The "seat belt syndrome" is a common condition resulting from trauma caused by the force exerted by the seatbelt after a car accident, affecting both drivers and passengers. Injuries associated with the use of a seatbelt are well-known and have been documented in medical literature.
These injuries can affect various areas of the body, especially those covered by the seatbelt. In most cases, injuries are mild, manifesting only as bruises, abrasions, and hematomas on the skin, as well as rib fractures or spinal injuries.
However, in a small percentage of high-speed accidents, severe injuries can be observed, involving both intra-abdominal organs (intestine, spleen, liver) and the abdominal wall. This can range from the development of small traumatic hernias to severe avulsions of the abdominal wall.
The case discussed in the article addresses some of the key points for the comprehensive management of polytraumatized patients with traumatic abdominal wall hernias. The first point to address is the resolution of vital injuries in an initial emergent surgery, repairing the abdominal wall only in cases of stability or anatomical feasibility, leaving definitive repair for a second stage if it requires complex surgery, as in the described case.
The second point to address is the timing chosen for the reconstructive surgery in the second stage. This depends on the type of surgery performed in the first stage, whether it is contaminated surgery, the type and severity of associated injuries, the patient's hemodynamic stability, and organic function [9,13]. In the described case, the patient had a complex postoperative course with respiratory failure and a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. Therefore, it was decided to defer the surgery until complete recovery of the baseline condition and to be able to face complex abdominal wall surgery with prehabilitation using botulinum toxin and pneumoperitoneum.
The third point to address is the preparation and prehabilitation of the patient for complex abdominal wall repair surgery. One of the benefits of performing reconstructive surgery as a second step is the ability to physically recover the patient to face complex abdominal wall surgery without being in a critical state, and to provide prehabilitation techniques. The use of botulinum toxin allowed us to increase tissue mobility and improve its elasticity, thus facilitating anatomical approximation more easily. Regarding the use of progressive pneumoperitoneum, despite not showing loss of domain, its application allowed us to reduce omental adhesions to the peritoneum, thus facilitating the dissection of surgical spaces without visceral injury. [20]
For surgical planning, although current evidence is limited, the use of 3D reconstructions in patients with complex abdominal wall pathology seems promising and appears to have a positive impact on accuracy, efficiency, safety, and improve short-term results after surgery, as well as reducing surgical time and decreasing the need for additional procedures, which in turn can reduce overall patient costs.
Despite the costs it may bring, the use of this type of images can have additional costs that must be considered in a public health system. However, these costs can be justified if it is considered that the accuracy and efficacy of the surgery improve thanks to the 3D planning, which in turn can reduce the surgical time and the need for additional procedures, decreasing long-term costs.
Finally, the last point to address is the technique of repair, with or without mesh. This depends on the anatomical characteristics of the traumatic hernia and, in cases of hollow viscus injuries, on peritoneal contamination since the use of prostheses in these cases may increase the risk of chronic infection. An alternative to synthetic meshes in these cases is the use of biological meshes, which are reported as safe alternatives in a contaminated environment. In cases of large tissue defects, different types of flaps and grafts have been described for abdominal wall reconstruction [21]. The choice of graft or flap will depend on the extent and location of the defect, as well as the individual characteristics of the patient. The most commonly used flaps in cases of large defects are myocutaneous flaps, such as the lateral or bilateral rectus abdominis flap or the external oblique muscle flap to cover defects in the inguinal area. In cases of large defects involving the entire abdominal musculature, flaps of the lumbar square muscle, sartorius, rectus femoris, and semitendinosus muscle can be used.
Although the use of myocutaneous flaps may yield good results, adequate vascularization must be provided to prevent necrosis. Most myocutaneous flaps rely on the intrinsic circulation of the muscle and fascia, so it is not necessary to perform vascular anastomoses to the lower inguinal vessels. However, in cases of extensive defects in the abdominal wall, it may be necessary to perform an arterial or venous anastomosis to ensure good vascularization of the flap. In some cases, myocutaneous flaps can be used with a revascularization technique, such as the rectus abdominis flap with an epigastric pedicle, to improve flap irrigation or a latissimus dorsi muscle flap. [22-24]
In the case of our patient, the fact that he is an athlete and the evidence from preoperative vascular CT showing complete section of the epigastric vessels was one of the factors that led us to opt for reconstructive surgery without flaps, considering the risk of being unable to guarantee proper vascularization to a limb flap.