The landscape of immune cell subtypes and decline in T cells in NASH
To decoding the omics feature of immune cell subtypes in NASH, we incipiently took advantage of scRNA-SEQ to analyze PBMCs from 4 NASH patients (NASH) and 4 healthy controls (HD) (Fig. 1A). After data filtering with R package Seurat14, a total number of 68466 single cells were automatically plotted into 25 sub-clusters and four major immune cell populations, including T cells, NK cells, B cells and monocytes (Fig. 1B-1C). Compared to those in the HC group, we found the percentage of T cells was declined whereas the T cell_NK subset was increased in NASH according to the statistical analysis of tSNE plots of PBMCs (Fig. 1D). According to UMAP diagrams, we intuitively noticed the sharp decrease in T cells and moderate decline in B cells, whereas the moderate increase in NK cells and T cell_NK (Fig. 1E-1F).
Furthermore, with the aid of specific biomarkers, the distribution of the indicated immune cell subsets was cataloged in PBMCs between the HD and NASH groups (Fig. 1G). To further verify the variations in the contents of the indicated immune cells, we turned to FCM analysis of the PBMCs and found that the percentage of total CD3+ T cells were moderately increased in NASH patients, whereas those of and the CD3+CD8+ T and CD3+CD56+ NKT cell subsets rather than CD3−CD56+ NK cells and the CD3+CD4+ T cell subset were decreased (Fig. 1H-1I). Taken together, NASH patients revealed diverse variations in immune signatures, and in particular, the decline in T cell subset compared to healthy controls.
The T cell spectrum and sharp increase in MAIT cells in NASH
Having verified the decline in total T cells in patients with NASH, we next plotted the 43101 retained cells in a tSNE containing the major T cell sub-clusters (Fig. 2A). Notably, the diverse variations in the contents of T cell subsets were observed between the HD and NASH groups, including MAIT cells, the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2B-2C). Distinguish from CD4+ T cells with minimal differences, MAIT cells revealed sharp increase in the NASH group whereas the CD8+ T cell subsets (naïve CD8+ T cells, GZMK and GNLY effector CD8+ T cells) showed contradictory tendency (Fig. 2D-2E). As to MAIT cells, we noticed the specific distribution of MAIT cells according to tSNE plot of MAIT cell-associated biomarkers (SLC4A10, TRAV1-2) in total T cells (Fig. 2F).
In consistent with the UMAP diagram, the proportion of MAIT cells in total T cells was significantly increased in the NASH group (Fig. 2G). In detail, the content of CD161+TCRVα7.2+ MAIT cells in total T cells of PBMCs was elevated in patients with NASH when compared to the HC group (Fig. 2H). Furthermore, with the aid of IHC staining, we further confirmed the accumulation of CD3+MDR-1+ MAIT cells in portal tract and lobular area of liver tissue in NASH patients (Fig. 2I). Collectively, our data indicated the variations in the distribution pattern of T cells and the significant increase in MAIT cells in patients with NASH.
The alterations in the differentiation trajectory of MAIT cells in NASH
Subsequently, we turned to pseudotemporal trajectories to verify the transcriptional dynamics and differentiation process of MAIT cells in PBMCs of the HD and NASH groups. As shown by the pseudotime single-cell trajectory, there were five branching points in the differentiation route of immune cells, and both the HD and NASH groups revealed a similar common pattern (Fig. 3A-3C). In detail, the naïve T cells and MAIT cells were respectively located towards the left and right terminus of the bifurcations of the trajectory, whereas the CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells were distributed throughout the trajectory (Fig. 3C). Meanwhile, we further assessed the pseudotime dynamics of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among these subclusters and installed them into three modules according to their pseudotemporal expression patterns (Fig. 3D-3E). For instance, naïve T cells revealed minimal expression of CD160 and XCL2, whereas with high level of PYHIN1, RPL22, TGFBR3, TPM3 expression (Fig. 3D). Differ from CD4+ effector T cells with high-level expression of all the aforementioned genes, CD8+ effector T cells with minimal expression of CD160 and XCL2 (Fig. 3D-3E).
As to MAIT cells, we intuitively observed the variations in pseudotime single-cell trajectory and the distribution between the HC and NASH groups, which was further confirmed by the pseudotime dynamics of the representative DEGs among the seven sub-clusters (Fig. 3F-3I). Furthermore, the representative genes (e.g., MALAT1, MT-RNR1) as well as the seven major gene sets in total MAIT cells were intuitively observed between the HC and NASH groups (Fig. 3I-3J). For instance, as to single cells with MALAT1 expression, the HC group revealed accumulation of sub-cluster 1 and 4, whereas the NASH group exhibited enrichment of single cells in sub-cluster 0, 2, 3, and 5 (Fig. 3J). Furthermore, we intuitively noticed the distribution of indicated gene sets in the seven sub-clusters in MAIT cells, and the sing-cells with the indicated expression pattern of representative genes (e.g., SNORD3B-1 in sub-cluster 4, LEF1 in sub-cluster 6, and CCL4L2 in sub-cluster 0) was also shown according to the violin plots (Fig. 3K). Overall, these data suggested the diverse variations in the differentiation route of immune cells and MAIT cells in PBMCs between HD and NASH.
Characterization of the transcriptomic signature of MAIT cells in NASH
To further dissect the transcriptomic signature of MAIT cells in total T cells of PBMCs between the HD and NASH groups, we conducted volcano plot analysis of the upregulated (e.g., RPL38, RPS4Y1, STAT1) and downregulated (e.g., IER2, NFKB1A, MT-ND4L) DEGs, together with the relative non-DEGs based on the gene expression profiling (Fig. 4A). From the HeatMap of Pearson correlation analysis, we noticed the variations in the affinity of the indicated 7 sub-clusters between the HC and NASH groups (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the representative DEGs (e.g., IER2, ID2, NFKBIA, STAT1, CCL4) in MAIT cells between the indicated two groups were observed as well (Fig. 4C).
With the aid of gene ontology (GO) analysis, we found the upregulated DEGs in MAIT cells between the HC and NASH groups were mainly involved in diverse immunoregulation-associated bioprocesses (e.g., protein binding, membrane, immune response, and interferon-gamma-mediated signaling pathway), whereas the downregulated DEGs were involved in protein binding and cytoplasm instead (Fig. 4D-4E). By conducing KEGG analysis, we observed that both the upregulated and downregulated DEGs were mainly involved in immune response- and metabolism-related signaling pathways such as antigen processing and presentation, chemokine signaling pathway, metabolic pathways, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway (Fig. 4F-4G). Consistently, a variety of pro-inflammatory response-related gene sets (e.g., TNF-α, rosiglitazone IFN-γ/TNF/IL-4 macrophage) were enriched between the HC and NASH groups according to GESA diagrams (Fig. 4H). Collectively, these data indicated the multifaceted variations of MAIT cells in gene expression profiling and immune response in patients with NASH.
Identification of candidate genes in MAIT cells for clinical diagnosis of NASH
Having illuminated the gene expression pattern of MAIT cells between the indicated groups, we hypothesized the feasibility of candidate genes for NASH diagnosis. For the purpose, a total number of top 26 DEGs associated with MAIT cells were specifically enriched according to log2 (P value) and the network of them was available according to PPI diagram (Fig. 5A-5B). Meanwhile, we turned to the online database and screened 9 candidate biomarkers in MAIT cells (Fig. 5C-5D). As shown by the Venn Map diagram, a total number 9 genes were enriched by overlapping them with the indicated 18 DEGs, and 4 candidate genes (GADD45B, STAT1, CCL4, and RPL38) were further selected by overlapping with the representative DEGs in MAIT cells (Fig. 4C, Fig. 5E).
Subsequently, we detected the mRNA expression of the aforementioned candidates in total T cells of PBMCs by qRT-PCR analysis, and found that the expression of GADD45B was significantly declined in the NASH group, whereas STAT1, CCL4 and RPL38 were collectively upregulated instead (Fig. 5F). Meanwhile, we conducted immunofluorescent staining of liver tissue for further identification, and found that the expression level of GADD45 was higher in CD161+ MAIT cells of liver tissues in patients with NASH over the HC group, whereas the relative candidate biomarkers (STAT-1, CCL4, RPL38) revealed a reverse expression pattern (Fig. 1E-1H). Taken together, these findings indicated MAIT cells and the concomitant genes served as potential candidate biomarkers of NASH.
STAT1-T-bet axis mediated the differentiation process and immunodysfunction of MAIT cells in NASH
STAT1 and STAT3 has been indicated respectively playing a pivotal role in the obesity of NASH patients and HCC in human and mice[32, 33], and we also observed the accumulation and upregulation of STAT1 in total T cells of PBMCs and liver tissue, yet the detailed information in MAIT cell-related pathogenesis of NASH was largely obscure. For the purpose, we detected the expression of STAT1-related genes in MAIT cells, and in particular, RORγt and GATA3 were reported with a pivotal role in mediating the activation and anti-inflammatory response of MAIT cells. With the aid of qRT-PCR and western-blotting analyses, we found that T-bet and RORγt were sharply upregulated in the NASH group, whereas RUNX1 and GATA3 were declined compared to the HC group (Fig. 6A-6C). Simultaneously, we assessed diverse MAIT cell-associated cytokines in the peripheral blood plasma, and verified that the concentrations of GzmB and pro-inflammatory factors (IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-17, IL-22) were consistently increased in patients with NASH (Fig. 6D). Overall, our findings indicated that STAT1-T-bet axis played a facilitating role in the activation of MAIT cells and the secretion of diverse pro-inflammatory effectors in NASH (Fig. 6E).