Study design
This is a description of a double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in two health facilities in the city of Kisangani (Cliniques Universitaires de Kisangani and Clinique des Anges de Kisangani) located within the province of Tshopo, northern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), from October 1, 2021, to October 31, 2023. Before being included in this study, the infertile couple underwent a clinical evaluation and standard paraclinical workup to identify the etiological factors of infertility. The paraclinical workup included ultrasounds, hormone and tubal patency tests for the female partner, and a spermiogram for the male partner.
The etiological work-up was identical for patients who participated in the study and those who did not. Additional para-clinical examinations were ordered based on each patient's clinical condition and case parameters. If the couple's evaluation did not reveal an apparent cause of infertility, they were deemed infertile due to unexplained causes. The study protocol was thoroughly explained to the participants, and written informed consent was obtained.
Sampling and selection criteria
The sample size was calculated based on endometrial thickness, which is a reliable indicator of endometrial receptivity. The study considered the findings of Ali Dawood et al. [16] and Fetih et al. [17] regarding the impact of sildenafil and estradiol on endometrial thickness. The sample size formula of Kirkwood et al. [18] was applied based on estimating the difference in means between two independent samples. Assuming a 10% loss due to follow-up rate, the study aimed to recruit 148 patients who met the following inclusion criteria: age between 19 and 35 years old, body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 Kg/m2, regular menstrual cycle lasting between 21 and 35 days, good ovarian reserve, bilateral tubal patency, and a spouse with a normal spermiogram according to WHO standards. Exclusion criteria for participation in this study included the presence of infertility due to an etiological factor in one or both spouses, recent hormonal treatment within the past 6 months, contraindications to drugs utilized in this study, history of cardiac, renal, hepatic, metabolic or neurological diseases, and refusal to participate.
Randomization and intervention
A total of 148 patients with unexplained infertility, who met the inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to two groups. In the intervention group, patients were administered clomiphene citrate (Clomid®, Doppel Farmaceutici S.r.l., Italy) orally at a dose of 2 x 50mg/day for 5 days, starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. Additionally, sildenafil citrate (Penegra®, Zydus Healthcare Ltd, India) was administered orally at a dose of 2 x 25mg/day for 5 days, from day 8 to day 12 of the same menstrual cycle. In the control group, patients were administered clomiphene citrate (Clomid®, Doppel Farmaceutici S.r.l., Italy) orally at a dose of 2 x 50mg/day for 5 days, starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle, and estradiol valerate (Progynova®, Zydus Healthcare Ltd, India) tablet orally at a dose of 2 x 2mg/day, from day 8 to day 12 of the same menstrual cycle. All drugs utilized in this study underwent quality control at the Laboratory for Analysis and Control of Medicines and Foodstuffs (LACOMEDA), University of Kinshasa, DRC.
Randomization was performed using the permuted block technique based on sequences generated by an independent statistician. The drugs were dispensed using closed envelopes, each containing medication for three cycles of ovarian stimulation. The envelope was only opened in the event of treatment discontinuation or when the patient had completed all three treatment cycles.
Discontinuation of treatment before the third cycle was indicated in the following cases: a positive pregnancy test, a major adverse event, non-compliance with the drug administration protocol, or withdrawal of consent from the study. During treatment, patients received transvaginal ultrasound monitoring of follicular growth every 24 to 48 hours from day 10 of their menstrual cycle until ovulation was confirmed. Ovulation was induced by administering 5000IU of chorionic gonadotropin (HUCOG®-5000HP, Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited, India) intramuscularly once until at least one follicle had reached 18 mm in diameter.
The couple was advised to have timed-intercourses. Before administering chorionic gonadotropin on the day of ovulation induction, transvaginal ultrasound was used to assess the biophysical profile of the uterus and calculate the Applebaum score.
All ultrasound scans were performed by the same operator using the EDAN Acclarix AX8, version 1.2X software (Edan Instruments, INC., 518122 Shenzhen, PR China). The uterine biophysical profile parameters assessed were endometrial thickness, endometrial stratification, endometrial zone 3 blood flow, myometrial echogenicity, uterine artery Doppler flow (assessed by pulsatility index (PI)), myometrial blood flow, and myometrial contractions.
The endometrial thickness, measured in millimeters, was determined on the longitudinal section of the uterus by measuring the maximum distance between each myometrial/endometrial interface. Endometrial stratification was assessed on the longitudinal section, and one of three modalities was recorded: no stratification, blurred appearance with five lines, or appearance with five distinct lines.
The study analyzed myometrial echogenicity on a longitudinal scan of the uterus, classifying it as either coarse/inhomogeneous or completely homogeneous. Additionally, the presence or absence of blood flow in zone 3 of the endometrium was noted, and uterine Doppler was performed on the ascending branch of the uterine arteries, in their segments located at the same level as the internal os of the cervix, with automatic PI calculation. Myometrial blood flow was measured within the arched vessel, and the presence, absence, or reversal of blood flow at the end of diastole was recorded. Myometrial contraction was observed as endometrial movement, and these contractions propagate from the internal cervical os to the fundus of the uterus during the late follicular phase.
Table 1 presents the parameters and their ratings for the Applebaum score. Two weeks after the estimated ovulation date, a serum β hCG test was conducted to confirm pregnancy. Patients with a positive test were scheduled appointments for clinical pregnancy ultrasound confirmation. Individuals with a negative test result resumed a new stimulation cycle on day 3 of their menstrual cycle, using the same drug protocol, for a maximum of three consecutive cycles.
Table 1. Applebaum's uterine scoring system [7].
Parameters
|
Modalities
|
Score
|
Endometrial thickness
|
< 7 mm
|
0
|
|
7-9 mm
|
2
|
|
10-14 mm
|
3
|
|
> 14 mm
|
1
|
Endometrial layering
|
No layering
|
0
|
Hazy five-line appearance
|
1
|
|
Distinct five-line appearance
|
3
|
Endometrial blood flow within zone 3
|
Absent
|
0
|
Present, but sparse
|
2
|
|
Present multifocal
|
5
|
Myometral echogenicity
|
Coarse/inhomogenous echogenicity
|
1
|
|
Relatively homogenous echogenicity
|
2
|
Uterine artery Doppler flow evaluated by PI
|
PI > 3.0
|
0
|
PI ≥ 2.5-2.99
|
0
|
PI ≥ 2.2 – 2.49
|
1
|
|
PI < 2.19
|
2
|
Myometral blood flow
|
Absent
|
0
|
|
Present
|
2
|
Myometral contractions
|
< 3 contractions in 2 minutes (real-time)
|
0
|
|
≥ 3 contractions in 2 minutes (real-time)
|
3
|
Total
|
|
20
|
`
Expected outcomes
The study's primary outcome was the conception rate, determined by the occurrence of pregnancies. Clinical pregnancy was defined as the visualization of one or more gestational sacs with ultrasound scans, whether normal or ectopic [19]. The secondary outcome was the determination of the Applebaum score.
Statistical analysis
The study results are presented as frequencies, percentages, and means ± standard deviations (SD). The primary and secondary outcomes were assessed based on the number of ovarian stimulation cycles. The main objective was to compare the clinical pregnancy rates between the two treatment protocols used in the study. The conception rate was defined as the number of pregnancies per 100 stimulation cycles [19].
The secondary objective of the study was to compare the biophysical profile between the two randomization groups, by determining the Applebaum score. The parameters of the Applebaum score, including endometrial thickness, endometrial stratification, endometrial zone 3 blood flow, myometrial echogenicity, uterine artery Doppler flow assessed by PI, myometrial blood flow, and myometrial contractions, were determined based on the number of stimulation cycles.
To compare proportions, we calculated Pearson's χ2 test with a significance level of P < 0.05. For continuous variables, we used the student’s t-test, and for categorical variables, we measured the strength of association using the relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed all analyses using the EPI Info TM software version 7.2.2.6.
Ethical considerations
The ethics committee of the University of Kisangani approved the protocol for this study (Ref. UNIKIS/CER/08/2021). The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Patients were provided with explanations of the study's objectives and procedures prior to participation. Participants provided written informed consent before being enrolled into the study.