In today’s world, environmental pollution is a pressing issue, prompting extensive research into effective and sustainable wastewater treatment strategies. Synthetic dyes generated from industrial activities pose a notable challenge among the array of pollutants, primarily due to their enduring nature and detrimental impacts (Lin et al., 2023). These dyes find their way into wastewater from textile factories, which release undesirable effluents containing mixed contaminants, including dyes. Textile industries, in particular, have the potential to cause harm to both fauna and flora when they dispose of dyes in the environment. The textile industry uses dyes in its finishing processes and releases polluting effluents that harm biodiversity (Chanwala et al., 2019; Cripps et al., 1990). Synthetic dyes, which originate from various industrial activities, pose a significant challenge due to their persistent nature and relatively low biodegradability index (Faghihinezhad et al., 2022). It has been estimated that over 100.000 distinct dye varieties exist in the marketplace, with a yearly worldwide output surpassing 700.000 tons (Chittal et al., 2019). According to Zollinger H., the textile industry releases 50% of its dyes into the natural receiving environment (Zollinger, 2003). These effluents contain an extensive array of organic chemicals (e.g., dyes, solvents, pigments, and surfactants) as well as harmful substances including heavy metals (Verma, 2008; Lotito et al., 2012) that are harmful to flora and fauna (Stumm & Morgan, 1996) due to their low biodegradability (Bouras, 2003) and their chemical stability against oxidizing agents (e.g., UV rays, and chemical oxidants). Given the high organic load, intense and persistent colours, and elevated concentration of dissolved solids in these effluents, dyeing and finishing manufacturers are now mandated to treat their wastewater before releasing it into public treatment facilities (Arslan, 2001).
Researchers have investigated both actual textile effluents and simulated wastewater with properties resembling those of typical textile discharges. Through the analysis of components and treatment techniques, their goal is to develop effective strategies for addressing synthetic dye contamination in wastewater (Yaseen & Scholz, 2019). There is a pressing need for innovative and eco-friendly strategies to address this issue (Kishor et al., 2021). Numerous techniques have been developed to treat colour in textile wastewater. However, removing this type of pollution from water often proves challenging due to the inability of the standard treatment to degrade organic dyes (Guiza & Bagane, 2013). Therefore, chemical oxidation treatment (Jamal et al., 2015; Mokif, 2019); electrocoagulation (Manh, 2016; Perng & Bui, 2014); biodegradation (Bisht & Lal, 2019; Carlıell et al., 1995); adsorption (Boumediene et al., 2018; Yadav et al., 2020) and membrane processes (Allègre et al., 2006; Petrinić et al., 2007) can remove dyes from industrial wastewater. However, while many of them are prohibitively expensive, others are considerably more affordable.
Among the various treatment technologies available, combining coagulation and adsorption processes is a promising approach for sustainable wastewater treatment, highlighting the importance of environmental preservation and resource utilization. This method can have synergistic effects, resulting in improved dye removal efficiencies and enhanced treatment outcomes. This integrated approach leverages the strengths of processes, overcoming the limitations of individual techniques and offering a holistic solution for textile dye wastewater treatment.
The coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) process is a commonly utilized method in wastewater treatment due to its effectiveness, simplicity, and economic benefits (Anjaneyulu et al., 2005; Georgiou et al., 2003; Golob et al., 2005; Judkins Jr & Hornsby, 1978; Puchana-Rosero et al., 2018; Zonoozi et al., 2008). It is generally acknowledged as a cost-effective and efficient technology (Semerjian & Ayoub, 2003). This approach has been shown to be effective in reducing turbidity and eliminating suspended solids from wastewater (Jarvis et al., 2005). However, it is important to recognize that the CFS process may have limited effectiveness in removing certain dyes (Riera-Torres et al., 2010). Therefore, integrating complementary treatment methods may be necessary to improve dye removal efficiency from wastewater.
Among the array of methods available, the adsorption process stands out as a favourable technique for eliminating dye pollutants from aqueous solutions owing to its notable removal efficiency, simplicity, and widespread application (Faghihian et al., 2014; Nourmoradi et al., 2016). Adsorption is widely recognized as an effective and cost-efficient method for dye removal from water, particularly when dealing with dye concentrations below 100 mg/L(Bailey et al., 1999; Crini, 2006; Ho & McKay, 2004; Zollinger, 2003). It should be noted that for higher concentrations, pretreatment may be required. Additionally, recent research has explored the use of a combination of diverse separation methods to achieve superior separation quality(Chakraborty et al., 2005; Furlan et al., 2010; Raj et al., 2023).
This research assessed the effectiveness of combining coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation with adsorption processes for removing textile dyes from synthetic aqueous solutions. Activated carbon is traditionally favoured for its efficacy in the adsorption process; however, its application is limited by high costs and regeneration challenges, as documented in the literature (Allen & Koumanova, 2005; Bailey et al., 1999; Crini, 2006; Ho & McKay, 2004). In light of these limitations, there has been a burgeoning interest in the exploration of sustainable materials. A plethora of studies have delved into the potential of agricultural by-products as eco-friendly adsorbents, demonstrating their capacity to mitigate dye pollutants in aqueous environments (Ait Ahsaine et al., 2018; Akkari et al., 2022; Akperov & Akperov, 2019; Boumchita et al., 2016; Boumediene et al., 2015; Guiza et al., 2014; Hajialigol & Masoum, 2019; Munagapati et al., 2021; Senthil Kumar et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2018). These investigations underscore the viability of such materials in addressing the economic and environmental concerns associated with conventional adsorbents. To overcome these limitations, the integration of adsorption using corncob is proposed as an adjunctive treatment measure. Corncob, which is abundant, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly, presents a promising alternative as a biosorbent for dye removal. Its porous structure and extensive surface area offer numerous sites for the adsorption of dye molecules, resulting in decreased dye concentrations and enhanced treatment efficacy.
Throughout our research, we investigated the optimal operational parameters for both techniques. This study assessed the effectiveness of corncob in removing Bemacid Marine N-5R (BM-N5R) and Bemacron Blue RS 01 (BB-RS01) dyes. In the coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) process, we adjusted several variables such as coagulant/flocculent dosage, contact time, and pH to determine the optimal conditions for maximum dye removal.
In some research, superfloc 8396 as a polymer was revealed to have promising performance in sludge conditioning, leading to enhancements in flocculation parameters through flock formation (Hocine et al., 2023; Kebaili et al., 2022). In our case study, we explored the efficiency of this product as a flocculent in textile wastewater treatment. During the adsorption process, the impacts of temperature, corncob mass, particle size, pH, and initial dye concentration on dye removal were investigated. These parameters significantly influence the adsorption process, subsequently affecting dye uptake.