Change in anthropometric characteristics and body composition
To examine the differences in body composition according to circadian rhythms and exercise order, we identified anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and hip and waist circumferences (Table 3). In comparison between pre-experimental groups, anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and hip and waist circumferences were no significant (all baseline p-values >0.05). At Post, body weight (p<0.003), body fat mass (p<0.010) and body mass index (p<0.002) were significantly decreased in the RAMG, while anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and hip and waist circumferences did not change significantly in the OCG. In addition, % fat, fat-free mass, waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio were not significantly different all groups. There was a significant group × time interaction in the body weight (p<0.004), body fat mass (p<0.042) and body mass index (p<0.003) except for percent body fat (p<0.984), free fat mass (p<0.275), waist and hip circumference (p<0.731, p<0.991, respectively), and waist-hip ratio (p<0.169).
Change in basic physical fitness
We measured various physical fitness parameters to identify maximal strength, muscular endurance, flexibility, and cardiorespiratory endurance according to circadian rhythms and exercise order (Table 4). In comparison between pre-experimental groups, physical fitness parameters were no significant (all baseline p-values >0.05). At Post, back strength was significantly increased in the ARMG (p<0.048), RAMG (p<0.021), AREG (p<0.004). Sit up was significantly increased in the AREG (p<0.001) and RAEG (p<0.006). Physical efficiency index was significantly increased in the RAMG (p<0.025) and RAEG (p<0.050), while physical fitness parameters did not change significantly in the OCG. There was a significant group × time interaction in the sit up (p<0.046) and sit and reach (p<0.049) except for grip and back strength (p<0.827, p<0.377, respectively) and physical efficiency index (p<0.088).
Change in Upper and lower extremity muscle functions
To examine upper- and lower-extremity muscle function, we performed the FAPT, SAPT, TFET, vertical jump, and sit-to-stand tests (Table 5). There was no significant difference at baseline between groups in upper- and lower-extremity muscle functions (all baseline p-values >0.05). At Post, front abdominal and right-side abdominal power test were significantly increased in the ARMG (p<0.031, p<0.031, respectively), RAMG (p<0.003, p<0.022, respectively), AREG (p<0.003, p<0.034, respectively). Left side abdominal power test, trunk flexor endurance test and sit to stand test were significantly increased in ARMG (p<0.041, p<0.016, p<0.008, respectively), RAMG (p<0.006, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), AREG (p<0.006, p<0.013, p<0.001, respectively), RAEG (p<0.001, p<0.011, p<0.013, respectively), while all upper- and lower-extremity muscle functions did not change in the OCG. There was a significant group × time interaction in the front abdominal power test (p<0.018), trunk flexor endurance test (p<0.006) and sit to stand (p<0.024) except for left and right abdominal power test (p<0.373, p<0.925, respectively) and vertical jump (p<0.372).
Change in blood lipids and Pittsburgh sleep quality index
We measured the levels of TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and FG in the blood and PSQI values to identify blood lipids and Pittsburgh sleep quality index according to circadian rhythms and exercise order (Table 6). There was no significant difference at baseline between groups in blood lipid and sleep quality index (all baseline p-values >0.05). At Post, Pittsburgh sleep quality index was significantly decreased in the ARMG (p<0.003), RAMG (p<0.010), AREG (p<0.008), RAEG (p<0.010), while OCG did not change significantly different. All blood lipid s was no significantly different in all groups except for fasting glucose. fasting glucose was significantly decreased only the ARMG (p<0.019). All groups were no significant group × time interaction in the blood lipid parameters (p>0.127) except for Pittsburgh sleep quality index (p<0.015).