Many sports are characterized by asymmetric kinetic and motor patterns and unilateral actions such as jumping, sprinting, and changing direction [1, 2]. Studies show that particular participation in team sports, where unilateral action is common, entails asymmetric functional and structural changes [3]. To a certain extent, the occurrence of asymmetry in the human body is a normal phenomenon. However, one-sided loading in the long term may lead to an increased risk of injury or a decrease in the sports level [4]. Asymmetries in team sports are most often an adaptive consequence of a long-term, one-sided load caused by technical elements performed during training or sports competition [5]. They occur in the area of the upper [6] and lower limbs [7, 8].
The relationship between asymmetry in strength, power, the range of motion and mobility, and the risk of injury or impaired performance may be related to the limitation of weaker limbs to produce and/or absorb the same amount of force or mobility as the dominant limb. Existing studies suggest that limb balance disorders occur in sports involving changes in the direction of movement (COD) and rotational range of motion (ROM), such as basketball [9], soccer [10] and volleyball [11]. These differences in performance or composition between the limbs can be linked to anatomical asymmetry [5], previous injuries such as suprascapular neuropathy [9], specific sports requirements [12] training experience, position during a game or mobility skills [5].
The physical demands of ice hockey suggest that injuries to the lower and upper extremities may be common [13]. This results, among others, from the dominance of the body side holding the stick and numerous changes in the direction of movement or sudden stops [14]. In addition, habitual strenuous activities cause changes in the structural and mechanical properties of the tendons and muscles of athletes [15]. Therefore, prolonged hockey training, added to the load characteristics of the lower and upper limbs during the game, may be one of the causes of overuse injuries, which are the most common forms of injury in ice hockey [16]. Many studies have examined the incidence of ice hockey injuries [17, 18].
The mechanical properties of muscles and tendons have already been linked to dynamic performance [19], and higher stiffness values are beneficial for activities involving a fast stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) and activities involving high movement speed [19]. Building on earlier research by Bohm et al. [20], asymmetric load profiles between the dominant and non-dominant lower limbs can cause significant differences in the mechanical properties of the tendons, such as increased stiffness of the Achilles tendon on the dominant side. However, there is still no clear answer regarding muscle adaptation [21]. Nevertheless, previous studies on hockey players have not evaluated the effect of lower and upper limb dominance on muscle and tendon stiffness by myotometry [22]. Myotometry is an operator-independent method of assessing stiffness, flexibility, and muscle tone in the lower and upper extremities that does not require as much experience from the operator as other techniques, such as ultrasound [22]. In addition, the feasibility, reproducibility and legitimacy of using myotometry in assessing musculotendinous stiffness in athletes such as karatekas, track cyclists and climbers have already been demonstrated [23, 24, 25]. However, only a few studies describe the myotometric evaluation of muscles and tendons in sports [23], but none have been conducted with hockey players.
The role of interlimb asymmetries and their impact on motor or athletic performance is ambiguous. While it is logical to assume that minimizing these differences is desirable, whether this has a tangible and measurable effect on motor or athletic performance remains unclear. The available literature shows that asymmetries between the limbs of about 10% result in a decrease in jump height [26] and slower change of direction (COD) time [27], thus indicating that the reduction of these differences may have a beneficial effect on the result. In contrast, other studies have shown conflicting athletic results [28, 29]. The occurrence of increased asymmetry between the limbs can be expected in the case of sports activities in which the preferred limb dominance is visible, e.g., tennis [30]. Moreover, the asymmetries between the limbs for kinetic and kinematic variables may show different values. Therefore, not all observed differences between body sides may be relevant to performance results [31, 32]. It seems interesting to assess asymmetry in the context of the increasing level of fatigue, e.g., in training conditions. On the other hand, training experience and the level of training of athletes may affect the acute responses of athletes, and thus the level of post-exercise changes in the body's functions, e.g., neuromuscular [33] or mechanical properties [25]. In conclusion, by better understanding the impact of asymmetry between limbs on motor and athletic performance, we will be able to provide important information on the design of training and testing protocols.
This is why the study aimed to determine the impact of training effort on neuromuscular control, static balance and mechanical properties of muscles depending on the sports level/competition experience in hockey players of the academic and senior teams. The following hypotheses were put forward: I) a more extended training period for hockey players increases the resting level and reduces post-exercise functional asymmetry; II) the one-sidedness of action resulting from holding the stick affects the motor performance of hockey players; III) training experience affects the level of fatigue during training.