FT-IR spectroscopy
In this study, the chemical structure of each component involved in the preparation of the adsorbent and the adsorption process was conducted using FT-IR spectroscopy, as depicted in Fig. 1. The broad peak observed at 3444 cm⁻¹ in spectrum 1a corresponds to the stretching vibration of OH bonds. This phenomenon is attributed to the presence of carboxylic acid and alcohol groups in cellulose or residual water 44. Additionally, the peak observed in the 1576 cm⁻¹ region is associated with the stretching vibration of C = O bonds, specifically for carbonyl and carboxylic acid groups. Furthermore, the band observed at 1420 cm⁻¹ is related to the stretching vibration of C-C bonds due to the presence of aromatic rings 44. After the pyrolysis process and subsequent activation, certain bonds were rearranged, leading to the formation of new functional groups on the surface of the MPFR-AS adsorbent. Notably, the stretching vibration of S = O bonds at 1013 cm⁻¹ provides clear evidence of sulfuric acid modification 45. Finally, upon adsorption of TC and PC onto the adsorbent, the initial peak positions and intensities in the FTIR spectrum underwent changes, confirming the successful adsorption process 44.
BET measurements
The BET method is employed to determine the specific surface area of materials. This technique relies on measuring the amount of nitrogen gas adsorbed within a relative pressure range of 0.1 to 1. Additionally, the pore size distribution is determined through the use of adsorption isotherms. In Fig. 2, the adsorption and desorption isotherms for two adsorbents are depicted. According to the IUPAC classification, these isotherms fall into Type IV (adsorption) and Type IV (desorption). Based on this classification, the pores exhibit a layered and sheet-like structure. Giving that Table 1, the specific surface area for carbon and m carbon adsorbents is equal to 195.5 and 182.5 m2/g, respectively. Also, in Table 4, the specifications of the absorbent surface are given. According to the data in Fig. 2, there is a distribution of the size of the holes in the absorber.
Table 1
Results of the BET measurements of adsorbent
parameter | Carbon | M carbon |
as (m2/g) | 195.5 | 182.5 |
Vm (cm3(STP) g− 1) | 96.46 | 94.66 |
Vp (cm3g− 1) | 0.42 | 0.33 |
rp (nm) | 5.06 | 4.21 |
ap (m2/g) | 117.24 | 115.44 |
SEM analysis
As observed in SEM images of MPFR-A and TC and PC adsorption (Fig. 3), before the adsorption process, the surface of the adsorbent is relatively smooth, and its pore sizes exhibit variability. However, following the adsorption of TC and PC, both the surface roughness and pore dimensions decrease. This reduction indicates the successful adsorption of pharmaceutical compounds onto the adsorbent material
XRD analysis
The observed patterns in several prior studies regarding MPFR-A indicate its amorphous nature (2θ = 15.8° to 22.8°). This amorphous character is attributed to the presence of organic materials, such as hydroxyl and carboxyl groups 44. Upon activation and thermal decomposition, the amorphous nature transforms due to the presence of elements like graphite, calcium, and silica, resulting in a semi-crystalline structure 44,45. Typically, the activation of the adsorbent involves acid treatment and high temperatures, leading to the breakdown of functional groups within cellulose and hemicellulose, ultimately forming graphite. The sharp peaks observed at 2θ = 29.38° and 43.12° in Fig. 4 correspond to the presence of graphite, silica, and the amorphous carbon nature, primarily due to the low graphite content 44.
VSM analysis
The VSM analyses of MPFR-A was performed in order to demonstrate the magnetic property (Fig. 5). As can be seen, the compound have magnetic property and shows a nice increase ( 35, emu/g,).
Adsorption experiments
Several parameters affect the phenomenon of adsorption such as initial concentration of TC and PC solutions, contact time, pH, and mass of MPFR-AS. Adsorption experiments were followed by using 400 mg MPFR-AS for all solutions (35 ml) with concentrations of 10–50 mg / l for TC and PC. The glass erlenmeyer flakes were stirred at 200 rpm for 2 hours in the ambient temperature. Afterwards, the contents of the Erlenmeyer flask were separated by an external magnet. The separated liquids were analyzed via the spectrophotometer (DR6000). The obtained results reveal that the initial amount of pharmaceutical residue is one of the most noticeable factors which impact on the adsorption process. Generally, observed data in Table 2 showed a slight increase in the initial concentration of the pharmaceutical residue leads to increase in removal percentages as well, but according to limited amount of adsorbent there is a risk that the adsorbent be poisoned in high concentration. Therefore, we selected 20 mg/l in optimum section. In the following, pH, adsorbent amount, dosage of adsorbent, and contact time, were investigated to achieve reasonable data to study adsorption kinetics, and adsorption isotherms.
Table 2
Adsorption percentage in 10–50 (mg/ l) concentrations of TC and PC by MPFR-A (reported by the spectrophotometer DR6000)
Conct. of TC or PC (mg/ l) | %Adsp TC | %Adsp PC |
10 | 78.16 | 73.11 |
20 | 83.15 | 81.18 |
30 | 85.21 | 88.14 |
40 | 89.13 | 91.17 |
50 | 91.14 | 91.17 |
The rate of TC and PC uptake on MPFR-A as adsorption capacity \(q\) (mg/g) was obtained according to below equation.
$$q=\frac{\left({C}_{0}-{C}_{e}\right)\times V}{m}$$
Where, C0 and Ce stand for the initial and equilibrium concentration respectively. V and m are defined the volume of the solution (L) and the weight of the adsorbent (g).
pH
The pH of a solution is one of the most influential factors in the adsorption process and the mechanism of electrostatic forces. To determine the optimal pH for the adsorption of PC and TC, each drug was individually tested at a concentration of 20 mg/L, using 0.4 g/L of the adsorbent within the pH range of 8 to 3. Considering the pKa values of the drugs and the isoelectric point of the investigated adsorbent (which is 5), we observe that at pH values below the isoelectric point, the surface charge of the adsorbent becomes positive, while at pH values above the isoelectric point, the surface charge becomes negative. The results of the pH effect on adsorption capacity are illustrated in Fig. 6. Considering that the pka of TC is equal to 3.26 and PC is 9.51, for the drug PC at pH between 5 and 9 bar, it is called a pollutant and adsorbent, and the drug is absorbed by the adsorbent. For the TC, at pHs between 3 and 5, the surface charge of the adsorbent and pollutant is not named and the maximum absorption capacity occurs. As a result, the maximum absorption capacity occurs at pH 4 and 5 for TC and PC drugs. Considering that pH change affects the absorption capacity of two drugs, it can be said that electrostatic forces are involved in the absorption process.
Figure 6. The effect of pH on the absorption capacity of PC and TC (initial concentration 20 mg/l, adsorbent amount 0.4 g, volume 35 ml and ambient temperature)
Dosage of adsorbent
To check the optimal amount of adsorbent, different amounts of adsorbent 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.5 and 2 g/l of solution with an initial concentration of 20 mg/l, pH equal to 4 and 5 and a duration of 120 minutes were investigated. As can be seen in Fig. 7, it increases with the increase of the amount of adsorbent from 0 to 0.4 g/liter due to the adsorption sites remaining unsaturated during absorption; However, by increasing the amount of absorbent from 0.4 g to 2 g, the absorption capacity for both drugs has decreased due to the adhesion and clumping of the absorbent and the reduction of available active surface. Therefore, the adsorbent amount of 0.4 g/liter was considered as the optimal amount of adsorbent for the adsorbent in the next experiments.
Temperature
According to Fig. 8, with the increase in temperature, the speed of movement of drug molecules in the solution increases, and as a result, the energy of the random collision speed increases and causes the absorption capacity to decrease. Also, an increase in temperature breaks the bonds created between the absorbent and the pollutant and disposal occurs. According to the Fig. 8, the maximum absorption capacity is related to the ambient temperature, so the temperature of 25 degrees Celsius was chosen to continue the experiments.
Figure 8. The effect of temperature on absorption rate of PC and TC (initial concentration 20 mg/l, pH equal to 4 and 5, duration of 120 minutes and ambient temperature, amount of adsorbent 0.4 g)
Contact duration and kinetics investigation
In our study, we investigated the adsorption kinetics of TC and PC to understand the impact of contact time on their adsorption behavior. The initial solutions were prepared with a concentration of 20 mg/L, and 0.4 g/L of each adsorbent was added. To ensure that the adsorption process reached equilibrium, the samples were agitated for 2 hours in a shaker operating at 250 rpm and maintained at a temperature of 25°C. The results of this investigation shed light on the dynamic behavior of TC and PC adsorption, providing valuable insights for environmental and pharmaceutical applications.
The obtained data were fitted to pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion models, with the results summarized in Table 3. Based on the coefficients of determination (R²) for each model, the pseudo-second-order linear model is deemed acceptable for the adsorption of TC and PC. The second-order kinetic model operates under the assumption that the rate-limiting step involves ion exchange. Additionally, the rate constants for the adsorption of TC and PC are estimated to be 0.116 g/(mg·min) and 0.096 g/(mg·min), respectively. The investigation of intraparticle diffusion kinetics provides valuable insights into the transport of solute species within porous adsorbents. Notably, the rate constant for intraparticle diffusion falls within the range of 3.21 to 3.78, while the constant C signifies the boundary layer thickness and characterizes the external mass transfer process. Furthermore, the pronounced increase in adsorption capacity during the initial stages of the process is attributed to the phenomenon of rapid mass transfer.
Table 3
Constants and coefficients related to absorption kinetic models
model | parameter | AC | TC |
First-order quasi-linear | qe (mg.g− 1) | 36.2 | 40.32 |
K1 (min− 1) | 0.04036 | 0.047 |
R2 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
Second-order quasi-linear | qe (mg.g− 1) | 44.41 | 47.94 |
K2/10− 2 (g/(mg.min)) | 0.096 | 0.116 |
R2 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Intraparticle penetration | C (mg/g) | 3.21 | 3.78 |
kipd (mg.min − 0.5 g− 1) | 3.46 | 5.11 |
R2 | 0.91 | 0.88 |
Elovich | α | 0.26 | 0.20 |
β | 8.34 | 3.42 |
R2 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
As shown in Fig. 9, in the early times, the slope of the graph is very steep (the rapid phase of external mass transfer) and as the equilibrium conditions are approached, the speed of the absorption process slows down (the slope of the graph decreases and reaches zero) until the adsorbent does not have more pollutant absorption power and the absorption graph is fixed. Also, after about 30 minutes, the absorption graph stabilizes and the absorption reaches equilibrium, however, to ensure the achievement of complete equilibrium, the studied time period was continued up to 120 minutes.
Adsorption isotherm
In the context of adsorption processes, quantifying the removal efficiency of pollutants from aqueous solutions is of paramount importance. To achieve this, we employ adsorption isotherm models, which explore the surface properties and affinity of the adsorbent toward the adsorption process. In this study, we investigated the adsorption behavior of TC and PC using the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models, as well as the three-parameter Redlich-Peterson model. The Langmuir model had the most overlap with the experimental results of TC and PC absorption. This model describes the adsorption process in terms of a monolayer at equilibrium. The maximum adsorption capacity (qm) represents the adsorption capacity of a single layer. For TC and PC, the Langmuir model yielded high coefficients of determination (R² = 0.99). The Langmuir constants KL characterizes the adsorbent’s affinity for the pollutant. The calculated values for TC and PC were 43.75 mg/g and 41.70 mg/g, respectively. By comparing the experimental data with the Langmuir isotherm, we observed excellent agreement between the model predictions and the measured adsorption capacities (as shown in Table 4). In summary, the Langmuir isotherm provides a robust framework for understanding the adsorption behavior of TC and PC, offering valuable insights for environmental remediation and pharmaceutical wastewater treatment.
The Freundlich isotherm, which characterizes heterogeneous surface adsorption, has been employed to investigate the interaction between the adsorbent and the pharmaceutical compounds. As shown in Table 4, the coefficient of determination (R²) for TC and PC adsorption using the Freundlich model is 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. Notably, these values are lower than those obtained from the Langmuir isotherm. This discrepancy underscores the limitations of the Freundlich model in describing the adsorption behavior of the aforementioned drugs. The parameter n in the Freundlich isotherm reflects the favorability of the adsorption process. For the range of n values between 0 and 10, the experimental data in Table 4 confirm favorable adsorption behavior. In summary, while the Freundlich isotherm provides insights into surface heterogeneity, the Langmuir model remains a more robust choice for describing the adsorption performance of TC and PC.
The Temkin isotherm model postulates that the heat of adsorption decreases linearly with coverage. Additionally, it assumes that the adsorption process is characterized by a uniform distribution of cohesive binding energies. According to the data presented in Table 4, the heat of adsorption follows a linear trend with decreasing surface coverage. The parameter AT represents the equilibrium binding energy, corresponding to the maximum bond energy, while BT pertains to the heat of adsorption. A low value of BT indicates weak interactions between the adsorbate molecules and the adsorbent surface
Hill's isotherm model, in this model, it is a cooperative phenomenon where the ligand is attached in one place on the macromolecules. In this case, it may affect different binding sites on the same macromolecules. qH is the adsorption capacity of the Hill isotherm, nH is the Hill binding interaction coefficient, and KH is the Hill constant.
Among the three-parameter adsorption isotherm models, the Redlich-Peterson model is frequently employed for liquid-phase adsorption of organic compounds. Based on the obtained correlation coefficients, both the Langmuir isotherm model and the Redlich-Peterson model outperformed the two-parameter models. This observation suggests that the adsorbent surface becomes more closed during surface adsorption, leading to a reduction in the influence of external factors on drug adsorption.
According to what was explained, the absorption of pharmaceutical pollutants on the researched absorbent is of single layer type. The absorbent structure is homogeneous and has the same absorption energy. Also, absorption has been done both physically and chemically. Considering that the value of β in the Redlich-Peterson equation is close to 1, the Langmuir model is more consistent with the laboratory equilibrium data. Figure 10 shows the fit of the Langmuir model curve.
Table 4
constants and coefficients of surface adsorption isotherm models for PC and TC absorption
model | parameter | PC | TC |
Langmuir isotherm | qmax (mg.g− 1) | 41.7 | 43.75 |
KL (L.mg− 1) | 0.69 | 0.84 |
R2 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
Freundlich isotherm | KF (mg1 − n.Ln.g− 1) | 17.1 | 16.97 |
n | 2.75 | 2.69 |
R2 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Temkin isotherm | BT (Kj.mol− 1) | 9.41 | 8.62 |
AT (L.mg− 1) | 6.55 | 8.91 |
R2 | 0.91 | 0.97 |
Redlich-Peterson isotherm | KRP (L.mg− 1) | 25.74 | 39.56 |
RPα (L.mg−1) | 0.44 | 1.08 |
Rpβ | 1.12 | 0.93 |
R2 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
Hill | qH (mg.g− 1) | 38.41 | 41.68 |
KH | 1.029 | 1.171 |
nH | 1.402 | 1.004 |
R2 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
Comparison studies with other adsorbents
In our study, we compared the adsorption capacity of activated magnetic carbon obtained from pine fruit waste with other existing adsorbents (see Table 5). However, due to variations in experimental conditions and physical properties of adsorbents, such as their structure, surface functional groups, and specific surface area, conducting a precise comparison remains challenging. Qualitatively, it appears that the adsorption capacity of materials derived from pine cone waste for the removal of TC and PC from aqueous environments generally outperforms other natural and synthetic adsorbents. These findings highlight the potential of utilizing waste-derived adsorbents for efficient pollutant removal in water treatment applications.
Table 5
Comparison of the adsorption efficiency of magnetic activated carbon derived from pine nut waste with others adsorbents
Adsorbents | TC | PC | Ref. |
Rice husk ash | 8.37 | - | 46 |
Olive pomace | 16 | - | 47 |
Biochar (Pinus taeda) | 29 | - | 48 |
Montmorillonite | 34 | - | 49 |
Auricularia | 3.2 | - | 50 |
Poplar hydrochar | 6.29 | - | 51 |
Graphene | - | 18.9 | 52 |
Rice husk ash | - | 7.65 | 53 |
Activated carbon derived from Quercus Brantii fruits | - | 45.45 | 54 |
Moringa oleifera seed pod activated carbon | - | 20.28 | 55 |
Dehydrated sewage sludge | - | 0.95 | 56 |
N-CNTs-β-CD | - | 41.0 | 57 |
magnetic activated carbon derived from pine nut waste | 43.75 | 41.7 | This Work |
Recovery
Absorbent recovery for reuse is important from an economic point of view (Fig. 11). Although the price of synthesized adsorbents is higher, but due to their high absorption capacity, they can be used in smaller amounts than other mentioned adsorbents, which will bring a higher economic value. To recover the adsorbents, after each use, we add 5 cc of ethanol to the adsorbent, it is placed on the shaker for 20 minutes, then it is separated with a magnet, and in the next step, 5 cc of the buffer prepared in the ratio (1:10) is added to it and placed on the shaker for 20 minutes and finally separated by a magnet. According to Fig. 10, the synthesized adsorbent for PC and TC drugs can be used 6 times with a removal efficiency of 71.6 and 66.4%.
Figure 11. Reusability of MPFR-A