Different Effects of Monophasic Pulses and Biphasic Pulses Applied by a Bipolar Stimulation Electrode in the Rat Hippocampal CA1 Region

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-40597/v1

PDF

Research

Different Effects of Monophasic Pulses and Biphasic Pulses Applied by a Bipolar Stimulation Electrode in the Rat Hippocampal CA1 Region

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-40597/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 09 Mar, 2021

Read the published version in BioMedical Engineering OnLine →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been successfully used for treating certain brain diseases such as movement disorders. High-frequency stimulations (HFS) of charge-balanced biphasic pulses have been used in clinic DBS to minimize the risk of tissue damages caused by the electrical stimulations, while HFS sequences of monophasic pulses have been used in animal experiments to investigate DBS therapy. However, it is not clear whether HFS sequences of monophasic pulses could induce abnormal neuronal responses different from biphasic pulses. Thus, the present study investigates the differences of neuronal responses to HFS of monophasic pulses and biphasic pulses.

Methods: Orthodromic-HFS (O-HFS) and antidromic-HFS (A-HFS) of the two types of pulses (with a 1-min duration) were delivered by bipolar electrodes to the Schaffer collaterals (i.e., afferent fibers) and the alveus fibers (i.e., efferent fibers) of the rat hippocampal CA1 region in-vivo, respectively. Responses of CA1 pyramidal neurons to the stimulations were recorded in the CA1 region. Single pulses of antidromic- and orthodromic-test stimuli were applied before and after HFS to evoke population spikes for evaluating the baseline and the recovery of neuronal activity.

Results: Spreading depression (SD) appeared during sequences of 200 Hz monophasic O-HFS with a high incidence (4/5), but did not appear during corresponding 200 Hz biphasic O-HFS (0/6). The potential waveform of SD was accompanied by a preceding burst of population spikes, propagated slowly, silenced neuronal firing temporarily and resulted in a non-recovery of orthodromically-evoked population spikes (OPS) after the O-HFS. No SD events appeared during the O-HFS with a lower frequency of 100 Hz of monophasic and biphasic pulses (0/5 and 0/6, respectively) nor during the A-HFS of 200 Hz pulses (0/9). However, the antidromically-evoked population spikes (APS) only recovered partially after the 200 Hz A-HFS of monophasic pulses.

Conclusions: The O-HFS with a high enough frequency of monophasic pulses may induce the abnormal neuron activity of SD instantaneously, which may be used as a biomarker to warn the damages caused by improper stimulations in brain tissues.

Biomedical Engineering

High-frequency stimulation

Monophasic pulse

Biphasic pulse

Spreading depression

Hippocampal CA1 region

Electrical pulses have been used in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treating certain neurological disorders successfully (e.g., Parkinson's disease and epilepsy) and for treating psychiatric disorders promisingly (e.g., major depression and obsessive compulsive disorder) [1, 2]. The DBS commonly utilizes sequences of narrow pulses with a pulse width around 0.1 ms and a pulse frequency ~ 100–200 Hz (termed as high-frequency stimulation, HFS). Charge-balanced biphasic pulses (with a preceding negative pulse immediately followed by a positive one) are usually utilized in clinical DBS for safety [3, 4], while negative monophasic pulses are used in animal studies for investigating DBS therapy [5–7]. However, it is not clear whether HFS sequences of monophasic pulses could induce abnormal neuronal responses different from biphasic pulses.

In theory, a negative pulse is more efficient to activate neurons than a positive pulse or a biphasic pulse in the situation of extracellular stimulation as DBS [8, 9]. However, continuous stimulations of negative monophasic pulses have a risk of tissue damage caused by irreversible chemical reactions, whereas biphasic pulses do not [8, 10]. The reverse electric field generated by the subsequent positive phase of a biphasic pulse may prevent an accumulation of cation/anion ions thereby preventing irreversible chemical reactions in the brain tissue around the electrode contacts. On the contrary, sequences of monophasic negative pulses could result in irreversible chemical reactions with toxic products to damage the brain tissue [8].

Besides poisons of electrochemical reactions, stimulation-related tissue damages may be also caused by other factors, such as depletion of oxygen by hyperactivity of neuronal firing, substantial changes of ionic concentrations in both intracellular and extracellular environments, and excitotoxicity caused by excessive release of glutamates [8, 11]. Some of the changes may lead to abnormal neuronal activity, such as a large shift of depolarization potential in brain regions, termed as spreading depression (SD) [12]. Thus, to investigate the differences of neuronal responses to HFS of monophasic pulses and biphasic pulses, we recorded the electrical signals in the hippocampal CA1 region in rat brain in-vivo during HFS of axonal fibers and observed the neuronal responses including the incidence of SD events induced by HFS of the two types of pulses.

The hippocampal region of brain is prone to generate SD events under certain circumstances [13, 14]. And, axons are the most susceptible structure of neurons to the extracellular stimulation of electrical pulses [15, 16]. Therefore, the incidence of SD induced by axonal HFS in hippocampal CA1 region could be used as a sensitive index to distinguish the neuronal responses to different sequences of HFS. Results of the study may provide new information for appropriate usage of pulse stimulations in DBS investigations and in clinical applications.

Spreading depression appeared during orthodromic-HFS with monophasic but not biphasic pulses and with a higher rather than a lower stimulation frequency

Electrical pulses of biphase and monophase were delivered through the concentric bipolar electrodes placed at the Schaffer collaterals for the orthodromic-HFS (O-HFS) and at the alveus fibers for the antidromic-HFS (A-HFS), respectively (Fig. 1a and 1b). For the stimulations of a single pulse with a same current intensity (Fig. 1c), the mean amplitude of orthodromically-evoked population spike (OPS) induced by a monophasic pulse (9.44 ± 1.25 mV, n = 5) was ~ 23% greater than that induced by a biphasic pulse (7.69 ± 1.74 mV, n = 6; t-test, P < 0.05). The result was consistent with the theory that a monophasic pulse is more efficient than a biphasic pulse in eliciting neuronal firing, because the second positive phase of a biphasic pulse may have a reverse effect to the first negative phase thereby reducing the ability of the negative pulse to activate neurons in a certain extent [8, 9].

During the O-HFS of 1-min 200 Hz biphasic pulses, OPS events only appeared in the initial several seconds of O-HFS (Fig. 2a). After the disappearance of OPS, multiple unit activity (MUA) continued to the end of the O-HFS with a firing rate of unit spikes higher than baseline. A silent period (10–30 s) without MUA appeared immediately following the end of O-HFS, indicating that the unit spikes during the O-HFS period were induced by the stimulation. During the period of O-HFS, an antidromic-test (A-test) pulse was applied every 5 seconds (i.e., 0.2 Hz) at the alveus fibers to evaluate the excitability of the CA1 neurons. The single A-test pulses and orthodromic-test (O-test) pulses were also applied before and after O-HFS to evaluate the baseline and the recovery of neuronal activity. Large antidromically-evoked population spike (APS) evoked by A-test pulses persisted throughout the 1-min O-HFS, and the mean amplitude of these APS (7.26 ± 5.59 mV, n = 6) was ~ 17% greater than the corresponding baseline level (6.19 ± 3.19 mV, n = 6; paired t-test, P < 0.05). These results indicated that the sustained O-HFS increased the excitability of the CA1 neurons. About 4 min after the end of O-HFS, both test APS and test OPS evoked by single pulses recovered to baseline level. In addition, no SD event appeared in all of the 6 rats with the 200 Hz biphasic O-HFS.

However, SD events appeared in 4 of the 5 rats with the 200 Hz monophasic O-HFS (Fig. 2b). The initial neuronal responses induced by the monophasic O-HFS was similar to that induced by the biphasic O-HFS: large OPS appeared at first, then OPS disappeared and dense MUA appeared. However, an SD appeared later with a slow waveform lasting 4.31 ± 3.11 s (n = 4). At the same time, the MUA disappeared completely and the A-test pulses were no longer able to induce APS, indicating a silence of neuronal activity. The MUA did not appear until 3.51 ± 2.47 min (n = 4) after the end of O-HFS (Fig. 2b, bottom). By this time, the test APS recovered to ~ 80% of baseline level. The test OPS did not recover even ~ 25 min after the end of O-HFS, while the test APS had almost recovered to baseline level (89.5 ± 9.7%, n = 4. Figure 2b, middle).

The 16 channels arranged in the four shanks of recording electrode (RE) showed the spread of SD waveforms (Fig. 3a). The waveforms of baseline OPS and APS along the shanks indicated the locations of each recording channel in the different stratums of CA1 region [17]. Because the signal recording in this study was AC-coupled (0.3–5000 Hz), the SD waveform appeared as a trough similar to previous reports [18]. The SD trough appeared first in the stratum radiatum (S. rad.) of hippocampal CA1 region (Fig. 3b), accompanied by a burst of population spikes (60–80 spikes/s) in the stratum pyramidale (S. pyr.) that was prominent in the filtered signals greater than 10 Hz (Fig. 3b right). Then the SD trough propagated slowly to the CA1 layers of S. pyr. and stratum oriens (S. ori.) at a speed of 89.9 ± 50.9 µm/s (n = 4) in the perpendicular direction, characterized by the movement of the negative peak of SD trough along the recording shanks (Fig. 3b, hollow triangles). Also, the SD trough moved at a speed of 826 ± 627 µm/s (n = 4) in the S. pyr. layer transversely among the recording shanks (Fig. 3a right, blue dotted line). The characteristics of the SD events, including the waveform, the accompanied burst of population spikes, the slow travelling speed and the silence of neuronal electrical activity, were consistent with previous reports [18, 19].

The result of statistical test showed that the SD incidence during 200 Hz monophasic O-HFS (4/5) was significantly greater than the incidence during 200 Hz biphasic O-HFS (0/6; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.05). In addition, with a decrease of the O-HFS frequency from 200 to 100 Hz, no SD events were observed with monophasic O-HFS (five rats) and with biphasic O-HFS (six rats). Therefore, given the data of monophasic O-HFS only, the SD incidence during 100 Hz O-HFS (0/5) was significantly lower than that during 200 Hz O-HFS (4/5; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.05).

These results indicated that O-HFS of monophasic pulses with a higher stimulation frequency may generate SD events in the hippocampal CA1 region and affect the orthodromic pathway persistently. The generation of OPS by the stimulation at afferent fibers involves both the axonal conductions and the synaptic transmissions. Therefore, the non-recovery of OPS after the monophasic O-HFS could have been caused by potential damages in the axons and/or synapses. To confirm whether the monophasic HFS could cause damages in axons, we next inspected the responses of CA1 neurons to the A-HFS at their own axons (i.e., the alveus) without involving synaptic transmissions.

More attenuation of population spike amplitudes during A-HFS of monophasic pulses

During the 1-min 200 Hz A-HFS of biphasic pulses, APS was able to follow each stimulation pulse with a large amplitude only at the initial period and then the APS amplitude decreased rapidly (Fig. 4a). Single test pulses showed that ~ 1 min after the end of A-HFS, the test APS recovered to ~ 70% of baseline level. And, ~ 2 min after the end of A-HFS, the test APS recovered to baseline level (92.2 ± 21.0%, n = 4).

When the A-HFS was applied with monophasic pulses, the neuronal responses at the initial period were similar to that of biphasic pulses -- each pulse induced a large APS. However, at the late period of A-HFS, the monophasic pulses hardly induced APS (Fig. 4b). In addition, the test APS only recover to 34.5 ± 12.1% (n = 5) of baseline level even ~ 20 min after the end of A-HFS.

The APS amplitude decreased rapidly at the onset of A-HFS and became steady within several seconds and persisted until the end of A-HFS, which may be caused at least partially by the depolarization block of axons [5, 20]. We calculated the APS amplitudes normalized to baseline value during the A-HFS period to evaluate the changes of APS (Fig. 4c). The decrease of APS amplitudes at the initial 1 s (ΔA_1s) of A-HFS was significantly greater with monophasic A-HFS (86.9 ± 8.7%, n = 5) than with biphasic A-HFS (73.5 ± 8.0%, n = 4; t–test, P < 0.05. Figure 4d). Also, the decrease of APS amplitudes at the end of A-HFS (ΔA_60s) was significantly greater with monophasic A-HFS (98.6 ± 1.2%, n = 5) than with biphasic A-HFS (94.1 ± 3.4%, n = 4; t–test, P < 0.05. Figure 4e).

The partial recovery of test APS after monophasic A-HFS together with the faster and larger degree of APS attenuation during A-HFS indicated that the monophasic A-HFS may cause conduction failures in a portion of axons even after the A-HFS.

In addition, no SD event was observed in all the 9 rats applied 1-min 200 Hz A-HFS (4 with biphasic pulses and 5 with monophasic pulses). That is, the SD incidence during 200 Hz monophasic A-HFS (0/5) was significantly smaller than that during 200 Hz monophasic O-HFS (4/5; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.05).

The major findings of the present study in the rat hippocampal CA1 region include: O-HFS of monophasic pulses at the afferent fibers with an enough high frequency may induce spreading depression (SD) events and affect the pathway of orthodromic activation; and A-HFS of monophasic pulses at the efferent fibers may cause conduction failures in a portion of axons even after the A-HFS but not induce SD events. Possible mechanisms underlying the findings are discussed below.

SD is a type of large shift of depolarization potential in brain regions. The earliest discovery of SD was associated with epileptic bursts and was described as the suppression of electroencephalographic signals following bursts of seizure discharges in the cortex regions [21]. Studies have also shown that SD events may follow neuronal discharges in other brain regions, such as the hippocampus [18]. One of the major associated characteristics of SD is the great concentration changes of certain ions in the extracellular space, especially a substantial elevation of extracellular potassium concentration ([K⁺]_o), indicating redistributions of the ions between extra- and intra-cellular spaces [22].

In the present study, SD events only appeared during monophasic O-HFS but not during biphasic O-HFS. Thus, certain effects associated with the HFS of monophasic pulses may be responsible for the appearance of SD. In contrary to the biphasic pulse, the monophasic pulse drives the ions in fixed directions in the brain tissue by the force of the unidirectional electric field. The cations migrate to the cathodic pole of the electrode and the anions to the anodic one. Under the action of repetitive monophasic pulses with a high frequency, the ions may accumulate around the two poles of the electrode and destroy the ionic equilibriums between the intracellular and extracellular environments. Previous studies have shown that repetitive stimulations can enhance [K⁺]_o in the CA1 region [23]. Presumably, the increase of [K⁺]_o may be exacerbated by the HFS of monophasic pulses because of the cationic accumulation by the unidirectional driving force around the small space of electrode poles (Fig. 1b). The high [K⁺]_o may result in a depolarization in neuronal membranes and generate epileptiform activity [24, 25], just as the burst of population spikes preceding SD trough in the present study (Fig. 3b). The burst activity may further elevate [K⁺]_o thereby resulting in the large shift of depolarization potential of SD. Given the fact that a potassium injection with a molar level of concentration can induce SD events in animal preparations [14, 26, 27], the accumulation of K⁺ by monophasic pulses may be one of the mechanisms to generate SD.

In addition, synapse-related effects may also contribute to the generation of SD, because SD events didn’t appear during A-HFS but appear during O-HFS involving synaptic transmissions. Previous studies have shown that an excessive concentration of glutamates released from excitatory synapses to the extracellular space can induce SD [27–29]. In the present study, the O-HFS in the afferent fibers can activate the excitatory synapses and cause glutamates releases at the S. rad., since the layer of apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons (i.e., S. rad.) is full of glutamatergic synapses. In addition, the elevation of [K⁺]_o by monophasic O-HFS may reduce the uptake of glutamates, and reduce extracellular space by astrocytes swelling, thereby further increasing the concentration of extracellular glutamates [30, 31]. Thus, an elevation of glutamates caused by monophasic O-HFS may be another factor to generate SD.

Furthermore, the non-recovery of the test OPS after monophasic O-HFS and the partial recovery of APS after monophasic A-HFS suggested that the application of intensive monophasic pulses may damage the axons under the stimulations. As previous reports, the toxic chemical products of irreversible chemical reactions at the electrode-tissue interface by monophasic stimulations can damage the neuronal tissues. The reactions include electrolysis of water, oxidation of saline, metal, and organic materials, as well as reduction of oxygen [32]. In addition, according to mass action theory, an extreme excitation by over-stimulating the excitable tissue may result in the depletion of oxygen or/and glucose and substantially change both the intracellular and extracellular concentrations of ions [8]. These factors may result in neuronal dysfunction and tissue damages. Further histological and morphological analysis of stimulated tissues may confirm the tissue damages. Nevertheless, the appearance of SD may be a sensitive index to warn the tissue damages.

Taken together, an extreme elevation of [K⁺]_o and an increase of glutamate concentrations may result in the generation of SD by the monophasic O-HFS. In addition, the irreversible chemical reactions induced by the monophasic HFS with an enough high frequency may damage a portion of the axons in the stimulation site.

The comparisons of neuronal responses to the HFS of monophasic- and biphasic-pulses show that O-HFS with an enough high frequency of monophasic pulses may induce the abnormal neuron activity of spreading depression. The SD event may be used as a biomarker to warn the damages caused by improper stimulations in brain tissues instantaneously.

Surgical procedures

The animal experiment was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Zhejiang University. Twenty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used: 11 for O-HFS (6 for biphasic and 5 for monophasic) and 9 for A-HFS (4 for biphasic and 5 for monophasic). Each rat was anesthetized with urethane (1.25 g/kg, i.p.) and was placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting Co.). Details of the surgery and the electrode placements were similar to the previous report [33]. Briefly, a 16-channel recording electrode array (#A4 × 4-3mm50-125-177, NeuroNexus Technologies, USA) was inserted into the hippocampal CA1 region to record electrical potentials. Two concentric bipolar stimulation electrodes (#CBBRC75, FHC Inc., USA) were positioned in the Schaffer collaterals and in the alveus fibers of CA1 region for orthodromic- and antidromic-HFS, respectively (Fig. 1a). The distance between the inner and outer poles of the stimulation electrodes was short (< 100 µm) (Fig. 1b), indicating a small environment around the two poles. The signals of multiple unit activity (MUA) and the waveforms of both orthodromically-evoked population spike (OPS) and antidromically-evoked population spike (APS) along the recording channels were used to guide the final positions of the three electrodes.

Stimulation And Recording

Sequences of current pulses of monophase (negative phase) and biphase (a preceding negative phase followed by a positive phase) with a phase width of 0.1 ms (Fig. 1c) were generated by a stimulator (Model 3800, A-M Systems, Inc. USA). The current intensity was 0.3–0.5 mA that was able to induce a population spike (PS) with an amplitude approximately 75% of the maximal PS amplitude. The pulse frequency was 100 or 200 Hz for O-HFS at the Schaffer collaterals, and 200 Hz for A-HFS at the alveus fibers of the hippocampal CA1 region. The duration was 1 min for both O- and A-HFS.

Recording signals were amplified 100 times by an AC-coupled (0.3–5000 Hz) amplifier (Model 3600, A-M Systems, Inc. USA). The amplified signals were then sampled at a rate of 20 kHz by a Powerlab data acquisition system (ADInstruments, Inc. Australia).

Data analysis

The artifacts of stimulation pulses in the raw recording signals were removed by an algorithm to detect each artifact segment (~ 1.0 ms) which was then replaced by an interpolation line [34]. The artifact-free signals were then filtered by digital high-pass filters with a cut-off frequency of 500 Hz to obtain the MUA signals, or with a cut-off frequency of 10 Hz to remove the slow waveform of SD to illustrate the burst population spikes accompanying SD. The recording signals from the channel closest to the cell body layer (i.e., S. pyr.) were used to calculate the amplitudes of evoked-PS.

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and n represented the number of rat experiments. Statistical Fisher’s exact test and t-test were used to judge the significance of differences among data groups.

DBS

deep brain stimulation; HFS:high-frequency stimulation; SD:spreading depression; OPS:orthodromically-evoked population spikes; APS:antidromically-evoked population spikes; MUA:multiple unit activity; S. rad.:stratum radiatum; S. pyr.:stratum pyramidale; S. ori.:stratum oriens.

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by China Ministry of Health. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.

Consent for publication:

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials:

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding:

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30970753).

Authors' contributions:

ZF, YY and LZ conceived and designed the experiments. YY, LZ and GY performed the experiments. ZF, YY and LZ analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank CL and YH for assisting animal experiments.

Lozano AM, Lipsman N, Bergman H, Brown P, Chabardes S, Chang JW,et al. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(3):148–60. doi:10.1038/s41582-018-0128-2.
Cagnan H, Denison T, McIntyre C, Brown P. Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(9):1024–33. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0244-6.
Almeida L, Martinez-Ramirez D, Ahmed B, Deeb W, Jesus S, Skinner J,et al. A pilot trial of square biphasic pulse deep brain stimulation for dystonia: The BIP dystonia study. Mov Disord. 2017;32(4):615–18. doi:10.1002/mds.26906.
De Jesus S, Okun MS, Foote KD, Martinez-Ramirez D, Roper JA, Hass CJ,et al. Square biphasic pulse deep brain stimulation for parkinson’s disease: The BiP-PD study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00368.
Jensen AL, Durand DM. High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction. Exp Neurol. 2009;220(1):57–70. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.07.023.
Fattahi M, Ashabi G, Karimian SM, Riahi E. Preventing morphine reinforcement with high-frequency deep brain stimulation of the lateral hypothalamic area. Addict Biol. 2018;24(4):685–95. doi:10.1111/adb.12634.
Feddersen B, Vercueil L, Noachtar S, David O, Depaulis A, Deransart C. Controlling seizures is not controlling epilepsy: A parametric study of deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;27(3):292–300. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2007.05.005.
Merrill DR, Bikson M, Jefferys JGR. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Meth. 2005;141(2):171–98. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020.
Weitz AC, Behrend MR, Ahuja AK, Christopher P, Wei J, Wuyyuru V,et al. Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(1):16007. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/11/1/016007.
10.1227/01.neu.0000336331.88559.cf
Piallat B, Chabardes S, Devergnas A, Torres N, Allain M, Barrat E,et al.. Monophasic but not biphasic pulses induce brain tissue damage during monopolar high-frequency deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(1): 156 – 62, 162 – 63. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000336331.88559.cf.
Butterwick A, Vankov A, Huie P, Freyvert Y, Palanker D. Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng. 2007;54(12):2261–67. doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.908310.
Snow RW, Taylor CP, Dudek FE. Electrophysiological and optical changes in slices of rat hippocampus during spreading depression. J Neurophysiol. 1983;50(3):561. doi:10.1152/jn.1983.50.3.561.
Yaari Y, Konnerth A, Heinemann U. Nonsynaptic epileptogenesis in the mammalian hippocampus in vitro. II. Role of extracellular potassium. J Neurophysiol. 1986;56(2):424–38. doi:10.1152/jn.1986.56.2.424.
Herreras O, Largo C, Ibarz JM, Somjen GG, Martin DRR. Role of neuronal synchronizing mechanisms in the propagation of spreading depression in the in vivo hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1994;14:7087–98. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-11-07087.1994.
Holsheimer J, Demeulemeester H, Nuttin B, de Sutter P. Identification of the target neuronal elements in electrical deep brain stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12(12):4573–77. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2000.01306.x.
Nowak LG, Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell bodies and axon initial segments. Exp Brain Res. 1998;118(4):489–500. doi:10.1007/s002210050305.
Kloosterman F, Peloquin P, Leung LS. Apical and basal orthodromic population spikes in hippocampal CA1 in vivo show different origins and patterns of propagation. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86(5):2435–44. doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2435.
Bragin A, Penttonen M, Buzsaki G. Termination of epileptic afterdischarge in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1997;17(7):2567–79. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-07-02567.1997.
Dreier JP. The role of spreading depression, spreading depolarization and spreading ischemia in neurological disease. Nat Med. 2011;17(4):439–47. doi:10.1038/nm.2333.
Feng Z, Zheng X, Yu Y, Durand DM. Functional disconnection of axonal fibers generated by high frequency stimulation in the hippocampal CA1 region in-vivo. Brain Res. 2013;1509:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.048.
Bures J. Leao's spreading depression of EEG activity. Brain Res Bull. 1999;50(5–6):459. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00133-1.
Vyskocil F, Kritz N, Bures J. Potassium-selective microelectrodes used for measuring the extracellular brain potassium during spreading depression and anoxic depolarization in rats. Brain Res. 1972;39(1):255–59. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(72)90802-5.
Haglund MM, Schwartzkroin PA. Role of Na-K pump potassium regulation and IPSPs in seizures and spreading depression in immature rabbit hippocampal slices. J Neurophysiol. 1990;63(2):225. doi:10.1152/jn.1990.63.2.225.
Traynelis SF, Dingledine R. Potassium-induced spontaneous electrographic seizures in the rat hippocampal slice. J Neurophysiol. 1988;59(1):259–76. doi:10.1152/jn.1988.59.1.259.
Moddel G, Gorji A, Speckmann EJ. Background potassium concentrations and epileptiform discharges. I. Electrophysiological characteristics of neuronal activity. Brain Res. 2003;959(1):135–48. doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03741-1.
10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.011
Lian X, Stringer JL. Astrocytes contribute to regulation of extracellular calcium and potassium in the rat cerebral cortex during spreading depression. Brain Res. 2004; 1012(1–2): 177 – 84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.011.
Somjen GG. Mechanisms of spreading depression and hypoxic spreading Depression-Like depolarization. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(3):1065–96. doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1065.
Larrosa B, Pastor J, Lopez-Aguado L, Herreras O. A role for glutamate and glia in the fast network oscillations preceding spreading depression. Neuroscience. 2006;141(2):1057–68. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.04.005.
Zhou N, Rungta RL, Malik A, Han H, Wu DC, MacVicar BA. Regenerative glutamate release by presynaptic NMDA receptors contributes to spreading depression. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(10):1582–94. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.113.
Billups B, Attwell D. Modulation of non-vesicular glutamate release by pH. Nature. 1996;379(6561):171–74. doi:10.1038/379171a0.
Florence CM, Baillie LD, Mulligan SJ. Dynamic volume changes in astrocytes are an intrinsic phenomenon mediated by bicarbonate ion flux. Plos One. 2012;7(11):e51124. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051124.
10.1016/b978-0-444-53497-2.00001-2
Brocker DT, Grill WM. Chapter 1 - Principles of electrical stimulation of neural tissue. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 116. Elsevier. 2013; p. 3–18. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53497-2.00001-2.
Feng Z, Yu Y, Guo Z, Cao J, Durand DM. High frequency stimulation extends the refractory period and generates axonal block in the rat hippocampus. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(5):680–89. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.011.
Yu Y, Feng Z, Cao J, Guo Z, Wang Z, Hu N,et al. Modulation of local field potentials by high-frequency stimulation of afferent axons in the hippocampal CA1 region. J Integr Neurosci. 2016;15(01):1–17. doi:10.1142/s0219635216500011.

PDF

Journal Publication

published 09 Mar, 2021

Read the published version in BioMedical Engineering OnLine →

Editorial decision: Major revision
10 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received at journal
25 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
18 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
16 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
08 Jul, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
07 Jul, 2020
Editor invited by journal
07 Jul, 2020
First submitted to journal
04 Jul, 2020

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Different Effects of Monophasic Pulses and Biphasic Pulses Applied by a Bipolar Stimulation Electrode in the Rat Hippocampal CA1 Region

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Methods

Surgical procedures

Stimulation And Recording

Data analysis

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1