Background of participants
The median age of the study participants and their IIEF-5 scores were 53 years and 17, respectively. Among the 398 men, 66 (17%) and 332 (83%) were classified into the non-ED and ED groups, respectively (Fig. 1).
Age, prevalence of HTN, dyslipidemia, and DM, educational level, number of Ca-blocker users, renal function, and baPWV values were significantly different between the two groups (Table 1).
Correlations between serum sex hormone levels and IIEF-5 scores
Spearman’s rank correlation test revealed that serum total testosterone and prolactin levels did not exhibit a significant correlation with IIEF-5 scores (Fig. 2A, F; ρ = −0.057, P = 0.258; ρ = 0.033, P = 0.509; respectively). Serum DHEA-S levels were positively and significantly correlated with IIEF-5 scores (Fig. 2B; ρ = 0.524, P < 0.001), whereas serum estradiol, LH, and FSH levels were negatively and significantly correlated with IIEF-5 scores (Fig. 2C–E; ρ = −0.133, P = 0.008; ρ = −0.409, P < 0.001; and ρ = −0.435, P < 0.001; respectively).
Associations between serum sex hormone levels and ED
Serum total testosterone and prolactin levels were not significantly different between the non-ED and ED groups (Fig. 3A, F; P = 0.555 and P = 0.331, respectively). Serum DHEA-S levels in the ED group were significantly lower than those in the non-ED group (Fig. 3B; P < 0.001), whereas serum estradiol, LH, and FSH levels in the ED group were significantly higher than those in the non-ED group (Fig. 3C–E; P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The median serum testosterone, DHEA-S, estradiol, LH, FSH, and prolactin levels were 608 ng/dL, 184 µg/dL, 24 pg/mL, 3.0 mIU/mL, 5.6 mIU/mL, and 7.0 ng/mL, respectively. When men were categorized into groups based on their median sex hormone levels, no significant differences in the prevalence of ED were observed between men with higher and lower testosterone and prolactin levels (Fig. 4A, F; P = 0.178 and P = 0.393, respectively). In contrast, the prevalence of ED in men with lower DHEA-S and higher estradiol, LH, and FSH levels was significantly higher than that in men with higher DHEA-S and lower estradiol, LH, and FSH levels (Fig. 4B–E; P < 0.001, P = 0.003, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively).
Univariable and multivariable analyses for ED
In the univariable analyses, age, HTN, dyslipidemia, eGFR, and baPWV were significantly associated with ED (Table S1). In the multivariable analyses adjusted for these confounding variables, serum DHEA-S and estradiol levels were significantly associated with ED (Table 2; odds ratio [OR]: 0.996, P = 0.030; OR: 1.082, P = 0.002; respectively), whereas serum total testosterone, LH, FSH, and prolactin levels did not demonstrate significant association (Table 2).
Correlations of serum DHEA-S and estradiol levels with systemic inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction markers and skin AGEs levels
In the multiple linear regression analyses, after adjusting for age, none of NLR, serum vWF and PAI-1 levels, and skin AGEs levels did not demonstrate significant correlation with serum DHEA-S levels (Table 3) and serum estradiol levels (Table 4).