Figure 1a displays the SEM micrograph of TiO2 nanotube powders that have tubular morphology with a diameter of about 40 nm and a length of several hundred nanometers to several micrometers, unlike the spherical morphology of P25 nanoparticles. Also, TEM was utilized to show the tubular structure of TNT which was hollow and open-ended nanotubes with uniform inner and outer diameters (see Fig. 1b).
In the following, the results of evaluating the properties of each electrospun sample will be examined. FTIR spectroscopy was utilized to characterize the presence of chemical compounds and monitor the molecular interactions between ingredients. According to Fig. 2a, the chitosan/PVA blend illustrates the absorption peaks of both chitosan and PVA, the chemical formula of PVA and chitosan is (C2H4O) n and C6H11NO4, respectively. The broadband at 3200–3550 cm− 1 is related to O-H stretching or –H bands. The C-H is stretched at 2940.46 cm− 1. The wavelength of 1255–1265 cm− 1 indicates the -CH3 wagging. The broad absorption bands at 1083.86 cm− 1 are attributed to the C-O stretching mode. The peaks at 849.64 cm− 1 were assigned C-C vibrations of PVA. The chitosan vibration situates in the broadband at 3360 cm− 1 which is owing to the OH stretching. The bands at 1432.92 and 1728.11 cm− 1 are assigned for NH bending (NH2) and \(\text{C}=\text{O}\) stretching (amid I) [24]. These results might differ slightly from the obtained results by others which is due to that when two or more polymers are blends, the characteristics spectra peaks could change, as a result of the reflection of physical blends and chemical interactions. These observations show a good miscibility between chitosan and PVA which is most likely owing to the formation of intermolecular hydrogen groups between the amino and hydroxyl groups that belong to chitosan and hydroxyl groups in PVA. Adding the curcumin to the chitosan-PVA blend (see Fig. 2b), led to a slight shift which could be caused by interactions between the polymer matrix and the phenolic compounds present in the curcumin powder. Peak displacement for NH2 was observed at wavenumbers of 1432 cm−1 (mixed polymers) and 1428 cm− 1 (blend with curcumin) [25]. Siripatrawan et al. [26] have similar findings about the formation of covalent bonds between chitosan and green tea extract. Figure 2c, d, and e show the blend of chitosan/PVA/curcumin with various TNT powders. The broadband around 440 to 700 cm− 1 is attributed to both the Ti-O-Ti band and the vibrations of Ti-O bonds in the TiO2 lattice. In addition, the peaks at about 1630 and 3400 cm− 1 have been assigned from the adsorbed water, and a large amount of hydroxyl groups appear on the surface of the TNTs [23]. It is noteworthy that the addition of TNTs into the chitosan/PVA/curcumin blend shifted a peak at 443 cm− 1 to a higher wavenumber while the quantity of TNTs increased in the polymeric blend.
The structure of scaffolds was examined by scanning electron microscope. Figure 3 shows completely uniform fibers and interrelated porosity. All investigated samples collected the fibers without tangling on aluminum foil. The diameter of fibers was also calculated by the Image J software. Figure 3A is related to the PVA-chitosan sample; the average fiber diameter in this structure is 53 nm. In another study, PVA/Chitosan nanofibers were made, and the average fiber diameter in this structure was calculated to be 53 nm [25]. Figure 3B is related to PVA-Chitosan-Curcumin. Compared to sample A, the fiber diameter has increased slightly and reached 57 nm. The structure of the PVA-Chitosan-Curcumin-TNT scaffolds can be seen in Fig. 3C, D, and E which compared to A and B, their dimensions of the pores decrease. Also, the diameter of the fibers increases significantly, so that in the structure containing 0.5% TNT (Fig. 3C), the average diameter of the fibers is 65 nm, and in 1.5% TNT (Fig. 3D) is 66 nanometers. However, the structure containing 3% TNT (Fig. 3E) shows a significant increase in the fibers' diameter, and the fibers' diameter reaches 74 nm, and the dimensions of the porosity are significantly reduced.
To investigate mechanical properties, fabricated scaffolds were subjected to 5 mm/min tension in the direction of parallel nanofibers. After five repetitions for each sample, the results were analyzed as a stress-strain diagram for each sample (Fig. 4). The results of the stress-strain diagram (Fig. 4a) show that the PVA-chitosan scaffold has the lowest and PVA-chitosan-curcumin-TNT 3% has the highest mechanical strength. Tensile strength obtained from the stress-strain diagram shows that the PVA-chitosan scaffold has tensile strength of 1.99 MPa. In another study, PVA/Chitosan nanofibers have a tensile strength of 0.89 MPa [26]. The incorporation of chitosan into the PVA network could lead to a less efficient crosslinking rate between PVA and chitosan, consequently, the mechanical properties improve becoming the most rigid. Stress-strain curve of PVA-CS was extremely dependent on the strain rate, which means the viscoelastic behavior, is generally observed in tensile tests of synthetic fibers, tendons, and ligaments. Therefore, the blend of PVA and chitosan can mechanically replace non-mineralized tissues, such as skin and muscle [29]. The PVA-chitosan-curcumin scaffold has a tensile strength of 2.54 MPa. In another study, PVA/Chitosan/Curcumin nanofibers have a tensile strength of 2.2 MPa [27] which is almost similar to the result obtained by our group. Another point that should be stated is that the distribution of curcumin in the polymeric matrix increases the strength by 20% compared to the pure PVA/chitosan sample which could make productive stress transfer at the interface. The increase in tensile strength at break means more strength. The intermolecular interaction between OH and NH2 groups of cyclic chain in chitosan molecules between chitosan and curcumin led to an improvement of the mechanical properties of the polymeric matrix. Adding curcumin, due to high-energy intermolecular interactions in which Cur acts as the CS molecules’ interface coupling agents, aids in the crosslinking between chitosan and curcumin, consequently, tensile strength increases [31]. An insignificant increase in the tensile strength of PVA/chitosan due to curcumin loading was noted which could be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of curcumin and its effect on the integration of two polymers [32]. By adding TNT to the scaffold structure, it can be seen that the strength increases. The tensile strength of PVA-chitosan-curcumin scaffolds containing 0.5, 1.5, and 3% of TNT was 2.81, 3.95, and 7.4 MPa, respectively (Fig. 4b). Thus, the addition of TNT into the polymeric matrix led to increased resistance to the deformation of PVA-CS material. This high enhancement is similar to that observed by Sharma et al. [33], where they showed that the addition of 2% carbon nanofiber in a polypropylene matrix caused a 748% increase. Interestingly, at a higher percent of TNT content, scaffolds did not experience a decrease in strength, which was contrary to the results shown by Eslami et al. [34], they obtained the optimal percent of TNT, 0.5 wt. % and believed due to high surface to volume ratio of nanotubes, resulting in, nanotubes accumulated which leads to the lack of TNTs proper dispersion. However, we obtain the higher strength, when the TNT percent reached 3 wt. %, which is more likely owing to the appropriate distribution of nanotubes in the polymeric matrix. This will provide more uniform stress distribution, minimizing the formation of the stress-concentration centers, finally, the increase in interfacial area for stress transfer from polymeric matrix to the nanotubes as a filler [35] as well as, because TNTs described as a continuous fiber, therefore, they can release stress in the composite without breaking and will increase the toughness of the composite for the sake of energy absorption of nanotubes [34], which led to good mechanical properties. As a result, they possessed acceptable tensile strengths for application in soft tissue engineering.
To investigate the ability of TiO2 nanotubes incorporated polymer blende on the wound healing, the PVA-chitosan-curcumin as well as that containing 3 wt% TNTs were sutured in the full thickness wound in the rats. On the day of implantation and each day after the implantation, the wound size was checked in each group and until the wound was completely healed, photographs were taken. Figure 5 shows the photographs of the wound with both neat and nanotube- containing wound dressings on the first day (Fig. 4a and e), on the 3rd day (Fig. 5b and f), on the 7th day (Fig. 5c and g), and on the 14th day (Fig. 5d and h) of implantation. In the initial days after implantation, it was difficult to get a clear idea about wound healing. However, it was obvious that the surface area property diminished over time during fourteen days in all treatments so that, the treatment group with nanotube was able to create a more restored surface area compared to the PVA-chitosan-curcumin group. Between the 3rd and 7th day of implantation, a region of both control wound dressing and nanotube-incorporated wound dressing is expelled from the healing wound along with the debris. After this, the wound surface was observable and there was a remarkable difference in healing between groups (Fig. 5.d and h). TiO2 nanotube-containing wound dressings were healed entirely within this period. It is also worth noting that on the 14th day, the wounds were entirely healed without any sign of scar formation in the case of nanotube-incorporated electrospun wound dressing. During the wound healing process, these fibrotic scars are usually formed, which can damage the normal tissue organization and have an effect on regeneration [36]. In this study, we could not perceive such a fibrotic scar after the entire wound healing which indicates regeneration. In the control sample of implanted wounds, hair formation in the healed area was less than in other regions. However, the sample containing TiO2 nanotube has normal skin with hairs as in other areas has been observed. Because there are no hair follicles which are the stem cells that produce hair as well as the lack of other components of the skin containing sebaceous glands and the epidermis [37]. From the point of view of inflammation in the wound areas, a minor inflammation was observed in the case of 3wt% TiO2 nanotube-containing wound dressing which could be due to the release of TiO2 nanotubes after implantation. This is attributed to release faster into the implantation site due to the agglomeration of nanotubes and, as a result, inflammation. This systemic inflammation is produced by higher levels of reactive oxygen [35].
The rate of wound healing was calculated from the area of healing wound to complete wound healing and expressed as the percentage of wound healing can be seen in Fig. 6. Up to 3rd day of healing, there was a negligible variation in the area of wound in both control and nanotube incorporated samples. But after that nanotube incorporated wound dressings showed a higher rate of wound healing so that 93% of wound healing was achieved on the 14th day of implantation whereas control wound dressing was still not entirely healed which was only 73% of wound healing. It seems that TiO2 nanotube containing wound dressing can not only improve wound treatment but also decline the elements against wound healing.
The influence of PVA-chitosan-curcumin including TiO2 nanotubes on the induction of fibroblast cell proliferation in in vivo is illustrated in Fig. 6. In the semi-quantitative evaluation section, histopathological indicators, it is obvious that the treatment specimen with 3 wt% of TiO2 nanotubes increased the fibroblast proliferation compared to the control wound dressing (Fig. 7). After 14 days of implantation, attachment of fibroblast cells enhanced and grown through the treatment wound dressing with 3 wt% TiO2 nanotubes. Fibroblast cells have displayed their trait elongated spindle-shaped morphology on PVA-chitosan-curcumin wound dressings that include TiO2 nanotubes whereas in the control wound dressing the cells had spherical morphology. The epidermis layer is fully formed in the treatment group and has a greater thickness than in the control group. Epidermis formation in the treatment subgroup was more complete and faster than in the control group. There was no significant difference between the epidermis thicknesses in the two groups (Table 2). The wound covered with a specimen containing TiO2 nanotube did not have a substantial increment in granulation tissue spot compared to the control. Angiogenesis was relatively high in the wound dressing contacting TNTs on day 14 when compared to the control group. Generally, the proliferation phase includes four stages: reepithelization, angiogenesis, tissue granulation formation, and collagen deposition [38]. As can be seen in Table 2, these four indices for wound dressing treated with TiO2 nanotubes were relatively higher than the control specimen. Another reason that could be stated is related to the anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory characteristics of TiO2 nanotubes. A number of researchers utilized an effective approach to speed up wound healing, for example. Razali et al. [393] used TiO2 nanotubes incorporated gellan gum bio-nanocomposite to accelerate wound healing. Moreover, TiO2 nanotubes regulate the progression of wound healing through enhancement of skin moisture (hydrophilic activity) [40].
Table 2
Effect of TNT on investigated traits
group | Epithelial gap (µ) | Granulation tissue (µ)2 | Angiogenesis (n) | Collagen fiber thickness (µ) | Fibroblast cells (n) | Collagen density (%) | Epithelialization (µ) | inflammation | Hyperemia |
Control | 0 | 2.25 x 106 | 480 | 37.5 | 12550 | 61 | 70 | - | - |
Treated With TNTs | 0 | 3.75 x 106 | 504 | 86 | 21450 | 89 | 102 | - | - |