actively contribute to neuroprotection by secreting essential compounds such as GDNF and reduced glutathione. Furthermore, they express receptors and enzymes capable of metabolizing neuroactive substances, thereby preventing abnormal neuronal activation. Essentially, EGCs function as proactive support cells in safeguarding the ENS[19, 20]. In response to gut infections, whether triggered by bacteria, viruses, or exposure to inflammatory mediators, EGCs undergo a pathophysiological transformation known as the "reactive glial phenotype."[21] The exact function of reactive EGCs remains uncertain. While the neuroprotective properties of glial cells might suggest that the loss of glial support could be a potential mechanism for neuron death, recent data indicate that, in the context of inflammation, it is glial activation, rather than glial cell loss, that drives neurodegeneration in the brain.
In the gastrointestinal context, it has been suggested that the activation of EGCs is partially implicated in enteric neuron death. A pioneering discovery by Thomas Clairebault et al. revealed that colonic EGCs in PD patients undergo pathological reactivity, characterized by an increase in GFAP expression. This underscores that colonic glial cell activation might represent another distinctive pathological feature in PD, in addition to synuclein deposition [10]. GFAP levels exhibited a strong correlation with the levels of various pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and others.
Various terms like 'activated,' 'reactive,' and 'gliopathy' are used to describe different states of the EGCs in response to various challenges. Unfortunately, these terms are often used interchangeably, resulting in significant ambiguity in the existing literature. 'Reactive' is a term employed to depict the state of the EGCs when they respond to a pathophysiological disturbance of any degree. Currently, there are no well-defined criteria to characterize reactive EGCs, and experimental assessment typically relies on evaluating changes in morphology and/or the expression of markers such as GFAP or S100β [22].
This complexity in terminology and the need for standardized criteria to characterize different states of EGCs are crucial considerations for understanding EGCs biology, intercellular signaling, and their roles in gastrointestinal diseases.
In our study, we observed a significant increase in the colonic expression of GFAP in PD rats, and GFAP-positive cells exhibited morphological changes, including enlarged cell bodies and increased branching, indicative of reactive EGCs. Interestingly, these reactive EGCs were primarily observed in the submucosal plexus or myenteric plexus, aligning with Thomas Clairebault's observations. Typically, EGCs can be categorized into four subgroups based on their structure and location within the gut wall. Those found in the submucosal plexus or myenteric plexus belong to Type I and Type II cells, often referred to as "protoplasmic" or "fibrous" glial cells. These cells are situated within the ganglia or inter-ganglionic connectives and surround the neurons [23]. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that Type I and Type II glial cells play a more prominent role in glia-neuron communication, thereby regulating gut motility in the context of PD pathology. Further investigations are imperative to unravel the precise mechanisms underlying this interaction.
Moderate to severe colon inflammation was observed in PD rats, marked by the infiltration of inflammatory cells and the disruption of the colon wall's original integrity and continuity. Furthermore, there was a notable upsurge in the expression of inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, within the colon of PD rats. This inflammatory response coincided with the loss of enteric neurons, evident through the significant decrease in PGP9.5, a neuron-specific protein also known as ubiquitin carboxyterminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1), within the colons of PD rats.
Gap junctions (GJs) represent a distinct mechanism of direct cell-to-cell communication, allowing neighboring cells to exchange various signaling molecules, including ions, nucleotides, metabolites, second messengers, microRNAs, and more. These exchanges play a pivotal role in supporting multicellular life. The fundamental constituents of GJ channels and hemichannels are connexin proteins, with CX43 being one of the most prevalent members within the connexin protein family. Interestingly, it is expressed predominantly by EGCs within the mouse myenteric plexus (MP) in the ENS, resembling its localization on astrocytes in the CNS[24].
Recent studies have unveiled the participation of CX43 in regulating the inflammatory process within the CNS [25]. In a neuroinflammatory model of PD, the expression of CX43 in astrocytes was found to be increased, and this increase dynamically correlated with the expression of GFAP [26]. Blocking CX43 in astrocytes has demonstrated the ability to modulate central nervous system (CNS) inflammation, thereby alleviating pathological reactions in various models of CNS damage[27]. In the ENS, CX43 is the most scrutinized subtype of the connexin family of gap junction proteins in the context of intestinal inflammation and motility. An increase in CX43 expression has been associated with an elevated occurrence of bacterial infection in colonocytes[28]. A study employing transgenic mice with conditional deletion of CX43 in intestinal smooth muscle reported a 29% reduction in gastrointestinal transit time [29] It was suggested that CX43 in EGCs blunts glial network activity and disrupts neuronal regulation of gastrointestinal transit[24].
Our study revealed an upswing in CX43 expression in reactive EGCs within the colon of PD rats, implying a potential connection between CX43, colonic inflammation, and colonic motility in PD. However, it's worth noting that there are reports indicating that CX43 in astrocytes can be down-regulated in inflamed white matter in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. This highlights the complex and context-dependent nature of CX43 regulation in different cell types and under various disease conditions [30].
Thus, the responses of EGCs in PD rats, encompassing reactive EGCs, neuroinflammation, and enteric neuropathy, could potentially contribute to impaired colon motility. Within this sequence of events, the upregulation of CX43 opening seems to play a pivotal role in mediating neuronal death. These findings give rise to a new question: should protective mechanisms or interventions be explored to achieve less severe disease outcomes?
In the CNS, gliosis, particularly involving CX43, has been a target of therapeutic approaches in neurodegenerative diseases [31] [32]. However, there is currently no clear consensus regarding gliosis in the ENS. Gulbransen et al. have proposed that targeting EGCs in motility disorders could represent a novel and promising therapeutic approach[33]. In this context, our aim is to target reactive EGCs in the colon of PD patients, with a particular focus on CX43 in EGCs, in order to explore new therapeutic approaches.
Indeed, GDNF, a member of the GDNF family ligands (GFLs), is renowned for its crucial role in promoting the growth and survival of various nervous systems, including the central, sensory, enteric, and parasympathetic systems. Recent research has unveiled its additional anti-inflammatory properties, which involve the suppression of IL-17-induced inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8, while also bolstering the survival of epithelial cells[14]. In the context of inflammation, GDNF released from EGCs plays a significant role in down-regulating pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-1β. This action of GDNF serves to inhibit mucosal inflammation, highlighting its potential as a modulator of the inflammatory response in the gut[15].
It was previously believed that EGCs were the primary source of GDNF. However, recent research has revealed that neurons and epithelial cells also produce and release GDNF[34]. In a previous clinical study, we reported that serum GDNF levels were significantly lower in PD patients with constipation, suggesting a potential link between GDNF levels and gastrointestinal symptoms in PD[16]. We observed a significant reduction in colonic GDNF levels in PD rats, which was accompanied by the activation of glial cells. This finding is consistent with a report by Michael and colleagues, which showed a decrease in GDNF in the entire intestinal tissue lytic fluid of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Importantly, Michael's report highlighted that the decrease in GDNF was particularly prominent in the inflamed portions of the tissue samples, as opposed to the non-inflamed areas. This suggests that GDNF levels may be specifically affected by inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract[35].
The reason for the reduction in GDNF is not yet clear. On one hand, pathologically reactive EGCs may undergo functional alterations. Astrocytes, which are the most abundant glial cells in the CNS and equivalent to EGCs in the ENS, play crucial roles in brain homeostasis. Following pathological brain insults, astrocytes undergo a dynamic transformation known as reactive astrogliosis. This process can manifest in two distinct types: the harmful A1 and the protective A2 types. Their roles can either be neuroprotective or neurodegenerative, depending largely on the specific molecules they release into or take up from the extracellular space[36]. Neuroprotective functions are exerted by releasing a variety of trophic factors, such as GDNF[37]. Additionally, inhibition of microglia-mediated astrocyte transformation to the A1 phenotype has a neuroprotective effect[38]. Furthermore, Fujita’s study showed that striatal GDNF levels decreased with the reduction of A2 astrocytes in PD mice (MPTP-treated)[39].
At this point, the function of reactive EGCs, similar to astrocytes in the CNS, remains poorly understood. The potential for functional changes, such as an increase in "A1" and a decrease in "A2" characteristics in colonic EGCs of PD rats, which could consequently result in decreased GDNF production, warrants further investigation. On the contrary, while GDNF has long been attributed to EGCs as its primary source, recent insights have revealed that neurons and epithelial cells also contribute to its production and release [91].
The decline of GDNF in PD rats, be it in the colon or bloodstream, appears to be the result of a complex interplay of reactions and balances. The intricate and currently unclear mechanisms underlying PD development hinder a comprehensive understanding of the reduction in colon GDNF. Nevertheless, we must address whether the reduction in GDNF correlates with the inflammatory status and the upregulation of CX43, and whether GDNF supplementation can mitigate inflammation and downregulate CX43, ultimately rescuing neurons and enhancing colon motility.
To investigate these questions, we developed an adenovirus overexpressing GDNF (AAV-GDNF) and administered it via intraperitoneal injection to PD rats in experimental and control groups, aiming to boost colonic GDNF levels. Four weeks later, our findings revealed that GDNF supplementation effectively restrained colon inflammation and gliosis. This was evidenced by reduced expression levels of inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and GFAP. Notably, CX43 expression significantly decreased, while PGP9.5 expression increased. Simultaneously, the colonic motility of PD rats witnessed marked improvement, as reflected in the increased FMP and CPPR values. These results suggest that GDNF might rescue enteric neurons and ultimately enhance colonic motility by mitigating colon inflammation, dampening EGC activation, and downregulating CX43. Coincidentally, Isola et al. reported that the opening of CX43 hemichannels is a prerequisite for neuron death during inflammation and that selective removal of glial CX43 exerts a neuroprotective effect in gut pathology[9].
GDNF has been evaluated as a treatment for PD to improve central nervous function in clinical and experimental studies [40, 41], but there have been few reports of its effect on gut motility function in PD. Our findings have firmly established that GDNF holds the potential to enhance gut motility in PD rat models by effectively curbing EGC activation and suppressing CX43 expression. Nevertheless, the intricate downstream mechanisms governing this process warrant further elucidation.
Currently, existing studies have reported that inflammation-induced CX43 opening leads to the release of substantial amounts of ATP within the gastrointestinal system. Extracellular ATP can subsequently engage with purinergic receptors, notably the P2X7R, which is of particular significance. This interaction is known to contribute to neuron death, ultimately influencing gut motility. While the interplay between connexins and purinergic receptors has been explored in diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), its investigation within the context of PD-related gut dysfunction remains relatively scarce.
In conclusion, our data strongly suggest that CX43, located within reactive EGCs of the colon, might play a pivotal role in the neuronal demise observed within the inflamed gut of PD. Moreover, our findings indicate that GDNF could act to down-regulate the activity of CX43, thereby preserving the integrity of colon neurons. Whether P2X7R and extracellular ATP are involved in the downstream mechanisms governing this process needs further investigation.
Limitation
Our study does have several limitations that should be taken into account. Firstly, there is potential to improve the objectivity of colon motility evaluation. Secondly, the interchangeability of terms like "activation," "reactivity," and "gliopathy" in the existing literature to describe different states of glial cells in the gut has led to substantial ambiguity. Seguella et al. have indeed proposed a set of guidelines aimed at providing a more precise definition of these terms[22]. However, in our study, we did not differentiate between EGCs in various states, nor did we investigate the status of EGCs under different degrees of 6-OHDA injury or at various time points following 6-OHDA injury. It is reasonable to assume that EGCs may exhibit varying levels of activation in response to different degrees of injury. Thirdly, we characterized the colon EGCs in 6-OHDA-induced PD rats as "reactive EGCs" by assessing changes in morphology and the expression of glial markers such as GFAP[42]. However, this approach may not be comprehensive, as a more precise characterization of reactive glial cells involves considering four primary characteristics. Reactive glia can manifest one or more of these changes, depending on the severity and nature of the insult, similar to the criteria used to define reactive astrocytes[22]. From this perspective, the experimental evaluation of reactive glial cells in our present study might be considered limited. Furthermore, our research lacks empirical evidence regarding the co-localization of CX43 and EGCs; instead, it relies solely on findings from other researchers. Therefore, it is imperative to isolate primary EGCs for subsequent analysis to enhance the comprehensiveness of our study.