4.1. Materials structural analysis
The XRD analysis of the materials confirmed the presence of oxide phases suitable for each of the materials (Fig. 1).
In the Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide material, ZnO (31.8°, 34.46°, 36.28°, 47.56°, 56.62°, 62.88°, 66.38°, 67.98° and 68.1°) and Cu Mn2O4 (18.4°, 30.1°, 35.48°, 53.84°, 57.5°, 62.88°, 66.38°) phases are present. These phases are reflected in the COD crystallographic data #2300116 and #1533674, respectively, for the phases. The phase ratio was 1:0.21, the elemental molar ratio was assumed as 1:0.2:0.3 and finally determined as 1:0.07:0.12 (Zn:Cu:Mn).
The Mn-Cu multioxide material contains Mn3O4 (18.01°, 28.9°, 38.1°, 44.4°, 53.9°, 56.1°), CuO (32.4°, 38.6°, 48.7°, 58.5) and Cu2O (42.32°, 61.4°, 69.7°) phases, corresponding to records with the respective COD numbers #1011262, #9016105 and #1010941. The oxide phase ratio was 1:0.125:0.06. The theoretical elemental molar ratio (Mn:Cu) was expected to be 1:0.35, which was verified as 1:0.23 after XRD analysis.
Material sizes were calculated from XRD data - average crystallite phase sizes were included in the Table 1, for each phase of nanomaterials.
Table 1
Nanomaterials phases calculated size in nm, based on XRD results
Material | Phase | Size [nm] |
Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide | ZnO | 50,25 |
CuMn2O4 | 27,70 |
Mn-Cu multioxide | Mn3O4 | 18,08 |
CuO | 7,85 |
Cu2O | 5,97 |
For the Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide material, the XRD results obtained for the ZnO phase are in agreement with those presented by the Raha et al. (Raha et al. 2021).
The researchers synthesised a CuO/Mn3O4/ZnO nanomaterial system - using the precipitation method to first obtain copper oxide, followed by zinc oxide and manganese oxide (II/III). The material was placed in an autoclave for the reaction and then the material was further calcined. In addition, the researchers characterised the different phases of the system. The size of the ZnO phase is larger than in study of Raha et al. (Raha et al. 2021), however, this may be due to the different order in which the oxides were obtained and the different methodology for synthesising the trioxide. The spinel phase of CuMn2O4 is consistent with the XRD results presented by Sanjabi S et al. (Sheikhzadeh and Sanjabi 2021) on copper manganese oxide films obtained by co-electrodeposition. The authors of the study particularly highlighted the presence of a peak at 18.4°, which determines the presence of the CuMn2O4 phase.
For the Mn-Cu multioxide material, the spectra for the CuO and Mn3O4 phases are also found to be similar in the study of Raha et al. (Raha et al. 2021), and the crystallite sizes are also similar – 10 nm for the CuO phase and 14 nm for the Mn3O4 phase. Similarly, in the study of Lee H et al. (Shaislamov et al. 2016), who obtained nanorods with CuO as the base doped with ZnO nanoxide. The authors prepared CuO films using copper (II) sulphate and sulphuric acid (VI), which was oxidised at 300°C for 2h. Then, by repeating the oxidation of zinc acetate to ZnO on the CuO surface several times, the researchers applied a layer of zinc oxide to the resulting film and the system thus prepared was reacted in a hydrothermal process. The researchers presented XRD spectra containing the different phases: CuO, Cu2O and ZnO, which can be compared with the phases obtained for Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide and Mn-Cu multioxide materials.
In the SEM microphotographs (Fig. 2) the difference in material structures can be observed. The Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide contains larger, single nanocomposite particles, on which smaller particles can be seen, forming a differentiated material structure. A difference in the shape of the nanoparticles can also be observed, with the larger elements being flat and asymmetrical and the smaller ones being more circular. The EDS analysis shows an even distribution of the zinc phase on the surface of the material, apart from the areas occupied by manganese and copper. It can be seen that Mn and Cu are visible in the same areas, confirming that the elements occur together. The Mn-Cu multioxide morphology shows more agglomerated particles of similar size with a swollen structure. The nanomaterial contains rather round structures and particle layering is visible. The microphotographs from the EDS analysis show an even distribution of both elements, manganese and copper, on the surface of the material. It is also possible to see areas occupied only by copper, which is evidence of phase separation.
Similar characteristics can be seen for the materials obtained by the team of Mohamed M et al. (Mohamed et al. 2023), who prepared Mn3O4/ZnO and CuO/ZnO-containing materials from chloride precursors by co-precipitation using a hydrothermal process.
The proteolytic activity assay (Fig. 4) was used to determine the direction of contaminant degradation by nanomaterials - according to the mechanism of enzymatic hydrolysis. Bromelain and the extract containing this enzyme belong to the group of hydrolases - enzymes that degrade the substrate by hydrolysis. These substances were used as a reference to measure the activity of the materials. Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide did not show proteolytic activity, due to the presence of zinc. Mn-Cu multioxide probably due to its higher manganese oxide content showed activity at 0.2 U/mL. The pure bromelain enzyme showed an activity of 0.45 U/mL. The commercial extract showed an activity of 0.25U/mL, approximately 48% relative to pure bromelain. The Mn-Cu multioxide material was capable of degrading the protein in a hydrolysis reaction.
According to Kiewiet et al. (Kiewiet et al. 2018), the reaction catalysed by enzymes from the hydrolase group can be represented as in the following equation:
4.2.2. Peroxidase activity
Further analysis was followed by a peroxidase activity assay (Fig. 5) involving the oxidation of guaiacol in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The activity of Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide was twice as high as that of the Mn-Cu multioxide material - it was 0.1 U/mL versus 0.04 U/mL. In a study by Alzahrani et al. (Aldhahri et al. 2021), the activity of immobilised horseradish peroxidase on CuO on SDS polymer matrix was 0.2 U/mg, with 2% Cu addition.
Enzymes of the peroxidase group facilitate electron transfer from the donor molecule to hydrogen peroxide, leading to the oxidation of the donor molecule and the reduction of hydrogen peroxide to water. According to Oliveira et al. (Kerstner De Oliveira et al. 2021), the electron transfer occurs at the active centre of the enzyme and, importantly, two electrons are generated during the reaction - unlike the Fenton reaction - after which the enzyme returns to the ground state. The reaction can be schematically represented as:
$$ROOH+A{H}_{2} \underrightarrow{enzyme} {H}_{2}O+ROH+A$$
Where: A - electrone donor in the oxidized form
or as a decomposition of H2O2 if no other substrate is present:
$${2H}_{2}{O}_{2}\underrightarrow{enzyme}2{H}_{2}O+{O}_{2}$$
4.3. Studies on the photocatalytic and biocatalytic activity of nanomaterials
After investigating possible reaction mechanisms, the photocatalytic properties of the nanomaterials were examined. The decomposition efficiency of the trypan blue dye in the presence of UV-light materials and under Vis-LED light was compared. Then, combining enzymatic activities in the catalysis, the decomposition of the dye in the presence of H2O2 was carried out - verifying the applicability of nanomaterials as nanozymes for the decomposition of environmental pollutants.
4.3.1. Photocatalytic decomposition
Photocatalytic activity was tested after 30 min of dye sorption in the dark conditions and then the TB decomposition for each material was measured at 15 min intervals (Fig. 6). The decomposition by material Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide exceeded 70% and by material Mn-Cu multioxide 50%, after one hour of light irradiation. For the reference material ZnO, the decomposition was over 90%. The results for these materials are higher than for the ZnO-Tb material used by Ghrib et al. (48%) (Ghrib et al. 2021). However, according to the study by Migdadi et al. (Migdadi et al. 2022) for the ZnO/CuO material, containing 10% mas. copper addition, the photocatalysis of the dye reached 97% after 90 minutes of irradiation, which could suggest an extended irradiation process.
The materials were also examined under Vis-LED light imitating sunlight (Fig. 7) to test the feasibility of the nanomaterials in decomposing the dye in an aqueous environment without the use of an artificial light source. The Mn-Cu multioxide material showed the best activity under Vis-LED light, reducing trypan blue by more than 45%. The material Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide and pure ZnO oxide achieved a dye reduction of 38% and 32%, respectively. In the literature, materials of CuO doped with zinc or iron can be found, resulting in approximately 40% decomposition of the MB dye under visible light mimicked by a xenon light source, developed by George et al. (George et al. 2022).
In addition, the materials were tested in repeated 15-min photocatalytic cycles under UV light Table 2). In the first cycle, Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide could be compared with ZnO reducing the amount of dye by 60%, Mn-Cu multioxide by 47%. In the next two cycles, the activity of materials Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide and Mn-Cu multioxide remained at a similar level degrading the dye by about 20% of the initial value. The activity of ZnO also decreased, however, it retained more activity than the nanozymes. Compared to the material consisting of Fe2O3 obtained by the team of Fattahi et al. (Fattahi et al. 2023), the cyclic use of nanomaterials also showed a decrease in catalytic activity by nearly half (74–47%, over two cycles). According to the authors of the study, this is a negative feature that should be moderated in future studies.
Table 2
Trypan blue decomposition after each photocatalytic cycle for materials in comparison to ZnO. Cycles were conducted after 30min period of dark process and 15 min UV irradiation.
Material
|
Zn-nanoxide
|
Mn-nanoxide
|
ZnO
|
Cycle 1
|
64%
|
47%
|
62%
|
Cycle 2
|
22%
|
21%
|
48%
|
Cycle 3
|
20%
|
18%
|
40%
|
4.3.2. Biocatalytic decomposition
The next stage was to use enzymatic activity to decompose the TB dye in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, as shown in Fig. 8. For the materials tested, the addition of peroxide resulted in decomposition of the dye by 24% for the Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide material and 27% for the Mn-Cu multioxide. An important element in the study was the absence of an additional light source to affect activity. The biocatalytic activity achieved is only due to the enzyme-like behaviour of the nanomaterials. In the study by Janović et al. (Janović et al. 2017), the degradation of azo dye (RB52) by the enzyme horseradish peroxidase immobilised on chitosan material was carried out. The activity of the system was also compared with the pure, non-immobilised HRP enzyme. In the experiments, H2O2 was added from 0.22mM to 4.4mM. The decomposition of the dye (RB52) after 4h for the pure enzyme was 20%. Compared to the nanozymes tested in the current research, the HRP enzyme mediated decomposition took significantly longer, despite the same final degradation result.
The addition of H2O2 enabled enzymatic decomposition of the dye according to the reaction:
$$ROOH+A{H}_{2} \underrightarrow{enzyme} {H}_{2}O+ROH+A$$
for material Zn-Mn-Cu multioxide
$$R-CO-NH-R+ HO-H \underrightarrow{enzyme} R-CO-OH+H-NH-R$$
for material Mn-Cu multioxide