Iloperidone treatment was associated with serum urate increases in two placebo controlled phase 3 clinical studies
Clinical laboratory evaluations are routinely conducted during clinical trials and are relevant in populations of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders who are at increased risk of disorder associated comorbidities (e.g., obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome)14. To evaluate the efficacy of the antipsychotic iloperidone, we conducted two separate four-week blinded, randomized, placebo controlled studies: one trial in patients with schizophrenia12 (hereafter, Study 3101) and, more recently, one trial in patients with bipolar mania13 (hereafter, Study 3201) (Figure 1A). Both trials had similar fixed designs: patients were titrated over approximately 1 week to a dose of 12mg twice daily of iloperidone or placebo and treated at this dose for 3 consecutive weeks. Iloperidone showed a statistically significant benefit compared to placebo in each study’s respective primary endpoints, which measured reduction in symptoms associated schizophrenia or bipolar mania (for topline efficacy, safety, disposition, and methods reporting for each study, refer to Cutler et. al. 200812 and Torres et. al. 202413, respectively).
Analysis of clinical laboratory results revealed iloperidone treated patients in both studies had statistically significant increases in serum urate from baseline to endpoint (day 28) as compared to placebo (and also for active control ziprasidone for Study 3101). (Figure 1B and C, and Table 1 and 2). In Study 3201 iloperidone patients had 4-fold greater increases in serum urate from baseline compared to placebo groups (33.4 μmol/L change for iloperidone and 4.2 μmol/L in placebo groups, respectively) (Table 1). This finding was replicated in Study 3101, with a roughly 4-fold greater increase in blood levels of uric acid for iloperidone compared to placebo treatment groups, and more than twice the change from baseline observed for iloperidone versus ziprasidone treated individuals (28.0 μmol/L, 4.2 μmol/L, and 13.1 μmol/L for iloperidone, placebo, and ziprasidone groups, respectively) (Table 2).
In both studies, significant differences in uric acid iloperidone vs placebo groups were detectable as early as 14 days (Table 1 and 2). At endpoint (day 28) in Study 3201, blood uric acid LS mean change was 27.2 μmol/L for iloperidone groups and 0.1 μmol/L for placebo groups (ANCOVA, p<0.0001, adjusting for covariates) (Figure 1C). Similarly, LS mean change in Study 3101 was 28.0 μmol/L for iloperidone treatment group compared to 4.2 μmol/L in placebo group (p=0.0014, Figure 1C), providing further confirmatory evidence that acute iloperidone treatment is associated with increases in circulating levels of uric acid.
SLC2A9 variant rs7442295 was associated with different baseline levels of serum urate in two separate psychiatric patient populations
We routinely collect genetic information during our clinical trials for exploratory pharmacogenetic analysis, and patients in both studies provided blood samples for DNA extraction, whole genome sequencing, and analysis (see methods). Polymorphisms in renal transport proteins can affect rates of uric acid reabsorption and secretion, impacting levels of serum urate in various genetic subgroups in the general population8. We hypothesized that genes encoding transporter proteins may be associated with observed baseline levels of serum urate in our patients as well.
To characterize the relationship between patient genetic compositions and serum urate levels prior to treatment, we used a linear regression model for serum urate, adjusting for age, sex, and principal components. One of the most significant variants identified was rs7442295 (p-value 10-5 (BETA= -23.12) (Figure 2A). Our results are similar to previous reports associating variant rs7442295 and baseline serum urate levels, including the observation of an intermediary phenotype in heterozygous individuals9. Interestingly, male carriers were broadly observed to have a higher baseline level of uric acid compared to females (beta = 24.08 per G allele, p=0.04) (Figure 2B), consistent with prior work supporting a sex-specific effect for this variant 15.
Additionally, we performed a full GWAS on these samples, and SLC2A9 variants were the strongest hits detected. Variant rs7442295 is in a strong LD with a coding nonsynonymous variant rs16890979 (Val253Ile), shown in Supplementary Figure 1, which was previously associated with serum uric acid levels where the minor allele, rs16890979 T allele was associated with a decrease of 0.47 mg/dl in the uric acid level (CI: 0.31-0.63, p = 1.43 x 10e-11). The rs7442295 variant has a global MAF (GnomAD) of 0.24 with the highest MAF reported in patients of African/African American ancestry (MAF=0.40), which was nearly twice the MAF reported for non-Finnish Europeans of (MAF=0.20) (Figure 2C).
Variant rs7442295 was associated with changes in serum urate levels in iloperidone treated individuals
Applying pharmacogenetic analysis to predict the clinical effects of drugs in different patient subgroups remains a critical goal in pharmaceutical research and development. Accordingly, based on the strong associations detected for SLC2A9 variants at baseline, we hypothesized that there may be a relationship between carrier status of variant rs7442295 and serum urate changes observed during iloperidone treatment. We analyzed clinical laboratory results according to genotype status in Study 3201 for variant rs7442295. Remarkably, for iloperidone-treated patients homozygous for the rs7442295 (G) allele, we observed a pronounced increase of 40.9 μmol/L (0.674 mg/dL) compared to a decrease of -16.86 μmol/L in the corresponding GG placebo group (Figure 3A Figure 3B and Table 3).
Given we observed a sex effect for genotype and baseline serum urate levels, we further analyzed the effect of this variant on serum urate change from baseline in Study 3201, using linear regression models stratified by sex and treatment. Changes from baseline in serum urate in individuals with the GG genotype were particularly pronounced in the male subgroup (Figure 3C and Table 4), with a 65.61 μmol/L increase in serum urate in iloperidone treated GG males compared to a -37.35 μmol/L decrease in the corresponding placebo group, further supporting a sex effect for males with the GG genotype.
To address the extent to which iloperidone treatment interacts with these different subgroups, we analyzed the effect of this variant on serum urate change from baseline using linear regression models stratified by sex and treatment. Among male placebo group, each additional G allele increased the serum urate change by 1.82 μmol/L. This effect was dramatically larger in the iloperidone treated subgroup, with an increase of 27.64 μmol/L (p-value=1.54e-3).
Since sex was not balanced in this study, we conducted sample matching to fit a linear regression model in iloperidone group with a gene-by-sex interaction term. In iloperidone group males, each additional rs7442295 G allele increased the urate change by 29.13 (p-value=5.83e-3).
Clinically relevant serum urate levels following iloperidone treatment, according to genotype, drug, and sex
Females have lower circulating levels of uric acid compared to males; a phenomenon hypothesized to be driven by differences in the sex hormone estradiol16. Sex differences in serum urate are reflected in laboratory ranges used to evaluate clinical laboratory results. Lab specified upper limits of normal (ULN) was >453 μmol/L (7.62 mg/dL) for males and >394 μmol/L (6.46 mg/dL) for female patients in Study 3201, in alignment with clinical guidelines for interpreting uric acid blood tests for hyperuricemia defined as approximately 6 mg/dL for women and 7 mg/dL for men17. A key goal of clinical research is to characterize the safety profile of medications studied, including which patient subgroups have differential risk for adverse events. Accordingly, to further characterize the clinical relevance of serum urate changes following iloperidone treatment, we evaluated the proportions of patients who had concentrations of serum urate exceeding ULN at baseline compared to endpoint in Study 3201 according to treatment, sex, and genotype (Table 5). Subgroups of iloperidone treated patients had concentrations of serum urate above the upper level of normal range more frequently than placebo.
Consistent with the results for a strong interaction with G-allele and male subgroups, iloperidone-associated increase in serum urate above the upper limit normal (ULN) was largest in males with homozygous (GG) genotype for rs7442295. Treatment with iloperidone resulted in an approximately 4-fold increase in the proportions of GG males with lab results above the ULN for serum urate (baseline, 8.3%; EOS, 33.3%, respectively). Conversely, the percentage of placebo treated GG males above the ULN decreased (baseline, 14.3%; EOS, 0.0%, respectively). Consistent with the compounding effect for G allele for the variant observed in previous sections, proportions of patients with laboratory values above the ULN increased for iloperidone treated with AG genotype (baseline, 2.4% and EOS ~13.5%), while the proportion of patients in the corresponding placebo group remained essentially the same (baseline, 14.9%; EOS, 15.5%). Analysis using Fisher’s exact test combining GG+AG genotypes vs baseline was significant for iloperidone versus placebo groups, (p-value = 0.03, OR=5.73), supporting that patients are more likely to be above the ULN following four weeks of treatment.